Community
Wiki Posts
Search

WOW! Calling really does work sometimes...

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 3, 2002 | 2:23 pm
  #16  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,967
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by duxfan:
Funny how an airline can "go negative" in how it treats cutomers (sticks rather than carrots), but you have to sprinkle some sugar around in order to get a CEO to hear customer feedback.</font>
Agree. However, I think it is dangerous in this situation to just stroke his ego with platitudes. The problem with CO is precisely that it became arrogant with its own success and GB is still on that high.

Look at the thread on revs and non-revs on how some of the employees are feeling and even quitting because of it. Even if a small percentage of employees have such a poor opinion of the CEO (a remarkable change from the previous years), then the CEO needs more than sugar-coating. He needs a wake up call.

I would respect a CEO that came in front of its critical customers and gave his position honestly than one who called an unabashed cheerleader.

Most Emperors in history surrounded themselves with sychophants before their downfall.
venk is offline  
Old Sep 3, 2002 | 2:34 pm
  #17  
Original Poster
Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Promoted to Chairman of the Most Wonderful Continental Airlines Highly Valuable OnePass Program Security and Ideological Purity Bureau
Posts: 4,129
I never said that I liked the HoKeY restrictions, which do put a damper on the frequency of my BF travels. What I am saying is that I appreciate CO's efforts to maximize revenue and stay in business, which benefits me in the long run.

While others may cheerlead UA, US, and AA, the bottom line is that the "cutomer loyalty and goowill" generated by those airlines' lenient policies isn't paying the bills. When UA seeks court protection, I would urge each and every UA FTer to go the BK Court and tell the Judge how wonderful United's policies were...
avek00 is offline  
Old Sep 3, 2002 | 2:48 pm
  #18  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: new york, ny, usa
Posts: 13,536
good for gordo on the callback.

[This message has been edited by fly co to see the yanks (edited 09-03-2002).]
fly co to see the yanks is offline  
Old Sep 3, 2002 | 3:49 pm
  #19  
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: EWR
Posts: 899
I too am surprised that Gordo called you back.

How exactly did you get his voicemail number? Is this out in the public domain??
sgopal2 is offline  
Old Sep 3, 2002 | 4:34 pm
  #20  
50 Countries Visited
5M
100 Nights
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: San Francisco (Marin County), CA
Programs: UA Lifetime 1K, LH Senator, SQ PPS Solitaire, Hyatt Courtesy Card
Posts: 3,031
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by avek00:
What I am saying is that I appreciate CO's efforts to maximize revenue and stay in business, which benefits me in the long run.</font>
I have a huge vested interest in CO remaining healthy: I'm a lifetime infinite platinum member, with a lifetime president's club membership.

And, I have the perspective of being a former shareholder and a former Continental employee.

I strongly disagree with your conclusion that recent changes will make CO more profitable and make them stay around longer. Exactly the opposite. Gordon is running the company into the ground for all the reasons heretofore articulated by many astute FT'ers who regulalry decide whether or not to spend their money on Continental.

P.S. If anyone else would like to leave Gordon voicemail, email me and I'll tell you how. You will need a not-blocked outbound line for caller ID purposes.

thesilb is offline  
Old Sep 3, 2002 | 6:25 pm
  #21  
Original Member
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Las Vegas, NV, USA
Programs: AAdvantage EXP/1mm/Admirals,United Silver+Club (life),Marriott Titanium,Hilton & Accor Gold
Posts: 5,064
Calling really does work? How so? Did calling result in any action other than a return phone call thanking you for thanking him? Weren't you calling Mr. Bethune irresponsible less than a month ago? My how your tune has changed!

------------------
"We will not cut benefits from OnePass, our industry-leading frequent flyer program, because we remain committed to rewarding our most loyal customers."

-- Gordon Bethune (Continental's CEO) two weeks before significantly cutting benefits of the OnePass program
TransWorldOne is offline  
Old Sep 3, 2002 | 6:41 pm
  #22  
Original Poster
Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Promoted to Chairman of the Most Wonderful Continental Airlines Highly Valuable OnePass Program Security and Ideological Purity Bureau
Posts: 4,129
My beef with Gordon has nothing to do with the operational side of Continental Airlines. My grievances deal with his approach to CAL's debt, which has mounted considerably under his leadership, and will ultimately force an "end" to CO by the end of the decade.

That said, Bethune's work at CO has positioned the company well for a merger or acquisition as soon as the economy begins to rebound. I expect and eagerly anticipate a corporate combination with Delta, Northwest, or both at some point down the road.
avek00 is offline  
Old Sep 4, 2002 | 7:23 am
  #23  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 481
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by avek00:
I appreciate CO's efforts to maximize revenue and stay in business, which benefits me in the long run.

