Community
Wiki Posts
Search

TSA behavior detection program

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 29, 2011 | 9:24 am
  #46  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: RDU
Programs: OnePass
Posts: 772
My response to any BDO attempts will be:

1. "Go SPOT someone else"
2. Incoherent gibberish.

I won't talk to any one in a TSA uniform unless absolutely forced. I want nothing to do with the US version of the Gestapo. As it is now, I only fly when forced. My last trips from NC to NJ have been by car, and I will continue to do so.

If Pistole/Nappy think this will make things better, then they need to submit for their regularly scheduled drug test.

Last edited by mikemey; Jul 29, 2011 at 9:37 am
mikemey is offline  
Old Jul 29, 2011 | 9:34 am
  #47  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Up in the air far too often.
Programs: Star Gold
Posts: 354
Originally Posted by cottonmather0
The purpose of this new announcement is that now they can use a "bad attitude" to justify being hard on people who don't just roll over and acquiesce and justify it as part of "enhanced security procedures" or whatever. It was always informal and kind of scandalous when they retaliated against people who didn't roll over, now they're setting themselves up to be able to retaliate openly and hide behind procedure.

Things aren't always as they seem. This isn't an attempt to make things more efficient, this is just a vehicle to get even more control and less pushback at checkpoints from people like us who are vocal about hating this nonsense.
Exactly right. It is already going on at BOS for those of you who fly out of there frequently. EVERY time (3x in past 2 wks) I have had a mini-"interview" by the BDO asking me where I'm coming from, and then been selected for cancer box (however, 75%+ of ppl are selected for cancer.)

I initially tried to play along, but it doesn't seem to "get me out" of the WBI at all, in fact ever. So, as long as I'm not getting any benefit I'm not going to participate. Next time I'm just going to look puzzled at the guy or be engrossed in my blackberry.

The irony is, I think that extended interviews, or even "CBP-style interviews" could divide people into low risk and higher risk. It would, however, take very trained agents, and clearly violate discrimination laws and even our constitution. I don't want this kind of effort in the freedom-loving (at least supposedly freedom-loving) U.S.A. This half-a$$ed implementation is absolute nonsense and simple retaliation for non-conformity.
cardiomd is offline  
Old Jul 29, 2011 | 9:37 am
  #48  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,343
Originally Posted by cardiomd
Exactly right. It is already going on at BOS for those of you who fly out of there frequently. EVERY time (3x in past 2 wks) I have had a mini-"interview" by the BDO asking me where I'm coming from, and then been selected for cancer box (however, 75%+ of ppl are selected for cancer.)

I initially tried to play along, but it doesn't seem to "get me out" of the WBI at all, in fact ever. So, as long as I'm not getting any benefit I'm not going to participate. Next time I'm just going to look puzzled at the guy or be engrossed in my blackberry.

The irony is, I think that extended interviews, or even "CBP-style interviews" could divide people into low risk and higher risk. It would, however, take very trained agents, and clearly violate discrimination laws and even our constitution. I don't want this kind of effort in the freedom-loving (at least supposedly freedom-loving) U.S.A. This half-a$$ed implementation is absolute nonsense and simple retaliation for non-conformity.
No biggie...this has never stopped the TSA before...
FliesWay2Much is offline  
Old Jul 29, 2011 | 9:42 am
  #49  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,964
Originally Posted by Mats
The questions in Europe have been the same for decades. It's the same set of five to ten question before check in at European and South American airports if one is flying on US carrier. There is then a second, smaller set of questions at the gate.
The questions do actually vary. There are the three 'standard' questions which used to be asked everywhere. They are no longer asked at every airport, and certainly not for every flight.

Then there are the additional, random, often bizarre questions. One is asked these before one can even check in for a US carrier, US bound flight (at LHR, MUC and FRA for example the questioner is before the check in area for UA). Then one may be asked additional questions before entering the gate area. (I was asked those exactly once, at MUC)

The questions as some have stated are asked by airline employees or security contractors. They are sometimes truly bizarre. What does annoy me is that the ones at MUC and FRA often do not speak German, and only speak heavily accented English. That is just useless is doing much at all to act as a deterrent or to scope out possible troublemakers. I tell them every single time that they should ask me in German, and sometimes they give up. I also cannot understand some of the American accents or terminology even at this point in my life and thus cannot answer some of the questions.

But I wouldn't think that this mandated, European model in use for some flights is what is being discussed here.

