View Poll Results: What Should The 4th Tier Qualification Level Be?
100,000 tier miles (in any class)



35
43.75%
100,000 tier miles in J or F only



16
20.00%
125,000 tier miles (any)



14
17.50%
150,000+ tier miles



15
18.75%
Voters: 80. You may not vote on this poll
4th tier confirmed: Clark
#31
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: New York
Programs: EK Plat, UA GS, Hyatt Diamond, SPG Platinum, Marriott Platinum, Amex Centurion
Posts: 514
In that thread he states:
"I asked a friend today whos a top exec w DNATA and was told the F lounge will still & ONLY be only for F passengers (Of both EK & QF). No one other then F passengers will be admitted regardless of status as its just not something EK does or wants to do."
Except what he is being told we already know is not accurate. EK IO members get F lounge access even if they fly in Y.
"I asked a friend today whos a top exec w DNATA and was told the F lounge will still & ONLY be only for F passengers (Of both EK & QF). No one other then F passengers will be admitted regardless of status as its just not something EK does or wants to do."
Except what he is being told we already know is not accurate. EK IO members get F lounge access even if they fly in Y.
#32


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Programs: Skywards silver :-(, HHonors Gold, IHG Diamond
Posts: 2,572
I'm in J tonight but was in F at the same time in May and July .Ive been in the F lounge only thrice (at exactly the same time) and it was more crowded than what you guys describe
#33
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: 30,000ft
Programs: EK, BA, EY, SQ, IHG, HH, SPG
Posts: 670
4th tier confirmed: Clark
I travel alot out of Dubai and I always use the 1st class lounge and I have never seen it crowded. Maybe just once in over 20 times this year did anyone even sit opposite me. Couple that with the new terminal (probably no coincidence that the 4th tier coming after the opening) and I think there should be plenty of room for a 4th tier in the 1st class lounge. Otherwise beyond upgrades what tangible benefit will they offer? Not unlike the previous debates on the tangible benefits of iO status in previous threads. May as well just call it Gold+ if nothing new on offer.
#34


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Programs: Skywards silver :-(, HHonors Gold, IHG Diamond
Posts: 2,572
I travel alot out of Dubai and I always use the 1st class lounge and I have never seen it crowded. Maybe just once in over 20 times this year did anyone even sit opposite me. Couple that with the new terminal (probably no coincidence that the 4th tier coming after the opening) and I think there should be plenty of room for a 4th tier in the 1st class lounge. Otherwise beyond upgrades what tangible benefit will they offer? Not unlike the previous debates on the tangible benefits of iO status in previous threads. May as well just call it Gold+ if nothing new on offer.
I'll try to take a photo next time I'm flying F .
#35




Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Programs: UA GS-2MM, QF LTG, EK Gold, Marriott Amb, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 4,006
I'm sure it does get busy, but nothing like the J lounge madness. During this years Dubai Do, we arranged an F lounge visit and there were probably 30+ people. We all sat down and had a great lunch (and the odd glass of champagne) and the lounge staff were actually quite excited at the prospect of being busy!
#36




Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Programs: UA GS-2MM, QF LTG, EK Gold, Marriott Amb, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 4,006
Please see new poll at the top of the thread
Just for something fun, I have added a poll to the top of this thread...wont make one bit of difference to what EK decide to do as the threshold limits have already been set - but will give us something to argue about over the weekend 
PS I personally think they not only need to add this additional tier (at 125,000 tier miles) but then enhance that same tier and provide added incentive to keep flying (ie like QF does for people who do double and triple the status credits in a year, as does BA). There is no reason for the incentives to be capped at all.

PS I personally think they not only need to add this additional tier (at 125,000 tier miles) but then enhance that same tier and provide added incentive to keep flying (ie like QF does for people who do double and triple the status credits in a year, as does BA). There is no reason for the incentives to be capped at all.
#37
Join Date: Jun 2012
Programs: Skywards Gold, AirNZ Gold, HHonors Gold, Priority Club Gold, GHA Black, Swissotel Eleva
Posts: 21
Wouldn't most people use travel agents to do all that? My company uses Amex to do all our booking and subsequent changes. (with the assumption that most people at that level don't book their own travel or have secretary's etc)
#38




Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: OSL
Programs: QR Plat | SK Diamond | A3 Gold
Posts: 4,612
Two ways to do this - These are the benefits we want to give so that this new status is actually something people work towards, so based on how much our customers fly, and how much we can afford, where do we set this benchmark. OR, We want a new tier at 1X0,000, what are the benefits we can afford to give to people flying that much.
#39




Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Aberdeen
Programs: BA Exec Silver, Hilton Honors Gold, Porter
Posts: 1,203
EK, please no F lounge access for Skywards Plat !
It's already busy enough with F passengers, and the quality will have to go down if you admit additional people.
F lounge is for people who pay for F. They fork out considerable money and expect certain level of service.
Till now EK was able to provide that. Hope it will remain this way.
Regards,
El Puerco Volante.
It's already busy enough with F passengers, and the quality will have to go down if you admit additional people.
F lounge is for people who pay for F. They fork out considerable money and expect certain level of service.
Till now EK was able to provide that. Hope it will remain this way.
Regards,
El Puerco Volante.
#40


