Organizing a Response
#1
Original Poster
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 47,229
Organizing a Response
I know we have another thread that discusses who is leaving or staying and we have a few threads discussing the various product issues that are devaluing our Elite experience, but I'd like to propose organizing a grass-roots movement of loyal, Elite customers who plan on staying and who are willing to push back against some of these product changes.
It's becoming quite obvious that the "new changes....and you'll like them" portion of the security video was not directed at frequent fliers - so far, there is very little for us to like.
Yes, 2011 will bring us regional upgrades and additional system-wide upgrades and we appreciate those enhancements. However, we're seeing a consistent erosion of core hard product benefits as well as a very poorly implemented buy-up program. There are likely additional product changes yet to come which might continue the unbundling of even more Elite benefits to be sold off, further diluting the value of our program.
I believe our first call to action is against the selling of ELR seats before OLCI. Firstly, I don't see how this program produces any legitimate incremental revenue over the previous version where these seats were opened for sale during OLCI - certainly nothing that would offset the impact to Elite customers who are finding access to the best ELR seats harder to come by, especially when booking close to departure (which, ironically, means higher paid fares are getting the worse seats).
US had the Cockroach movement, while Delta loyalists challenged and reversed many of their changes through SaveSkyMiles. Both movements were successful and resulted in a better airline and product for loyal customers.
I don't have a name or branding yet - but at this point, I'm looking to find out how many folks are interested in joining such a movement. With Larry gone and Cigarman no longer active in our forum (and he is missed), we need to self-organize with the goal of educating non-FT Elites, expanding the movement and pushing for change. The big DOs are gone, and the new leadership is rather cold to interacting with us.
As I wrote in another thread, I'm not against CO finding ways to generate incremental revenue. I've even made suggestions on where such revenue can be generated. The issue is the dilution or loss of important Elite product benefits when CO unbundles and sells these benefits to non-Elite customers on a fee-based basis. We need to find some middle ground - help CO find the right mix/timing of these ancillary services while preserving complimentary access to these services for the company's best customers.
It's becoming quite obvious that the "new changes....and you'll like them" portion of the security video was not directed at frequent fliers - so far, there is very little for us to like.
Yes, 2011 will bring us regional upgrades and additional system-wide upgrades and we appreciate those enhancements. However, we're seeing a consistent erosion of core hard product benefits as well as a very poorly implemented buy-up program. There are likely additional product changes yet to come which might continue the unbundling of even more Elite benefits to be sold off, further diluting the value of our program.
I believe our first call to action is against the selling of ELR seats before OLCI. Firstly, I don't see how this program produces any legitimate incremental revenue over the previous version where these seats were opened for sale during OLCI - certainly nothing that would offset the impact to Elite customers who are finding access to the best ELR seats harder to come by, especially when booking close to departure (which, ironically, means higher paid fares are getting the worse seats).
US had the Cockroach movement, while Delta loyalists challenged and reversed many of their changes through SaveSkyMiles. Both movements were successful and resulted in a better airline and product for loyal customers.
I don't have a name or branding yet - but at this point, I'm looking to find out how many folks are interested in joining such a movement. With Larry gone and Cigarman no longer active in our forum (and he is missed), we need to self-organize with the goal of educating non-FT Elites, expanding the movement and pushing for change. The big DOs are gone, and the new leadership is rather cold to interacting with us.
As I wrote in another thread, I'm not against CO finding ways to generate incremental revenue. I've even made suggestions on where such revenue can be generated. The issue is the dilution or loss of important Elite product benefits when CO unbundles and sells these benefits to non-Elite customers on a fee-based basis. We need to find some middle ground - help CO find the right mix/timing of these ancillary services while preserving complimentary access to these services for the company's best customers.
#2
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
Do you really believe that FFOCUS resulted in a better US for its customers? I very much respect the work that Art234 and others put into that effort but I believe that the ultimate end result from US was a product that mostly marginalized those customers further and ultimately saw many leave the US program.
Either way, good luck.
Either way, good luck.
#3



Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NYC, LON
Programs: *
Posts: 3,174
I know we have another thread that discusses who is leaving or staying and we have a few threads discussing the various product issues that are devaluing our Elite experience, but I'd like to propose organizing a grass-roots movement of loyal, Elite customers who plan on staying and who are willing to push back against some of these product changes.
It's becoming quite obvious that the "new changes....and you'll like them" portion of the security video was not directed at frequent fliers - so far, there is very little for us to like.
Yes, 2011 will bring us regional upgrades and additional system-wide upgrades and we appreciate those enhancements. However, we're seeing a consistent erosion of core hard product benefits as well as a very poorly implemented buy-up program. There are likely additional product changes yet to come which might continue the unbundling of even more Elite benefits to be sold off, further diluting the value of our program.
I believe our first call to action is against the selling of ELR seats before OLCI. Firstly, I don't see how this program produces any legitimate incremental revenue over the previous version where these seats were opened for sale during OLCI - certainly nothing that would offset the impact to Elite customers who are finding access to the best ELR seats harder to come by, especially when booking close to departure (which, ironically, means higher paid fares are getting the worse seats).
US had the Cockroach movement, while Delta loyalists challenged and reversed many of their changes through SaveSkyMiles. Both movements were successful and resulted in a better airline and product for loyal customers.
I don't have a name or branding yet - but at this point, I'm looking to find out how many folks are interested in joining such a movement. With Larry gone and Cigarman no longer active in our forum (and he is missed), we need to self-organize with the goal of educating non-FT Elites, expanding the movement and pushing for change. The big DOs are gone, and the new leadership is rather cold to interacting with us.
As I wrote in another thread, I'm not against CO finding ways to generate incremental revenue. I've even made suggestions on where such revenue can be generated. The issue is the dilution or loss of important Elite product benefits when CO unbundles and sells these benefits to non-Elite customers on a fee-based basis. We need to find some middle ground - help CO find the right mix/timing of these ancillary services while preserving complimentary access to these services for the company's best customers.
It's becoming quite obvious that the "new changes....and you'll like them" portion of the security video was not directed at frequent fliers - so far, there is very little for us to like.
Yes, 2011 will bring us regional upgrades and additional system-wide upgrades and we appreciate those enhancements. However, we're seeing a consistent erosion of core hard product benefits as well as a very poorly implemented buy-up program. There are likely additional product changes yet to come which might continue the unbundling of even more Elite benefits to be sold off, further diluting the value of our program.
I believe our first call to action is against the selling of ELR seats before OLCI. Firstly, I don't see how this program produces any legitimate incremental revenue over the previous version where these seats were opened for sale during OLCI - certainly nothing that would offset the impact to Elite customers who are finding access to the best ELR seats harder to come by, especially when booking close to departure (which, ironically, means higher paid fares are getting the worse seats).
US had the Cockroach movement, while Delta loyalists challenged and reversed many of their changes through SaveSkyMiles. Both movements were successful and resulted in a better airline and product for loyal customers.
I don't have a name or branding yet - but at this point, I'm looking to find out how many folks are interested in joining such a movement. With Larry gone and Cigarman no longer active in our forum (and he is missed), we need to self-organize with the goal of educating non-FT Elites, expanding the movement and pushing for change. The big DOs are gone, and the new leadership is rather cold to interacting with us.
As I wrote in another thread, I'm not against CO finding ways to generate incremental revenue. I've even made suggestions on where such revenue can be generated. The issue is the dilution or loss of important Elite product benefits when CO unbundles and sells these benefits to non-Elite customers on a fee-based basis. We need to find some middle ground - help CO find the right mix/timing of these ancillary services while preserving complimentary access to these services for the company's best customers.
#4
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SEA
Programs: AA Executive PLatinum CO Platinum DL Gold Hyatt Diamond Hilton no more :)
Posts: 1,958
happy about cr-1s eh? CO took them from UA 1ks pockets, they didnt create them, they stole them from other members
#5
Original Poster
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 47,229
I'm not sure we'll get the same passion here as DL or US, but it's worth a try. Other posters might be right - especially if, as I suspect, E+ is removed or reduced, the UA people will go ballistic.
#6
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Btwn EWR and PHL
Programs: UA 1K; Marriott Gold
Posts: 241
You have my support on this. I'll be here to do my part.
I know a thing or two about branding (so my clients tell me) so will think about that part and ideas for it.
I know a thing or two about branding (so my clients tell me) so will think about that part and ideas for it.
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: CLT
Programs: UA 1K, SPG Platinum, Penalty Box 2K, PWP Posting Unit 9
Posts: 13,516

