Passengers Complaining
#62
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: MRY
Posts: 539
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by TacomaRain:
(please, CarmelGreg don't come back at me with that "flag Waiving" cr..p.</font>
(please, CarmelGreg don't come back at me with that "flag Waiving" cr..p.</font>
#63
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Northeast MA, USA.
Programs: HHonors Diamond, DL Silver, TSA Harassee
Posts: 3,657
In my experience, the Leads and Supervisors are power hungry head cases.
I refuse to discuss complaints with anyone lower than Screening Manager and have had only 1 bad experience dealing with complaints this way.
I refuse to discuss complaints with anyone lower than Screening Manager and have had only 1 bad experience dealing with complaints this way.
#64
In memoriam
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Seattle WA
Programs: Kimpton IC, Hyatt Diamond, Gold Marriott, Lifetime Platinum Starwood
Posts: 8,664
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by jrjcd:
....lol...whatever....
at the end of the day, however, you are STILL an empty vessel without a positive constructive thought in your head about the situation, just a lot of gas and complaints for the sake of complaining because you can't stand the inconvenience you face because of the screening process...
oh, well...let's get the sad violins playing...</font>
....lol...whatever....
at the end of the day, however, you are STILL an empty vessel without a positive constructive thought in your head about the situation, just a lot of gas and complaints for the sake of complaining because you can't stand the inconvenience you face because of the screening process...
oh, well...let's get the sad violins playing...</font>
Those posting are TSA reps? As far as "solutions" I think that many people on this board have provided solutions and yet nobody appears to be listening. .. 1. Stop checking IDs so often. You check them once when we enter, why do you need to continue checking them.
2. Make everything consistent!
3. Treat customers as decent human beings. What has happened to "Please and thank you?" Simple words, cost nothing, and yet has a huge impact. You say that you (the posters from TSA here) want to be treated with respect and yet from these posts I am shaking my head wondering if this is how you act in real life (btw. . .I have met Spiff in real life on several occasions and can only say that for you to say that he's an empty vessel as well as other comments well. . you are wayyyyy off base as well as offensive!).
4. Make the process easy for those of us travelling. This is NOT about you. .. it is about getting us to our flights with the least amount of hassle. I am not going to get into a debate/discussion about whether or not I think the TSA is doing a good job, but I am fascinated by the fact that so many of the posters from the TSA are so "defensive" as well as "offensive" imo. . .Why is there a line that can only be used by the crew when the line for regular passengers is so long? What has happened to common sense?
Finally. . .I think that the tone of this thread is horrible. It's offensive, it's personal, and it serves no purpose when somebody has a legitimate complaint that the responses are so imo juvenile. . .that alone speaks volumes.
#66
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 98
1. I can only guess that things at DFW are different from other parts of the country, because for the most part we don't check BP w/IDs after the private company ticket checker clears the passenger-in fact, many times passengers offer them to us and we tell them they won't need them until they get to their gate...
2.This will shake out eventually, and probably sooner than later, but TSA IS a new organization and subject to a certain amount of growing pains(not the least of which is surviving it's second birthday)...
3. Once again, at our airport, we go the extra mile in being polite to passengers-most respond in like manner, but for the few who don't, we still stay professional in our interaction with them as much as the passenger will allow....
4. Once again, my airport must be an anomily(sic)in that flight crews must go thru the checkpoint line like anyone else-the fact that other airports gives them preferential treatment explains their attitude sometimes, but for the most part, these days at the worst flight crews behave indifferent and cool towards us, but no longer nasty-i will say that i wish every airport had a separate flight crew/airport employee checkpoint-there is a different paradigm involved here as these people have jobs they need to get to to be able to serve the passengers better...as far as getting you to your flight with the least amount of hassle, we try to do our best there(despite what the fab four will retort here)and following the suggestions made by screeners at the front of the checkpoint, whether you agree with them or not, will actually make the process go faster for you-yes, this includes the shoe thing and also the continuous inspection of laptops and bags at the ETD, but your suggestions are listened to-the revised second chance policy at the mag is a good example of that.
Don't believe anyone when they tell you that no one at TSA hears what you say ( certain folk WILL tell you this as soon as they can get to their keyboards)
2.This will shake out eventually, and probably sooner than later, but TSA IS a new organization and subject to a certain amount of growing pains(not the least of which is surviving it's second birthday)...
