Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Discontinued Programs/Partners > Continental OnePass (Pre-Merger)
Reload this Page >

Politically Incorrect: The "fat" pax policy

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Politically Incorrect: The "fat" pax policy

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 9, 2004, 10:26 pm
  #31  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: EVERYWHERE
Posts: 73
I am so sorry about your ordeal. POS should be made to bye 2 seats if they are going to take up so much space. As for the FA requesting you to put up the armrest, that is terrible. When I have seen Large Passengers raising the armrest, I always request that it is put down before take off. If they are traveling with the others in the row, they can do as they please. But if they are not, too bad, keep your fat in your own space.

When I see passengers squished together because of a large passenger, try to make find 2 empty seats so i can move the larger one out as discreetly as possible. But sometimes it is impossible to do. SORRY.

I once had a FAT family of 3 in 1 row. The mother was demanding that they be moved so they could have more room. Sorry, full flight. Why should others suffer? They had the armrests up. Even the one on the aisle. The Son took up 3/4 of the aisle. We could hardly get the cart past him.
CalFlyGAL is offline  
Old Nov 9, 2004, 11:25 pm
  #32  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SJC
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 3,686
I agree that the OP got a bad deal.

Realistically, I think the only approach is to write a letter and take this from the point of "future policy" because of not having room, safety, etc.

I am not small by any means, and I sympathize...but anyone who can't unbuckle their own seatbelt -- that's just wrong.

Steve
sllevin is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2004, 12:17 am
  #33  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Francisco/Tel Aviv/YYZ
Programs: CO 1K-MM
Posts: 10,762
CO, like all the majors needs to have a sensible, consistent and enforced POS policy, buy 2 or 3 seats, whatever you need, and, if the flight is not full, you get a refund on the extra seat(s).

in any event, people ought to keep in better shape, I work out 3 hours a day so I can eat whatever I want...there's more to life than potato chips.
entropy is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2004, 4:27 am
  #34  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Saipan, MP 96950 USA (Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands = the CNMI)
Programs: UA Silver, Hilton Silver. Life: UA .57 MM, United & Admirals Clubs (spousal), Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,056
Originally Posted by DJ_Iceman
If you get the airline to actually look at their "fat pax" policy and reprimand those FAs, you should take a lot of satisfaction in that.
Actions on personnel matters are not communicated to third parties, at least if the employer has competent legal counsel.
SPN Lifer is online now  
Old Nov 10, 2004, 5:49 am
  #35  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Jersey City, NJ USA
Posts: 975
Originally Posted by LawFlyer
Absolutely! I'm with you, Tosser. See my "update" post I just posted a few minutes ago with questions at the bottom relating to your suggestion. Any ideas for what I should say?
Rather than a thrashing I think you can expect to hear from a very contrite representative. In my view the poster who referred to each passenger as "renting a cube of airspace" has it right. If there is one empty seat on a flight, the airline would not sell tix to two passengers right before takeoff (unless of course they were going to bump someone). The same rule should apply to one passenger who cannot fit into the space of one seat.
Tod E Tosser is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2004, 6:50 am
  #36  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 269
I think this thread has gotten a little out-of-hand. I see the legitimate issue here, but now it seems to be a celebration of idiocy. I suppose even the excerebrose need to have fun, but I'd vote for this thread to be closed.
dthernandez is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2004, 7:05 am
  #37  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,068
Originally Posted by dthernandez
I think this thread has gotten a little out-of-hand. I see the legitimate issue here, but now it seems to be a celebration of idiocy. I suppose even the excerebrose need to have fun, but I'd vote for this thread to be closed.
I disagree. This is a legitimate concern and it affects the comfort and safety during air travel on CO.
channa is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2004, 7:37 am
  #38  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: New York NY USA
Posts: 432
Originally Posted by dthernandez
I suppose even the excerebrose need to have fun...
You just did. Now let's get back to the fat people.
Elite Nomore is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2004, 7:48 am
  #39  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,542
Originally Posted by Elite Nomore
You just did. Now let's get back to the fat people.
climbermom is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2004, 8:04 am
  #40  
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: EWR (Wayne Township, NJ) and PHX
Programs: CO OnePass Plat and SPG - Plat, Marriott Plat (don't use -it's a comp), AmericaWest CP
Posts: 4,810
Excuse Me

Originally Posted by Elite Nomore


Fat people are fat because they eat like pigs and don't exercise. Enough of this "I have a glandular condition" crap. If there are any fat people that are reading this you should put the donut down and go take a walk. It's time we all stopped being so PC to "people of size" and start making them pay for their gluttony and their lack of discipline and self control. They infringe on my personal space, they smell from not being able to properly clean themselves and they put all of us at risk by flying. My mother was over a hundred pounds overweight and now she's dead because her size. She could have cared less about her health and her size and just wanted to eat all the time. She flew all the time and I know for a fact that didn't give a rat's ... about the guy sitting next to her in 17A.