While others may cheerlead UA, US, and AA, the bottom line is that the "cutomer loyalty and goowill" generated by those airlines' lenient policies isn't paying the bills.
</font>
Um, excuse me, but the jury is still out on whether CO's recent policy changes will "pay the bills." CO, like most carriers, is still losing a ton of money, and there is the distinct possibility that its chosen strategy for maximizing revenue and staying in business will actually drive customers away and make the airline worse off. Only time will tell.

KGruendel is offline  
Old Sep 4, 2002 | 2:03 pm
  #24  
Original Poster
Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Promoted to Chairman of the Most Wonderful Continental Airlines Highly Valuable OnePass Program Security and Ideological Purity Bureau
Posts: 4,129
As things stand now, Continental is basically breaking even if not generating small operating profits. I agree that time will tell on the new changes, but up to this point, CO's strategies have proven to be among the most successful in the post-9/11 industry environment...
avek00 is offline  
Old Sep 4, 2002 | 2:23 pm
  #25  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: In protest of Flyertalk's uncalledfor censoring of my point of view, I cancelled my InsideFlyer subscription. So long, and thanks for everything.
Posts: 3,325
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">When Continental turned in a staggering $139 million second-quarter loss instead--bringing the carrier's first half losses up to $305 million--Bethune said it wasn't his fault. He would have been profitable had it not been for his stupid competitors, he said.

Now Continental is in serious trouble. It is burning through almost $2 million a day even though it has the lowest labor costs of the Big Six carriers. There is no hope of profit in the foreseeable future and the carrier might lose as much as $750 million this year. Unlike its competitors, Continental has few assets to sell or mortgage to help it weather the next storm. And Continental has lost more than its share of high-yield business travelers, due primarily to its heavy-handed tactics with corporate travel buyers and its infuriating cuts to the OnePass program.
</font>
http://www.zyworld.com/brancatelli/branc082202.htm
NJDavid is offline  
Old Sep 4, 2002 | 2:42 pm
  #26  
Original Poster
Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Promoted to Chairman of the Most Wonderful Continental Airlines Highly Valuable OnePass Program Security and Ideological Purity Bureau
Posts: 4,129
Yes, CO lost a great deal of money in Q2 2002. However, early indications suggest that CO is, at the least, VERY close to (or even past) the operational breakeven point for Q3 2002. That said, debt servicing and one-time charges will likely prevent CO from achieving a "real" profit through at least Q2 2003.

[This message has been edited by avek00 (edited 09-04-2002).]
avek00 is offline  
Old Sep 4, 2002 | 4:04 pm
  #27  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,967
What early indications may I ask?

Need to separate facts from wishful thinking
venk is offline  
Old Sep 4, 2002 | 4:59 pm
  #28  
Original Poster
Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Promoted to Chairman of the Most Wonderful Continental Airlines Highly Valuable OnePass Program Security and Ideological Purity Bureau
Posts: 4,129
For the months of July and August, Continental exceeded its breakeven load factor number. For July, Continental achieved a load factor of 79.4%, 0.4 points above its estimated breakeven load factor of 79.0%. In August, Continental achieved a load factor of 79.1%, 1.1 points above its estimated breakeven load factor of 78%.

September will almost certainly prove to be an operational money-loser, though. The estimated breakeven load factor for that month is a virtually unattainble 87%.

Although the RASM/CASM figures are necessary to give a more precise description of CO's current condition, the LF data suggests that CO more or less did OK this quarter on a purely operational basis.
avek00 is offline  
Old Sep 4, 2002 | 5:13 pm
  #29  
50 Countries Visited
3M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Los Angeles, CA, USA
Programs: AA EXP and Lifetime Gold, UA LifetMarriott Lifetime Platinum, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 1,011
Wow!
I wonder if I call any other airlines' CEOs, how many will actually call me back.

There are often many negative comments at this board about Gordon or CO, I rarely respond to the comments. I understand the frustration and the need to vent.

But a company at CO's size, and at a very difficult time for overall airlines industry, I am very impressed that Gordon actually returned a customer's phone call. It says a lot about Gordon and Continental's culture.

I believe there are many of us, if not most of us, at this board that disagree with many malice remarks but never bother wasting time writing about our thought. Deep down we do appreciate CO and what Gordon brings to CO.

[Edit for misspellings]


[This message has been edited by Bookexp (edited 09-04-2002).]
Bookexp is offline  
Old Sep 7, 2002 | 7:11 am
  #30  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: IAH
Posts: 203
Some people are so easily seduced by a powerful man.

And some, just like to be personally ENHANCED.

Glad you enjoyed it.

The Emperor has no clothes. And is a liar.
Gordon is A Liar is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.