Last edit by: fti
People, please edit/use the wiki so same questions are not always asked.
The current CTA decision on the Yangon deal is only for tickets canceled by SWISS Airlines for the seven merged complaints/companions and tickets canceled by Jet Airways for one complainant and companions
- It's not about other carriers because each carrier submits different tariffs.
- If you are not one of the complainants or their companions above who were mentioned in the respective cases, you need to submit a case yourself for hearing.
- There's currently one person who is on Iberia for CTA decision, one can either wait for results or submit a complaint to CTA.
Result of the current case for LX in brief is:
- CTA found 5(F) in the tariff used to be unclear for canceling tickets on erroneously quoted fares.
- 5(F) is unjust and unreasonable and must be revised or taken down by July 9, 2013 (or SWISS can appeal by then)
- SWISS did not use its tariff correctly to cancel the tickets.
- SWISS must compensate one complainant's First Class ticket and any related expenses by July 18, 2013 provided with evidence.
- SWISS must transport other complainants (and their companions) in the original price charged with same booking class and routing by June 18, 2014.
Result of the current case for 9W in brief is:
- Tariff on file had no clauses for "erroneous fares" and was updated subsequently, which means it is not relevant to this event
- Therefore, 9W is to reinstate the tickets with a 1-year validity for transport between the same points and the same booking class.
CTA official news can be read here for general overview of the case.
Actual CTA case review can be found here for reference should you wish to file a complaint.
If you have a similar case that's with SWISS, you need to file with CTA to get a result through informal process first before it gets to formal process. The entire procedure can take up to 3 months for each and the result may not be same cause it's case-by-base and the reviewer of the case can be different.
To file an informal complaint with CTA, see here. Click through all of the pages to get to the online form for the informal complaint. Or click here.
To file a formal complaint after informal complaint has been closed, see here. Continue on to the next page to see the address or email address for the formal complaint.
The July 17th and 18th responses from LX can be found here:
Other Letters:
Feel free to add dates, flights, etc., in order to plan DOs, etc.
Aug 4: SFO-ICN (UA893)
Jason8612
Aug 5: ICN-SFO (UA892)
Jason8612
Aug 7: SFO-ICN (UA893)
Jason8612
Aug 11: ICN-NRT-ORD (UA78, UA882)
Jason8612
Aug 14: BOS-IAD-NRT-ICN (UA285, UA803, UA79)
Deltspygt
Aug 19: ICN-NRT-IAD-BOS (UA78, UA804, UA352)
Deltspygt
Oct 1: UA433-UA893
JeredF +1
Oct 8: UA892-UA242
JeredF +1
Oct 9: BOS-SFO-ICN (UA433, UA893)
BigJC
Oct 13: ICN-NRT-ORD-BOS (UA78, UA882, UA744)
BigJC
Oct 21: BOS-SFO UA433 to SFO-ICN UA893
Sterndogg +1
flyerdude88 (SFO - ICN portion only)
Oct 23: ICN - SFO UA 892
flyerdude88
Oct 27: ICN-SFO UA892 to SFO-BOS UA286
Sterndogg +1
Nov 05: BOS-ORD UA521, ORD-NRT UA881
kokonutz, I012609, BingoSF +1
Nov 11: ICN-SFO UA892, SFO-IAD UA727
kokonutz, I012609, BingoSF +1
Nov 26: BOS-SFO UA433, SFO-NRT UA837, NRT-ICN UA79
thepla
Nov 27: BOS-ORD-NRT-ICN (UA501, UA881, UA196)
BigJC+1
Nov 29: Planning 2 days in TPE, been to ICN
thepla
Dec 1: ICN-SFO UA892, SFO-ORD UA698, ORD-BOS UA961
thepla
Dec 1: ICN-NRT-IAD-BOS (UA78, UA804, UA822)
BigJC+1
Dec 15: BOS-SFO UA433, SFO-ICN UA893
songzm
Dec 25: BOS-IAD UA285, IAD-NRT UA803, NRT-ICN UA79
Dinoscool3 +2
Dec 30: ICN-SFO UA892, SFO-BOS UA444
songzm
Dec 31: ICN-SFO UA892, SFO-BOS UA770
Dinoscool3 +2
Jan 11: BOS-SFO UA1523, Jan 12: SFO-ICN UA893
margarita girl
Jan 12: BOS-SFO UA433, SFO-ICN UA893
Zebranz
14 Jan: BOS-SFO UA433 to SFO-ICN UA893
ORDOGG
19 Jan: ICN-SFO UA892 to SFO-ORD UA698 to ORD-BOS UA961
ORDOGG
Jan 22: ICN-SFO UA892 SFO-BOS UA500
margarita girl
Feb 5: ICN-SFO UA892 SFO-BOS UA242
Zebranz
CMB-DFW EY F
FARE IS GONE
FARE RULES (thanks to SQ421)
FRTLK Fare Rules (RT)
FOWLK Fare Rules (OW)
WHEN ARE YOU FLYING?
