Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Emirates | Skywards
Reload this Page >

Dissapointing DXB lounge experience

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Dissapointing DXB lounge experience

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 25, 2017 | 12:34 pm
  #31  
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited5 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Economy, mostly :(
Programs: Skywards Gold
Posts: 7,791
Originally Posted by ioto1902
Thanks a lot Wtravel !

I didn't know that.
Moreover, it says 'minors', therefore, they don't have to be my children (too late !). They can be my grand children. Quite good for us ! ^
How would they know anyway?
skywardhunter is offline  
Old Mar 25, 2017 | 1:09 pm
  #32  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: West Coast, USA
Programs: Skywards Platinum
Posts: 3,747
As others have stated, this is not a lounge experience, rather a lounge check-in experience.

You are disappointed they didn't bend the rules. But, IMHO the ME3 never bend any rules, ever. The front-line people you interact with typically not empowered to.
whimike is offline  
Old Mar 25, 2017 | 2:49 pm
  #33  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Europe
Programs: EK plat, ex-FB gold, Accor plat
Posts: 1,074
Originally Posted by subject2load
Or perhaps just grab a couple of random kids from the general concourse ioto ..... and guest them into the lounge.

I'm sure the parents won't mind. They might even be delighted for you to take them off their hands for an hour or so
Yeah right.
I'll try to find Coop and spend a few hours in the lounge, then, once on board, invite him in my suite.
We'll see if his mother will be cheerful.
I'd rather bet police will greet me at arrival.
TV ads are so full of lies.
ioto1902 is offline  
Old Mar 25, 2017 | 3:34 pm
  #34  
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Programs: BAEC Gold, EK Skywards (enhanced Blue !), Oman Air Sindbad Gold
Posts: 6,818
Originally Posted by ioto1902
Yeah right.
I'll try to find Coop and spend a few hours in the lounge, then, once on board, invite him in my suite.
We'll see if his mother will be cheerful.
I'd rather bet police will greet me at arrival.
TV ads are so full of lies.
Surely not ....?

And there was me thinking they were 100% truthful & accurate.

I'll be watching with a whole new perspective from now on .......
subject2load is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2017 | 12:12 am
  #35  
40 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: PHX, SEA
Programs: Alaska MVP, Avis Presidents Club
Posts: 4,511
I'm surprised that she expected special treatment. 1 guest is 1 guest. I expect to see similar threads in the Amex section now that there is a guest limit to the Centurion lounge.
Gig103 is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2017 | 12:42 am
  #36  
NoY
1M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Dubai, UAE / Phuket, Thailand / York, England
Programs: SAS Diamond/STE+, Emirates, OW Sapphire (bye-bye BA, yesss!), Radisson VIP, Hilton, Marriott
Posts: 5,505
The rules were applied properly. End.

The whole sleepy kids/its unfair/ routine is irrelevant nonsense & a situation that you/your wife created. Pony up the cash for Business flights or the $ for the appropriate lounge access and stop whining. Simple.
NoY is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2017 | 1:41 pm
  #37  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 115
where is moral low ground?
enjoyingit is offline  
Old Mar 27, 2017 | 9:43 am
  #38  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nowhere - Tax Free Nomad
Programs: BA GfL, UA Gold, Hilton LT Diamond, Marriott LT Titanium, IHG Plat
Posts: 1,393
To be expected from someone from Hove and is more prosaic. Not a bad effort though :-)
moral_low_ground is offline  
Old Apr 1, 2017 | 10:50 pm
  #39  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Dubai, UAE
Programs: BA Gold, GGL, Virgin Silver, Skywards Platinum, SPG VIP
Posts: 193
Originally Posted by subject2load
Perhaps your wife could have negotiated a payment of half the requested $50 - on the grounds that your 3 year-old was "half-asleep" ........??



I've no doubt that the OP will not like my opinion and the reasons offered. But he did invite views from other FT-ers - and these are mine
No hard feelings at all! :-)

The point I was trying to make is that for a mother GC holder traveling with kids, it has now become impossible to use the lounge that she is entitled to, without forking out the money. Unlike adult guests, one can hardly 'ditch' one of the kids and use the lounge oneself.....
Brussels traveller is offline  
Old Apr 1, 2017 | 10:51 pm
  #40  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Dubai, UAE
Programs: BA Gold, GGL, Virgin Silver, Skywards Platinum, SPG VIP
Posts: 193
Originally Posted by NoY
The rules were applied properly. End.