And I still question if like 'pronounce your name' and 'spell your name' the TSA is prepared to handle those passengers who do not speak English.
exbayern is offline  
Old Jul 29, 2011 | 10:18 am
  #50  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Up in the air far too often.
Programs: Star Gold
Posts: 354
If a BDO could tell instantly when somebody was lying, he would have better professions to enter:

http://www.allvegaspoker.com/

It CAN NOT be done with any sort of accuracy. The questions are going to be a huge annoyance. Ask me if I'm coming back from vacation while wearing a suit and tie and I WILL get annoyed. A great deal of people would, because it shows you are just stupid.

We need a trusted traveler program, body scanning for secondary ONLY with opt-out option, and a massive downsizing of the TSA with focus on intelligence and organized threat detection. Nothing else, no more toys.
cardiomd is offline  
Old Jul 29, 2011 | 10:43 am
  #51  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 48,871
Originally Posted by cardiomd
If a BDO could tell instantly when somebody was lying, he would have better professions to enter:

http://www.allvegaspoker.com/

It CAN NOT be done with any sort of accuracy. The questions are going to be a huge annoyance. Ask me if I'm coming back from vacation while wearing a suit and tie and I WILL get annoyed. A great deal of people would, because it shows you are just stupid.

We need a trusted traveler program, body scanning for secondary ONLY with opt-out option, and a massive downsizing of the TSA with focus on intelligence and organized threat detection. Nothing else, no more toys.
^
Looks like another massive taxpayer boondoggle coming down the road. Huge taxpayers dollars will be spent on training folks who aren't qualified in the first place. I suspect only a small percentage of my own workforce would be qualifed to do this sort of interrogation effectively - and we're going to waste time and money telling folks who can't master the website list of '10 allowable IDs' to become ace BDOs.

Right.

This from an agency that can't even control the barking and braying. Airports around the world can teach their security personnel how to communicate without barking and braying, but after almost ten years, TSA still hasn't mastered that one.

Right.
chollie is online now  
Old Jul 29, 2011 | 11:29 am
  #52  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
1M
40 Nights
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Marriott or Hilton hot tub with a big drink <glub> Beverage: To-Go Bag DYKWIA:SSSS /rolleyes ☈ Date Night:Costco
Programs: Sea Shell Lounge Platinum, TSA Pre✓ Refusnik Diamond, PWP Gold, FT subset of the subset
Posts: 12,523
Originally Posted by cardiomd
We need a trusted traveler program, body scanning for secondary ONLY with opt-out option, <SNIP>
I disagree. We do not need to have some animals more equal than others, and the Nude-O-Scopes do not detect explosives nor do they see into body cavities or under folds of flesh.

Everyone (passengers, airline employees, TSA employees) should be subject to the same screening. X-ray of belongings, hand held / walk through metal detectors, and Explosive Trace Detection / Explosive Trace Portal.

Originally Posted by cardiomd
and a massive downsizing of the TSA with focus on intelligence and organized threat detection. Nothing else, no more toys.
Agreed 100%.
N965VJ is offline  
Old Jul 29, 2011 | 12:15 pm
  #53  
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
1M
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 29,069
Originally Posted by VH-RMD
BDO "how are you today?"
PAX 'Oh good, porter service. Carry these over there will you?'


Originally Posted by RadioGirl
Originally Posted by goalie
And risk goalie-mom's all reaching and all powerful backhand slap upside my head for not being polite? I learned to fear that many moons ago
I'll bet goalie-mom could always tell when you were lying. RadioMom could (okay, she couldn't tell when you were lying, but she could tell when I was lying). Maybe they should hire mothers of teenagers as BDOs. @:-) OTOH, they wouldn't last long listening to the lies coming from HQ. ......
I move that goalie-mom and RadioMom co-run the TSA's BDO problem . Do I have a second?
goalie is offline  
Old Jul 29, 2011 | 12:45 pm
  #54  
1M
40 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: on the path to perdition
Programs: Delta, United
Posts: 5,014
Originally Posted by chollie
Looks like another massive taxpayer boondoggle coming down the road. Huge taxpayers dollars will be spent on training folks who aren't qualified in the first place. I suspect only a small percentage of my own workforce would be qualifed to do this sort of interrogation effectively - and we're going to waste time and money telling folks who can't master the website list of '10 allowable IDs' to become ace BDOs.
TSA and the security screening has a huge credibility problem. This new program will do nothing to help it. Look at the comments already. TSA really need to go back and look at the fundamentals and what is really needed for travel security. A program such as this one could be feasible but as said above the given that the many of the TSOs the public interfaces with on a day to day basis have been hired on very on very standards it does not help.

