FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/checkpoints-borders-policy-debate-687/)
-   -   Discussion: Constitutionality of BOS (Logan) BDO program (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/checkpoints-borders-policy-debate/1248216-discussion-constitutionality-bos-logan-bdo-program.html)

jtodd Aug 19, 2011 1:13 pm


Originally Posted by PresRDC (Post 16954928)
Another stupid TSA scheme.

Very, very stupid!

FliesWay2Much Aug 19, 2011 1:17 pm


Originally Posted by 14940674 (Post 16954259)
In Tel Aviv the security agents handle passengers with grace and respect,

...and without the constraints of the Constitution of the United States of America.

..thermonuclear difference...

PTravel Aug 19, 2011 1:19 pm


Originally Posted by 14940674 (Post 16954355)
The TSA is only using college educated agents for this assignment, which should help on that front.

Is that what you think? There is "college educated," and, "college educated." Attending a college guarantees nothing.


Also I think you misjudge the El Al approach. It is much more centered on training and skill than profiling.
Which is why it will fail here. The people in Israel who do this are trained and experienced intelligence professionals. The people in the U.S. who do this are "college-educated" clerks who couldn't find a better job than working for TSA.


They would not have their perfect security record just by hassling every Arab passenger flying on El Al.
I agree with this. However, what TSA is doing may look like Israeli-style security, but it isn't Israeli style security and, moreover, its presumptively unconstitutional.

PTravel Aug 19, 2011 1:21 pm


Originally Posted by vvortex1 (Post 16954745)
Several years ago, my boarding passes used to get flagged for secondary screening frequently, and they'd ask questions along these lines. It is intrusive, but unless the tactic has changed, they're less interested in the answers than in how you act. It's fine to say that the purpose of your trip was "to visit family," or "to go to a conference" and unlike Immigration, they probably won't inquire any further, provided that you don't act nervous or cause a problem.

If that's the case, then let them ask other questions:

Seen any good movies lately?

How 'bout this weather?

I love dogs. Do you?

or even

What's your favorite airline?

I wouldn't mind answering these questions. I have absolutely no intention of telling a government agent anything as personal as what I do for a living, why I'm traveling, etc.

PTravel Aug 19, 2011 1:22 pm


Originally Posted by Always Flyin (Post 16954798)
"Am I required to answer these questions before I am allowed to fly because, frankly, the answers are none of your da*n business..."

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

neko Aug 19, 2011 1:23 pm


Originally Posted by Always Flyin (Post 16954798)
"Am I required to answer these questions before I am allowed to fly because, frankly, the answers are none of your da*n business..."

+1

"For my own safety, I don't give personal information to strangers."

"Company policy bars me from discussing details of our business travel."

14940674 Aug 19, 2011 1:23 pm


Originally Posted by PTravel (Post 16955027)
Which is why it will fail here. The people in Israel who do this are trained and experienced intelligence professionals. The people in the U.S. who do this are "college-educated" clerks who couldn't find a better job than working for TSA.

Would you support the program if the TSA hired employees of Israeli-caliber?

ecaarch Aug 19, 2011 1:25 pm


Originally Posted by BearX220 (Post 16954866)
Those guys are a little different from TSA guys. Here we have guys who have never seen the word "Lufthansa" before and find it suspicious, or will ask you if Zurich is a place in the USA.

I actually have no problem with the AMS gate talks because I feel the inquisitor is intelligent and guided by a well-designed program...

+1

I personally know TSA airport agents that have never been on an airplane in their life. And these people are supposed to make judgements about where or why I fly?

As long as TSA insists on hiring people that think going to Disney World once when they were in elementary school constitutes having "traveled" before, I will be more than a little skeptical of this program.

PTravel Aug 19, 2011 1:27 pm


Originally Posted by 14940674 (Post 16955059)
Would you support the program if the TSA hired employees of Israeli-caliber?

Absolutely not. Unlike Israel, (1) we have a constitutional prohibition against this kind of interrogation, (2) we are not in a state of constant war with hostile powers. Because of the skill of our intelligence services (post-9/11) there has not been a terrorist attack on American soil -- interdiction works here and, rather than sacrifice the Constitutional guarantees of freedom of liberty that have worked for this country for more than 200 years, I'd rather put my faith and trust in the FBI, CIA, NSA and real police agencies, than the Kafka-esque incompetent nightmare that is TSA.