Join Date: Jun 2009
Programs: A3 Gold, AA Platinum, Marriott & Discovery Platinum, IGH Diamond
Posts: 900

EK does have the best overall F product. SQ is still better in the air, but if you consider the whole package - ground service, lounge, aircraft HW and so on - EK is the clear winner.
So it's good to hear that this QF alliance won't break the product that I don't mind paying for.
And about F lounge being already full - I never said that it's already too crowded. But at times it's very dangerously close to it, for my tastes. In F it's NOT about being able to find a place to sit - it's about finding a place to sit with enough privacy and space.
Do I really want to share seating space with sweaty Y pax coming off 12+ flight from MEL when I paid F prices ?

Currently F on EK is my first choice - and will continue to be so as long as EK can keep the product intact and enjoyable to fly.
Regards,
El Puerco Volante.
#41


Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,981
Yee-ha! 
EK does have the best overall F product. SQ is still better in the air, but if you consider the whole package - ground service, lounge, aircraft HW and so on - EK is the clear winner.
So it's good to hear that this QF alliance won't break the product that I don't mind paying for.
And about F lounge being already full - I never said that it's already too crowded. But at times it's very dangerously close to it, for my tastes. In F it's NOT about being able to find a place to sit - it's about finding a place to sit with enough privacy and space.
Do I really want to share seating space with sweaty Y pax coming off 12+ flight from MEL when I paid F prices ?
Currently F on EK is my first choice - and will continue to be so as long as EK can keep the product intact and enjoyable to fly.
Regards,
El Puerco Volante.

EK does have the best overall F product. SQ is still better in the air, but if you consider the whole package - ground service, lounge, aircraft HW and so on - EK is the clear winner.
So it's good to hear that this QF alliance won't break the product that I don't mind paying for.
And about F lounge being already full - I never said that it's already too crowded. But at times it's very dangerously close to it, for my tastes. In F it's NOT about being able to find a place to sit - it's about finding a place to sit with enough privacy and space.
Do I really want to share seating space with sweaty Y pax coming off 12+ flight from MEL when I paid F prices ?

Currently F on EK is my first choice - and will continue to be so as long as EK can keep the product intact and enjoyable to fly.
Regards,
El Puerco Volante.
For EK (and QF) Platinums then, I wonder what would be the lounge benefit, if any. More guests? Perhaps F Lounge access if flying J (so no F Lounge access if flying Y)? Or F Lounge access passes after achieving Platinum and then after certain tier mile thresholds after that?
For what it's worth, EY Gold Elites, which attain their status after 120k tier miles in their program (100k requalification), have access to Diamond First Class lounges irrespective of travel class, but only for themselves (no guest).
I can see where you're coming from with the argument, though. That's definitely what makes SQ TPR or LH FCT quite exclusive in that regard (though SQ TPR is a bit too hyped for liking, and LH FCT can get notoriously busy at times, but other times it is excellent, and always very civilised).
I wonder if EK Platinums will have access to QF F Lounges in SYD and MEL (and in other parts of the network - questionable, since they will not be necessarily covered under the EK partnership network strategy and agreement). If so, that would be a touch unfair
though that said QF F Lounges do accommodate pax who fly Y (viz. oneworld Emeralds and QF Platinums).The fact that QF and EK high tier members may only have access to the Business Class lounges in DXB I think really screams out that these facilities will need to be vastly expanded. How that will happen I have no idea...........
#43


Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,981
For QF at least people (read: FTers and AFFers) will be salivating at the differences between WP, [email protected] and P1; my hunch is that as far as the EK partnership goes, there will be at best minimal differences.
#44


Join Date: May 2010
Location: BOM
Programs: EK Plat, HHonors Gold
Posts: 3,000
Please do not be so presumptuous. Trust me that there are a fairly large number of folks on this planet who go in paid F but don't have the slightest of consideration for their fellow passengers or etiquette on board (apart from being sweaty and smelly). I'm sure you'll find yourself next to them fairly soon. (or do you belong to them that you actually don't notice that money doesn't have the slightest to do with grooming????)
#45


Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,981
Originally Posted by jackiedada:19277209
Please do not be so presumptuous. Trust me that there are a fairly large number of folks on this planet who go in paid F but don't have the slightest of consideration for their fellow passengers or etiquette on board (apart from being sweaty and smelly). I'm sure you'll find yourself next to them fairly soon. (or do you belong to them that you actually don't notice that money doesn't have the slightest to do with grooming????)
smiley.On top of that, all EK A380 F services have onboard shower, so in a way no F pax on such services, including El Puerco Volante, should have any excuse for being smelly upon disembarkation and proceeding to transit.

