![]() |
Originally Posted by RichardInSF
(Post 14994798)
All of this doesn't take away from the problems Japan is facing. It is truly amazing that they aren't trying something now to deal with the problem of their aging population, but apparently Japanese nationalism (kinder term) or racism (less kind term) stands in the way of that.
|
Originally Posted by RichardInSF
(Post 14994798)
It is truly amazing that they aren't trying something now to deal with the problem of their aging population, but apparently Japanese nationalism (kinder term) or racism (less kind term) stands in the way of that.
|
Originally Posted by kcvt750
(Post 14995506)
The aging population is not a problem. A quick check of Ministry records will show you that no one dies of old age in Japan. You just get stuffed under the futon so the checks keep rolling in.
|
Originally Posted by jib71
(Post 14994846)
By "something", do you mean "immigration"? Why so coy?
|
Originally Posted by RichardInSF
(Post 14997134)
Immigration is one solution, most closely tied to my nationalism point. Better employment opportunities for women would be another. And maybe there are other possibilities out there as well, if they seriously discussed the issue.
|
Originally Posted by jib71
(Post 14998000)
I favor a cull of retired people as the solution.
|
Originally Posted by jib71
(Post 14998000)
Failing a North Korean invasion, I favor a cull of retired people as the solution.
I actually feel that the birthrate is a huge problem here that isn't anywhere near being solved. Women want to have more kids but they don't want to give up their jobs. Even then, there's a ton of pressure to give up their job when they have kids. Also, if their husband is a seishain, there's the possibility that he'll get transferred, which requires the family to either live separately (happens a fair bit) or quit and move to the new place. Sooner or later, the 2 tiered system of seishain and hourly workers is going to break up. |
Originally Posted by Pickles
(Post 14993571)
... but with their peers in Korea, Taiwan, and China, and in that regard, these other countries are eating Japan's lunch because they dither, hem and haw....
|
Originally Posted by Pickles
(Post 14993571)
There are now countless examples of consumer electronics, including TVs and mobile phones, where the Japanese managed to squander a spectacular lead into near irrelevance.
And re: the pension issue, the problem is that the aging majority has a strong short-term vested interest in keeping pensions high, and no incentive to do anything to change the system. They won't be around to see the Japanese government bankrupted... :( Speaking of which, what's the FT opinion on how long the yen will continue to be as strong as it is at the moment? It seems to me that the only way out both for debt repayment and deflation is that sooner or later the Japanese government will have to start printing money ("quantitative easing"), and that will obviously weaken the yen. |
I expect the Yen will remain strong as long as the Chinese continue to make lots and lots of Yen purchases. Kill the competition and diversify out of USD at the same time! Surprising they aren't doing the same to the Korean Won, at least not yet.
|
Originally Posted by SJUAMMF
(Post 15000228)
Apple is eating Sony's consumer electronic lunch too. Korean government purposely set favorable exchange rates buying Japanese equipment with high exchange rate and selling to the U.S. with low exchange rate and helped industries including DRAM, TV. The resultant margin delta of 10%+ was too large for Japanese producers to sustain, year after year. This was analyzed by SIRIJ and reported.
|
Originally Posted by RichardInSF
(Post 14987444)
I think locals underestimate the huge societal cost imposed on Japan by its banking system.
For decades now, every resident of Japan has been royally screwed by these banks, who charge not twice as much as in every other country, but at least ten times as much. And, in a culture where service is highly valued, in return for those ridiculous fees, the banks provide absolutely abysmal service. It's a huge drain on the entire economy, one that could easily be set right. Yet Japanese put up with it even though it would be readily fixable. Why? Maybe because the banks are good at paying off the government. Simple reforms here would go a long way towards changing the country as a whole. I'm sure the Tea Party will put an end to that! :rolleyes: Welcome to America's second lost decade -- as previewed in Japan! |
Originally Posted by jpatokal
(Post 13090436)
- When I first came to Japan in 1996, it felt like the country of the future. Now, it seems increasingly to be the city of the past:
Now, the internet is alive. In 1996, it was very small and just a toy. Cell phones are everywhere. In 1996, only some had them. Side airbags are everywhere. In 1996, only front...and no traction control. Of course, since 1996, the Concorde died, al-Qaeda won a decisive battle destroying the WTC, and Northwest, Ansett of Australia, and TWA died. |
My unscientific observation:
I am currently on my third visit to Japan auditing [food] factories. I audit factories all over the world, and I am shocked at the state of Japanese factories. The quality is top notch, but the physical plants seems stuck in the 80's or maybe 90's. Except the two decades of rust on some of these facilities, you would think you were time warped back 20 years. On top of that, the leve of utilization and efficiency is extemely low. The big cities like Osaka and Tokyo are beautiful and vibrant, but out where the manufacturing is taking place is a whole different story. It should be unrelated, but the Shinkansen trains are really nice and efficient, but at least in the green cars that my company pays for, they seem to be 75-80% empty. My personal assessment is that Japan has been trying "stimulus" for the last two decades. With stimulus money flowing why should anyone try to be efficient in the utilization of their factory? Why should they update it? I may be wrong on my take, but I am not encouraged to the idea of stimulus somehow successfully jump starting an economy, nor am I encouraged about the future of Japan. |
Originally Posted by travellerK
(Post 15152950)
My unscientific observation:
I am currently on my third visit to Japan auditing [food] factories. I audit factories all over the world, and I am shocked at the state of Japanese factories. The quality is top notch, but the physical plants seems stuck in the 80's or maybe 90's. Except the two decades of rust on some of these facilities, you would think you were time warped back 20 years. On top of that, the leve of utilization and efficiency is extemely low. It should be unrelated, but the Shinkansen trains are really nice and efficient, but at least in the green cars that my company pays for, they seem to be 75-80% empty. My personal assessment is that Japan has been trying "stimulus" for the last two decades. With stimulus money flowing why should anyone try to be efficient in the utilization of their factory? Why should they update it? About the shinkansen, it depends where you're going. A lot of the shinkansens were built for political reasons but if you're going from Osaka to Tokyo on a weeknight it's hard to get a seat. During the day is usually an entirely different matter though. One of the things that (IMO) drags Japan down is that companies waste a ton of money on things and don't call it quits. For example, Sony stopped making walkmans this year. Last year Pioneer finally stopped producing laserdisc players. Willcom, before it was bought, was originally owned by KDDI (which owns AU). KDDI didn't want to sell it as it would mean "giving up" on a division (which hadn't released new products or had a visit from AU executives in years). |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:06 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.