Vote with your wallet. Anything else is
.
#8
Join Date: Nov 2008
Programs: CO PLAT
Posts: 243
Do you really believe that FFOCUS resulted in a better US for its customers? I very much respect the work that Art234 and others put into that effort but I believe that the ultimate end result from US was a product that mostly marginalized those customers further and ultimately saw many leave the US program.
Either way, good luck.
Either way, good luck.

@OP,
I would be for a grass roots effort. Why not? Is there a downside? I don't share the above opinion that it had negative effects at US. Are we really to believe Smisek the Long Shanks will step off his thrown and come take care of us upstarts once and for all William Wallace style? pfft!
I have already made the decision to leave CO...My first two TPAC trips have been booked with other airlines for the first time in 3yrs. Will take me a while to earn status. Until then I would view at least SOME effort by CO to quit insulting its elites as a positive thing.
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LGA/JFK/EWR
Programs: UA 1K2MM, Hyatt Globalist, abandoned Marriott LTT (RIP SPG), Hertz PC
Posts: 21,318
Count me in.
What I liked about UA the past few years is that they found ways to make hundreds of millions of $ in incremental revenue without impacting elites (as we discussed in another thread - Premier Line/Baggage/Seating, BOB, E+, etc.). Combined with smart capacity restraints and a great new hard int'l C/F product, carrier was doing great.
But the new UA (really currently the CO side) is experimenting on things that are/will have direct impact on elites (TOD upgrades in all their various forms, selling ELR, various F service cuts e.g., pillows, new RU earning rules, etc.). We'll feel those new "enhancements" (if we aren't already), and who knows what will come next...
What I liked about UA the past few years is that they found ways to make hundreds of millions of $ in incremental revenue without impacting elites (as we discussed in another thread - Premier Line/Baggage/Seating, BOB, E+, etc.). Combined with smart capacity restraints and a great new hard int'l C/F product, carrier was doing great.
But the new UA (really currently the CO side) is experimenting on things that are/will have direct impact on elites (TOD upgrades in all their various forms, selling ELR, various F service cuts e.g., pillows, new RU earning rules, etc.). We'll feel those new "enhancements" (if we aren't already), and who knows what will come next...
#10




Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: 42mi from AMS
Programs: UA 1K 1MM, Marriott LT Au, Hilton C, IHG PtA
Posts: 577
Originally Posted by sbm12
Do you really believe that FFOCUS resulted in a better US for its customers?
Originally Posted by sbm12
I very much respect the work that Art234 and others put into that effort but I believe that the ultimate end result from US was a product that mostly marginalized those customers further and ultimately saw many leave the US program.
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Pacific Northwest
Programs: UA Gold 1MM, AS Plat, AA EP, Bonvoy Plat, Hilton Dia, Hyatt Glob, IHG Plat, ...
Posts: 21,541
I am merely a GM of the CO part of the combined UnitedContinentals Holdings company, but it should hopefully be pretty clear to any UA elite that any changes and experiments the CO program makes have a great potential of sticking around for good with the merged program. In other words, we UA flyers need to stand united with our new CO friends. You have my support.
#12
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Frozen in Carbonite
Programs: UA Aluminum 0.6MM, Bonvoy Life Sentence, Hyatt Eliteist, AA Super Plutonium
Posts: 2,878
I'm on the bus
#13


Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Programs: MYOB
Posts: 1,456
Just curiuos
Will there be BUTTONS?
#14
Original Poster
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 47,229
#15


Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: CO Gold
Posts: 406
Count me in. I've been drinking the COolaid for 15+ years, have consistently maintained status, and have organized CO as our company's sole carrier. Now I'm not even considering a MR to requalify this year. Saying that, my gut says that even after loyal customers with average annual purchases > $10k sign on to tell CO/UA they're screwing up, CO/US doesn't care. Something else is driving the corporation that is more important. Just my $0.02.

