Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

Naked man arrested at Portland International Airport after disrobing at security

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Naked man arrested at Portland International Airport after disrobing at security

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 18, 2012, 2:17 pm
  #16  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by themicah
I wonder what they'd do if you showed up to the airport in nothing but shoes and an overcoat (both of which you're required to remove before going through the gauntlet).
Unless interested in checking out general passengers' "junk" like the TSA does, you hope they are PreCheck LLL passengers.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Apr 18, 2012, 2:35 pm
  #17  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: PDX
Programs: DL DM, AS MVP 100K, Amtrak peon, Colbert Lifetime Platinum
Posts: 4,534
Originally Posted by N830MH
Shame on him!!
Actually, shame is the exact problem here. As Americans, we're shamed into hating our bodies, shamed into unfailingly revering authority figures, and shamed into mindless compliance with stupid laws or regulations that have nothing to do with public safety.

Stripping naked at a TSA checkpoint is the perfect protest against all of that and only carries TSA's own procedures to their logical conclusion. More power to him and everyone else who expresses disgust at the Talibanization of our country.
GoAmtrak is offline  
Old Apr 18, 2012, 3:33 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Programs: AA SPG Amex
Posts: 4,644
Originally Posted by GoAmtrak
Actually, shame is the exact problem here. As Americans, we're shamed into hating our bodies, shamed into unfailingly revering authority figures, and shamed into mindless compliance with stupid laws or regulations that have nothing to do with public safety.

Stripping naked at a TSA checkpoint is the perfect protest against all of that and only carries TSA's own procedures to their logical conclusion. More power to him and everyone else who expresses disgust at the Talibanization of our country.
This may be a larger issue, but I think you've hit on something more complex: when those values became cultural institutions of sorts (think pre-1960) only those who were really obese were "shamed" into hating their bodies (nobody went to a gym; everyone was flabby after 30), we had far more authority figures worthy of that kind of respect and we became comfortable following laws and regulations since they were far less invasive/less about @$$-covering.

While I'm sure much of it is an exaggeration/outright fiction try watching the film "J. Edgar" and you can see how much of that began to change (or at least imagine how that happened).
Upgraded! is offline  
Old Apr 18, 2012, 4:33 pm
  #19  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: United States
Programs: UA, AA, DL, Amtrak
Posts: 4,647
Here's an article with a more detailed interview and profile of this guy:

http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/i...an_choses.html
fairviewroad is offline  
Old Apr 18, 2012, 4:58 pm
  #20  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,972
Originally Posted by TheRoadie
In a state where public nudity is constitutionally protected, and airports may be privately owned but public access (as in a mall) is assured, what's their beef? I know - the ol' "disruption" clause.
Public nudity is not "constitionally protected" in Oregon: it just isn't against the law by itself. ORS 163.465: "A person commits the crime of public indecency if while in, or in view of, a public place the person performs: ... (c) An act of exposing the genitals of the person with the intent of arousing the sexual desire of the person or another person."

So intent of sexual arousal is required. Seems kind of hard to show in this case.

Last edited by RichardKenner; Apr 18, 2012 at 5:05 pm
RichardKenner is offline  
Old Apr 18, 2012, 5:40 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,425
A
Originally Posted by RichardKenner
Public nudity is not "constitionally protected" in Oregon: it just isn't against the law by itself. ORS 163.465: "A person commits the crime of public indecency if while in, or in view of, a public place the person performs: ... (c) An act of exposing the genitals of the person with the intent of arousing the sexual desire of the person or another person."

So intent of sexual arousal is required. Seems kind of hard to show in this case.
If it was hard to show isn't that prima facie evidence?
nachtnebel is offline  
Old Apr 18, 2012, 6:27 pm
  #22  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: California. USA
Posts: 1,404
Originally Posted by GoAmtrak
Actually, shame is the exact problem here. As Americans, we're shamed into hating our bodies, shamed into unfailingly revering authority figures, and shamed into mindless compliance with stupid laws or regulations that have nothing to do with public safety.

Stripping naked at a TSA checkpoint is the perfect protest against all of that and only carries TSA's own procedures to their logical conclusion. More power to him and everyone else who expresses disgust at the Talibanization of our country.
^^^^^^^You are a 100 % correct !
tanja is offline  
Old Apr 18, 2012, 6:32 pm
  #23  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: California. USA
Posts: 1,404
Talking

What are people teching their children?!

