TSA's bomb-sniffing dogs
Jun 1, 2016, 1:28 pm
#166
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: WAS
Programs: enjoyed being warm spit for a few years on CO/UA but now nothing :(
Posts: 2,507
However, it is not logistically possible as there are not enough PSC teams to provide coverage at a checkpoint for an entire day (let alone for week or more) at a major airport (although it might be possible for a smaller airport).
Jun 1, 2016, 1:42 pm
#167
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,114
Theoretically, I suppose, PSC teams might speed up the line IF all pax and bags going through a checkpoint were screened by the teams as this would (mostly) negate the need for using the ETD machines and related delays.
However, it is not logistically possible as there are not enough PSC teams to provide coverage at a checkpoint for an entire day (let alone for week or more) at a major airport (although it might be possible for a smaller airport).
However, it is not logistically possible as there are not enough PSC teams to provide coverage at a checkpoint for an entire day (let alone for week or more) at a major airport (although it might be possible for a smaller airport).
Jun 1, 2016, 2:57 pm
#168
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
My question has been answered:
http://reason.org/news/show/1014536.html
More canines—give me a break!
http://reason.org/news/show/1014536.html
Last edited by petaluma1; Jun 1, 2016 at 3:24 pm
Jun 1, 2016, 2:59 pm
#169
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Theoretically, I suppose, PSC teams might speed up the line IF all pax and bags going through a checkpoint were screened by the teams as this would (mostly) negate the need for using the ETD machines and related delays.
However, it is not logistically possible as there are not enough PSC teams to provide coverage at a checkpoint for an entire day (let alone for week or more) at a major airport (although it might be possible for a smaller airport).
However, it is not logistically possible as there are not enough PSC teams to provide coverage at a checkpoint for an entire day (let alone for week or more) at a major airport (although it might be possible for a smaller airport).
The choke points of TSA's screening process are the TDC, disrobing, bag xray/hand inspection, WBI, pat down, and ETD. For canines to do any good one or more steps in the list has to be eliminated. If that's not happening then dogs just add another layer to an already time consuming process.
Jun 1, 2016, 3:31 pm
#171
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,700
2800 BDOs hanging around, playing with their cellphones and chatting with other TSOs.
If that manpower were actively employed screening people, not only would it reduce wait times and dangerous landside congestion; it might very well lead to improved Red Team scores, because there would 2800 fewer non-working TSOs standing around distracting actual working screeners.
I wonder if the BDOs ever hang around the exits where TSO baggage screeners leave work.
SMH.
Jun 1, 2016, 3:55 pm
#172
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Programs: Southwest Rapid Rewards. Tha... that's about it.
Posts: 4,332
The choke points of TSA's screening process are the TDC, disrobing, bag xray/hand inspection, WBI, pat down, and ETD. For canines to do any good one or more steps in the list has to be eliminated. If that's not happening then dogs just add another layer to an already time consuming process.
That's pretty much what I always thought, too.
Jun 1, 2016, 7:00 pm
#173
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,114
Yes, and if the process isn't changed then backups will persist. All more screeners provide is the means to open more screening lanes which is the least cost effective solution. Adding explosive canines has potential if other steps are taken to streamline the screening process. I have little confidence in TSA doing anything other than adding.
Jun 2, 2016, 9:49 am
#174
Moderator: Travel Safety/Security, Travel Tools, California, Los Angeles; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: LAX
Programs: oneword Emerald
Posts: 20,639
In The New York Times:
T.S.A. Trains Dogs to Stay One Sniff Ahead of Bomb Makers
Excerpt
Note: The above is a Permalink, no subscription or login is needed to access the article
Excerpt
The Department of Homeland Security, the parent agency of the T.S.A., has expanded its use of dogs to help screen passengers in airport security lines. Jeh Johnson, the secretary of Homeland Security, recently announced the deployment of bomb-sniffing dogs to larger airports where long security lines had not only increased the wait but provided a vulnerable target for an attack like the one in March at Brussels Airport.
Jun 9, 2016, 11:37 am
#175
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 616
TSA is at it AGAIN with the Dogs!!!
In The New York Times:
Note: The above is a Permalink, no subscription or login is needed to access the article
Note: The above is a Permalink, no subscription or login is needed to access the article
"I have a fear of dogs and will not allow this dog to sniff my shoes. I consent to a full pat down and full hand search of my shoes and luggage."
That's right, I am willing to go beyond my normal opt out procedure. Most fears are irrational, and I know these dogs are highly trained, but I was bit as a child and whenever I am near a dog, I get flashbacks to that day and literally cannot be around most dogs for more than a second. There is no way you will have my FREEZE in line with DOG(s?) roaming around!
Jun 9, 2016, 1:39 pm
#176
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
My mom had this happen TODAY at FLL. THEY STOPPED THE LINE!!!! to have dogs come through and sniff everyone's shoes. Having separate lines with the dogs is one thing, but stopping all lines? Come on!!!!! This again shows that TSA can do what they want. If I am in that line and I have a) an allergy or b) a fear of dogs (which I do), but I am told to FREEZE (which is what they did...yes they're back at that tactic), what am I supposed to do. I have already prepared a speech for the TSO with the dog:
"I have a fear of dogs and will not allow this dog to sniff my shoes. I consent to a full pat down and full hand search of my shoes and luggage."
That's right, I am willing to go beyond my normal opt out procedure. Most fears are irrational, and I know these dogs are highly trained, but I was bit as a child and whenever I am near a dog, I get flashbacks to that day and literally cannot be around most dogs for more than a second. There is no way you will have my FREEZE in line with DOG(s?) roaming around!
"I have a fear of dogs and will not allow this dog to sniff my shoes. I consent to a full pat down and full hand search of my shoes and luggage."
That's right, I am willing to go beyond my normal opt out procedure. Most fears are irrational, and I know these dogs are highly trained, but I was bit as a child and whenever I am near a dog, I get flashbacks to that day and literally cannot be around most dogs for more than a second. There is no way you will have my FREEZE in line with DOG(s?) roaming around!
Jun 9, 2016, 2:12 pm
#179
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,700
It is a joke, because supposedly the reason we have to take our shoes off at the checkpoint is not only to detect explosives, but also to detect contraband like knives.
TSA wanted dogs because other agencies have them. Now that they have them, they have to try to find excuses to justify them.
TSA wanted dogs because other agencies have them. Now that they have them, they have to try to find excuses to justify them.
Jun 9, 2016, 3:37 pm
#180
Moderator: Travel Safety/Security, Travel Tools, California, Los Angeles; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: LAX
Programs: oneword Emerald
Posts: 20,639