![]() |
I believe your explanation, although technically accurate, is not a viable argument.
Let's take your example and use it else where You say that if you get stiffed all night, you make negative money. If a hotel has bookings and they all no show, they will make negative money, paying staff, electric while receiving no revenue... but the hotel has few no-shows and they do make money If an airline has bookings and the pax all don't show, the flight loses money. But only some passengers no show and the flight goes on. If a bank suddenly has everyone with drawl all their money, they wouldn't have enough to operate. But if only a few people withdraw, they still operate and make money. IF ALL YOUR CUSTOMERS LEFT NO TIP, I agree you would lose money for that day. But how many times has that happened. I'd think it's just as the examples above. Some customers leave nothing, no show for hotels and airplanes, withdraw from the bank. But, I'm willing to bet you make umpteen times more than you've ever lost. On the average, I'd say a waiter makes more than most people would believe.
Originally Posted by JayhawkCO
(Post 9077606)
This opinion is very much a cop-out. Those people all get paid a salary. I get paid nothing to work at the restaurant. I haven't gotten a check from the restaurant I work at in my five years of employment. If I get stiffed all night, I walk home with negative money. If I don't tip a UPS driver, he's still making at least $10/hr (guessing). If I don't tip a doctor or dentist, I think they can still afford their green fees.
I didn't create the system. I just try and educate people on the topic. Chris |
minimum wages per state - including service workers
I am posting this because I have not heard a reply from anyone about
what the minimum wages are for a service worker. http://www.dol.gov/esa/programs/whd/...d.htm#Illinois I would think the state law trumps federal law, but I am guessing. |
Very interesting numbers. Thank you, happytravelling.
You know, JayhawkCO, if I were you, I think I would move out of Kansas and find a job in California, Oregon or Washinton. Just out of curiosity, do you folks think we should tip less in states that do not allow tip credits against the minimum wage? |
Originally Posted by JayhawkCO
(Post 9077606)
To define:
Experienced diner = aperitif/cocktail to start, wine with dinner, a couple courses, maybe an after dinner drink |
Portions of the post that previously appeared in this space has been deleted. I would provide you with a reason why, but doing so would likely be against the TOS.
|
While I don't know that I would label such a person a "drunk"belive me when I tell you that I know more about food and restaurant service than 80% (or more)than than the customers JayhawkCO is idolizing for the amount of alcohol they are consuming.
|
Originally Posted by JayhawkCO
(Post 9077606)
This opinion is very much a cop-out. Those people all get paid a salary. I get paid nothing to work at the restaurant. I haven't gotten a check from the restaurant I work at in my five years of employment. If I get stiffed all night, I walk home with negative money. If I don't tip a UPS driver, he's still making at least $10/hr (guessing). If I don't tip a doctor or dentist, I think they can still afford their green fees.
I didn't create the system. I just try and educate people on the topic. Chris The reality is that there aren't many formal qualifications to be waiter. You need to have a decent personality, the ability to multitask, and be willing to work nights. As with most jobs that don't require a lot experience, education, or "up front work", the supply of people willing to do the job outstrips the number of jobs available. The jobs are demanding, so the turnover is high. Being a doctor or dentist requires years of schooling and hard work before you get to pay those greens fees. Being a CEO in most cases requires 4 to 6 years of college (undergrad and graduate degrees), and years of "working your way up" in a company. Anyone can go be a waiter in an Applebees or a Denny's tomorrow. And I imagine that after a few years they could gain enough experience (or contacts) to get a chance at a higher salary by waiting at a more upscale restaurant. The same applies to a UPS or FedEx employee working years in a distribution center sorting boxes before getting the chance at earning that higher salary driving the truck. So, please, accept the fact that you're in a job where the supply of people willing to do the job outstrips the number of jobs available, accept the fact that you don't need to spend years in school to qualify for your job, accept the fact that you're working "on spec" (you can hit a home run one night and get screwed the next). But don't whine about a "flawed system." |
Originally Posted by happytravelling
(Post 9078067)
Then there is the threat implied by one poster saying that they will f** with a customers food if they receive bad tips and the customers return another day. You can understand the reaction of the average person - this is now EXTORTION. |
FWIW - there was a court case last year in New York state about mandatory tipping. A guy was arrested when he refused to pay the mandatory tip added to the bill for his large group. The judge threw it out because tips can't be mandatory.