Feel free to add any additional cities you're leaving from!
Please slot yourselves in!!!
ex-CMB
Feb
Mar
8 - Darmajaya
12 - Thaidai
22 - Deadinabsentia
Apr
21 - SQ421, penegal, jozdemir
26 - tahsir21
May
28 - Upperdeck744
29 - bonsaisai (positioning flights SIN-CMB, DFW-ORD)
Jun
12 - lelee
Jul
7 - HansGolden +6
8 - arcticbull + 1
11 - bonsaisai's friend (positioning flights: SIN-CMB, DFW-MCI)
25 - Tycosiao
30 - bonsaisai's friend (positioning flights: MCI-DFW, CMB-SIN)
Aug
17 - DC777Fan
26 - Yi Yang
31 - dcas
Sep
Oct
Nov
8 - harryhv
29 - stephem+4
Dec
6 - roastpuff and (soon) Mrs. roastpuff , JFKEZE (UL Code-share)
7 - DWFI
10 - jlisi984 + dad (CMB-AUH-DFW)
21 - bonsaisai (positioning flights SIN-CMB, DFW-ORD)
ex-AUH
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
27 - RICHKLHS
May
Jun
29 - yerffej201
Jul
9 - HansGolden +6
27 - Tycosiao
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
30 - stephem+4 (to JFK)
Dec
7 - JFKEZE, DWFI [EY161 nonstop]
9 - roastpuff and (soon) Mrs. Roastpuff
ex-DFW
Jan
Feb
Mar
14 - Thaidai
15 - zainman +1
Apr
25 - SQ421, penegal, jozdemir
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
22 - arcticbull + 1
Sep
22 - bonsaisai (positioning flights ORD-DFW, CMB-SIN)
Oct
Nov
19 - harryhv->Paris
Dec
19 - Yi Yang, jona970318
24 - DWFI (EY160 nonstop)
26 - HansGolden +6 (CDG), LwoodY2K (AUH)
The current CTA decision on the Yangon deal is only for tickets canceled by SWISS Airlines for the seven merged complaints/companions and tickets canceled by Jet Airways for one complainant and companions
- It's not about other carriers because each carrier submits different tariffs.
- If you are not one of the complainants or their companions above who were mentioned in the respective cases, you need to submit a case yourself for hearing.
- There's currently one person who is on Iberia for CTA decision, one can either wait for results or submit a complaint to CTA.
Result of the current case for LX in brief is:
- CTA found 5(F) in the tariff used to be unclear for canceling tickets on erroneously quoted fares.
- 5(F) is unjust and unreasonable and must be revised or taken down by July 9, 2013 (or SWISS can appeal by then)
- SWISS did not use its tariff correctly to cancel the tickets.
- SWISS must compensate one complainant's First Class ticket and any related expenses by July 18, 2013 provided with evidence.
- SWISS must transport other complainants (and their companions) in the original price charged with same booking class and routing by June 18, 2014.
Result of the current case for 9W in brief is:
- Tariff on file had no clauses for "erroneous fares" and was updated subsequently, which means it is not relevant to this event
- Therefore, 9W is to reinstate the tickets with a 1-year validity for transport between the same points and the same booking class.
CTA official news can be read here for general overview of the case.
Actual CTA case review can be found here for reference should you wish to file a complaint.
If you have a similar case that's with SWISS, you need to file with CTA to get a result through informal process first before it gets to formal process. The entire procedure can take up to 3 months for each and the result may not be same cause it's case-by-base and the reviewer of the case can be different.
To file an informal complaint with CTA, see here. Click through all of the pages to get to the online form for the informal complaint. Or click here.
To file a formal complaint after informal complaint has been closed, see here. Continue on to the next page to see the address or email address for the formal complaint.
