View From The Front - Ask The Pilots Thread
#166
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: CLE
Posts: 9,816
What aircraft, past or present, would you like to fly that you have not?
#167
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: CLE
Posts: 9,816
What aircraft do you NOT like as a passenger?
#168


Join Date: Jun 2007
Programs: CO-plat, SPG-plat
Posts: 1,658
how is it possible to have only one runway for take-off at IAH?
With the weather mess at IAH yesterday evening, the captain announced that winds limited take-offs to one runway. We waited 45-50 minutes in a 2-mile queue for take-off.
IAH has multiple parallel runways, so if planes must takeoff against the wind, shouldn't IAH have at least 2 runways oriented along the same axis?
Would the other parallel runway be restricted to landings, thereby limiting take-offs to 1 runway?
IAH has multiple parallel runways, so if planes must takeoff against the wind, shouldn't IAH have at least 2 runways oriented along the same axis?
Would the other parallel runway be restricted to landings, thereby limiting take-offs to 1 runway?
#169
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: CLT
Programs: UA 1K, SPG Platinum, Penalty Box 2K, PWP Posting Unit 9
Posts: 13,516
I'm not a pilot but I've seen, depending on the wind and other WX factors, 15L used for departures and 26R/L and 27 will be used for arrivals. I've seen it reversed where 8R/L and 9 were used for arrivals and then times were only 26R/L and 27 were used for all operations. Just depends on the wind.
#170
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: SAT
Programs: UA Premier Silver
Posts: 3,682
Who is permitted to ride in the jumpseat (provided Capt. approval of course)?
#172
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: SAT
Programs: UA Premier Silver
Posts: 3,682
So no airline execs?
#173
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Central NJ (Usually EWR but sometimes PHL)
Programs: UA-1K w/2MM & lifetime U-Club; Marriott-Lifetime Titanium; IHG-Diamond; National-Exec. Elite
Posts: 2,553
#174
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,660
It would be fun to take a 777 for a spin, but not at the expense of dealing with 16+ hour flights every time you step on the plane.
Always wanted to strap on an F-16....but never had the chance. I know a lot of Air Force pilots who would like to say they have a carrier landing, and I have 600, so I guess I've managed to do some things that others have not.
Generally the RJs. My tall frame doesn't fit in those seats, and I always get home with a shoulder/neck muscle tension headache. Having said that, it is my primary ride home, and I'll take it anyday over the 14 hour drive, which would be the next option available.
Mostly pilots. Our own commuting to/from work, but also those from other carriers with whom we have a reciprocal jumpseat agreement. Check airmen sit up there while conducting 'line checks' on us. FAA inspectors. Mechanics who are commuting to/from work (somewhat rare, but we have a few). Airline Dispatchers (even more rare, but they are authorized). Flight attendants are not, although at some airlines the pilots are allowed to jumpseat in the flight attendant jumpseat. Northwest allows that with the caveat that F/As have priority over the seat before a commuting pilot. Great policy......a butt in every seat is a good thing if you are a commuter.
DRW
Always wanted to strap on an F-16....but never had the chance. I know a lot of Air Force pilots who would like to say they have a carrier landing, and I have 600, so I guess I've managed to do some things that others have not.
Generally the RJs. My tall frame doesn't fit in those seats, and I always get home with a shoulder/neck muscle tension headache. Having said that, it is my primary ride home, and I'll take it anyday over the 14 hour drive, which would be the next option available.
DRW
#175
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,660
DRW
#176
Suspended
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA. UA 1K, reluctant but * best in class * DL FO/MM. Former BA jumpseat rider and scourge of Dilbertian management and apologists. As LX might - and do - say: "....an experienced frequent flyer of international airlines"
Posts: 3,386
Ah, the JS.... never mind CW or F cabins, these were the best rides I enjoyed on BA... when such things were allowed. This would be utterly impossible now, on CO or other airlines. And as for BA, well, they're useless to FF who don't have clients that pay for F or J.
But that is now, this was then....
