Final Continental Airlines Flights on March 2 and March 3 (CO 6)
#48
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: ATL
Programs: Delta Silver, Hilton Gold
Posts: 966
Just so I understand correctly, will there be any major change between CO flights on March 2 and March 3? There will still be CO routes, operated by sCO planes with sCO crews, and they've already aligned so much, that I don't see how much more the product will change.. (I only eat SPMLs, so even the food isn't a change for me)
Please correct me if I am wrong.
#49
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
Only one FF program, with all the associated rules and quirks and such rather than two.
Only one revenue management system.
Only one inventory management system.
Only one reservations system.
Only one FLIFO system.
Only one website.
Only one ticketing code.
I'm sure there are more.
#50
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: LFT
Programs: AA Plat, lots of AA, AS, DL, UA miles, former top level CO Elite (sigh...)
Posts: 10,795
Glad to see one final salute to good old CO....and perhaps this just may be the last one on FT.
I've been flying on Continental since the late 60's. And I've flown on the following CO mainline equipment over the years (listed alphabetically and in numerical progression):
Airbus: A300
Boeing: 720B, 727-200, 737-300/500/700/800/900, 747-200, 757-200/300, 767-200/400, 777-200
Douglas: DC-9-30, DC-10-10/30
McDonnell Douglas: MD-80
Plus the usual suspects with regard to COEx RJs and COCo turboprops.
All in all, it's been a great experience with many flights in F domestically and BF internationally in addition to flights in F and C back when CO offered three class service on their larger aircraft primarily on international routes.
And I'm very glad I got to experience Continental back when Gordon and his team were turning things around and the airline was on the mend with dramatic improvements across the board. I think this may well have been the best time to fly on CO, at least during my time as an adult (meaning being of legal age in order to enjoy a suitable refreshment or two while on board or in the PC).
So long, Old Friend! You will be missed!
I've been flying on Continental since the late 60's. And I've flown on the following CO mainline equipment over the years (listed alphabetically and in numerical progression):
Airbus: A300
Boeing: 720B, 727-200, 737-300/500/700/800/900, 747-200, 757-200/300, 767-200/400, 777-200
Douglas: DC-9-30, DC-10-10/30
McDonnell Douglas: MD-80
Plus the usual suspects with regard to COEx RJs and COCo turboprops.
All in all, it's been a great experience with many flights in F domestically and BF internationally in addition to flights in F and C back when CO offered three class service on their larger aircraft primarily on international routes.
And I'm very glad I got to experience Continental back when Gordon and his team were turning things around and the airline was on the mend with dramatic improvements across the board. I think this may well have been the best time to fly on CO, at least during my time as an adult (meaning being of legal age in order to enjoy a suitable refreshment or two while on board or in the PC).
So long, Old Friend! You will be missed!
#51
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: ATL
Programs: Delta Silver, Hilton Gold
Posts: 966
I actually would say that making this change is a very major deal. By finally consolidating everything into a single platform they can streamline all sorts of operational things. Strictly from a flight scheduling perspective there isn't much difference, other than that the CO code will no longer appear on schedules. But from an operational perspective many other things are changing.
Only one FF program, with all the associated rules and quirks and such rather than two.
Only one revenue management system.
Only one inventory management system.
Only one reservations system.
Only one FLIFO system.
Only one website.
Only one ticketing code.
I'm sure there are more.
Only one FF program, with all the associated rules and quirks and such rather than two.
Only one revenue management system.
Only one inventory management system.
Only one reservations system.
Only one FLIFO system.
Only one website.
Only one ticketing code.
I'm sure there are more.
Glad to see one final salute to good old CO....and perhaps this just may be the last one on FT.
I've been flying on Continental since the late 60's. And I've flown on the following CO mainline equipment over the years (listed alphabetically and in numerical progression):
Airbus: A300
Boeing: 720B, 727-200, 737-300/500/700/800/900, 747-200, 757-200/300, 767-200/400, 777-200
Douglas: DC-9-30, DC-10-10/30
McDonnell Douglas: MD-80
Plus the usual suspects with regard to COEx RJs and COCo turboprops.
All in all, it's been a great experience with many flights in F domestically and BF internationally in addition to flights in F and C back when CO offered three class service on their larger aircraft primarily on international routes.
And I'm very glad I got to experience Continental back when Gordon and his team were turning things around and the airline was on the mend with dramatic improvements across the board. I think this may well have been the best time to fly on CO, at least during my time as an adult (meaning being of legal age in order to enjoy a suitable refreshment or two while on board or in the PC).
So long, Old Friend! You will be missed!
I've been flying on Continental since the late 60's. And I've flown on the following CO mainline equipment over the years (listed alphabetically and in numerical progression):
Airbus: A300
Boeing: 720B, 727-200, 737-300/500/700/800/900, 747-200, 757-200/300, 767-200/400, 777-200
Douglas: DC-9-30, DC-10-10/30
McDonnell Douglas: MD-80
Plus the usual suspects with regard to COEx RJs and COCo turboprops.