I cannot believe the number of people I see everyday that weigh 300, 400, 500, even 600 pounds. And many of them are young kids. Kids who have been brought up on processed foods and 64oz cokes and "all you can eat buffets". I think CO should institute a fat tax for any passenger that cannot fit under a standard seat belt. Perhaps $100 per inch for every inch of the seat belt extender. Maybe that'll discourage them from "supersizing" their next meal from Micky D's.

EXCUSE ME?!?!

Maybe you should take your insensative and baised attitude and SHOVE IT. I am 20 and a bit over weight (I am 5'9" and like 160ish). I have a thyroid problem (under active) an it causes me to have serious issues trying to loose weight. To further the situation I am diabetic. Let me tell you I eat decently healthy (everyone goes to McD one and a while, esp when you rin a hurry) and I exercise (early morning jogging) 4 times a week. Just to keep where I am. While i may not be 400 pounds, I still am considered over weight (by most standards) and could stand to lose a few pounds... BUT as dearly as I try it's extremely difficult.

Maybe I'm a minor case, but in High School I had a teacher who had a much more bad case of the thyroid issue and he was like 400 pounds.. Nice guy - ate the right proportions of food, ate "healthy" food, and tried to exercise as much as he could. Yet he could only stand to lose a few pound. He tried to do what you seem to think would make him loose weight, IT DIDN"T WORK. I come from a family of lots of doctors and nurses... Some people are just damn lazy but don't sterotype because there are people out there who try and try and try and would kill to loose weight but just CANT.


-Vincent
vincom is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2004, 8:31 am
  #41  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,069
I think we should buy square footage when we buy a ticket.

...I would have CERTAINLY taken a photo.
That's the ONLY way to demonstrate this.
BumpMe! is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2004, 8:35 am
  #42  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Jersey City NJ USA
Programs: CO GOLD
Posts: 131
oversized "baggage"

I had the same situation on a (short) flight. DC to Newark. Two of us were traveling and did not get the upgrade on the way back even being gold. No matter, short flight. Well I am in the aisle, my partner is in the center hopeing no one is coming along to force us into an uncomfortable flight. Well, along comes the sideway walker down the aisle. I never understood that. How do they think that they are going to fit in a seat if they cant walk down the isle facing forward? He jams himself into the window seat. This causes my partner to squeeze into my seat, and me to lean into the aisle.
As we are getting ready to take off the FA comes up the aisle looking and was about to say something to me as she approached, saw the seating arrangements and turned around and walked back up front and sat down. I didnt blame her. The flight felt like a flight to California. Not a get up, get down flight.
We finally land, and as we get to the gate, the heavyset gentleman gets up and starts to push towards the aisle. That was the last straw. We dealt with him taking up 2 seats, breathing on us like he just did a marathon, asking for 2 sodas (not diet) and 3 pretzel bags, and squirming around like he was the one uncomfortable. As he pushed to the aisle, my partner looked square in the face and said" thats is it, You took up my seat got food on me, and now you are pushing me out of the way. SIT DOWN and wait your turn. You will get out after the rest of us and then you walk down the aisle like a crab all you want !!!!" I almost fell over laughing. I am sure we looked like snobs to others, but they didnt live thru and hour of sweat and wheezing with us.
I sympathize having to to do a trans atlantic crossing in that type of arrangement.

Last edited by cadet93; Nov 10, 2004 at 7:14 pm
cadet93 is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2004, 8:37 am
  #43  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Jersey City, NJ USA
Posts: 975
vincom: we're not talking about someone who is 5, 10, or even 60 pounds overweight. And frankly I have no problem with someone who weighs 500 pounds and sits on a couch eating bon bons all day. I don't tell others how to live their lives. What is galling is the attitude of the FAs that the OP was in the wrong for objecting to their treatment of him. We are all responsible for our own lives. There are ramifications to weighing this much and they should not be borne by someone who is not responsible (even if the passenger was one of those rare cases who absolutely cannot lose any weight). CO should be free to charge her for two seats, or let her use two for the price of one. But they shouldn't inflict this abuse on another customer then scold him when he objects. It's political correctness run amock.
Tod E Tosser is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2004, 8:41 am
  #44  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Holmfirth, UK & Colorado Springs, CO
Programs: LH*G, CO Gold, SPG Gold, HH Gold, Marriott Gold, Hertz Gold
Posts: 8
Armrests up?

Just want to confirm something here - the FA was demanding that the armrest be raised? On every single flight I've been on, the FAs always want 'seat backs upright and armrests down' for all T/O and Landings... Suggesting that this is a safety regulation.

From what I've read in this thread, they are now willingly flouting this 'rule' to suit themselves? Surely not...

The solution has to be quite simple - as someone else has already said, if you can't fit in one seat, you need to buy two. Live with it - if you are too big for the seat, then you have no right to free use of another person's space, which they have paid for. It's a simple commercial transaction.
softwaresorcerer is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2004, 9:14 am
  #45  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 17,769
LawFlyer, what did CO say?!?!?
BenjaminNYC is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.