Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > MilesBuzz
Reload this Page >

First Class Dying as FTers are only takers

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

First Class Dying as FTers are only takers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 20, 2012 | 8:37 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 210
First Class Dying as FTers are only takers

Most travellers in first class on TATL flights are using points, so the airlines are switching to upgraded biz class.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...DS=first+class
uppereastff is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2012 | 8:52 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 280
Very surprised this has not happened earlier. Flew UA US-Asia in GF on an award ticket, and while it was enjoyable, I cannot see more than the ultra rich who would pay $7.5k for a one way ticket that lasts for 12 hours. Smart move, UA and AA.
accrue450 is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2012 | 8:59 am
  #3  
mia
Flyertalk Posting Legend Moderator: Credit Card Programs, American Express, Capital One, Chase, Citi, Diners Club, Eco Travel, Signatures
10 Countries Visited
20 Nights
2M
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Miami, Mpls & London
Programs: AA, IHG & Marriott Platinum; DL & HH Gold
Posts: 51,909
Moderator observation

There is already discussion in progress in the AA forum:

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/ameri...rst-class.html

Will leave this thread open for now, but if similar threads appear in UA or other forums this one may have a short life.
mia is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2012 | 6:14 pm
  #4  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 291
So how are the foreign airlines holding onto their first class? It feels like there is a fundamental flaw in the business model
iexaltu is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2012 | 6:46 am
  #5  
40 Nights
5M
100 Countries Visited
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Naples FL, Munich DE
Programs: UA MM, AA 2MM, Marriott LT Titanium, Hilton Gold
Posts: 6,817
Originally Posted by iexaltu
So how are the foreign airlines holding onto their first class? It feels like there is a fundamental flaw in the business model
Possibly by increasing quality of service so that you *do* get something resembling what you pay for? (Have you flown Cathay Pacific international First?)

Also, some cultures (business and social) are more willing to pay higher fares.

Finally, some airlines are subsidized by their nation for prestige purposes.
Counsellor is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2012 | 11:30 am
  #6  
Used to be 'Travelergcp'
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New Orleans
Programs: AA Plat, Marriott Gold, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 2,934
It's been mentioned before, but a very rational reason for international F to exist is for people who normally fly private jets on domestic routes but the cost is prohibitive for international. I doubt the demand is enough to fill a whole lot of F cabins though.
TravelerMSY is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2012 | 1:38 pm
  #7  
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: HH Gold, Marriott Gold, PC Plat, Emirates Silver
Posts: 2,729
I think international F will still exist but the routes it is on will be limited to where the paid demand is. Routes like JFK-LHR and LAX-HKG may survive bit others will not. We have already seen a trend towards this.
mileshound is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2012 | 4:46 pm
  #8  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: 787
Programs: Too many to list
Posts: 1,313
I just flew first to Narita on AA an out of Narita on JAL and there is no comparison of services of two. JAL was serving dom perignon and black caviar... AA didn't even have a tooth brush for us.
ThePointsCollector is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2012 | 7:07 pm
  #9  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: LAS
Programs: DL PM, UA PS, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 4,907
Originally Posted by Bored_Russian
I just flew first to Narita on AA an out of Narita on JAL and there is no comparison of services of two. JAL was serving dom perignon and black caviar... AA didn't even have a tooth brush for us.
Did you fly paid F or did you fly paid J + SWU?
amolkold is offline  
Old Jul 22, 2012 | 3:04 pm
  #10  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
Originally Posted by iexaltu
So how are the foreign airlines holding onto their first class? It feels like there is a fundamental flaw in the business model
Many of the foreign airlines aren't. LH and BA are cutting it back, for example. There are fewer and fewer markets where it can be justified.
sbm12 is offline  
Old Jul 22, 2012 | 11:39 pm
  #11  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 11,883
Originally Posted by sbm12
Many of the foreign airlines aren't. LH and BA are cutting it back, for example. There are fewer and fewer markets where it can be justified.
And yet LH recently introduced a new F-class product. It appears that F-class is here to stay at least in certain high-profile markets.
cesco.g is offline  
Old Jul 23, 2012 | 7:36 am
  #12  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: 787
Programs: Too many to list
Posts: 1,313
Originally Posted by amolkold
Did you fly paid F or did you fly paid J + SWU?
Both on AA miles.
ThePointsCollector is offline  
Old Jul 23, 2012 | 7:45 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New York, NY
Programs: United Platinum, Hilton Gold
Posts: 281
Originally Posted by mileshound
I think international F will still exist but the routes it is on will be limited to where the paid demand is. Routes like JFK-LHR and LAX-HKG may survive bit others will not. We have already seen a trend towards this.
Exactly. On some of these routes it will make sense to have a solid F product. Especiallly the Asian carriers where there seems to be better demand and a more solid product.
flykodo is offline  
Old Jul 23, 2012 | 9:00 am
  #14  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: SJC/SFO
Programs: UA lifetime gold; Hilton Gold; Marriott/SPG Plat; Hyatt Discoverist
Posts: 2,959
Originally Posted by cesco.g
And yet LH recently introduced a new F-class product. It appears that F-class is here to stay at least in certain high-profile markets.
but I understand they have fewer seats per flight.
I think there will always be a group of people that do not have a private jet but have no problems dropping 10-20K for an international flight.
I cannot imagine they would pay that money to fly AA or UA; they would pick one of the European or Asian airlines.
keisari is offline  
Old Jul 23, 2012 | 11:39 am
  #15  
2M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Helsinki & Austin
Programs: "But, I'm a GLOBALIST guest...."
Posts: 2,885
Originally Posted by keisari
but I understand they have fewer seats per flight.
I think there will always be a group of people that do not have a private jet but have no problems dropping 10-20K for an international flight.
I cannot imagine they would pay that money to fly AA or UA; they would pick one of the European or Asian airlines.
Or buy a seat on a chartered plane....
austin_modern is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.