All in all, it's been a great experience with many flights in F domestically and BF internationally in addition to flights in F and C back when CO offered three class service on their larger aircraft primarily on international routes.
And I'm very glad I got to experience Continental back when Gordon and his team were turning things around and the airline was on the mend with dramatic improvements across the board. I think this may well have been the best time to fly on CO, at least during my time as an adult (meaning being of legal age in order to enjoy a suitable refreshment or two while on board or in the PC).
So long, Old Friend! You will be missed!
#52
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,068
This is going to be challenging for them with IRROPS at the hubs. While the legacy UA hubs will have legacy CO-operated flights out of them, these flights won't have the same degree of scheduling or service recovery flexibility if there's no FA base.
I wonder if there will be any reliability impact to scheduling this way.
#53
Join Date: May 2001
Location: TPA 50%/BKK 30%/HKG 20%
Programs: UA 1K MM - AF G – TK G – AZ Ex – Hilton D – Marriott G – IHG P
Posts: 1,990
Just to clarify: My CO79 flight on the 7th will be UA79 FOR SURE?
Have they already rooted out all of the duplicate flight numbers?
Have they already rooted out all of the duplicate flight numbers?
#54
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: ATL
Programs: Delta Silver, Hilton Gold
Posts: 966
#55
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: HaMerkaz/Exit 145
Programs: UA, LY, BA, AA
Posts: 13,167
I actually would say that making this change is a very major deal. By finally consolidating everything into a single platform they can streamline all sorts of operational things. Strictly from a flight scheduling perspective there isn't much difference, other than that the CO code will no longer appear on schedules. But from an operational perspective many other things are changing.
Only one FF program, with all the associated rules and quirks and such rather than two.
Only one revenue management system.
Only one inventory management system.
Only one reservations system.
Only one FLIFO system.
Only one website.
Only one ticketing code.
I'm sure there are more.
Only one FF program, with all the associated rules and quirks and such rather than two.
Only one revenue management system.
Only one inventory management system.
Only one reservations system.
Only one FLIFO system.
Only one website.
Only one ticketing code.
I'm sure there are more.
So I'm just curious if the customer will see major changes beginning March 3, or if the flights will seem like legacy CO flights, just with the UA code (and new UA livery).
#56
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: ATL
Programs: Delta Silver, Hilton Gold
Posts: 966
I actually would say that making this change is a very major deal. By finally consolidating everything into a single platform they can streamline all sorts of operational things. Strictly from a flight scheduling perspective there isn't much difference, other than that the CO code will no longer appear on schedules. But from an operational perspective many other things are changing.
Only one FF program, with all the associated rules and quirks and such rather than two.
Only one revenue management system.
Only one inventory management system.
Only one reservations system.
Only one FLIFO system.
Only one website.
Only one ticketing code.
I'm sure there are more.
Only one FF program, with all the associated rules and quirks and such rather than two.
Only one revenue management system.
Only one inventory management system.
Only one reservations system.
Only one FLIFO system.
Only one website.
Only one ticketing code.
I'm sure there are more.
So I'm just curious if the customer will see major changes beginning March 3, or if the flights will seem like legacy CO flights, just with the UA code (and new UA livery).
#57
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: HaMerkaz/Exit 145
Programs: UA, LY, BA, AA
Posts: 13,167
Will the on-board product (soft, obviously) change at all, beginning March 3?
#58
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: ATL
Programs: Delta Silver, Hilton Gold
Posts: 966
Not really...they have combined those such as food drinks etc. It is a bit different still with Ua have some 3 class aircraft, but from my understanding the onboard product is pretty much the same. However, Ua has renamed the classes such as United First, United BusinessFirst and United Global First
#59
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: HaMerkaz/Exit 145
Programs: UA, LY, BA, AA
Posts: 13,167
Not really...they have combined those such as food drinks etc. It is a bit different still with Ua have some 3 class aircraft, but from my understanding the onboard product is pretty much the same. However, Ua has renamed the classes such as United First, United BusinessFirst and United Global First
Does the rebranding of Global First coincide with an increase and service, and same with United Business being rebranded as BusinessFirst?
#60
Join Date: May 2001
Location: TPA 50%/BKK 30%/HKG 20%
Programs: UA 1K MM - AF G – TK G – AZ Ex – Hilton D – Marriott G – IHG P
Posts: 1,990
I understand, but many of these don't impact the customer. Unless the customer is a FF, one FFP doesn't impact a lot, especially when we're talking specifically about the flight. One revenue management means nothing to the customer. The fact that the code will no longer include CO means less to the average flyer than the fact the plane no longer says "Continental."
So I'm just curious if the customer will see major changes beginning March 3, or if the flights will seem like legacy CO flights, just with the UA code (and new UA livery).
So I'm just curious if the customer will see major changes beginning March 3, or if the flights will seem like legacy CO flights, just with the UA code (and new UA livery).