Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Destinations > America - USA > Midwest
Reload this Page >

Guide to the Milwaukee Airport

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Guide to the Milwaukee Airport

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 21, 2011, 9:10 am
  #226  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,412
Originally Posted by MKE Sam
Newsmanhoss - can you please elaborate? I'm not sure I understand your comment. Thanks.
I quoted the wrong post. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.

What I meant was I'm glad to see that MKE is adding another public observation lot for aircraft spotting.

Most airports try to obstruct people from watching planes land. It sounds like MKE is actually encouraging people to watch aircraft movement.

As an aviation enthusiast, I'm glad to hear a second area is in the works! I, too, hope they have a radio frequency to listen to the tower.
newsmanhoss is offline  
Old Mar 21, 2011, 9:46 am
  #227  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,653
Originally Posted by newsmanhoss
I quoted the wrong post. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.
LOL...I thought maybe you'd had a bad experience with those Redbox machines or something and were glad to see it gone. I'm relatively indifferent to them, myself.

If I had to guess, it comes down to $$ if and/or where a Redbox machine ends up.


Originally Posted by newsmanhoss
What I meant was I'm glad to see that MKE is adding another public observation lot for aircraft spotting.

Most airports try to obstruct people from watching planes land. It sounds like MKE is actually encouraging people to watch aircraft movement.

As an aviation enthusiast, I'm glad to hear a second area is in the works! I, too, hope they have a radio frequency to listen to the tower.
+1. I'm a little surprised they're going to the effort of creating a new, additional place. But I'm happily surprised!
knope2001 is offline  
Old Mar 21, 2011, 12:05 pm
  #228  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 344
Really interesting location for an observation lot would be on Whitnall, on top of the hill behind the other lot, this is definitely the best view of planes landing. That damn fence isn't great to look through.

http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&ll=4...01929&t=h&z=16
MostlyAir is offline  
Old Mar 21, 2011, 4:45 pm
  #229  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: MKE
Posts: 2,161
Originally Posted by newsmanhoss

What I meant was I'm glad to see that MKE is adding another public observation lot for aircraft spotting.
The Layton Ave. lot can get crowded at certain times of day. Having an alternative lot is great idea.
RSVP is offline  
Old Mar 22, 2011, 3:24 pm
  #230  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,638
New 4G Service

Verizon 4G now at MKE...

http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/entert...118433024.html
mke9499 is offline  
Old Mar 23, 2011, 3:14 pm
  #231  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: MKE
Posts: 2,161
Parking Problem

http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/118529149.html
RSVP is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2011, 7:23 pm
  #232  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: America's Dairyland
Programs: Midwest Miles, Early Returns
Posts: 156
Went inside the terminal to pick up an arriving family member today. I got there plenty early because of the parking problem (seems to have cleared up somewhat--there were plenty of spaces in the hourly, overflow lots looked full). Anyway, without going through security, there is really no way to see any of the "tarmac action" from inside the terminal. I suppose this is true of most airports now, but the best view I found was looking out of the south windows on the hallway to the C concourse.
Wisconsin is offline  
Old Mar 30, 2011, 6:57 am
  #233  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: MKE
Posts: 2,161
Local media is reporting the problem seems to have alleviated itself. The first half of last week seems to have been impacted.
RSVP is offline  
Old Apr 6, 2011, 12:57 pm
  #234  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,638
AA mainline returns to MKE.

http://twitpic.com/4hablg
mke9499 is offline  
Old Apr 7, 2011, 7:02 am
  #235  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,638
MKE deemed to be second most competitively-priced large airport in U.S....

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes...ares/?src=tptw
mke9499 is offline  
Old Apr 7, 2011, 8:56 pm
  #236  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,412
Originally Posted by mke9499
MKE deemed to be second most competitively-priced large airport in U.S....

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes...ares/?src=tptw
Interesting that the New York Times considers MKE to be a "large" airport while others like MEM and CVG are deemed "midsize."
newsmanhoss is offline  
Old Apr 7, 2011, 9:32 pm
  #237  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,653
Sounds like a chapel is in the works for MKE.

http://www.jsonline.com/features/rel...119357944.html

To me, an airport chapel screams 1962. Back to the days when frightened travelers might stop for a quick prayer to wind up the courage to fly. Or when every flight was met by throngs of passengers' family and friends, and a chapel stood by waiting to comfort those family and friends when a flight didn't make it.

Obviously the accident rate is not zero, and there are still nervous flyers. But an airport chapel seems to harken back to a time when flying was much more exotic and dangerous.

Last edited by knope2001; Apr 7, 2011 at 9:47 pm
knope2001 is offline  
Old Apr 7, 2011, 9:38 pm
  #238  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,653
Originally Posted by newsmanhoss
Interesting that the New York Times considers MKE to be a "large" airport while others like MEM and CVG are deemed "midsize."
I wonder what they used to make that determination. MKE served a lot more passengers than CVG did in 2010. But I don't think MKE quite passed MEM for the full year. And it's often takes time for new stats to be complied, released and percolated about. Looks like they might be using partial 2010 stats.

Quite remarkable to think of MKE serving more passengers than CVG and catching MEM. I was looking at a DL timetable from around 10 years ago and they had around 185 mainline and 305 RJ's. Times change.
knope2001 is offline  
Old Apr 7, 2011, 9:52 pm
  #239  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,653
Actually, looking back at the NYT story, it looks like they used O+D traffic, not total traffic. I believe MKE has more local O+D than either MEM or CVG. I would guess that MKE is in the 40's and CVG and MEM are in the 50's.
knope2001 is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2011, 6:24 am
  #240  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,412
Originally Posted by knope2001
Sounds like a chapel is in the works for MKE.

http://www.jsonline.com/features/rel...119357944.html

To me, an airport chapel screams 1962. Back to the days when frightened travelers might stop for a quick prayer to wind up the courage to fly. Or when every flight was met by throngs of passengers' family and friends, and a chapel stood by waiting to comfort those family and friends when a flight didn't make it.

Obviously the accident rate is not zero, and there are still nervous flyers. But an airport chapel seems to harken back to a time when flying was much more exotic and dangerous.
One of the best chapels is at PIT, which was a totally new facility built in the early 90s. But I suspect that's anomaly.

It's hidden in the upstairs area of the airside terminal, near the US Airways Club.
newsmanhoss is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.