Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Live and Lets Fly [merged]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 22, 2017 | 7:56 pm
  #76  
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: AMS
Programs: M&M
Posts: 10
Originally Posted by Adam1222
Unlike him, I've passed several bar exams (and they were easy for me, tbh).
Ouch. I could see him reading that and his face boiling. I hope LX does not back down.
BaliLoverNL is offline  
Old Dec 23, 2017 | 12:56 am
  #77  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,862
Originally Posted by BaliLoverNL
Ouch. I could see him reading that and his face boiling.
Why?
Lack is offline  
Old Dec 27, 2017 | 9:33 am
  #78  
1M
50 Countries Visited
5 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: GIG - SVO
Programs: Lost it all and don't care
Posts: 996
Originally Posted by 84Fiero
Crap like this just seems to encourage more restrictive rules and practices in the future, that wind up impacting everyone for the worse, even if indirectly. You have to pick your battles, and this isn't one I would choose. However this blogger seems to see everything as a battle.
Agreed, and, this isn't even a valid battle worth fighting.
KDS777 is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2018 | 9:08 pm
  #79  
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: LAS
Programs: LH HON
Posts: 1,221
He actually bought First class tickets on his own, to pursue compensatory damages lol.
ckx2 is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2018 | 9:13 pm
  #80  
1M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: DL PM; Hilton Dia; Marriott Titanium/LT Gold
Posts: 8,514
Originally Posted by ckx2
He actually bought First class tickets on his own, to pursue compensatory damages lol.
Lol. Buying a ticket to manufacture damages when you had no intention of traveling until you tried to take advantage of what you knew to be a mistake. Probably a good thing he isn't a member of a bar, as this sort of conduct would cause trouble with the disciplinary authorities.

The affirmative defenses here just get better and better: failure to mitigate, mutual mistake, unclean hands. It's turning into a contracts final hypothetical issue spotter.
Adam1222 is online now  
Old Jan 3, 2018 | 1:28 am
  #81  
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: AMS
Programs: M&M
Posts: 10
Originally Posted by Adam1222

The affirmative defenses here just get better and better: failure to mitigate, mutual mistake, unclean hands. It's turning into a contracts final hypothetical issue spotter.
Hopefully, barbri gave him his money back when he failed, or let him keep his books or something...
BaliLoverNL is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2018 | 2:26 am
  #82  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: London
Programs: BA, VS, HH, IHG, MB, MR
Posts: 27,222
And he took his 14 month old son in Swiss F too ....
Raffles is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2018 | 3:45 am
  #83  
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Programs: Airline Free Agent, Fairmont Lifetime Platinum, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton Honors Diamond
Posts: 3,064
Oh boy...I expect a series of at least 20 posts about this...remember the Ethiopian saga?
gpapadop is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2018 | 6:34 am
  #84  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 4,706
And of course blogging about his intentions ("strategy") makes it even worse. I assume (hope) he used Chase or AmEx points to "buy" these tickets through AmEx or Chase travel services and didn't actually lay out his own cash for this scheme.
JetAway is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2018 | 6:56 am
  #85  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Park, CO
Programs: Tegridy Elite
Posts: 5,677
Originally Posted by gpapadop
Oh boy...I expect a series of at least 20 posts about this...remember the Ethiopian saga?
And that, after all, is the point of the whole stunt at this stage.

Some of his arguments are just laughable such as:
But how was I supposed to get home? Wasnt I clear enough in my post that SWISS F was the only option?
Really? SWISS F is his only option to get back to the US? Interesting. No idea if that argument could hold any water in a lawsuit but from a common sense standpoint (and someone who has traveled worldwide with their little one) it's a ridiculous statement to make.

The comments to his post from yesterday are entertaining, both from the clueless cheerleaders to the people questioning him on it.
84fiero is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2018 | 7:05 am
  #86  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 4,706
Originally Posted by 84fiero
No idea if that argument could hold any water in a lawsuit
It wouldn't. At all. A judge would have the same reaction you have. Maybe more so.
JetAway is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2018 | 7:37 am
  #87  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,862
Originally Posted by Adam1222
Lol. Buying a ticket to manufacture damages when you had no intention of traveling until you tried to take advantage of what you knew to be a mistake. Probably a good thing he isn't a member of a bar, as this sort of conduct would cause trouble with the disciplinary authorities.
How exactly did you deduct that?

Originally Posted by Raffles
And he took his 14 month old son in Swiss F too ....
Scarring the kid for life?

Originally Posted by JetAway
It wouldn't. At all. A judge would have the same reaction you have. Maybe more so.
Or maybe not.
Lack is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2018 | 8:07 am
  #88  
1M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: DL PM; Hilton Dia; Marriott Titanium/LT Gold
Posts: 8,514
Following up on an earlier post, I thought it would be fun to turn this behavior into a law school final exam question. Granted, it is far easier than the exams I took in law school, but it is a fun exercise. I wrote it up in the format of an actual law school final, so could be fun for the lawyers and non-lawyers alike. It's too long to post here, but I've posted it on my blog at Travel Blogger Malpractice and a Contracts Law School Exam Hypo – You Went Where???. Happy to discuss the right answers here, and will also post an explanatory answer after folks have had a chance. So whip out those bluebooks (or I guess computers).
Adam1222 is online now  
Old Jan 3, 2018 | 8:58 am
  #89  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 4,706
Originally Posted by Lack
Or maybe not.
Yes they would. Without a doubt.
JetAway is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2018 | 9:14 am
  #90  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,862
Originally Posted by Adam1222
Following up on an earlier post, I thought it would be fun to turn this behavior into a law school final exam question. Granted, it is far easier than the exams I took in law school, but it is a fun exercise. I wrote it up in the format of an actual law school final, so could be fun for the lawyers and non-lawyers alike. It's too long to post here, but I've posted it on my blog at Travel Blogger Malpractice and a Contracts Law School Exam Hypo You Went Where???. Happy to discuss the right answers here, and will also post an explanatory answer after folks have had a chance. So whip out those bluebooks (or I guess computers).
You sure it's not in the from of a palm reader final exam? Seems like some of the facts stated could only be sourced to a crystal ball, and the others are simply wrong (or 'altered for dramatic effect').

Originally Posted by JetAway
Yes they would. Without a doubt.
Based on a couple rulings in 'mistake fare' category I've seen, I have plenty of doubt.
Lack is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.