![]() |
Originally Posted by Face81
(Post 18519083)
Q: You don't fly to Chicago, Atlanta or Detroit, for example. Are those possibilities? A: Oh yeah. I think one day we'll fly to Chicago, yes. Fly one day to Florida? Yes. Flying to other destinations? Yes, why not? http://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireS...tions-16252981 I don't think it's a coincidence that he mentioned Chicago and Florida (aka Miami) by name. |
Originally Posted by MAH4546
(Post 18537631)
I don't think it's a coincidence that he mentioned Chicago and Florida (aka Miami) by name.
|
Well, he mentioned Florida without being prompted at all. MIA in H1 2013?
|
Originally Posted by Xlr
(Post 18540257)
Well, he mentioned Florida without being prompted at all. MIA in H1 2013?
|
Originally Posted by jackiedada
(Post 18521816)
A388 on EK029/030 now postponed to 1-Jul. Given how many times EK has been postponing the A388 on this flight, I am wondering if it will ever come...
|
Emirates takes fresh run at Berlin slots
FRANKFURT | Wed May 9, 2012 1:27pm EDT
FRANKFURT May 9 (Reuters) - Airline Emirates took a new approach in its long-running battle to secure slots at Berlin and Stuttgart airports, brandishing before the government a study that contradicts claims it takes business from flag carrier Lufthansa. "It's not that Germany's restrictive but it's over 10 years now that we've been asking politely," Andrew Parker, senior vice president public affairs at Emirates, told journalists in Frankfurt on Wednesday. So far, the Gulf-based carrier may only fly to four airports in Germany and its plans to expand have met with fierce opposition from Lufthansa, which claims Emirates benefits from unfair subsidies and is therefore distorting competition on the German market. The study, compiled for Emirates by the non-profit German Aerospace Centre DLR, says that Emirates has created additional demand for travel between Germany and the eastern hemisphere and that if it were allowed to fly into Berlin and Stuttgart on a daily basis, it would create close to 1,000 jobs through aviation-related activities and tourism. The research, which Emirates will present to politicians in Berlin, also says Emirates would compete more with rival Gulf airline Etihad than with Lufthansa were it allowed to fly into and out of Berlin and Stuttgart. Lufthansa has cited competition from Gulf airlines as one of the main reasons why it needs a new 1.5 billion euro ($1.95 billion) savings drive. Some have argued that Emirates could stop operations at two of the airports it serves now in order to fly into Berlin and Stuttgart, the southwestern German city where it hopes to take advantage of cargo and business travel demand from the region's big carmakers like Daimler. The recent move by fellow Gulf carrier Etihad to raise its stake in German No.2 carrier Air Berlin to almost 30 percent also highlights Emirates' lack of access to Berlin. Emirates' Parker said however that the airline would not give up any of its existing destinations in Germany - Frankfurt, Hamburg, Munich and Duesseldorf - nor would it resort to acquisitions to get further access to the market. ($1 = 0.7695 euros) (Reporting by Victoria Bryan; Editing by Hans-Juergen Peters) http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/...8G98BJ20120509 |
|
Originally Posted by blackmamba
(Post 18561805)
Wow, so a couple months ago I said that EK would be smart to just partner up with an airline like Jetblue or Virgin America instead of flying nonstop to all those "domestic" cities. Look what they did. Smart.
My advice to EK - Don't fly to MIA or MCO. Let Jetblue handle that for you. I think the reason in which JBU was signed was so Emirates could say 'Yes we fly to MIA or MCO'. So really it's just a short-term stunt in my opinion by Emirates. After all, it's only a matter of time until we'll see a Emirates service into MIA. I strongly doubt the current B777 fleet size would be able to incur another long-haul sector which would see two aircraft assigned daily. |
Germany Rejects Emirates Landings Request, Handelsblatt Reports
:td::td::td::td:
By Niklas Magnusson - May 15, 2012 3:40 PM GMT+0100 . Germany’s transport ministry has rejected a request by Emirates to increase the number of weekly landings it is permitted to make in Germany, Handelsblatt reported, citing confidential correspondence between the ministry and Emirates. While airlines from the United Arab Emirates, which also include Etihad Airways, are no longer limited to using only the airports in Frankfurt, Munich, Dusseldorf and Hamburg in Germany, they will continue to be limited to 84 landings per week, the newspaper cited the letter as saying, in a preview of an article that will be published tomorrow. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-0...t-reports.html |
Originally Posted by Face81
(Post 18579259)
:td::td::td::td:
By Niklas Magnusson - May 15, 2012 3:40 PM GMT+0100 . Germany’s transport ministry has rejected a request by Emirates to increase the number of weekly landings it is permitted to make in Germany, Handelsblatt reported, citing confidential correspondence between the ministry and Emirates. While airlines from the United Arab Emirates, which also include Etihad Airways, are no longer limited to using only the airports in Frankfurt, Munich, Dusseldorf and Hamburg in Germany, they will continue to be limited to 84 landings per week, the newspaper cited the letter as saying, in a preview of an article that will be published tomorrow. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-0...t-reports.html |
So if I understand the article right,
UAE airlines can now access all airports in Germany but are limited to 84 landing per 7 days. If so I don't see the problem with 84 landings MUC-2x Daily=14 Landings (21 if 3rd Daily is added) FRA-3x Daily=21 Landings DUS-2x Daily=14 Landings HAM-2x Daily= 14 Landings =63 Landings a week (70 if MUC goes 3/7) then BER-Daily=7 Landings (14 if 2 daily) STR- Daily=7 Landings =77 Landings (+7 for either 3/7 MUC or 2/7 BER) Obviously in the future it would hamper thier expansion but for now it looks positive. |
Originally Posted by MucEKPer
(Post 18579426)
So if I understand the article right,
UAE airlines can now access all airports in Germany but are limited to 84 landing per 7 days. If so I don't see the problem with 84 landings MUC-2x Daily=14 Landings (21 if 3rd Daily is added) FRA-3x Daily=21 Landings DUS-2x Daily=14 Landings HAM-2x Daily= 14 Landings =63 Landings a week (70 if MUC goes 3/7) then BER-Daily=7 Landings (14 if 2 daily) STR- Daily=7 Landings =77 Landings (+7 for either 3/7 MUC or 2/7 BER) Obviously in the future it would hamper thier expansion but for now it looks positive. |
Originally Posted by MAH4546
(Post 18537631)
I don't think it's a coincidence that he mentioned Chicago and Florida (aka Miami) by name.
|
Originally Posted by Face81
(Post 18579259)
:td::td::td::td:
By Niklas Magnusson - May 15, 2012 3:40 PM GMT+0100 . Germany’s transport ministry has rejected a request by Emirates to increase the number of weekly landings it is permitted to make in Germany, Handelsblatt reported, citing confidential correspondence between the ministry and Emirates. While airlines from the United Arab Emirates, which also include Etihad Airways, are no longer limited to using only the airports in Frankfurt, Munich, Dusseldorf and Hamburg in Germany, they will continue to be limited to 84 landings per week, the newspaper cited the letter as saying, in a preview of an article that will be published tomorrow. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-0...t-reports.html |
Originally Posted by MucEKPer
(Post 18579426)
UAE airlines can now access all airports in Germany but are limited to 84 landing per 7 days.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 9:20 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.