Community
Wiki Posts
Search

recognizing military

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 2, 2009 | 9:46 pm
  #106  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: OKC
Programs: OnePass, AAdvantage
Posts: 262
methinks if times were different (i.e. if this were during/after say...WWII) a lot of sentiments would be different. i think the conflict we're currently engaged in has soured many.
Pahdz is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2009 | 10:35 pm
  #107  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DFW
Programs: UA Pleb, HH Gold, PWP General Secretary
Posts: 23,199
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 3_0 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/528.18 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile/7A341 Safari/528.16)

But did they get free food or did they bring their own vittal?
colpuck is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2009 | 11:00 pm
  #108  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: NYC
Programs: AA ExecPlat; UA gold; Hyatt L. Globalist; Marriott gold; Hilton gold; FB silver; National EE
Posts: 6,439
Originally Posted by magiciansampras
Amen, brother. An airline flight should be an airline flight, not a Sarah Palin rally.
Well put. +1
Buster CT1K is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2009 | 12:24 am
  #109  
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: MSN/HOU
Programs: DL Silver (0.239 MM), DL SkyClub Life, IHG Plat, Hilton Gold
Posts: 1,107
Originally Posted by magiciansampras
Amen, brother. An airline flight should be an airline flight, not a Sarah Palin rally. ^
Wow, this thread keeps going lower and lower. By the sounds of it, I guess I shouldn't have bothered putting my hand up in the air 6+ years ago to swear an oath to defend the Constitution (that's right kids, not Bush, not Obama, but the Constitution of the United States of America). Yup, clearly would've been better off getting a business degree and chilling on Wall Street like a few others in my HS class.

I stand by my post from earlier today that this small gesture of appreciation was a good move and, ultimately, beneficial to CO's bottom line. Frankly, both sides in here ought to have left politics at the door and debated this move solely on the basis of how it affects a. CO b. the CO customer base, including the joes who got comped.

For that matter, daggone it, it would've been nice for certain participants in this discussion to put themselves in joe's shoes and really consider what this gesture meant to those joes. When I left the ranks to enter the commissioning pipeline, one of my NCOs pointed out that it was a good thing that I had gotten to see how the other half lived. Maybe it'd be useful for those who want to drag in politics, ideals, right/left discourse, whatever, to step back and try to really imagine what it's like to be a joe. I really could care less about one's politics, but believe me, if you want to try to twist all that around into some unfounded beef with joe, that sure as heck fires me up. Alright, off of my soapbox for tonight, hopefully...
uavking is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2009 | 12:50 am
  #110  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,092
Originally Posted by uavking
I stand by my post from earlier today that this small gesture of appreciation was a good move and, ultimately, beneficial to CO's bottom line. Frankly, both sides in here ought to have left politics at the door and debated this move solely on the basis of how it affects a. CO b. the CO customer base, including the joes who got comped.
The fact that there is so much discussion on this issue indicates that perhaps it's not that good of a business decision. Or at least for the positives that it has, there are also unintended negatives.

Frankly, I believe there are additional folks who don't agree with the move, but the'yre afraid to state their opinion out of fear of being labeled "unpatriotic." Perhaps even a silent majority, but the pro-military sentiment in this country is so vocal, that people don't feel comfortable voicing their opinion on this subject.
channa is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2009 | 1:09 am
  #111  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: USA
Programs: UA/CO(1K-PLT), AA(PLT), QR, EK, Marriott(PLT), Hilton(DMND)
Posts: 9,538
Originally Posted by uavking
Wow, this thread keeps going lower and lower.
If you think airing one's opinions make things lower, I'm happy to take my share of the blame for it.

Originally Posted by uavking
By the sounds of it, I guess I shouldn't have bothered putting my hand up in the air 6+ years ago to swear an oath to defend the Constitution (that's right kids, not Bush, not Obama, but the Constitution of the United States of America). Yup, clearly would've been better off getting a business degree and chilling on Wall Street like a few others in my HS class.
Soldiering vs. Wall Street - they both sound about equal to me - you could have gone to Law School to improve your standing though (j/k) .

Originally Posted by uavking
I stand by my post from earlier today that this small gesture of appreciation was a good move and, ultimately, beneficial to CO's bottom line. Frankly, both sides in here ought to have left politics at the door and debated this move solely on the basis of how it affects a. CO b. the CO customer base, including the joes who got comped.
The politics is a natural progression in this particular argument. There are people who fly several times a week who for years have done the rah-rah- support the troops routine, and will do a lot to recognize them, but my feeling is that even they are beginning to get a bit cheesed off with losing out on upgrades, watching others get free drinks, listening to pep talks, etc. It might currently still be a positive for the customer base for airlines to do a little extra for soldiers, but what about four years from now, when the wars will still be going strong and people will have lost their will?

