Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Ask a SPOTnik

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 12:03 pm
  #31  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 8,957
Originally Posted by tsadude1
It's a requirement for us to report it and a requirement for someone else to investigate. Could we ignore it, probably. Has it been a requirement since TSA took over from the private screeners? yes.
If it is a requirement to report, then it calls more into question the validity of the administrative search. It is for this reason that TSO's are not given any instruction in the identification of drugs.
ND Sol is offline  
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 12:07 pm
  #32  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: MSY
Programs: DL, Hhonors Gold
Posts: 283
If I fart a SBD and then sort of wiggle and move to the side and try to glance at someone to make everyone else think it was that person...... am I a terrorist?
spleenstomper is offline  
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 12:16 pm
  #33  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: CLT
Programs: Choice Hotels/FFOCUS
Posts: 7,259
Welcome

spotnik:
First off welcome to FT . It's great that you are willing to answer the questions. While I don't fly as much as most of the people who post on here, I am around TSA 5 days a week at work. And I'll grant you there are "a few" good ones & I will talk to a couple of them but for the most part I have zero respect for them as I see them "in action" each working day. IMO the bdos at my airport don't have a clue(they are brainwashed) as I've talked to a couple of them.
coachrowsey is offline  
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 12:17 pm
  #34  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: MSY
Programs: DL, Hhonors Gold
Posts: 283
Please excuse the above... I thought we were playing a game to poke fun at the illogical and ridiculous nature of anything related to airport security.
spleenstomper is offline  
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 7:31 pm
  #35  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: HSV
Posts: 876
Originally Posted by studentff
It seems you're saying it's a requirement (i.e., part of the SOP) that you report someone carrying a large amount of cash to "someone else" (be it within TSA or a LEO). Not an option or up to screener judgment, but a requirement. Correct?
Originally Posted by tsadude1
It's a requirement for us to report it and a requirement for someone else to investigate.
I can confirm that. It's happened twice at Huntsville, one of them where I personally found it (dude had, like, $14,000 in just, like, wads of $100s in his pockets) during a pat-down. I reported it to the Supervisor, Supervisor called Customs. Customs got there, asked him a few questions, and let him go after determining that he wasn't traveling overseas (which was, for some reason, something we were very specifically not allowed to inquire about ourselves; probably has something to do with legal liability and law enforcement procedures). The whole shebang took about ten minutes, IIRC, with nine of it being Customs' travel time.

Again, carrying 10K+ in cash domestically isn't illegal. I wouldn't call it wise necessarily, but there's nothing illegal about it.

Originally Posted by ND Sol
If it is a requirement to report, then it calls more into question the validity of the administrative search.
Our training coordinator here at Huntsville put it very eloquently, I think, when it comes to the cash thing and reporting any drugs/drug paraphernalia found during the searches: "If you're driving down the road and you happen to see a car under a bridge, you stop and see if they need help. You're not driving down the road looking for cars under bridges, though."
HSVTSO Dean is offline  
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 7:51 pm
  #36  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Programs: Many
Posts: 2,496
Originally Posted by HSVTSO Dean
I can confirm that. It's happened twice at Huntsville, one of them where I personally found it (dude had, like, $14,000 in just, like, wads of $100s in his pockets) during a pat-down. I reported it to the Supervisor, Supervisor called Customs. Customs got there, asked him a few questions, and let him go after determining that he wasn't traveling overseas (which was, for some reason, something we were very specifically not allowed to inquire about ourselves; probably has something to do with legal liability and law enforcement procedures). The whole shebang took about ten minutes, IIRC, with nine of it being Customs' travel time.

Again, carrying 10K+ in cash domestically isn't illegal. I wouldn't call it wise necessarily, but there's nothing illegal about it.



Our training coordinator here at Huntsville put it very eloquently, I think, when it comes to the cash thing and reporting any drugs/drug paraphernalia found during the searches: "If you're driving down the road and you happen to see a car under a bridge, you stop and see if they need help. You're not driving down the road looking for cars under bridges, though."
Where is the duty/authority to call anyone? There is nothing illegal about carrying any amount of cash domestically. There isn't even anything illegal about carrying it internationally, as long as you declare it if over the limit.