OTOH - when with a group I like it when they auto-add it. Especially if there's more than one person paying. |
No I don't
Originally Posted by uncguy85
(Post 9080836)
You clearly have no sense of humor about a quote from a funny movie about the serving industry.
|
Originally Posted by Punki
(Post 9078343)
You know, JayhawkCO, if I were you, I think I would move out of Kansas and find a job in California, Oregon or Washinton.
Originally Posted by opus17
(Post 9078710)
Actually, that sounds more like a drunk. I wouldn't want to have people like that driving to and from a restaurant -- they'd be well over the legal limit.
Originally Posted by uncertaintraveler
(Post 9078801)
So whether one is considered an "amateur" or "experienced" diner presumably depends on the amount of money they are willing to spend on a meal?
Originally Posted by bigguyinpasadena
(Post 9078838)
While I don't know that I would label such a person a "drunk"belive me when I tell you that I know more about food and restaurant service than 80% (or more)than than the customers JayhawkCO is idolizing for the amount of alcohol they are consuming.
Originally Posted by skofarrell
(Post 9078930)
So, please, accept the fact that you're in a job where the supply of people willing to do the job outstrips the number of jobs available, accept the fact that you don't need to spend years in school to qualify for your job, accept the fact that you're working "on spec" (you can hit a home run one night and get screwed the next).
But don't whine about a "flawed system." The only thing I'm trying to do in this thread is to educate those that think we're a) getting paid tons of money in addition to tips (we're not, actually none) and b) think that not tipping on some portion of a meal is indifferent to their server (it actually makes him/her lose money). Chris |
You have done your job
Originally Posted by JayhawkCO
(Post 9084274)
The only thing I'm trying to do in this thread is to educate those that think we're a) getting paid tons of money in addition to tips (we're not, actually none) and b) think that not tipping on some portion of a meal is indifferent to their server (it actually makes him/her lose money). Chris
|
Originally Posted by JayhawkCO
(Post 9084274)
If having three drinks makes you a drunk, you should see some of the teetotalers that come in my restaurant. A party of two might have a martini before dinner, share a bottle of wine, and then have a glass of port after dinner. Scandalous, I know. |
Now that you mention Ruth's Chris Steak House, it reminded me that that was the location of the worst food and the worst service that I have ever experienced. I know that folks who don't eat red meat should probably steer clear of steak houses, but I was going there to dine with friends. I paid the same price as those folks who ordered steaks and was given a plate with six disgusting looking blobs of over cooked vegetables. :( :(
We were a large group and a number of folks in our group did not show. We were happy to pitch in and pay for those uneaten meals, but when we asked if we could have those steaks, the wait staff became totally indignant and refused to even consider the possibility that we should be allowed to take that food we paid for. That experience soured me so completely that I have refused to step foot in Ruth's Chris ever since. Now that I think about it, every "famous" expensive steak house in which I have ever eaten, with the exception of the Metropolitan Grill in Seattle (which is fantastic no matter what one orders), has been a huge disappointment. |
"But, if you know as much about the industry as you claim, you would know that tipping 15% before tax is no longer the "industry standard" for good service."
Might I kindly offer a kind word? Bu@@S##t :D The standard has not changed my friend.Things have gotten more expensive-so that 15% might not have the purchasing power that it once did.But food in most places has gone up also-so it is a wash. And again 15% is a standard for standard service.Not my problem if your employer is greedy and makes you pay his labor cost.And you can always increase your tip by giving me great service. "The only thing I'm trying to do in this thread is to educate those that think we're a) getting paid tons of money in addition to tips (we're not, actually none) and b) think that not tipping on some portion of a meal is indifferent to their server (it actually makes him/her lose money)." Some might feel that there is another motive in this-but that might be considered cynical. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 2:04 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.