The July 17th and 18th responses from LX can be found here:
Other Letters:
Feel free to add dates, flights, etc., in order to plan DOs, etc.
Aug 4: SFO-ICN (UA893)
Jason8612
Aug 5: ICN-SFO (UA892)
Jason8612
Aug 7: SFO-ICN (UA893)
Jason8612
Aug 11: ICN-NRT-ORD (UA78, UA882)
Jason8612
Aug 14: BOS-IAD-NRT-ICN (UA285, UA803, UA79)
Deltspygt
Aug 19: ICN-NRT-IAD-BOS (UA78, UA804, UA352)
Deltspygt
Oct 1: UA433-UA893
JeredF +1
Oct 8: UA892-UA242
JeredF +1
Oct 9: BOS-SFO-ICN (UA433, UA893)
BigJC
Oct 13: ICN-NRT-ORD-BOS (UA78, UA882, UA744)
BigJC
Oct 21: BOS-SFO UA433 to SFO-ICN UA893
Sterndogg +1
flyerdude88 (SFO - ICN portion only)
Oct 23: ICN - SFO UA 892
flyerdude88
Oct 27: ICN-SFO UA892 to SFO-BOS UA286
Sterndogg +1
Nov 05: BOS-ORD UA521, ORD-NRT UA881
kokonutz, I012609, BingoSF +1
Nov 11: ICN-SFO UA892, SFO-IAD UA727
kokonutz, I012609, BingoSF +1
Nov 26: BOS-SFO UA433, SFO-NRT UA837, NRT-ICN UA79
thepla
Nov 27: BOS-ORD-NRT-ICN (UA501, UA881, UA196)
BigJC+1
Nov 29: Planning 2 days in TPE, been to ICN
thepla
Dec 1: ICN-SFO UA892, SFO-ORD UA698, ORD-BOS UA961
thepla
Dec 1: ICN-NRT-IAD-BOS (UA78, UA804, UA822)
BigJC+1
Dec 15: BOS-SFO UA433, SFO-ICN UA893
songzm
Dec 25: BOS-IAD UA285, IAD-NRT UA803, NRT-ICN UA79
Dinoscool3 +2
Dec 30: ICN-SFO UA892, SFO-BOS UA444
songzm
Dec 31: ICN-SFO UA892, SFO-BOS UA770
Dinoscool3 +2
Jan 11: BOS-SFO UA1523, Jan 12: SFO-ICN UA893
margarita girl
Jan 12: BOS-SFO UA433, SFO-ICN UA893
Zebranz
14 Jan: BOS-SFO UA433 to SFO-ICN UA893
ORDOGG
19 Jan: ICN-SFO UA892 to SFO-ORD UA698 to ORD-BOS UA961
ORDOGG
Jan 22: ICN-SFO UA892 SFO-BOS UA500
margarita girl
Feb 5: ICN-SFO UA892 SFO-BOS UA242
Zebranz
CMB-DFW EY F
FARE IS GONE
FARE RULES (thanks to SQ421)
FRTLK Fare Rules (RT)
FOWLK Fare Rules (OW)
WHEN ARE YOU FLYING?
Feel free to add any additional cities you're leaving from!
Please slot yourselves in!!!
ex-CMB
Feb
Mar
8 - Darmajaya
12 - Thaidai
22 - Deadinabsentia
Apr
21 - SQ421, penegal, jozdemir
26 - tahsir21
May
28 - Upperdeck744
29 - bonsaisai (positioning flights SIN-CMB, DFW-ORD)
Jun
12 - lelee
Jul
7 - HansGolden +6
8 - arcticbull + 1
11 - bonsaisai's friend (positioning flights: SIN-CMB, DFW-MCI)
25 - Tycosiao
30 - bonsaisai's friend (positioning flights: MCI-DFW, CMB-SIN)
Aug
17 - DC777Fan
26 - Yi Yang
31 - dcas
Sep
Oct
Nov
8 - harryhv
29 - stephem+4
Dec
6 - roastpuff and (soon) Mrs. roastpuff , JFKEZE (UL Code-share)
7 - DWFI
10 - jlisi984 + dad (CMB-AUH-DFW)
21 - bonsaisai (positioning flights SIN-CMB, DFW-ORD)
ex-AUH
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
27 - RICHKLHS
May
Jun
29 - yerffej201
Jul
9 - HansGolden +6
27 - Tycosiao
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
30 - stephem+4 (to JFK)
Dec
7 - JFKEZE, DWFI [EY161 nonstop]
9 - roastpuff and (soon) Mrs. Roastpuff
ex-DFW
Jan
Feb
Mar
14 - Thaidai
15 - zainman +1
Apr
25 - SQ421, penegal, jozdemir
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
22 - arcticbull + 1
Sep
22 - bonsaisai (positioning flights ORD-DFW, CMB-SIN)
Oct
Nov
19 - harryhv->Paris
Dec
19 - Yi Yang, jona970318
24 - DWFI (EY160 nonstop)
26 - HansGolden +6 (CDG), LwoodY2K (AUH)
[PREM FARE GONE] RGN First class comes back again!!!!