The whole sleepy kids/its unfair/ routine is irrelevant nonsense & a situation that you/your wife created. Pony up the cash for Business flights or the $ for the appropriate lounge access and stop whining. Simple.
Thanks for the deep insight there ...
Brussels traveller is offline  
Old Apr 1, 2017 | 11:00 pm
  #41  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Dubai, UAE
Programs: BA Gold, GGL, Virgin Silver, Skywards Platinum, SPG VIP
Posts: 193
Originally Posted by whimike
As others have stated, this is not a lounge experience, rather a lounge check-in experience.

You are disappointed they didn't bend the rules. But, IMHO the ME3 never bend any rules, ever. The front-line people you interact with typically not empowered to.
Agree. it should have been titled 'Lounge check-in experience'.

The frontline people at EK use their discretion for common sense decisions many times in my experience, quite unlike the robots one finds frequently in the US. Allowing a 3-year old child in with her mother and not demand the $50 charge, could have been one such decision. Sadly, it did not happen on this occasion. Doing it was an opportunity to create a loyal fan of the airline (which she is, albeit, a bit soured now).
Brussels traveller is offline  
Old Apr 1, 2017 | 11:03 pm
  #42  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Dubai, UAE
Programs: BA Gold, GGL, Virgin Silver, Skywards Platinum, SPG VIP
Posts: 193
Originally Posted by skywardhunter
We all know the rules, but to follow them is ridiculous?

I think there is no complaint to be made, however I do also think there was a minor CS failing in not having the leeway here given a few months ago the child would've been allowed in free. I think an unofficial 1-year grace (i.e. under 2 is free but unofficially if asked they allow under 3) would be an appropriate policy.
^
The minor CS failing is all it is. Glad you recognise it as such.
Brussels traveller is offline  
Old Apr 1, 2017 | 11:11 pm
  #43  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Dubai, UAE
Programs: BA Gold, GGL, Virgin Silver, Skywards Platinum, SPG VIP
Posts: 193
Originally Posted by stargold
Is it Emirates' fault if your wife made the poor choice of taking exception to an entirely justified request to pay for the 3rd guest, and decided to "save $50" by sitting it out in the main gate area? I'm afraid that any supposedly "very poor taste" left by EK is entirely self-inflicted.

When asking for an exception to a rule, it's best not to do so while just assuming it iwll be granted, as you are only setting yourself up for disappointment.
In general, I agree. The point here though is the difference between a mother traveling with her little kids Vs a normal case of adult guesting. In the case of the mother, even if she is entitled to use the lounge, she cannot use this entitlement unless her kids are let in as well. Not the case with adult guests. So my point is that she has no option but to pay for lounge access she is normally entitled to anyway. This applies to a very small number of very specific cases of mother traveling with very young children and she has lounge access and they do not.

I just think it would be good customer service for an airline that is working to build a reputation as a family-friendly airline to recognise this.
Brussels traveller is offline  
Old Apr 2, 2017 | 1:47 am
  #44  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Udon Thani, Thailand
Programs: TK E,*G, A-Club G
Posts: 869
I for one second the OP.
There should be leeway for sole adults travelling with small children, at the discretion of the lounge dragon, full stop.

I live in Asia and have many stories of strange rules you only discover AFTER the facts: I booked 12 ballet lessons for my 6 year youg, they printed 12 dates on a membership card, I mentioned she would not attend two dates because we would be on holiday, no problem sir, until after the last lesson where they tell you you lost two session being absent, 30 minutes of discussion will get you nowhere. I should have refused the membership card to begin with.
That's how you learn to live here.
tartempion is offline  
Old Apr 2, 2017 | 6:11 am
  #45  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: West Coast, USA
Programs: Skywards Platinum
Posts: 3,747
Originally Posted by Brussels traveller
Agree. it should have been titled 'Lounge check-in experience'.

The frontline people at EK use their discretion for common sense decisions many times in my experience, quite unlike the robots one finds frequently in the US. Allowing a 3-year old child in with her mother and not demand the $50 charge, could have been one such decision. Sadly, it did not happen on this occasion. Doing it was an opportunity to create a loyal fan of the airline (which she is, albeit, a bit soured now).
The part I bolded is very strange. In my quite vast experience it is the US agents that are the most flexible of any in the world and the ME3 that are the least flexible.
whimike is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.