Ask a SPOTnik
#31




Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 8,957
If it is a requirement to report, then it calls more into question the validity of the administrative search. It is for this reason that TSO's are not given any instruction in the identification of drugs.
#33
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: CLT
Programs: Choice Hotels/FFOCUS
Posts: 7,259
Welcome
spotnik:
First off welcome to FT . It's great that you are willing to answer the questions. While I don't fly as much as most of the people who post on here, I am around TSA 5 days a week at work. And I'll grant you there are "a few" good ones & I will talk to a couple of them but for the most part I have zero respect for them as I see them "in action" each working day. IMO the bdos at my airport don't have a clue(they are brainwashed) as I've talked to a couple of them.
First off welcome to FT . It's great that you are willing to answer the questions. While I don't fly as much as most of the people who post on here, I am around TSA 5 days a week at work. And I'll grant you there are "a few" good ones & I will talk to a couple of them but for the most part I have zero respect for them as I see them "in action" each working day. IMO the bdos at my airport don't have a clue(they are brainwashed) as I've talked to a couple of them.
#35
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: HSV
Posts: 876
Originally Posted by studentff
It seems you're saying it's a requirement (i.e., part of the SOP) that you report someone carrying a large amount of cash to "someone else" (be it within TSA or a LEO). Not an option or up to screener judgment, but a requirement. Correct?
Originally Posted by tsadude1
It's a requirement for us to report it and a requirement for someone else to investigate.
Again, carrying 10K+ in cash domestically isn't illegal. I wouldn't call it wise necessarily, but there's nothing illegal about it.
Originally Posted by ND Sol
If it is a requirement to report, then it calls more into question the validity of the administrative search.
#36
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Programs: Many
Posts: 2,496
I can confirm that. It's happened twice at Huntsville, one of them where I personally found it (dude had, like, $14,000 in just, like, wads of $100s in his pockets) during a pat-down. I reported it to the Supervisor, Supervisor called Customs. Customs got there, asked him a few questions, and let him go after determining that he wasn't traveling overseas (which was, for some reason, something we were very specifically not allowed to inquire about ourselves; probably has something to do with legal liability and law enforcement procedures). The whole shebang took about ten minutes, IIRC, with nine of it being Customs' travel time.
Again, carrying 10K+ in cash domestically isn't illegal. I wouldn't call it wise necessarily, but there's nothing illegal about it.
Our training coordinator here at Huntsville put it very eloquently, I think, when it comes to the cash thing and reporting any drugs/drug paraphernalia found during the searches: "If you're driving down the road and you happen to see a car under a bridge, you stop and see if they need help. You're not driving down the road looking for cars under bridges, though."
Again, carrying 10K+ in cash domestically isn't illegal. I wouldn't call it wise necessarily, but there's nothing illegal about it.
Our training coordinator here at Huntsville put it very eloquently, I think, when it comes to the cash thing and reporting any drugs/drug paraphernalia found during the searches: "If you're driving down the road and you happen to see a car under a bridge, you stop and see if they need help. You're not driving down the road looking for cars under bridges, though."
What is it exactly that you are reporting to the supervisor, and what is the basis for it?
There is no reason to detain a traveller on the basis of his legal carrying of cash, no different than him carrying a camera, a hat, his shoes, jacket or anything else.
Am I missing something?
#37
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 239
On multiple IDs and "excessive cash"
mkt,
I promised you a response on these issues, and I think I can talk about it a bit without running afoul of the SSI goons.
The TSA PR statements emphasize that we check ID materials because we need to know that you are who you say you are. Multiple IDs, therefore, should not be an issue unless they would open a question as to whether you misrepresented your identity.
The "excessive cash" business requires us to call a LEO if we observe an amount of cash which appears to be over $10,000 USD. Frankly, I have as much TSA training on recognizing $10,000 cash as I have from TSA in recognizing illegal drugs.
TSA does not seem to provide much quality information on these issues, and most of what I have found has been discussed many times on this forum. I will, however, post the links again if any of you wish for them.
I promised you a response on these issues, and I think I can talk about it a bit without running afoul of the SSI goons.
The TSA PR statements emphasize that we check ID materials because we need to know that you are who you say you are. Multiple IDs, therefore, should not be an issue unless they would open a question as to whether you misrepresented your identity.
The "excessive cash" business requires us to call a LEO if we observe an amount of cash which appears to be over $10,000 USD. Frankly, I have as much TSA training on recognizing $10,000 cash as I have from TSA in recognizing illegal drugs.
TSA does not seem to provide much quality information on these issues, and most of what I have found has been discussed many times on this forum. I will, however, post the links again if any of you wish for them.
#38
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 47,171
If it's not in your SOP, I will ask our legislators to question Kippy during his next appearance why his staff seem so interested in reporting cash when they seem so unable to find guns, knives and bomb parts.
#39




