Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > External Miles and Points Resources
Reload this Page >

Alaska confirms: 'travel hackers' killed their Emirates Offerings

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Alaska confirms: 'travel hackers' killed their Emirates Offerings

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 1, 2016, 2:30 pm
  #31  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by sbm12
And it always was. Say you needed 100K for an award and you were chugging along "normally" and finally made it to 75K after some period of time. Or even to 95K. You still needed more and a 30-day warning probably wouldn't have been enough to get the rest.

What warning/window would have been sufficient for a "normal" member of the program who earns through a combination of flying and regular (not churning/MS) co-brand CC activity? Someone will say 30 days and someone else will demand at least 90. There's no sufficient answer.

As for lawsuits, I think that the UA MMer suit set sufficient precedent to show that there is not a valid claim, but that doesn't mean someone wouldn't try. But I doubt that was a significant factor at play here.
You do realize that the US is not the only jurisdiction where US airline loyalty programs have a nexus and may be subject to litigation?

I share doubts that litigation was the reason for AS granting a refund allowance for recent mileage purchases. AS makes too much money from selling miles to want to kill that goose by telling all its loyalty program customers that they should have no faith in AS when buying AS miles or crediting partner activity to an AS account.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Apr 1, 2016, 2:57 pm
  #32  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: Currently: UA 1K | Previously: AS MVPG75K, SPG Gold, Kimpton IC, HH Gold
Posts: 144
Originally Posted by belfordrocks
My thoughts on this entire situation -

. For the latter, AS perhaps could have offered MVP Gold/75K's who qualified by flying the required # of EQM's on AS metal an exemption from the devaluation. Just a thought.
This would have been nice. I will make MVPG75K again this year, and recently used my BIS-earned miles for an EK F redemption. I booked it assuming there had to be a deval coming up, as this is what happens with FF miles. But I am admittedly surprised by how much more the new EK F redemption costs. Some sort of exception for elites, or for example, upping the annual MVPG75K mileage bonus from 50k to 75k or 100k miles, would soften the blow. Not that I expect it to happen.
felixmendelssohn is offline  
Old Apr 1, 2016, 4:09 pm
  #33  
Original Member, Ambassador: External Miles and Points Resources
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Digital Nomad Wandering the Earth - Currently in LIMA, PERU
Posts: 58,626
Originally Posted by Dieuwer
Airlines are culpable as well:
Sure, the airlines create the bubbles then the airlines pop the bubbles. It's their bespoke currency...they are free to manipulate it any way they please.

Whining about how 'unfair' it is that an airline mnipulates its currency after hacking that airline seems both naive and selfish....a bit like Yogi Bear b!tching about the fact that people don't cool their pies on window sills anymore...@:-)
kokonutz is offline  
Old Apr 1, 2016, 4:14 pm
  #34  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
Originally Posted by GUWonder
You do realize that the US is not the only jurisdiction where US airline loyalty programs have a nexus and may be subject to litigation?
I'd be very, very surprised to see a foreign court take on a case against a US-based FF program.
sbm12 is offline  
Old Apr 1, 2016, 4:17 pm
  #35  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: North America
Posts: 2,265
To continue the blame-shifting game started by Alaska, here's Ben (trying to) shift the blame: http://onemileatatime.boardingarea.c...ruining-deals/

I will say he made a couple of good points such as AS pumping miles sales for the last couple of years and profiting from it. Alaska isn't a victim here, either, as much as they may (attempt to) act like one with their blog post.
CodeAdam10 is offline  
Old Apr 1, 2016, 4:41 pm
  #36  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 181
I guess what I don't understand is this: they only upped the award chart for EK. Where are the people outraged about this going that can't be re-routed on CX or AA in F?

I genuinely don't know much about these awards so I'm not sure if there was a sweet spot. I know Australia is basically the holy grail of awards but why would it be more attractive to route via DXB over HKG on CX / LAX on AA? Maybe I'm missing something but I am also not one of those that purposely spends more time on a plane than I need to.
MCIUnitedGuy is offline  
Old Apr 1, 2016, 4:52 pm
  #37  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: IAD
Posts: 6,148
With this type of outrage towards a generally minor change I can't wait for airlines to move to full dynamic pricing for both money and awards. The hysterics will be amazing.
whlinder is offline  
Old Apr 1, 2016, 5:12 pm
  #38  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS
Posts: 15,027
Originally Posted by kokonutz
Sure, the airlines create the bubbles then the airlines pop the bubbles. It's their bespoke currency...they are free to manipulate it any way they please.
Sure. And that's why people shouldn't be so DUMB to BUY miles. Crank credit cards and beat them at their own game. Which of course will lead to more devaluations and more outcries...