#9677
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: AU
Programs: former Olympic Airways Gold (yeah - still proud of that!)
Posts: 14,409
if Swiss is going to reinstate the original itinerary, aren't they gonna have to ticket as agent for the various airlines involved? so they will need to pay SQ for example the full whack for use of their suites?
while they could ignore the cost implication of their own flights, how does it fit with other carriers? I'm sure SQ isn't going to sit back and accept a % of the $650 fare, x1000 tickets, for their suites (and simply honour the tickets as a matter of goodwill.)
#9678
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2003
Programs: BA Silver, EY Gold, HH Diamond, IHG Plat
Posts: 12,214
somebody will correct me on this... but my thoughts are that Swiss can't simply 'reinstate' the original tickets. they have been cancelled. and there is no applicable fare for the route.
if Swiss is going to reinstate the original itinerary, aren't they gonna have to ticket as agent for the various airlines involved? so they will need to pay SQ for example the full whack for use of their suites?
while they could ignore the cost implication of their own flights, how does it fit with other carriers? I'm sure SQ isn't going to sit back and accept a % of the $650 fare, x1000 tickets, for their suites (and simply honour the tickets as a matter of goodwill.)
if Swiss is going to reinstate the original itinerary, aren't they gonna have to ticket as agent for the various airlines involved? so they will need to pay SQ for example the full whack for use of their suites?
while they could ignore the cost implication of their own flights, how does it fit with other carriers? I'm sure SQ isn't going to sit back and accept a % of the $650 fare, x1000 tickets, for their suites (and simply honour the tickets as a matter of goodwill.)
Pseudo Nim, what was your ticket reissued at? Is there a way to check via Amadeus ETR or any other way?
#9679
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: UA-1K, MM, Hilton-Diamond, Marriott-Titanium
Posts: 4,439
somebody will correct me on this... but my thoughts are that Swiss can't simply 'reinstate' the original tickets. they have been cancelled. and there is no applicable fare for the route.
if Swiss is going to reinstate the original itinerary, aren't they gonna have to ticket as agent for the various airlines involved? so they will need to pay SQ for example the full whack for use of their suites?
while they could ignore the cost implication of their own flights, how does it fit with other carriers? I'm sure SQ isn't going to sit back and accept a % of the $650 fare, x1000 tickets, for their suites (and simply honour the tickets as a matter of goodwill.)
if Swiss is going to reinstate the original itinerary, aren't they gonna have to ticket as agent for the various airlines involved? so they will need to pay SQ for example the full whack for use of their suites?
while they could ignore the cost implication of their own flights, how does it fit with other carriers? I'm sure SQ isn't going to sit back and accept a % of the $650 fare, x1000 tickets, for their suites (and simply honour the tickets as a matter of goodwill.)
#9680
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 796
somebody will correct me on this... but my thoughts are that Swiss can't simply 'reinstate' the original tickets. they have been cancelled. and there is no applicable fare for the route.
if Swiss is going to reinstate the original itinerary, aren't they gonna have to ticket as agent for the various airlines involved? so they will need to pay SQ for example the full whack for use of their suites?
while they could ignore the cost implication of their own flights, how does it fit with other carriers? I'm sure SQ isn't going to sit back and accept a % of the $650 fare, x1000 tickets, for their suites (and simply honour the tickets as a matter of goodwill.)
if Swiss is going to reinstate the original itinerary, aren't they gonna have to ticket as agent for the various airlines involved? so they will need to pay SQ for example the full whack for use of their suites?
while they could ignore the cost implication of their own flights, how does it fit with other carriers? I'm sure SQ isn't going to sit back and accept a % of the $650 fare, x1000 tickets, for their suites (and simply honour the tickets as a matter of goodwill.)
