![]() |
Originally Posted by FlySkyTeam
(Post 20074974)
Let's take a vote and send Delta a message (one way or another)
Poll: Do you support the new MQM qualification change for 2015? http://micropoll.com/t/KE8hqZQdPv Multi-billion dollar corporations don't change course because of a big steaming pile of internet crazy. Actually.....DL has sent some elites a message....and, it is pretty-clear. |
Originally Posted by Ebes1099
(Post 20075101)
This is precisely what I was going to reply with. I've read through the first 50+ pages of this thread and a couple others and the common theme is that many people don't have a choice of who they book for their flights, they have to take the lowest cost carrier. Or potentially, they can take a slightly more expensive flight if it's more convenenient. That being said, they don't have a lot of flexibility to choose carriers. Which leads to my point, if that individual isn't taking the flight, someone else at the company will be. The company still needs to send people to the worksite to get the job done.
(Obviously this doesn't hold true in EVERY occasion, but I think it's more the norm than the exception) |
So the next big question is when the RDM changes will hit. Giving a GM (like me :p) double miles on a 5 cpm TCON T fare is clearly unsustainable. Time to start nailing down those intl J redemptions.
|
Originally Posted by rylan
(Post 20074774)
Thats part of the problem... they've made it overly complicated. Is the website doing to display MQD now when booking along with miles/mqm? Or is that going to be up to the traveler to guess what is included in the fare and what isn't?
The problems appear when mileage runs accumulate large numbers of miles for small amounts of money. In these cases, one is going to have to consider using the AMEX card or switching FFPs. International flying is also going to become an issue, especially with partners. I am not a Delta elite but was considering it as my new secondary FFP. I think that I may have to reconsider now.:eek: |
Originally Posted by CJKatl
(Post 20074792)
That would drive me nuts.
IME, companies have realized the people whose jobs are just to find savings in travel cost more than what they save. Employees aren't wasteful and want to do what's right. Using an honor system and budget responsibility, with occaisional monitoring, seems to work much better. Penny-wise, pound-foolish. Companies like this deserve to fail. |
My only complaint with the program is the varying amounts of tax and fees per ticket (given that these do not qualify for the MQD spend). Frankly, I had never looked at it prior to this announcement, but here are three example airfares I just booked.
Total Price: $159. Tax/Fee Component: 49.90 Total Price: $533. Tax/Fee: $68.50 Total Price: $357. Tax/Fee: 64.06 I bring this up because I think when we are looking at our 2012 dollars spent, it is more challenging than I expected to figure if you would have hit the appropriate threshold. |
Originally Posted by bubbashow
(Post 20075111)
Poll all you want...it is non-scientific.
Multi-billion dollar corporations don't change course because of a big steaming pile of internet crazy. Actually.....DL has sent some elites a message....and, it is pretty-clear. |
I can imagine Dwayne is getting a headache scanning through this...
I have lots of issues with this, but am putting them aside for now. My wife and I, both Diamond Medallions, have been high-level elite flyers on Delta for years. I have not tracked it, but anecdotally I know that some years we might be a bit below the the new $12,500, some years we would be above it. It's really based on our personal and business needs for any particular year. If we thought we'd be below it, we could alter our spend and get above it fairly easily. As we also fly on non-Skyteam airlines, my wife keeps a spreadsheet so that we know we will each comfortably hit the 125,000 level, which also means tracking future planned, if unticketed, travel. However, we just don't have the time or desire to start tracking MQDs, especially since it backs out certain fees (which would be higher on int'l flights). So the $25,000 "safe harbor" Amex spend would work for us/is easy to comply with, as we spend over $50,000 on Amex. And in this case, we would be doing exactly what Delta wants us to do, in that we have a non-Delta Amex card (as we'd rather be able to use the Rewards miles on non-Skyteam carriers), and would need to get a Delta Amex card. However, and I realize that this doesn't impact most on this board as most aren't husband/wife Diamond elites, we currently maintain a single non-Delta Amex account with two cards. As I read this, we would each need $25,000 on completely separate Delta Amex accounts in order to qualify. This gets insanely unwieldy...we would literally have to make a "which card to use" decision for every purchase we make, to ensure that each of us hits the $25,000 separately. We just don't have the time to deal with this. I hope they come up/clarify a better solution on the Amex side of this. |
Originally Posted by youvesaiditall
(Post 20075224)
My only complaint with the program is the varying amounts of tax and fees per ticket (given that these do not qualify for the MQD spend). Frankly, I had never looked at it prior to this announcement, but here are three example airfares I just booked.