3. Once again, at our airport, we go the extra mile in being polite to passengers-most respond in like manner, but for the few who don't, we still stay professional in our interaction with them as much as the passenger will allow....
4. Once again, my airport must be an anomily(sic)in that flight crews must go thru the checkpoint line like anyone else-the fact that other airports gives them preferential treatment explains their attitude sometimes, but for the most part, these days at the worst flight crews behave indifferent and cool towards us, but no longer nasty-i will say that i wish every airport had a separate flight crew/airport employee checkpoint-there is a different paradigm involved here as these people have jobs they need to get to to be able to serve the passengers better...as far as getting you to your flight with the least amount of hassle, we try to do our best there(despite what the fab four will retort here)and following the suggestions made by screeners at the front of the checkpoint, whether you agree with them or not, will actually make the process go faster for you-yes, this includes the shoe thing and also the continuous inspection of laptops and bags at the ETD, but your suggestions are listened to-the revised second chance policy at the mag is a good example of that.
Don't believe anyone when they tell you that no one at TSA hears what you say ( certain folk WILL tell you this as soon as they can get to their keyboards)
#67
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Oviedo, Florida
Posts: 1,580
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by TacomaRain:
Unknown Screener I'm not sure why you feel that we as leads and supervisors as a whole were not hired on our qualifications. I am a lead and for one have more than adequate qualifications. However, on the other hand, the biggest portion of the management staff had been hired because of their airline backgrounds, not security or management backgrounds. Do you see a problem here?
As to your statement that screeners will be charged with insubordination if they complain, trust me, it isn't only you. Just this past two days I have been threatened with insubordination by management for questioning a manager and Supervisor's handling of an IED. I will continue to do so on the grounds that I, as a lead have a responsibility to act if I see something that will get them hurt or killed.
(please, CarmelGreg don't come back at me with that "flag Waiving" cr..p.</font>
Unknown Screener I'm not sure why you feel that we as leads and supervisors as a whole were not hired on our qualifications. I am a lead and for one have more than adequate qualifications. However, on the other hand, the biggest portion of the management staff had been hired because of their airline backgrounds, not security or management backgrounds. Do you see a problem here?
As to your statement that screeners will be charged with insubordination if they complain, trust me, it isn't only you. Just this past two days I have been threatened with insubordination by management for questioning a manager and Supervisor's handling of an IED. I will continue to do so on the grounds that I, as a lead have a responsibility to act if I see something that will get them hurt or killed.
(please, CarmelGreg don't come back at me with that "flag Waiving" cr..p.</font>
------------------
Don't take life too seriously, afterall, you won't get out alive.
#68
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tacoma, Wa USA
Posts: 87
Unknown Screener, yse, you are absolutely right about the hiring process. No, not all leads, supervisors and particularly managers were hired because of their qualifications. I agree with you also that there are many screeners that I work with that have unbelievable qualifications. Of course TSA blames this all on the company that they used to do the process, but even when TSA had the opportunity to make it right as they did here at SeaTac they still screwed it up. We still have certain individuals with little or no experience that were permanently promoted into Supervisory rolls. Is it going to get any better? Not as long as these clueless local managers have control of the system.