In the end, it will probably cancel out. Most tickets were on their own stock anyway.
#9681
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: AU
Programs: former Olympic Airways Gold (yeah - still proud of that!)
Posts: 14,409
If LX tickets for SQ, LX has to pay SQ. They are ticketing as agent for SQ.
I don't know what the YY fare is RGN-YUL, but SQ doesn't offer a fare RGN-ZRH (it didn't from the dummy booking I just tried to make).
Checking Expedia a fare for MH/SQ RGN-ZRH came in at ~USD9000 - although the SQ fare SIN-ZRH in suites was only around USD6000 - so they could knock a fair amount off that $9000 by constructing ticketing differently.
However - even allowing $1000 for RGN-SIN (to connect with the SQ suites for $6000) that still comes in at $7000 excluding carriage by LX. x1000.
#9682
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,984
The potential cost at full fare of reinstating the tickets is a spurious argument.
It conveniently ignores the fact that the complainants would likely accept tickets in LX F SIN-ZRH-YUL if LX offered them instead (subject to making this option attractive - e.g. not collecting the YQ).
Or that LX could turn around and sue ATPCO for damages.
Or the ongoing cost to LX of retaining counsel on this matter.
It conveniently ignores the fact that the complainants would likely accept tickets in LX F SIN-ZRH-YUL if LX offered them instead (subject to making this option attractive - e.g. not collecting the YQ).
Or that LX could turn around and sue ATPCO for damages.
Or the ongoing cost to LX of retaining counsel on this matter.
#9683
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: CAN, LAX, TPE
Programs: AA, AS, CI, DL, UA
Posts: 2,899
somebody will correct me on this... but my thoughts are that Swiss can't simply 'reinstate' the original tickets. they have been cancelled. and there is no applicable fare for the route.
if Swiss is going to reinstate the original itinerary, aren't they gonna have to ticket as agent for the various airlines involved? so they will need to pay SQ for example the full whack for use of their suites?
while they could ignore the cost implication of their own flights, how does it fit with other carriers? I'm sure SQ isn't going to sit back and accept a % of the $650 fare, x1000 tickets, for their suites (and simply honour the tickets as a matter of goodwill.)
if Swiss is going to reinstate the original itinerary, aren't they gonna have to ticket as agent for the various airlines involved? so they will need to pay SQ for example the full whack for use of their suites?
while they could ignore the cost implication of their own flights, how does it fit with other carriers? I'm sure SQ isn't going to sit back and accept a % of the $650 fare, x1000 tickets, for their suites (and simply honour the tickets as a matter of goodwill.)
Some of your arguments are hilarious if people bother to read the past 600 pages.
#9684
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Anywhere I need to be.
Programs: OW Emerald, *A Gold, NEXUS, GE, ABTC/APEC, South Korea SES, eIACS, PP, Hyatt Diamond
Posts: 16,046
being on the airline's own stock doesn't matter except for the portions of travel it is undertaking itself (for example it could carry FOC on the ZHR-YUL legs operated by Swiss).
If LX tickets for SQ, LX has to pay SQ. They are ticketing as agent for SQ.
I don't know what the YY fare is RGN-YUL, but SQ doesn't offer a fare RGN-ZRH (it didn't from the dummy booking I just tried to make).
Checking Expedia a fare for MH/SQ RGN-ZRH came in at ~USD9000 - although the SQ fare SIN-ZRH in suites was only around USD6000 - so they could knock a fair amount off that $9000 by constructing ticketing differently.
However - even allowing $1000 for RGN-SIN (to connect with the SQ suites for $6000) that still comes in at $7000 excluding carriage by LX. x1000.
If LX tickets for SQ, LX has to pay SQ. They are ticketing as agent for SQ.
I don't know what the YY fare is RGN-YUL, but SQ doesn't offer a fare RGN-ZRH (it didn't from the dummy booking I just tried to make).
Checking Expedia a fare for MH/SQ RGN-ZRH came in at ~USD9000 - although the SQ fare SIN-ZRH in suites was only around USD6000 - so they could knock a fair amount off that $9000 by constructing ticketing differently.
However - even allowing $1000 for RGN-SIN (to connect with the SQ suites for $6000) that still comes in at $7000 excluding carriage by LX. x1000.
