Richmond TSA screener Michael Luedecke arrested for shooting his father
#61
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Greensboro
Programs: TSA
Posts: 2,424
#62
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,165
#63
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Greensboro
Programs: TSA
Posts: 2,424
Based on what I have seen throughout the history of cases similar to this, there is not much of a chance of that. If found guilty, he will most likely get a life sentence if things are proven with premeditation. The chances of this guy being convicted and getting the "needle" are about as good as my chances of winning the lottery. Most likely (if things pan out in court the way they have been related in the press) he will be found guilty of manslaughter/wrongful death - if he is found guilty. Juries can be fickle, they can be obstinate, they can be enlightening and they can be moving - but they are always unpredictable. Going to court is a gamble for both the State and the Defendant, but there is simply not a clear cut reasoning for seeking the death penalty in this case. (All that being said, I am not going to bet you on this point...)
#64
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 57,616
Based on what I have seen throughout the history of cases similar to this, there is not much of a chance of that. If found guilty, he will most likely get a life sentence if things are proven with premeditation. The chances of this guy being convicted and getting the "needle" are about as good as my chances of winning the lottery. Most likely (if things pan out in court the way they have been related in the press) he will be found guilty of manslaughter/wrongful death - if he is found guilty. Juries can be fickle, they can be obstinate, they can be enlightening and they can be moving - but they are always unpredictable. Going to court is a gamble for both the State and the Defendant, but there is simply not a clear cut reasoning for seeking the death penalty in this case. (All that being said, I am not going to bet you on this point...)
That said, the current CA in Henrico appears to be a political hack, so I'd bet political correctness will work against a capital murder conviction in this case.
#67
Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,728
#68
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,165
Based on what I have seen throughout the history of cases similar to this, there is not much of a chance of that. If found guilty, he will most likely get a life sentence if things are proven with premeditation. The chances of this guy being convicted and getting the "needle" are about as good as my chances of winning the lottery. Most likely (if things pan out in court the way they have been related in the press) he will be found guilty of manslaughter/wrongful death - if he is found guilty. Juries can be fickle, they can be obstinate, they can be enlightening and they can be moving - but they are always unpredictable. Going to court is a gamble for both the State and the Defendant, but there is simply not a clear cut reasoning for seeking the death penalty in this case. (All that being said, I am not going to bet you on this point...)
Since you don't live in the Commonwealth, I'll give you a pass on your knowledge of how we treat murderers. Overall, Virginia has executed more capital defendants than any other state in the union, and post 1982 (the "modern" era), only Texas executes more defendants than we do, and when you are convicted of capital murder in Virginia, your stay on death row is short.
That said, the current CA in Henrico appears to be a political hack, so I'd bet political correctness will work against a capital murder conviction in this case.
That said, the current CA in Henrico appears to be a political hack, so I'd bet political correctness will work against a capital murder conviction in this case.
#69
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,657
Of course, all politics is local, and so are all juries. I expect that some jurisdictions return death penalty sentences with greater frequency than others. Living in a state without the death penalty, I will defer to the observations of those who do.
#70
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 57,616
Even though the Beltway snipers killed more people in Maryland than Virginia, there is a reason why the first trials were held in Virginia.
#71
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Greensboro
Programs: TSA
Posts: 2,424
Since you don't live in the Commonwealth, I'll give you a pass on your knowledge of how we treat murderers. Overall, Virginia has executed more capital defendants than any other state in the union, and post 1982 (the "modern" era), only Texas executes more defendants than we do, and when you are convicted of capital murder in Virginia, your stay on death row is short.
That said, the current CA in Henrico appears to be a political hack, so I'd bet political correctness will work against a capital murder conviction in this case.
That said, the current CA in Henrico appears to be a political hack, so I'd bet political correctness will work against a capital murder conviction in this case.
I admit that I went to public schools. I will also admit that I am not a learned, clairvoyant SPONik such as yourself. I will say that I have no idea what you are talking about, let alone your point.
And, up to a certain calendar date, our condemned inmates had the choice of the needle or the electric chair. The clerk was lucky he committed capital murder in Henrico County. If he had worked at IAD and lived in Prince William County, they would be cleaning out the IV lines with saline as we speak.
And, up to a certain calendar date, our condemned inmates had the choice of the needle or the electric chair. The clerk was lucky he committed capital murder in Henrico County. If he had worked at IAD and lived in Prince William County, they would be cleaning out the IV lines with saline as we speak.
What I think West is saying is this: if there's any hint of sympathy for the defendant --- say because of the hints we've heard of a violent home environment that led to the killing of the father out of self-defense and/or the defense of others in the home --- then it's extremely unlikely that a jury will unanimously convict of first-degree murder and agree upon a death sentence. All you need is one holdout on the juryy who buys the sympathetic argument.
Of course, all politics is local, and so are all juries. I expect that some jurisdictions return death penalty sentences with greater frequency than others. Living in a state without the death penalty, I will defer to the observations of those who do.
Of course, all politics is local, and so are all juries. I expect that some jurisdictions return death penalty sentences with greater frequency than others. Living in a state without the death penalty, I will defer to the observations of those who do.