What is it exactly that you are reporting to the supervisor, and what is the basis for it?

There is no reason to detain a traveller on the basis of his legal carrying of cash, no different than him carrying a camera, a hat, his shoes, jacket or anything else.

Am I missing something?
unagi1 is offline  
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 8:07 pm
  #37  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 239
On multiple IDs and "excessive cash"

mkt,

I promised you a response on these issues, and I think I can talk about it a bit without running afoul of the SSI goons.

The TSA PR statements emphasize that we check ID materials because we need to know that you are who you say you are. Multiple IDs, therefore, should not be an issue unless they would open a question as to whether you misrepresented your identity.

The "excessive cash" business requires us to call a LEO if we observe an amount of cash which appears to be over $10,000 USD. Frankly, I have as much TSA training on recognizing $10,000 cash as I have from TSA in recognizing illegal drugs.

TSA does not seem to provide much quality information on these issues, and most of what I have found has been discussed many times on this forum. I will, however, post the links again if any of you wish for them.
spotnik is offline  
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 8:17 pm
  #38  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 47,171
Originally Posted by spotnik
....The "excessive cash" business requires us to call a LEO if we observe an amount of cash which appears to be over $10,000 USD. Frankly, I have as much TSA training on recognizing $10,000 cash as I have from TSA in recognizing illegal drugs.....
Is this written in your SOP? If so, great - I will be targeting that as part of our anti-TSA lobbying efforts. The TSA is not permitted to make up laws which are not germane to the scope of their authority. Carrying cash in ANY amount is not illegal - and any 'suspicion' resulting from your finding of said cash is so far outside the scope of your search, I will ask our legislators to order TSA management to remove that from your SOP.

If it's not in your SOP, I will ask our legislators to question Kippy during his next appearance why his staff seem so interested in reporting cash when they seem so unable to find guns, knives and bomb parts.
bocastephen is online now  
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 8:19 pm
  #39  
mkt
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: MIA/SJU/MCO
Programs: AA LT PLT; DL GLD, UA nothing, B6 Mosaic; Emerald Club Executive
Posts: 3,333
Originally Posted by spotnik
The TSA PR statements emphasize that we check ID materials because we need to know that you are who you say you are. Multiple IDs, therefore, should not be an issue unless they would open a question as to whether you misrepresented your identity.
Well, my multiple ID's all have the same details, albeit with varying addresses. I've been using my passport as my primary ID, with it paperclipped so it only opens to my photo & information, and my TWIC as backup.
mkt is offline  
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 8:25 pm
  #40  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 239
Originally Posted by HSVTSO Dean
why were our BDOs gone for seven days, then came back for their three days of OJT? And this might be more like a no-brainer than anything, but I'll assume you know a definitive answer -- can/does/how often do the airport's local FSD assign additional training to the BDOs not required by the baseline?

The 10-12 hours part fits what I was told, but our BDOs are going to be going for some kind of special training with the FBI to the tune of 100+ hours. Is that nationwide with the program, or just something our own FSD wants done, and approved the funding for?
Unfortunately, any answer I could offer would be, at best, an educated guess. Although the BDO program has been around for a while, widespread hiring and implementation across the country is fairly recent. They have been doing some experimentation with the training program, and at my airport we have been told to expect a bunch of shiny new training coming soon. I do not, however, have any knowledge about what the training is or when we will actually receive it.

BDOs have nationally mandated recurrent training, just like TSOs. It is just a different set of courses to reflect the different job duties. Locally, we can be assigned additional training, although this content varies according to the FSD and management priorities. We are strongly encouraged to seek additional training and education opportunities. Currently, I am reading an excellent sociological study of suicide terrorist campaigns.
spotnik is offline  
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 8:31 pm
  #41  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 8,957
Originally Posted by HSVTSO Dean
I can confirm that. It's happened twice at Huntsville, one of them where I personally found it (dude had, like, $14,000 in just, like, wads of $100s in his pockets) during a pat-down. I reported it to the Supervisor, Supervisor called Customs. Customs got there, asked him a few questions, and let him go after determining that he wasn't traveling overseas (which was, for some reason, something we were very specifically not allowed to inquire about ourselves; probably has something to do with legal liability and law enforcement procedures). The whole shebang took about ten minutes, IIRC, with nine of it being Customs' travel time.