Total Price: $159. Tax/Fee Component: 49.90 Total Price: $533. Tax/Fee: $68.50 Total Price: $357. Tax/Fee: 64.06 I bring this up because I think when we are looking at our 2012 dollars spent, it is more challenging than I expected to figure if you would have hit the appropriate threshold. Price per passenger: $694.40 (USD) Taxes/Carrier-imposed Fees: $642.40 (USD) Total for all passengers (1): $1,336.80 (USD) |
Originally Posted by FlySkyTeam
(Post 20075279)
What about those Int'l fares that are half taxes/fees
Price per passenger: $694.40 (USD) Taxes/Carrier-imposed Fees: $642.40 (USD) Total for all passengers (1): $1,336.80 (USD) |
MQM earning rates on Skyteam Carriers!
I am surprised that this thread is almost 100% focused on domestic travel issues. The MQD issue is a minor hassle for me. Yes, I will now have to track this metric and book some flights on Delta.com rather than KLM.com (I do this to get free EC seating with less hassle). Otherwise, I don't care.
However, the cuts on MQM earnings on KE, CI, CZ, MU, and SU devalue the Skyteam alliance enough that I am tempted to switch to Southwest domestically and Oneworld internationally rather than fly Delta. I love flying Delta domestically, but I doubt I will get enough MQMs there to keep my status without help from long-haul international trips on partners. |
Originally Posted by youvesaiditall
(Post 20075224)
My only complaint with the program is the varying amounts of tax and fees per ticket (given that these do not qualify for the MQD spend). Frankly, I had never looked at it prior to this announcement, but here are three example airfares I just booked.
Total Price: $159. Tax/Fee Component: 49.90 Total Price: $533. Tax/Fee: $68.50 Total Price: $357. Tax/Fee: 64.06 I bring this up because I think when we are looking at our 2012 dollars spent, it is more challenging than I expected to figure if you would have hit the appropriate threshold. LOL....... |
Originally Posted by mhop1027
(Post 20075049)
Think of DL as a small business:
Group 1: You have the locals who always come by 2 or 3 times a week, our DL elites who qualify on MQS. Group 2: You have the people that come in and don't mind dropping a $20 and say "keep the change", our high-revs. Group 3: Then you have the couponers, who only visit when it most benefits THEIR wallet and not YOURS. They may come by a fair bit, but they don't come by as much as group 1 and don't spend as much as group 2. So I ask, if you had to reward 1 or 2 of these groups who would it be? See, people on FT, I submit, incorrectly associate themselves with Groups 1 or 2, when they may fall in Group 3. Sometimes you're in group 3 because you don't have the means, and that isn't your fault but it happens to just flat out be the TRUTH. It makes no sense to reward all 3, because then you're rewarding everyone. That's where we are with DL and DL has decided to change that. I probably will still make Plat because of the Delta Plat Amex. However, due to the large tax amounts on TATLs, the MQDs may not be quite as easy as I first thought. MQMs will still be fairly easy. If they send out the offer to purchase 10,000 MQMs for 1000 dollars (also on my Amex) it may be worth it bump up the MQD spend. |
Originally Posted by DelrayChris
(Post 20075178)
...They are also not permitted to expense WiFi or similar services....
Before purchasing monthly access, I did charge GoGo a couple times when I had something that had to be done, and nobody questioned it, but since it is technically not permitted, I just pay it on my own. |
Originally Posted by CJKatl
(Post 20074948)
SM is not a program to reward loyalty. It is a program to maximize revenue for DL.
Originally Posted by CJKatl
(Post 20074792)
Employees aren't wasteful and want to do what's right. Using an honor system and budget responsibility, with occaisional monitoring, seems to work much better.
In any case, defense contractors are penalized when employees do not travel on the lowest available fare. That is federal procurement law. This has taken a huge bite out of airline revenue. I used to travel Y fares all the time. No more. I really don't have a dog in this fight, as my travel is winding down and I will revert to complimentary annual FO on 3/1/2014. I fully believe that the big 3 of Delta, United, and the soon-to-be Frankenline (AA, US, AW) will come to the realization that chasing elites is a zero sum game. Corporate travel will continue to be reduced, and VFR travel will occur as needed and when stimulated with low fares. In today's travel environment, the elite programs aren't achieving any real return on investment other than to keep folks away from startup carriers such as VX. And even then, the legacies might be able to stomp on the startups with low fares as being more cost effective than elite benefits. David |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:07 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.