FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   MilesBuzz (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/milesbuzz-370/)
-   -   First Class Dying as FTers are only takers (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/milesbuzz/1368469-first-class-dying-fters-only-takers.html)

uppereastff Jul 20, 2012 8:37 am

First Class Dying as FTers are only takers
 
Most travellers in first class on TATL flights are using points, so the airlines are switching to upgraded biz class.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...DS=first+class

accrue450 Jul 20, 2012 8:52 am

Very surprised this has not happened earlier. Flew UA US-Asia in GF on an award ticket, and while it was enjoyable, I cannot see more than the ultra rich who would pay $7.5k for a one way ticket that lasts for 12 hours. Smart move, UA and AA.

mia Jul 20, 2012 8:59 am

Moderator observation
 
There is already discussion in progress in the AA forum:

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/ameri...rst-class.html

Will leave this thread open for now, but if similar threads appear in UA or other forums this one may have a short life.

iexaltu Jul 20, 2012 6:14 pm

So how are the foreign airlines holding onto their first class? It feels like there is a fundamental flaw in the business model

Counsellor Jul 21, 2012 6:46 am


Originally Posted by iexaltu (Post 18971738)
So how are the foreign airlines holding onto their first class? It feels like there is a fundamental flaw in the business model

Possibly by increasing quality of service so that you *do* get something resembling what you pay for? (Have you flown Cathay Pacific international First?)

Also, some cultures (business and social) are more willing to pay higher fares.

Finally, some airlines are subsidized by their nation for prestige purposes.

TravelerMSY Jul 21, 2012 11:30 am

It's been mentioned before, but a very rational reason for international F to exist is for people who normally fly private jets on domestic routes but the cost is prohibitive for international. I doubt the demand is enough to fill a whole lot of F cabins though.

mileshound Jul 21, 2012 1:38 pm

I think international F will still exist but the routes it is on will be limited to where the paid demand is. Routes like JFK-LHR and LAX-HKG may survive bit others will not. We have already seen a trend towards this.

ThePointsCollector Jul 21, 2012 4:46 pm

I just flew first to Narita on AA an out of Narita on JAL and there is no comparison of services of two. JAL was serving dom perignon and black caviar... AA didn't even have a tooth brush for us.

amolkold Jul 21, 2012 7:07 pm


Originally Posted by Bored_Russian (Post 18976409)
I just flew first to Narita on AA an out of Narita on JAL and there is no comparison of services of two. JAL was serving dom perignon and black caviar... AA didn't even have a tooth brush for us.

Did you fly paid F or did you fly paid J + SWU?

sbm12 Jul 22, 2012 3:04 pm


Originally Posted by iexaltu (Post 18971738)
So how are the foreign airlines holding onto their first class? It feels like there is a fundamental flaw in the business model

Many of the foreign airlines aren't. LH and BA are cutting it back, for example. There are fewer and fewer markets where it can be justified.

cesco.g Jul 22, 2012 11:39 pm


Originally Posted by sbm12 (Post 18981001)
Many of the foreign airlines aren't. LH and BA are cutting it back, for example. There are fewer and fewer markets where it can be justified.

And yet LH recently introduced a new F-class product. It appears that F-class is here to stay at least in certain high-profile markets.

ThePointsCollector Jul 23, 2012 7:36 am


Originally Posted by amolkold (Post 18976925)
Did you fly paid F or did you fly paid J + SWU?

Both on AA miles.

flykodo Jul 23, 2012 7:45 am


Originally Posted by mileshound (Post 18975579)
I think international F will still exist but the routes it is on will be limited to where the paid demand is. Routes like JFK-LHR and LAX-HKG may survive bit others will not. We have already seen a trend towards this.

Exactly. On some of these routes it will make sense to have a solid F product. Especiallly the Asian carriers where there seems to be better demand and a more solid product.

keisari Jul 23, 2012 9:00 am


Originally Posted by cesco.g (Post 18983223)
And yet LH recently introduced a new F-class product. It appears that F-class is here to stay at least in certain high-profile markets.

but I understand they have fewer seats per flight.
I think there will always be a group of people that do not have a private jet but have no problems dropping 10-20K for an international flight.
I cannot imagine they would pay that money to fly AA or UA; they would pick one of the European or Asian airlines.

austin_modern Jul 23, 2012 11:39 am


Originally Posted by keisari (Post 18985149)
but I understand they have fewer seats per flight.
I think there will always be a group of people that do not have a private jet but have no problems dropping 10-20K for an international flight.
I cannot imagine they would pay that money to fly AA or UA; they would pick one of the European or Asian airlines.

Or buy a seat on a chartered plane....


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 7:31 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.