New trend in cost-cutting? Company paid travel = company miles?
#151
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Programs: MR/SPG LT Titanium, AA LT PLT, UA SLV, Avis PreferredPlus
Posts: 31,010
"now it seems more companies are asking their employees to fork over their frequent flyer miles" seems to come up every few years. Is there any empirical data that this is actually happening?
#152
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: HSV
Programs: Hy Glob,Choice Dia, MR TIT,IHG SPR,HH Dia, Wyn Dia, UA Sil, WN Alis, Hert 5*, National EE
Posts: 1,188
If I were head of travel for a large company I would absolutely try to do this. Think of all the money that could be saved on those last minute flights if booked with miles.
Not sure if they can do it without having the passwords/pins to employees accounts.
Not sure if they can do it without having the passwords/pins to employees accounts.
#153
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 216
It comes up on FT every few months. I am too lazy to search and post the links, but it is pretty frequent.
#154
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: DC
Programs: DL gold; UA - 1k; AA gold; Marriott Platinum; Hyatt Diamond; SPG gold; Groupon Falcon;
Posts: 747
But the point/counterpoint always seems to be that the flights were employer funded, so the attendant benefits should go to the employer.
And then someone chimes in about travel for public employees, and how a public employee should never make personal use of miles earned on official travel.
But here is the deal:
Most organizations know the administrative cost of monitoring which miles were employer funded, and that they are not sufficient flyertalk fiends to maximize the benefits, leads them to the conclusion that letting the employee "keep" the miles, doing as they please with them, is the best business decision, legailities aside.
Then four months later, some variant on this topic reappears.
#155
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
There are a lot of variants, but they rarely work for administrative reasons. The best one I have heard are employers who have offered employees who use miles to fly on company business, a "bonus" of half the typical cost of the airfare. A win for both the employer who saves 50% on the ticket and the employee who converts the miles to cash at a decent rate.
Bigger problem will be tougher corporate discounts which give the employer a larger discount in return for no miles. That, of course, hurts because it means that employees lose the ancilary benefits of elite status.
Bigger problem will be tougher corporate discounts which give the employer a larger discount in return for no miles. That, of course, hurts because it means that employees lose the ancilary benefits of elite status.
#156
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: MKE
Programs: DL-MM-Diamond HH-Diamond
Posts: 3,218
My Company looks at is a benefit for being away from home 3 wks a month. I consider it as part of my salary package. I miss so many events at home with family and friends that if they took this away from me, I would get another job that requires no travel, no nights away from home, no getting up at 3am to catch a flight, no getting home at midnight due to mechanical delay, no sleeping in a strange hotel in a strange country each night.
They would need to pay me twice the amount they do now if they took this away from me. Thank God they realize this.
They would need to pay me twice the amount they do now if they took this away from me. Thank God they realize this.
#157
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 690
There would be a huge recoil by those who are required to travel a lot for their jobs. Especially under the "corporate contract for cheap rates w/o miles" idea. If you couldn't even get the benefit of elite miles, no one would want to travel.
#158
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: San Jose, CA
Programs: DL DM, HH Gold, SPG Gold, Hyatt Plat
Posts: 2,874
Seeing how this forum is filled with thousands and thousands of people who travel heavily with large corporations... is there anyone actually here that has their employers force them to use their miles for business travel?
I am pretty surprised that no one has chimed in from personal experience, which leads me to believe this is a non-issue.
I am pretty surprised that no one has chimed in from personal experience, which leads me to believe this is a non-issue.
#159
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,433
Seeing how this forum is filled with thousands and thousands of people who travel heavily with large corporations... is there anyone actually here that has their employers force them to use their miles for business travel?
I am pretty surprised that no one has chimed in from personal experience, which leads me to believe this is a non-issue.
I am pretty surprised that no one has chimed in from personal experience, which leads me to believe this is a non-issue.
Typical are the small firms with the occasional large corporate offender.
For the most part, it's a non-issue though.