#69
In memoriam
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Seattle WA
Programs: Kimpton IC, Hyatt Diamond, Gold Marriott, Lifetime Platinum Starwood
Posts: 8,664
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by TacomaRain:
Unknown Screener, yse, you are absolutely right about the hiring process. No, not all leads, supervisors and particularly managers were hired because of their qualifications. I agree with you also that there are many screeners that I work with that have unbelievable qualifications. Of course TSA blames this all on the company that they used to do the process, but even when TSA had the opportunity to make it right as they did here at SeaTac they still screwed it up. We still have certain individuals with little or no experience that were permanently promoted into Supervisory rolls. Is it going to get any better? Not as long as these clueless local managers have control of the system.</font>
Unknown Screener, yse, you are absolutely right about the hiring process. No, not all leads, supervisors and particularly managers were hired because of their qualifications. I agree with you also that there are many screeners that I work with that have unbelievable qualifications. Of course TSA blames this all on the company that they used to do the process, but even when TSA had the opportunity to make it right as they did here at SeaTac they still screwed it up. We still have certain individuals with little or no experience that were permanently promoted into Supervisory rolls. Is it going to get any better? Not as long as these clueless local managers have control of the system.</font>
#70
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: MRY
Posts: 539
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by ldsant:
I find it fascinating that so many of the TSA posters here on this board seem/appear so disgruntled. Why don't you quit your job and get another one somewhere else? I'm sure if this is the "attitude" that you have you are bringing it to the job whether knowingly or not.</font>
I find it fascinating that so many of the TSA posters here on this board seem/appear so disgruntled. Why don't you quit your job and get another one somewhere else? I'm sure if this is the "attitude" that you have you are bringing it to the job whether knowingly or not.</font>
#71
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tacoma, Wa USA
Posts: 87
Oh, Oh CG, your complete idocy is showing again. I think that if you can't get your brain out of neutral (which it seems to always be in) that maybe you should put it in reverse and back your head out of your a..!
#72
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tacoma, Wa USA
Posts: 87
Idsant now there is a wonderful idea. If all of us that are disgruntled would just quit then TSA would be operated only by clueless managers and some screeners who DO, in fact get a kick out of lording over passengers. I, for one feel that if I stay I MIGHT just have a small chance of changing the system and making it a viable tool for what it was designed.
#73
In memoriam
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Seattle WA
Programs: Kimpton IC, Hyatt Diamond, Gold Marriott, Lifetime Platinum Starwood
Posts: 8,664
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by TacomaRain:
Idsant now there is a wonderful idea. If all of us that are disgruntled would just quit then TSA would be operated only by clueless managers and some screeners who DO, in fact get a kick out of lording over passengers. I, for one feel that if I stay I MIGHT just have a small chance of changing the system and making it a viable tool for what it was designed.</font>
Idsant now there is a wonderful idea. If all of us that are disgruntled would just quit then TSA would be operated only by clueless managers and some screeners who DO, in fact get a kick out of lording over passengers. I, for one feel that if I stay I MIGHT just have a small chance of changing the system and making it a viable tool for what it was designed.</font>
Wow. . .I am sorry that you feel the need to personally attack others too e.g., CG above - what purpose does that serve?
#74
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 940
"Or perhaps new screeners could be brought in who actually realize that the PASSENGERS are their CUSTOMERS as well as human beings and deserve respect and civility?"
Yes, a lot of us have issue with TSA and yes a lot of screeners at my airport and it seems other airports are looking for new jobs.
But in that time I personally don't let my personal life interfer with my work life. I treat passengers with respect, when they want it. When a passenger wants to be left alone, I do it, while still doing my job.
I grew up using "Sir, Thank You" so I still use it. But if I'm talking to someone else my age, I talk differently with them, and it seems to make people more comfortable.
Screeners in general understand, at least I think so, that your the customer. Some do have issues, sure, what business doesn't? But anyway, the company makes it hard for us to treat you that way.
Yes, a lot of us have issue with TSA and yes a lot of screeners at my airport and it seems other airports are looking for new jobs.
But in that time I personally don't let my personal life interfer with my work life. I treat passengers with respect, when they want it. When a passenger wants to be left alone, I do it, while still doing my job.
I grew up using "Sir, Thank You" so I still use it. But if I'm talking to someone else my age, I talk differently with them, and it seems to make people more comfortable.
Screeners in general understand, at least I think so, that your the customer. Some do have issues, sure, what business doesn't? But anyway, the company makes it hard for us to treat you that way.
#75
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: northeast coast of Florida
Programs: UA 1K - 2MM, Lifetime Hilton Diamond, Lifetime Marriott Platinum Elite, Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 10,436
A bit of advise to the newcomers to Flyertalk. I would be more incline to listen to the opinions of members that have several hundred to several thousand posts than loud mouth insensitive and disrespectful people that a few of you seem to be. Tone down your response and offer a little respect towards a differing opinion and stop flaming. If your attacks go on, you will be banned from FlyerTalk and we here will be the better for it. Mature adults offer respect while immature idiots posts in the tone we have seen the past few days here on this thread.

