New route?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Zurich
Programs: Miles and more Senator, Matmid Silver, AAdvantage GLD, Starwood
Posts: 153
New route?
Following up on everyone's concern about this forums inactivity, I thought that maybe we can copy some successful threads from other forums, if they can potentially liven up the forum.
Therefore I suggest a thread I saw in a different forum.
What two destinations would you like to see ELAL flying to?
Therefore I suggest a thread I saw in a different forum.
What two destinations would you like to see ELAL flying to?
#5


Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: 30,000 Feet
Programs: LY Top Platinum, AA Platinum, Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 881
MIA
Makes zero sense to me that there is no service to this significant US gateway which also happens to have an enormous Jewish community (all over South Florida) and a tremendous number of Israelis as well.
Makes zero sense to me that there is no service to this significant US gateway which also happens to have an enormous Jewish community (all over South Florida) and a tremendous number of Israelis as well.
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: May 2005
Location: TLV/LHR
Programs: BA GGL, IHG Diamond Elite Amb, HH Diamond, Avis PC, Hertz PC, Sixt Platinum
Posts: 13,004
MAN - Not that I would gain anything from it but I strongly believe there is a case for them to reinstate the route.
LCA - Always chose LY on my trips there.
LCA - Always chose LY on my trips there.
#7
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, Rapids Reward
Posts: 40,121
I don't think LY will ever reinstating TLV-IST. Because LY has been discontinuation some a long, long time ago. Maybe LY will have reconsidering it.
No doubt about it. I think it will under particular consideration for LY is choosing NRT or HND. This is a logical choice for which the specific routes will start own metal nonstop from TLV-NRT, if necessary.
No doubt about it. I think it will under particular consideration for LY is choosing NRT or HND. This is a logical choice for which the specific routes will start own metal nonstop from TLV-NRT, if necessary.
#9




Join Date: Dec 2008
Programs: DL Diamond; LY Plat; BA Bronze
Posts: 2,462
LY won't start MIA until FAA ranks Israel as cat. I again, which will not happen soon. But shouldn't they start ORD first due to the AA codeshare?
Or maybe if they start MIA they could fly TLV-MIA 1-2 weekly and TLV-MIA-MCO-TLV (or TLV-MCO-MIA-TLV) 1 weekly (so total 2-3 weekly).
Or maybe if they start MIA they could fly TLV-MIA 1-2 weekly and TLV-MIA-MCO-TLV (or TLV-MCO-MIA-TLV) 1 weekly (so total 2-3 weekly).
#10


Join Date: Aug 2008
Programs: A3 *G, BA bronze, LH, UA
Posts: 521
BOS (assuming Israel would become cat I) or SFO (both are good destinations for lots of Israeli travel, and both are big airports with lots of connections).
and...
TPE (just because I want a direct flight there, not because it would make sense from LY's point).
and...
TPE (just because I want a direct flight there, not because it would make sense from LY's point).
#11




Join Date: Dec 2008
Programs: DL Diamond; LY Plat; BA Bronze
Posts: 2,462
I would also like to see LY flying B757s to the US as TLV-DUB/Shannon-US for US immigrations in Ireland (hopefully with newer business class seats).
I would also like them to start PVG (maybe as TLV-PEK-PVG).
Last edited by gordo6; Oct 5, 2010 at 1:52 pm
#12


Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: London uk
Programs: *A Gold, BA Silver, Avis President, Hertz President circle
Posts: 2,812
LY won't start MIA until FAA ranks Israel as cat. I again, which will not happen soon. But shouldn't they start ORD first due to the AA codeshare?
Or maybe if they start MIA they could fly TLV-MIA 1-2 weekly and TLV-MIA-MCO-TLV (or TLV-MCO-MIA-TLV) 1 weekly (so total 2-3 weekly).
Or maybe if they start MIA they could fly TLV-MIA 1-2 weekly and TLV-MIA-MCO-TLV (or TLV-MCO-MIA-TLV) 1 weekly (so total 2-3 weekly).
#13
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, Rapids Reward
Posts: 40,121
I think BSL could be consider. I think those routes will done extremely performance very well. I think LY will have 3 or 4x weekly frequencies. I think it will perfect opportunity for me. There is few 10,000 Jewish populations who lived in BSL areas.
#14




Join Date: Jul 2008
Programs: *A
Posts: 1,393
Tokyo would be nice but is there enough O&D. Israle would have to work on the tourist aspect in conjunction with LY to woo the Japanese into coming. Currently there don't seem to be too many Japanese tourists in E"Y. Can't speak about business travel though.
I think LY are more likely to start a new route where they would have a monopoly.
SYD and SIN both have a similar O&D problem. In addition, anywhere SE involves a big detour. Hence I don't think LY could currently handle SYD anyway.
MIA/ORD have got to be on the tabs next. But the FAA rating doesn't help.
Jet2 do seem to be doing pretty well there. It's proximity to LON must be a factor for LY's decision, but it would still shave off 3 hours each way for any MAN pax.
Can LY make it work to LCA against two CY and one IZ (IIRC) flights?
BSL's not going to happen with ZRH and GVA already strongly served. And YUL is too close to YYZ and NYC. Only possibility is as an add-on like gordo6 suggests.
BOS is to close to NYC. I don't think SFO could work for a similar reason. The alternative connection options are too plentiful from SFO.
TPE 
I know you mean as a continuation from TLV, but do LY have 5th freedom rights in the US of A?
That's a very interesting idea. However, it would be a lot less popular on the return, unless Israel set up pre-clearance in DUB/SNN as well (which I don't see happening).
I could see PVG. It is currently really difficult to get there easily, and the LY/CA (?) option isn't particularly palatable. With good partnership in PVG, they could really give it the potential to work.
One interesting possibility I can thinkof is MEX. Tat would really open up Latin America, the Carribean and various Mexican tourist destinations. But again, LY would need a strong partner there.
I guess we'll just have to wait and see...
I think LY are more likely to start a new route where they would have a monopoly.
SYD and SIN both have a similar O&D problem. In addition, anywhere SE involves a big detour. Hence I don't think LY could currently handle SYD anyway.
Can LY make it work to LCA against two CY and one IZ (IIRC) flights?
BSL's not going to happen with ZRH and GVA already strongly served. And YUL is too close to YYZ and NYC. Only possibility is as an add-on like gordo6 suggests.

I could see PVG. It is currently really difficult to get there easily, and the LY/CA (?) option isn't particularly palatable. With good partnership in PVG, they could really give it the potential to work.
One interesting possibility I can thinkof is MEX. Tat would really open up Latin America, the Carribean and various Mexican tourist destinations. But again, LY would need a strong partner there.
I guess we'll just have to wait and see...
#15


Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: London uk
Programs: *A Gold, BA Silver, Avis President, Hertz President circle
Posts: 2,812
Assuming you are referring to Basel, it dosen't make much sense, as Zurich is less than a hour's drive away.