Funny how I got this message
1 SQ 997Z 19MAR RGNSIN SS1 1025A 305P * WE E 2
2 SQ 346A 20MAR SINZRH SS1 130A 750A * TH E 2
>X2/0R
STANDBY - BOOKING VIA LINK IN PROGRESS
>
SELL RESTRICTED - CALL AIRLINE * *
UNABLE TO CANCEL
>
#9685
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: West Coast, USA
Programs: Skywards Platinum
Posts: 3,747
If LX tickets for SQ, LX has to pay SQ. They are ticketing as agent for SQ.
I don't know what the YY fare is RGN-YUL, but SQ doesn't offer a fare RGN-ZRH (it didn't from the dummy booking I just tried to make).
Checking Expedia a fare for MH/SQ RGN-ZRH came in at ~USD9000 - although the SQ fare SIN-ZRH in suites was only around USD6000 - so they could knock a fair amount off that $9000 by constructing ticketing differently.
However - even allowing $1000 for RGN-SIN (to connect with the SQ suites for $6000) that still comes in at $7000 excluding carriage by LX. x1000.
I don't know what the YY fare is RGN-YUL, but SQ doesn't offer a fare RGN-ZRH (it didn't from the dummy booking I just tried to make).
Checking Expedia a fare for MH/SQ RGN-ZRH came in at ~USD9000 - although the SQ fare SIN-ZRH in suites was only around USD6000 - so they could knock a fair amount off that $9000 by constructing ticketing differently.
However - even allowing $1000 for RGN-SIN (to connect with the SQ suites for $6000) that still comes in at $7000 excluding carriage by LX. x1000.
That is the risk that LX took in canceling tickets. If they didn't cancel tickets, they would only have had to pay SQ, NH, et al, their % of the YY fare. LX cancelled simply so that they wouldn't have to honor segments on LX metal at this low cost. (I am not aware of any itineraries that had LX code-shares on other carriers metal in F) In fact, on some of the tickets I had on LX stock, they had NH code-shares of LH metal (and thus LH group would have earned full "A" fare for that leg from NH), offsetting any actual loss LX would have had transporting ZRH-YUL. (If we consider it from LH Group overall profits.)
The fact that LX is now on the hook for $15k/ticket is due to their actions of cancellation. Had they not cancelled their actual cost would have been a fraction of what it is now, the YY fare no longer exists and they will have to pay SQ, NH, et al the full price.
It is also worth pointing out that NH, SQ, etc... had no problem accepting the % of YY fare to transport passengers on their flights, even on LX ticket stock. Frankly, I think LX shot itself in the foot.
#9686
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: UA-1K, MM, Hilton-Diamond, Marriott-Titanium
Posts: 4,439
That is the risk that LX took in canceling tickets. If they didn't cancel tickets, they would only have had to pay SQ, NH, et al, their % of the YY fare. LX cancelled simply so that they wouldn't have to honor segments on LX metal at this low cost. (I am not aware of any itineraries that had LX code-shares on other carriers metal in F) In fact, on some of the tickets I had on LX stock, they had NH code-shares of LH metal (and thus LH group would have earned full "A" fare for that leg from NH), offsetting any actual loss LX would have had transporting ZRH-YUL. (If we consider it from LH Group overall profits.)
The fact that LX is now on the hook for $15k/ticket is due to their actions of cancellation. Had they not cancelled their actual cost would have been a fraction of what it is now, the YY fare no longer exists and they will have to pay SQ, NH, et al the full price.
It is also worth pointing out that NH, SQ, etc... had no problem accepting the % of YY fare to transport passengers on their flights, even on LX ticket stock. Frankly, I think LX shot itself in the foot.
The fact that LX is now on the hook for $15k/ticket is due to their actions of cancellation. Had they not cancelled their actual cost would have been a fraction of what it is now, the YY fare no longer exists and they will have to pay SQ, NH, et al the full price.
It is also worth pointing out that NH, SQ, etc... had no problem accepting the % of YY fare to transport passengers on their flights, even on LX ticket stock. Frankly, I think LX shot itself in the foot.
#9688
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Penang, Malaysia
Programs: OZ *G, HHonors Gold, Aclub Plat
Posts: 1,025
#9689
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Anywhere I need to be.
Programs: OW Emerald, *A Gold, NEXUS, GE, ABTC/APEC, South Korea SES, eIACS, PP, Hyatt Diamond
Posts: 16,046
#9690
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Multiple locations
Programs: AAdvantage ExPlat LT Gold, BA Silver, Aegean Star Gold
Posts: 5,038