Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

Congress Wants TSA to Secure Amtrak & Buses

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Congress Wants TSA to Secure Amtrak & Buses

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 7, 2016, 1:26 pm
  #91  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Testimony of John Roth, DHS IG, re TSA

Furthermore, unlike aviation and maritime port workers, TSA did not develop regulations requiring security background checks for rail workers. ...

These very issues were identified in 2009 by GAO, which reported that TSA had
only completed one of the key passenger rail requirements from the
9/11 Act. Seven years later, we identified that the same rail requirements — a regulation for rail carriers to complete security assessments, a regulation for rail security training, and a program for conducting background checks on rail employees — remain incomplete.
More damning stuff follows the above.

https://www.oig.dhs.gov/assets/TM/20...-JR-120716.pdf
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Dec 7, 2016, 1:54 pm
  #92  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,126
Originally Posted by petaluma1
More damning stuff follows the above.

https://www.oig.dhs.gov/assets/TM/20...-JR-120716.pdf

TSA is too busy abusing cancer patients to do its core job.
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Dec 7, 2016, 2:56 pm
  #93  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by petaluma1
More damning stuff follows the above.

https://www.oig.dhs.gov/assets/TM/20...-JR-120716.pdf
DHS is in for a fixing under the general nominated to replace the current DHS Secretary. But the rail network in the US is mostly an afterthought and likely to remain so.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Dec 7, 2016, 3:26 pm
  #94  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Originally Posted by GUWonder
DHS is in for a fixing under the general nominated to replace the current DHS Secretary. But the rail network in the US is mostly an afterthought and likely to remain so.
How so? I know nothing about the guy.
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Dec 7, 2016, 3:28 pm
  #95  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
http://www.nj.com/traffic/index.ssf/..._stations.html

Commuters at Secaucus Junction encountered the new security screening for the first time on Wednesday morning.

Known as a passive threat analysis system, the equipment monitors riders by measuring body density as they pass by, but doesn't require them to stop and empty their pockets to be checked, said a security official who was not authorized to provide details.
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Dec 7, 2016, 6:07 pm
  #96  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,165
Note (from the linked article in the above article) that the cops were conducting warrantless SIGINT on passengers.

NJ Transit has stopped eavesdropping on conversations aboard its light rail trains after facing a string of criticism over how it stored and handled the recordings.

A spot check of 10 light rail trains on the Hudson-Bergen and Newark Light rail lines on Wednesday found that the word "audio" on all signs warning of the surveillance had been masked by white tape.

NJ Transit confirmed Wednesday afternoon that it had ended the program.

"Following a careful internal review that involved weighing security benefits, operational necessities and evolving industry practices, NJ Transit has decided to remove the audio recording feature from light rail vehicles," said Nancy Snyder, a spokeswoman.
Interesting that you won't find "Constitutional" or "Civil Liberties" in the spokesholess' statement.
FliesWay2Much is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.