Originally Posted by uavking
For that matter, daggone it, it would've been nice for certain participants in this discussion to put themselves in joe's shoes and really consider what this gesture meant to those joes. When I left the ranks to enter the commissioning pipeline, one of my NCOs pointed out that it was a good thing that I had gotten to see how the other half lived. Maybe it'd be useful for those who want to drag in politics, ideals, right/left discourse, whatever, to step back and try to really imagine what it's like to be a joe. I really could care less about one's politics, but believe me, if you want to try to twist all that around into some unfounded beef with joe, that sure as heck fires me up. Alright, off of my soapbox for tonight, hopefully...
I take a flight from the gate adjacent to the Baghdad Express at DFW most Monday afternoons. I know from speaking with the soldiers, and pulling their leg a little, that some love the attention and perks they get while traveling commercially, and have even begun planning their travel around it (almost like Flyertalkers to be honest). However, I see others who just couldn't care less, and I swear I see rolled eyes at some of the antics at the gate - they seem to like the 5'11" blonde gospel singer that shows up occasionally though.
PhlyingRPh is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2009 | 5:49 am
  #112  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: SAT
Programs: UA Premier Silver
Posts: 3,682
Originally Posted by magiciansampras
Amen, brother. An airline flight should be an airline flight, not a Sarah Palin rally. ^
Originally Posted by PhlyingRPh
I am sick and tired of having to endure all manner of praises for soldiers on board aircraft. It's a plane, not a Republican Party rally.
Since when did supporting the US Military make you a Republican and Governor Palin supporter? If I am a Republican, it is not because I support the US Military, and if I am not a Republican it is not because I do not support the US Military.
OPFlyer is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2009 | 7:01 am
  #113  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Programs: Mileage Plus 1P, Hilton HHonors Gold, Priority Club Gold, Delta member, Continental Member
Posts: 77
I guess Kipling had it right.

I went into a public-'ouse to get a pint o' beer,
The publican 'e up an' sez, "We serve no red-coats here."
The girls be'ind the bar they laughed an' giggled fit to die,
I outs into the street again an' to myself sez I:
O it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "Tommy, go away";
But it's "Thank you, Mister Atkins", when the band begins to play,
The band begins to play, my boys, the band begins to play,
O it's "Thank you, Mister Atkins", when the band begins to play.

I went into a theatre as sober as could be,
They gave a drunk civilian room, but 'adn't none for me;
They sent me to the gallery or round the music-'alls,
But when it comes to fightin', Lord! they'll shove me in the stalls!
For it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "Tommy, wait outside";
But it's "Special train for Atkins" when the trooper's on the tide,
The troopship's on the tide, my boys, the troopship's on the tide,
O it's "Special train for Atkins" when the trooper's on the tide.

Yes, makin' mock o' uniforms that guard you while you sleep
Is cheaper than them uniforms, an' they're starvation cheap;
An' hustlin' drunken soldiers when they're goin' large a bit
Is five times better business than paradin' in full kit.
Then it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "Tommy, 'ow's yer soul?"
But it's "Thin red line of 'eroes" when the drums begin to roll,
The drums begin to roll, my boys, the drums begin to roll,
O it's "Thin red line of 'eroes" when the drums begin to roll.

We aren't no thin red 'eroes, nor we aren't no blackguards too,
But single men in barricks, most remarkable like you;
An' if sometimes our conduck isn't all your fancy paints,
Why, single men in barricks don't grow into plaster saints;
While it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "Tommy, fall be'ind",
But it's "Please to walk in front, sir", when there's trouble in the wind,
There's trouble in the wind, my boys, there's trouble in the wind,
O it's "Please to walk in front, sir", when there's trouble in the wind.

You talk o' better food for us, an' schools, an' fires, an' all:
We'll wait for extry rations if you treat us rational.
Don't mess about the cook-room slops, but prove it to our face
The Widow's Uniform is not the soldier-man's disgrace.
For it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "Chuck him out, the brute!"
But it's "Saviour of 'is country" when the guns begin to shoot;
An' it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' anything you please;
An' Tommy ain't a bloomin' fool -- you bet that Tommy sees!
Tartar21 is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2009 | 7:05 am
  #114  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC (formerly BOS/DCA)
Programs: UA 1K, IC RA
Posts: 60,745
Originally Posted by uavking
Wow, this thread keeps going lower and lower. By the sounds of it, I guess I shouldn't have bothered putting my hand up in the air 6+ years ago to swear an oath to defend the Constitution (that's right kids, not Bush, not Obama, but the Constitution of the United States of America). Yup, clearly would've been better off getting a business degree and chilling on Wall Street like a few others in my HS class.
In these discussions those that have served in the military always take things personally. Why is that? Why is that some people don't share the need to thank the military at every moment of their lives?

I'm just asking if we can keep CO out of the nationalism business. You want nationalism, go to a baseball game or something. Plenty there for sure.

