![]() |
Originally Posted by moondog
(Post 35184441)
My understanding (as of several months ago) is that they want parity based on the number of frequencies each side is actually using going forward (I.e fresh start)...as opposed to returning to the caps that were in place during 2019.
If the US side is worried about Chinese carriers flooding the market, they should just try to negotiate for a lower cap under the current framework. |
Originally Posted by boat stuck
(Post 35184499)
That seems like a difficult framework to use. So if US airlines ramp up to 21x a week, Chinese carriers are given permission to match, but then say AA leaves the market and US airlines go back down to 14x, Chinese carriers have to cut? I doubt China is ever going to agree for their airlines' frequencies to be at the mercy of US airlines' route planning.
If the US side is worried about Chinese carriers flooding the market, they should just try to negotiate for a lower cap under the current framework. Carriers were allowed to remove or modify routes without too much hassel, and if a US carrier pulled out of a given route, there was no impact on China carriers' existing slots. Furthermore, the DOT was permitted to reassign the US carrier's forfeited slots to another US carrier, based on its own procedures. In any event, if we were to return to 2020 limits now, neither side would come close to maxing out in the short term, but the Chinese would presumably ramp up faster. |
If I recall correctly the system categorized cities into different tiers. Tier 1 (Shanghai, Beijing?) had a hard cap, and for the lower tiers it was pretty easy for airlines to add flights.
|
Originally Posted by YariGuy
(Post 35185486)
If I recall correctly the system categorized cities into different tiers. Tier 1 (Shanghai, Beijing?) had a hard cap, and for the lower tiers it was pretty easy for airlines to add flights.
|
https://www.aeroroutes.com/eng/230424-cnns23
Why can't Chinese airlines increase flights to Canada? |
Originally Posted by Philipp Morgenstern
(Post 35196876)
https://www.aeroroutes.com/eng/230424-cnns23
Why can't Chinese airlines increase flights to Canada? |
If this stalemate keeps on going maybe a Chinese airline should just fly to Tijuana to grab the demand from California.
|
Originally Posted by Philipp Morgenstern
(Post 35196920)
If this stalemate keeps on going maybe a Chinese airline should just fly to Tijuana to grab the demand from California.
😮 |
Originally Posted by narvik
(Post 35197091)
Silly, but I would actually consider it!
😮 |
Originally Posted by Philipp Morgenstern
(Post 35197143)
But does it say where in China they're trying for? |
Originally Posted by narvik
(Post 35197206)
Nice, and my favorite Chinese airline too, HU.
But does it say where in China they're trying for? |
Originally Posted by narvik
(Post 35197206)
Nice, and my favorite Chinese airline too, HU.
But does it say where in China they're trying for? |
Originally Posted by Philipp Morgenstern
(Post 35197225)
Shanghai.
Originally Posted by moondog
(Post 35197371)
....HU from PVG to TIJ.....
That's out for me then. I'm done with flying into PVG. |
Originally Posted by narvik
(Post 35198954)
Okay, thanks for the info.
That's out for me then. I'm done with flying into PVG. |
Originally Posted by travelinmanS
(Post 35199092)
What’s wrong with PVG? I find it much better than PEK.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:04 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.