Originally Posted by
sbm12
As for lawsuits, I think that the UA MMer suit set sufficient precedent to show that there is not a valid claim, but that doesn't mean someone wouldn't try. But I doubt that was a significant factor at play here.
I actually disagree here - the Court's opinion did ponder (but did not pass judgement on) the fact that FF programs are increasingly divorced from airlines in that most miles and points are not earned by flying these days with DL and UA at least.
IMHO, we're nearing a point where airlines have strayed far enough from the intended protections of the ADA that a state or federal consumer protection agency will take their shot.
Cheers!