Always Flyin Aug 19, 2011 1:28 pm


Originally Posted by 14940674 (Post 16955059)
Would you support the program if the TSA hired employees of Israeli-caliber?

No. This isn't Israel.

We have a Constitution that prohibits this type of coerced government questioning. Boarding an airplane does not exempt the government from compliance with the Constitution.

If this is going to make us safer, how come we didn't have a single hijacking in the 10-year period before or after 9/11? We seem to have done ok without it.

Just tell this out-of-control government, "NO!"

Always Flyin Aug 19, 2011 1:31 pm


Originally Posted by neko (Post 16955057)

"For my own safety, I don't give personal information to strangers."

"Company policy bars me from discussing details of our business travel."

Screw that. You're still giving them responses.

The only response should be, "I don't have to answer your questions and I am not going to." Then walk past them.

FliesWay2Much Aug 19, 2011 1:32 pm

Sorry, Annie Babe...
 

Originally Posted by 14940674 (Post 16954927)
"At Logan, about 70 agents — all with college degrees — are undergoing training by an international consulting firm that includes a four-day classroom course and 24 hours of on-the-job experience, said TSA spokeswoman Ann Davis."

http://www.bostonherald.com/news/reg...icleid=1355725

...We caught you in a lie again. Do you even bother to read your own agency's vacancy announcements???

SPOTNik Vacancy Notice -- 2 vacancies in PHL

By the way, here are the qualifications:


Qualifications and Evaluations

QUALIFICATIONS REQUIRED:

To qualify for the SV-H Pay Band (equivalent to GS-12) you must have one year of experience equivalent to the SV-G Pay Band or the GS-11 in the Federal service or equivalent in the private sector. Specialized Experience is defined as experience that has equipped you with the particular knowledge, skills and abilities to successfully perform the duties of the position, and is typically in or related to the work of the position to be filled. Such experience includes:


    Michael El Aug 19, 2011 1:41 pm


    Originally Posted by gobluetwo (Post 16954046)

    Seriously, though, I just don't see how the execution of this program will result in any tangible positive outcome. The training they are supposed to be getting is said to be relatively minimal. We don't know that these people have a suitable background or temperament for this sort of behavioral analysis. We don't know the effectiveness of this analysis in such a brief encounter. I'm sure a bunch of shrinks somewhere came up with a manual instructing people to look for facial tics, shifty eyes, crossed arms, or whatever, which may or may not be indicative of anything beyond a fear of flying, gas, or a real intention to do harm (99.999999% sure it won't EVER be that last one). And, as this thread is proving, this is just another way for them to take the focus off the patdowns and body scans and improve their PR.

    +1
    The TSA only exists so we feel safe about flying. Liquids, shoes, pat-downs, x-ray and now questions are just PR.

    14940674 Aug 19, 2011 1:42 pm


    Originally Posted by FliesWay2Much (Post 16955123)
    ...We caught you in a lie again. Do you even bother to read your own agency's vacancy announcements???

    I was referring to the qualifications required in Boston. In there is no need for personal attacks on this forum. The TSA is not my agency.

    I agree with PTravel and Always Flyin that the US does not need this level of airport security, even if it is conducted competently.

    Often1 Aug 19, 2011 1:45 pm


    Originally Posted by FliesWay2Much (Post 16955123)
    ...We caught you in a lie again. Do you even bother to read your own agency's vacancy announcements???

    SPOTNik Vacancy Notice -- 2 vacancies in PHL

    By the way, here are the qualifications:

    FT has too many posts to count in which posters rant about how they want TSA to function more like Israeli aviation security. That's what this is. It's not invasive, it's not unconstitutional and is used to make judgments about whether some people need secondary inspection.

    Fortunately, it will only take a few prosecutions of people who deliberately lie to TSA (18 USC Sec. 1001 provides a 5-year felony penalty for that) before the jokesters stop giving poor advice.

    In the meantime, BOS-ATL is easily driveable and a wonderful view of scenic I-95!


    All times are GMT -6. The time now is 6:06 pm.


    This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.