A search in the archives will tell you wonders.
#160
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
What's good business practice?
The government angle was the rule until approx. 2003, when it changed to allow employees to keep and use the miles earned on official travel. As with most businesses, govt. agencies found that it cost a lot more to administer than it saved taxpayers and that the employee goodwill was significant. In the end, if you can provide an employee benefit that doesn't cost you anything, why not?
GSA authorizes government agencies and some have implemented a bonus system whereby an employee who uses FF to pay for travel for which the government would have had to pay, gets a spot bonus equal to 50% of the government fare for the trip. That saves the taxpayer 50% and the employee sees money too.
As an employer, you can spend just so much time and effort turning the screws on your employees before you lose focus on the profit motive behind the business.
When you do petty things to employees, you find that even in the worst economies, the top ones can always find a new job and you are then stuck with the duds whom you wish would have left. And, when you do need to hire, the top tier people won't come to a company which is known for pettiness.
GSA authorizes government agencies and some have implemented a bonus system whereby an employee who uses FF to pay for travel for which the government would have had to pay, gets a spot bonus equal to 50% of the government fare for the trip. That saves the taxpayer 50% and the employee sees money too.
As an employer, you can spend just so much time and effort turning the screws on your employees before you lose focus on the profit motive behind the business.
When you do petty things to employees, you find that even in the worst economies, the top ones can always find a new job and you are then stuck with the duds whom you wish would have left. And, when you do need to hire, the top tier people won't come to a company which is known for pettiness.
#161
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: GGG, DFW, IAH
Posts: 284
Just as a simple exercise I looked at Continental/United award availability from IAH (my preferred major airport) to NYC (thinking that it should be a popular business destination). No non-stops on 09/1 and 09/2. Connecting flight either arrive in time not suitable for business travelers (past 10pm) or have ridiculous connection times (how about 23 minutes?) or take 7+ hours from take off to landing or combine several of these inconveniences. Conclusion? If I were a business owner this is a clear no go. And we're talking about one of the most well served routes in the country.
I personally cannot see how a proposition to take away frequent flier miles from employees could be anything rather than a "lose-lose"
#162
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
+1 - It only works when you have low-level employees who ride a specified circuit and you can book them months out and don't particularly care about routing or their travel time. It certainly doesn't work for people whose time is money, have high-end walk-up (or close to) travel and who bring value to the company.
The only employees who don't likely care are those at the top end: 1) highly-compensated so award travel not necessary; 2) paid F so UG not necessary; 3) fly conveinece not loyalty so status not necessary.
The only employees who don't likely care are those at the top end: 1) highly-compensated so award travel not necessary; 2) paid F so UG not necessary; 3) fly conveinece not loyalty so status not necessary.
#163
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 237
I work for a very large CPG company and they have always kept miles/hotel points to redeem for future employee travel. The policy has changed recently and we were allowed to keep whatever points that were in our accounts. I ended up with about 300k in miles/hotel points .. I can not even guess how many that I lost for redemptions or that were expired
#164
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 237
I work for a very large CPG company and they have always kept miles/hotel points to redeem for future employee travel. The policy has changed recently and we were allowed to keep whatever points that were in our accounts. I ended up with about 300k in miles/hotel points .. I can not even guess how many that I lost for redemptions or that were expired
#165
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: LAX
Programs: AA EXP 1.5MM, Asiana Club Silver, KE Morning Calm, Hyatt Platinum, Amtrak Select
Posts: 7,161
If enough companies start pressuring airlines, they might consider it as corporations are the biggest spenders in air travel these days.
In all, it could just be a simple software upgrade that says:
First/Last Name:
Flying on behalf of: [Corporate name]
credit miles to [Corporation's own FF#]
Places like BestBuy, Staples, and OfficeDepot have started offering business solutions to reward companies with points and discounts, I don't see why not airlines can't jump in on the same bandwagon.
Last edited by kebosabi; Aug 31, 2011 at 10:08 am