And the circle is round.
Dieuwer is offline  
Old Apr 1, 2016, 5:33 pm
  #39  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by sbm12
I'd be very, very surprised to see a foreign court take on a case against a US-based FF program.
US airline loyalty programs that do business with counterparties outside of the US are NOT excluded from all foreign litigation/liability exposure; nor are they immune from being subject to non-US courts. Do you really think that a US airline has never been subject to a foreign court over matters involving the airline's loyalty program?

Last edited by GUWonder; Apr 1, 2016 at 5:38 pm
GUWonder is offline  
Old Apr 1, 2016, 6:00 pm
  #40  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: YYZ
Posts: 1,666
Originally Posted by CodeAdam10
To continue the blame-shifting game started by Alaska, here's Ben (trying to) shift the blame: http://onemileatatime.boardingarea.c...ruining-deals/

I will say he made a couple of good points such as AS pumping miles sales for the last couple of years and profiting from it. Alaska isn't a victim here, either, as much as they may (attempt to) act like one with their blog post.
Rather disingenuous of Lucky to make himself look like he's the benevolent Robin Hood just sharing deals with his readership out of the good of his heart. He used EK F and showers to pimp Alaska credit cards to the extreme, which no doubt contributed to the devaluation. But of course, Alaska did have a role in it by selling miles and probably profited handsomely from it until EK stopped the music for them.

And if he truly did share things out of the good of his heart - then why didn't he share the lucrative LM tricks that he had made use of on a regular basis? Oh right, AV isn't giving him any kickbacks to do so, and he wanted the cheap LH F flights to last a while longer...

Originally Posted by Dieuwer
Sure. And that's why people shouldn't be so DUMB to BUY miles. Crank credit cards and beat them at their own game. Which of course will lead to more devaluations and more outcries...

And the circle is round.
The rest of the world outside of America doesn't have access to those insane credit card deals and far fewer programs to choose from. For some, the ability to buy a EK F one-way ticket for just $2,000 was the best deal they could get.

The whole mileage game has been largely American-centric ever since I could remember!

Last edited by tng11; Apr 1, 2016 at 6:05 pm
tng11 is offline  
Old Apr 1, 2016, 6:33 pm
  #41  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: YYZ
Posts: 1,666
Looks like I touched a nerve enough to elicit Lucky's immediate response:



"Maximizing the greater good" of travellers. More like maximizing your own wallet.
tng11 is offline  
Old Apr 1, 2016, 7:05 pm
  #42  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: LAX
Posts: 1,849
Originally Posted by tng11
Rather disingenuous of Lucky to make himself look like he's the benevolent Robin Hood just sharing deals with his readership out of the good of his heart. He used EK F and showers to pimp Alaska credit cards to the extreme, which no doubt contributed to the devaluation. But of course, Alaska did have a role in it by selling miles and probably profited handsomely from it until EK stopped the music for them.

And if he truly did share things out of the good of his heart - then why didn't he share the lucrative LM tricks that he had made use of on a regular basis? Oh right, AV isn't giving him any kickbacks to do so, and he wanted the cheap LH F flights to last a while longer...

+100. Nothing to add. Hypocrisy on display.
Big_Foot is offline  
Old Apr 1, 2016, 7:06 pm
  #43  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
Originally Posted by GUWonder
Do you really think that a US airline has never been subject to a foreign court over matters involving the airline's loyalty program?
I'd love to see some examples of cases which have seen a foreign claim actually go to trial and or verdict. Please feel free to share some; I cannot think of any off-hand.
sbm12 is offline  
Old Apr 1, 2016, 7:11 pm
  #44  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Somewhere above the Mason-Dixon
Programs: DL Ham Samich
Posts: 1,661
Originally Posted by sbm12
As for lawsuits, I think that the UA MMer suit set sufficient precedent to show that there is not a valid claim, but that doesn't mean someone wouldn't try. But I doubt that was a significant factor at play here.
I actually disagree here - the Court's opinion did ponder (but did not pass judgement on) the fact that FF programs are increasingly divorced from airlines in that most miles and points are not earned by flying these days with DL and UA at least.

IMHO, we're nearing a point where airlines have strayed far enough from the intended protections of the ADA that a state or federal consumer protection agency will take their shot.

Cheers!

Last edited by RFDMinnesota; Apr 1, 2016 at 7:12 pm Reason: Grammar... Bleh
RFDMinnesota is offline  
Old Apr 1, 2016, 7:23 pm
  #45  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS
Posts: 15,027
Originally Posted by RFDMinnesota
IMHO, we're nearing a point where airlines have strayed far enough from the intended protections of the ADA that a state or federal consumer protection agency will take their shot.

Cheers!
Like Aeroplan?
Dieuwer is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.