Originally Posted by uavking
I stand by my post from earlier today that this small gesture of appreciation was a good move and, ultimately, beneficial to CO's bottom line. Frankly, both sides in here ought to have left politics at the door and debated this move solely on the basis of how it affects a. CO b. the CO customer base, including the joes who got comped.
We have multiple individuals in this thread explaining how, to them, it is alienating. You are going to have to do a lot more to convince me that this is a good decision than simply repeating "it was a good business decision."

Show, don't tell.

Originally Posted by uavking
For that matter, daggone it, it would've been nice for certain participants in this discussion to put themselves in joe's shoes and really consider what this gesture meant to those joes. When I left the ranks to enter the commissioning pipeline, one of my NCOs pointed out that it was a good thing that I had gotten to see how the other half lived. Maybe it'd be useful for those who want to drag in politics, ideals, right/left discourse, whatever, to step back and try to really imagine what it's like to be a joe. I really could care less about one's politics, but believe me, if you want to try to twist all that around into some unfounded beef with joe, that sure as heck fires me up. Alright, off of my soapbox for tonight, hopefully...
I'll ask again. Should we thank the soldiers from Abu Ghraib on the next CO flight they take?
magiciansampras is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2009 | 7:29 am
  #115  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: A menace to everything in the sky. Yes. Even birds.
Programs: Eh+ Rapid Rolleyes
Posts: 14,522
Originally Posted by magiciansampras
Should we thank the soldiers from Abu Ghraib on the next CO flight they take?
Sure, and while we're at it -- let's stereotype and classify large groups of people based on the actions of a few. I guess all pilots are drunkards, all police officers are bigots, all politicians are adulterers, etc.

Man, why didn't I think of this before -- life is so much easier panting with a very broad brush!!

Sarcasm aside, whether or not you agree with the agenda of the US military, the mental and psychological duress these individuals are subjected to is nothing short of astounding and horrific. I, for one, will go out of my way to help soldiers assimilate back into a normal routine and let them know that their sacrifices did not go unappreciated or un-noticed.
belynch is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2009 | 7:41 am
  #116  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC (formerly BOS/DCA)
Programs: UA 1K, IC RA
Posts: 60,745
Originally Posted by belynch
Sure, and while we're at it -- let's stereotype and classify large groups of people based on the actions of a few. I guess all pilots are drunkards, all police officers are bigots, all politicians are adulterers, etc.

Man, why didn't I think of this before -- life is so much easier panting with a very broad brush!!

Sarcasm aside, whether or not you agree with the agenda of the US military, the mental and psychological duress these individuals are subjected to is nothing short of astounding and horrific. I, for one, will go out of my way to help soldiers assimilate back into a normal routine and let them know that their sacrifices did not go unappreciated or un-noticed.
You're not telling me anything I don't know. Look at Zimbardo's Stanford Prison study from the 70s. The psychological duress under an oppressive structure is well identified and replicated. But I'm not sure it is CO's responsibility to rehabilitate these individuals. Do you think it is?

Like I said earlier, feel free to be these guys/gals a drink at the airport bar on your own dime. I think that would be a nice gesture.
magiciansampras is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2009 | 7:47 am
  #117  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: A menace to everything in the sky. Yes. Even birds.
Programs: Eh+ Rapid Rolleyes
Posts: 14,522
Originally Posted by magiciansampras
But I'm not sure it is CO's responsibility to rehabilitate these individuals. Do you think it is?
I think an empowered agent of the company made a decision. Just like they do every day, on a much less debated scale.

As has been said before, there is no company-wide CO policy that dictates whether or not FA's should do this.
belynch is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2009 | 7:51 am
  #118  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC (formerly BOS/DCA)
Programs: UA 1K, IC RA
Posts: 60,745
Originally Posted by belynch
I think an empowered agent of the company made a decision. Just like they do every day, on a much less debated scale.

As has been said before, there is no company-wide CO policy that dictates whether or not FA's should do this.
Exactly!
magiciansampras is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2009 | 7:55 am
  #119  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: COS
Programs: UA Plat, Hilton Diamond, Hertz 5 Star
Posts: 677
Here are my thoughts on this.

I've never been upgraded as a military member. If I sit in F/C it's because I used an upgrade instrument, or it's a op up.

Regarding the "business decision" as a plus or minus for Continental I've seen nothing but opinions and we all know what they say about those....

For those that wish to thank military members for doing what they thank you. For those that chose not to thats ok too as we've given you the right to free speech, your opinons, and beliefs.
AFJon is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2009 | 7:55 am
  #120  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: A menace to everything in the sky. Yes. Even birds.
Programs: Eh+ Rapid Rolleyes
Posts: 14,522
Originally Posted by magiciansampras
Exactly!
So this thread is over? @:-)

Dear CO forum regulars, I will gladly accept your drink chits (or Dunkin') in thanks and appreciation for stepping into the line of fire and ending this "debate." :-:
belynch is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.