My favorite semi-pilot's eye views from the cockpit were:
Landing with a 25-30 kt crosswind component at a northern UK airport in a HS Trident. The yaw angle on final approach at low IAS has to be seen from the cockpit to be believed, although in a Trident, the view wasn't that great compared with other types. These guys work hard and well for their money under such conditions. And that machine could block LHR-ABZ in under an hour, 50% faster than it can be done today by sluggish 735s or 320s doubly impeded by the departure procedures.
Watching from within the stack at LHR in the mid-80s, on a clear day you could see multiple a/c in the track, all turning around you. It really is busy up there!
Ah yes, the 742 over Baffin Island on the way to ANC....watching the shadow of the a/c crossing the ice floes from up at 350. I can attest that the view from the cockpit of the 747 is awesome. And its fuel burn seems low once settled in cruise. Such a great machine in so many ways. Sometimes it doesn't even want to land....floating in the cushion over JFK once, in a light 742, it didn't seem to want to kiss the runway...waiting, watching IAS, rad alt, still nothing happening. I sensed a little crew stress once they had MLG contact, rapid deployment of full reverse and heavy braking. Even so we overshot the departure taxiway and had to execute a tight turn, like the MH734s do at JHB. Not easy turning a 742 in limited space, you can't see anything of the monster once it's on the ground.
Then, of course, there was the politically incorrect dialog among flight crew carried by the intercom which shall not be recalled in any detail. Or at all. It seems unlikely that this is the same now, given the composition of newer flight decks and the omnipresent CVR.
But that is now, this was then....
My favorite semi-pilot's eye views from the cockpit were:
Landing with a 25-30 kt crosswind component at a northern UK airport in a HS Trident. The yaw angle on final approach at low IAS has to be seen from the cockpit to be believed, although in a Trident, the view wasn't that great compared with other types. These guys work hard and well for their money under such conditions. And that machine could block LHR-ABZ in under an hour, 50% faster than it can be done today by sluggish 735s or 320s doubly impeded by the departure procedures.
Watching from within the stack at LHR in the mid-80s, on a clear day you could see multiple a/c in the track, all turning around you. It really is busy up there!
Ah yes, the 742 over Baffin Island on the way to ANC....watching the shadow of the a/c crossing the ice floes from up at 350. I can attest that the view from the cockpit of the 747 is awesome. And its fuel burn seems low once settled in cruise. Such a great machine in so many ways. Sometimes it doesn't even want to land....floating in the cushion over JFK once, in a light 742, it didn't seem to want to kiss the runway...waiting, watching IAS, rad alt, still nothing happening. I sensed a little crew stress once they had MLG contact, rapid deployment of full reverse and heavy braking. Even so we overshot the departure taxiway and had to execute a tight turn, like the MH734s do at JHB. Not easy turning a 742 in limited space, you can't see anything of the monster once it's on the ground.
Then, of course, there was the politically incorrect dialog among flight crew carried by the intercom which shall not be recalled in any detail. Or at all. It seems unlikely that this is the same now, given the composition of newer flight decks and the omnipresent CVR.
#177
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: PDX
Programs: AS Titanium, Marriott Lifetime Plat, UA Gold
Posts: 11,594
The other evening (April 12) at IAH I noticed that they were using 26 L/R for arrivals and 9 for departure. There was obviously enough space for the planes to safely maneuver in and around the pattern, but I was wondering how common it is for them use the IAH runways in such a way?
#178
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: CLE
Posts: 9,816
Another question, how many of the pilot group are former military?
#179
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: CLT
Programs: UA 1K, SPG Platinum, Penalty Box 2K, PWP Posting Unit 9
Posts: 13,516
#180
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,660
The other evening (April 12) at IAH I noticed that they were using 26 L/R for arrivals and 9 for departure. There was obviously enough space for the planes to safely maneuver in and around the pattern, but I was wondering how common it is for them use the IAH runways in such a way?
Of the military here, I think most are Air Force or Air National Guard. Of the Navy guys, most are maritime background (P-3). I can probably count the number of carrier pilots I've met here on one hand.