That the naked body is a sin and a shame?!

No wonder that people get problems in their life.

Nothing wrong at all. I do support the man to a 100 %.

Just sad that he had to prove a point at an airport to travel.

TSA cant have anything against him.
They want to be sure he is not "hidding " anything.

He proved he is not.

Also I dont think that they do want anybody else to see what they can see.
They just dont want to share.
tanja is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2012, 8:57 am
  #24  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: YYC
Programs: AC Basic, UA MP Gold, Marriott Gold Elite, SPG Gold, Amex Platinum
Posts: 3,008
This thread is a lot more valuable with no pictues attached.
WR Cage is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2012, 9:00 am
  #25  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 8,498
Originally Posted by YEG Guy
This thread is a lot more valuable with no pictues attached.
BoingBoing has a (carefully redacted to avoid too much tushie) pic:

http://boingboing.net/2012/04/18/nak...a-screeni.html
themicah is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2012, 9:30 am
  #26  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: YYC
Programs: AC Basic, UA MP Gold, Marriott Gold Elite, SPG Gold, Amex Platinum
Posts: 3,008
Originally Posted by themicah
BoingBoing has a (carefully redacted to avoid too much tushie) pic:

http://boingboing.net/2012/04/18/nak...a-screeni.html
If the TSA Haters are going to get any traction with general public, you guys need to teach Grizzly Adams how to use twitter and make Bar Rafaeli your new strip search poster child.
WR Cage is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2012, 2:13 pm
  #27  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Finally back in Boston after escaping from New York
Posts: 13,644
Originally Posted by YEG Guy
If the TSA Haters are going to get any traction with general public, you guys need to teach Grizzly Adams how to use twitter and make Bar Rafaeli your new strip search poster child.
Not only did you get this comment in before I did but you were a lot funnier than I was going to be.



Mike
mikeef is offline  
Old Apr 22, 2012, 5:53 pm
  #28  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ATL Lost Luggage
Programs: Kettle with Kryptonium Medallion Tags
Posts: 10,321
Overheard on CNN.com: Readers cheer efforts of naked TSA protester

CNN has posted an item describing reader reaction to this story. Here's the link:

CNN
Overheard on CNN.com: Readers cheer efforts of naked TSA protester

April 18th, 2012 05:36 PM ET


The article includes this comment:
Clay Pratt: "I am amazed he was arrested in a city they allows a mass public naked bike ride right through it's most congested and populated business districts every year. Portland has no laws against public nudity. They do have laws regarding lewd behavior while nude, though they would not apply to this mans behaviors."
RatherBeOnATrain is online now  
Old Jul 3, 2012, 4:40 pm
  #29  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: in the sky
Posts: 490
Trial by jury denied for TSA protester

http://fromthetrenchesworldreport.co...otestor/17147/

Oh well, what do constitutionally protected rights matter anyways?

I am reminded of this bit of poetry somehow:

Does It Matter?
Siegfried Sassoon

Does it matter?—losing your leg? …
For people will always be kind,
And you need not show that you mind
When the others come in after hunting
To gobble their muffins and eggs.

Does it matter?—losing your sight? …
There’s such splendid work for the blind;
And people will always be kind,
As you sit on the terrace remembering
And turning your face to the light.

Do they matter?—those dreams from the pit? …
You can drink and forget and be glad,
And people won’t say that you’re mad;
For they’ll know that you’ve fought for your country,
And no one will worry a bit.

Online text © 1998-2012 Poetry X. All rights reserved.
loops is offline  
Old Jul 3, 2012, 5:56 pm
  #30  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Programs: AA SPG Amex
Posts: 4,644
The constitutionally-protected right in question here will be one's right to protest and whether he went beyond what is constitutionally-protected "speech" by stripping naked in the airport. Few (if any) jurisdictions will grant a jury trial for a violation (or whatever they specifically call it there). I have to say, I found the article more than a little biased. It states that there are three constitutional rights that aren't granted those charged with a violation but it fails to mention the reason for this: a violation has substantially lesser penalties attached (probably no chance of jail time, nor large fines vs a misdemeanor which can carry up to a year in jail). The author makes it sound as though the DA decided to prosecute this as a violation in an effort to screw him out of a jury trial, rather than to ensure this guys doesn't end up with a misdemeanor conviction on his record (or something in the middle).
Upgraded! is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.