Join Date: May 2005
Location: MIA/SJU/MCO
Programs: AA LT PLT; DL GLD, UA nothing, B6 Mosaic; Emerald Club Executive
Posts: 3,333
Well, my multiple ID's all have the same details, albeit with varying addresses. I've been using my passport as my primary ID, with it paperclipped so it only opens to my photo & information, and my TWIC as backup.
#40
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 239
why were our BDOs gone for seven days, then came back for their three days of OJT? And this might be more like a no-brainer than anything, but I'll assume you know a definitive answer -- can/does/how often do the airport's local FSD assign additional training to the BDOs not required by the baseline?
The 10-12 hours part fits what I was told, but our BDOs are going to be going for some kind of special training with the FBI to the tune of 100+ hours. Is that nationwide with the program, or just something our own FSD wants done, and approved the funding for?
The 10-12 hours part fits what I was told, but our BDOs are going to be going for some kind of special training with the FBI to the tune of 100+ hours. Is that nationwide with the program, or just something our own FSD wants done, and approved the funding for?
BDOs have nationally mandated recurrent training, just like TSOs. It is just a different set of courses to reflect the different job duties. Locally, we can be assigned additional training, although this content varies according to the FSD and management priorities. We are strongly encouraged to seek additional training and education opportunities. Currently, I am reading an excellent sociological study of suicide terrorist campaigns.
#41




Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 8,957
I can confirm that. It's happened twice at Huntsville, one of them where I personally found it (dude had, like, $14,000 in just, like, wads of $100s in his pockets) during a pat-down. I reported it to the Supervisor, Supervisor called Customs. Customs got there, asked him a few questions, and let him go after determining that he wasn't traveling overseas (which was, for some reason, something we were very specifically not allowed to inquire about ourselves; probably has something to do with legal liability and law enforcement procedures). The whole shebang took about ten minutes, IIRC, with nine of it being Customs' travel time.
Again, carrying 10K+ in cash domestically isn't illegal. I wouldn't call it wise necessarily, but there's nothing illegal about it.
Again, carrying 10K+ in cash domestically isn't illegal. I wouldn't call it wise necessarily, but there's nothing illegal about it.
Our training coordinator here at Huntsville put it very eloquently, I think, when it comes to the cash thing and reporting any drugs/drug paraphernalia found during the searches: "If you're driving down the road and you happen to see a car under a bridge, you stop and see if they need help. You're not driving down the road looking for cars under bridges, though."
And HSVTO Dean, I do appreciate you coming on here and the TSA Blog, and explaining what you are permitted to do so. I am not trying to shoot the messenger, only the message.
#42
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 239
Here's a question: if you identify a person for additional screening based on their behavior, can/will you tell the passenger why? Would you volunteer that information or wait for the passenger to ask?
And how specific can you be? Would you tell him, "You're wearing a heavy coat in September, sir," or would you say something generic like "Your behavior has led me to believe a secondary screening will be necessary."
And how specific can you be? Would you tell him, "You're wearing a heavy coat in September, sir," or would you say something generic like "Your behavior has led me to believe a secondary screening will be necessary."
#43
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 239
Just out of curiosity, anything more to the MKE comment than the bagggie incident from a couple years ago? I love hearing stories from around the country that reinforce my idea that TSA needs more employees like me.
#44
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Programs: Many
Posts: 2,496
I notice that not a small number of long time FTers have correctly zeroed in on the carrying cash aspect.
Mr/Ms spotnik, although having subsequently posted, since that comment was originally made, on a number of other items, has gone a bit silent with respect to our posts on cash.
Unbelievable arrogance on the part of the TSA to try and creep this into their scope.
Mr/Ms spotnik, although having subsequently posted, since that comment was originally made, on a number of other items, has gone a bit silent with respect to our posts on cash.
Unbelievable arrogance on the part of the TSA to try and creep this into their scope.
#45
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 239
Spotnik, where has TSA published a list of all the rules and regulations that TSA will subject someone to if that person wishes to cross a U.S. Government checkpoint at an airport en route to the gate from which his domestic flight will depart, not including laws that the person is required to abide by outside of the airport checkpoint (i.e., just those rules and regulations that apply only at the checkpoint). Please provide a URL or name of the government publication.
I'm not interested in guidelines, hints, and out-of-date or internally-inconsistent Web pages, but the official and legal definition of all the rules beyond those which we were already required to follow that TSA requires us to follow in order to avoid having our right to travel restricted when we attempt to pass through the "roadblocks" TSA has erected at our airports .
I'm not interested in guidelines, hints, and out-of-date or internally-inconsistent Web pages, but the official and legal definition of all the rules beyond those which we were already required to follow that TSA requires us to follow in order to avoid having our right to travel restricted when we attempt to pass through the "roadblocks" TSA has erected at our airports .