Again, carrying 10K+ in cash domestically isn't illegal. I wouldn't call it wise necessarily, but there's nothing illegal about it.
Different story at ORD when the TSO took my money over to the TSO supervisor and he asked where I was going, which was domestic. End of story and off I go. At IAH, supervisor made a call, but then I went on my way without talking to anyone else. Traveling with money is not illegal, so stop the hassle. It is not even illegal internationally. What is illegal is failing to file the form if you are carrying $10,000+.



Originally Posted by HSVTSO Dean
Our training coordinator here at Huntsville put it very eloquently, I think, when it comes to the cash thing and reporting any drugs/drug paraphernalia found during the searches: "If you're driving down the road and you happen to see a car under a bridge, you stop and see if they need help. You're not driving down the road looking for cars under bridges, though."
Perhaps eloquent as related to drugs, but not so IMHO as it relates to cash. The car analogy is being a Good Samaritan; the money is being nosy and not related to your mission. But TSA has "caught" more persons possessing illegal drugs at screening checkpoints than terrorists. Of course the former doesn't have to be a large number since the latter is a number less than one.

And HSVTO Dean, I do appreciate you coming on here and the TSA Blog, and explaining what you are permitted to do so. I am not trying to shoot the messenger, only the message.
ND Sol is offline  
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 8:41 pm
  #42  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 239
Originally Posted by njm
Here's a question: if you identify a person for additional screening based on their behavior, can/will you tell the passenger why? Would you volunteer that information or wait for the passenger to ask?

And how specific can you be? Would you tell him, "You're wearing a heavy coat in September, sir," or would you say something generic like "Your behavior has led me to believe a secondary screening will be necessary."
We are specifically forbidden from telling passengers about behaviors which caused them to be referred for additional screening. It is carefully protected SSI, and (supposedly) could be used to beat the system. In this area, I disagree with the powers that be in Virginia, but I am very limited in what I can actually do about this. The press releases and fluff news stories seem to include a lot of this information, however. I'm not sure how it is less of a problem when reported in major media outlets.
spotnik is offline  
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 8:48 pm
  #43  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 239
Originally Posted by studentff
Welcome to FT.

A TSA employee (let alone a BDO) who recognizes that the Bill of Rights doesn't stop at the airport terminal? Somebody promote this guy. And send him around the country to do training. He can start with MKE.
Thank you. May I add the "least restrictive means" test to the training regimen? It may not be specifically required of TSA, but I think this standard ought to be applied to all government activity.

Just out of curiosity, anything more to the MKE comment than the bagggie incident from a couple years ago? I love hearing stories from around the country that reinforce my idea that TSA needs more employees like me.
spotnik is offline  
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 8:49 pm
  #44  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Programs: Many
Posts: 2,496
I notice that not a small number of long time FTers have correctly zeroed in on the carrying cash aspect.

Mr/Ms spotnik, although having subsequently posted, since that comment was originally made, on a number of other items, has gone a bit silent with respect to our posts on cash.

Unbelievable arrogance on the part of the TSA to try and creep this into their scope.
unagi1 is offline  
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 8:56 pm
  #45  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 239
Originally Posted by pmocek
Spotnik, where has TSA published a list of all the rules and regulations that TSA will subject someone to if that person wishes to cross a U.S. Government checkpoint at an airport en route to the gate from which his domestic flight will depart, not including laws that the person is required to abide by outside of the airport checkpoint (i.e., just those rules and regulations that apply only at the checkpoint). Please provide a URL or name of the government publication.

I'm not interested in guidelines, hints, and out-of-date or internally-inconsistent Web pages, but the official and legal definition of all the rules beyond those which we were already required to follow that TSA requires us to follow in order to avoid having our right to travel restricted when we attempt to pass through the "roadblocks" TSA has erected at our airports .
I have yet to be able to find one, which is one of my serious problems with TSA. In the USA, last I checked, citizens have the right to demand this sort of information of their government. Government is also required, last I checked, to provide due notice for any rules changes and, at a minimum, provide opportunity for public review and comment. If TSA is doing any of this, they need to do a much better job of making it easy to access and readily available to the public.
spotnik is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.