To me the only way out of some of this mess it have another program take it over. Such a program might be useful not just at airports but any large gathering of people. For instance, FAM though part of TSA is on the law enforcement side. As such they have higher standard for training and employment. If left as part of the security screening program then forget it no matter how well trained.
FlyingUnderTheRadar is offline  
Old Jul 29, 2011 | 12:50 pm
  #55  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 733
Originally Posted by goalie
I move that goalie-mom and RadioMom co-run the TSA's BDO problem . Do I have a second?
Don't you love your own mother? I would never nominate my own mother to work in such a den of thieves, liars, and cheats.
barbell is offline  
Old Jul 29, 2011 | 1:04 pm
  #56  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: RDU
Programs: OnePass
Posts: 772
Originally Posted by goalie


I move that goalie-mom and RadioMom co-run the TSA's BDO problem . Do I have a second?
Seconded.

A motion has been made and seconded. All in favor?
mikemey is offline  
Old Jul 29, 2011 | 1:22 pm
  #57  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 642
Originally Posted by mikemey
Seconded.

A motion has been made and seconded. All in favor?
Aye!
jtodd is offline  
Old Jul 29, 2011 | 2:07 pm
  #58  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Finally back in Boston after escaping from New York
Posts: 13,684
A few questions:

1) What kind of training will the new BDOs get? How will it compare to the training that their "equivalents" in Israel get?

2) In Israel, I did not have to remove shoes or liquids. Would that be carried over, as well?

3) What controls will be in place to make sure that there are no retaliatory screenings for those who do not work and play nicely with others?

Originally Posted by Mats

The staff at Tel Aviv are for more interactive. Although the questions have been the same for years, they tend to work in teams, and have a far more conversational approach.
The female ones that I went through were also smoking hot. No matter how many times I asked, though, I couldn't get them to give me a patdown. My wife was happy to slap me silly, though, after I pointed it out to her.

Originally Posted by cardiomd
We need a trusted traveler program, body scanning for secondary ONLY with opt-out option, and a massive downsizing of the TSA with focus on intelligence and organized threat detection. Nothing else, no more toys.
You bring up an important issue. In Israel, a lot of the "screening" is done before anyone gets to the airport. It's not "one size fits all," and they don't determine who a terrorist is by asking them a few questions.

Originally Posted by goalie


I move that goalie-mom and RadioMom co-run the TSA's BDO problem . Do I have a second?
No, because, as you correctly pointed out, Radio's mom can only detect when Radio is lying, and Goalie's mom can only determine when Goalie is lying. I would, however, be happy to have Goalie's mom join the JMS force (Jewish Mothers for Security) at the airport. As the son of a Jewish mother, I guarantee you that, within a few minutes, they would have the terrorists feeling so guilty that they would confess their plans.

Mike
mikeef is offline  
Old Jul 29, 2011 | 5:22 pm
  #59  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Programs: AA ex-EXP (buh-bye!), HH Gold, SPG Gold, UM Go Blue
Posts: 543
About 99% of the time, when I am in line, I have noise-cancelling headphones on and am listening to music. I remove them just before I get to the TDC. I never actually did this to avoid TSA, but rather the incessant prattle of people yammering on their cell phones. If I can't hear them, how can they interrogate me, at least when I am in line? So far, they have never asked me to take them off as there is usually someone lonely or friendly enough to actually chat up the BDOs and keep them busy.

I am curious how this will be handled. Or will I be deemed suspicious for having headphones on in the first place? What if I am on a cell phone, having a conversation, will they make me hang up the phone to talk to them?
Wollstonecraft is offline  
Old Jul 29, 2011 | 6:36 pm
  #60  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
1M
40 Nights
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Marriott or Hilton hot tub with a big drink <glub> Beverage: To-Go Bag DYKWIA:SSSS /rolleyes ☈ Date Night:Costco
Programs: Sea Shell Lounge Platinum, TSA Pre✓ Refusnik Diamond, PWP Gold, FT subset of the subset
Posts: 12,523
Originally Posted by Wollstonecraft
About 99% of the time, when I am in line, I have noise-cancelling headphones on and am listening to music.

<>

I am curious how this will be handled. Or will I be deemed suspicious for having headphones on in the first place? What if I am on a cell phone, having a conversation, will they make me hang up the phone to talk to them?
I've worn earbuds with the cord not plugged into anything shoved in my pocket to avoid being pestered by panhandlers while walking around some cities, so I imagine the same technique would work in an airport to avoid pestering Behavior Detection voodoo practitioners.

But there is nothing that compels anyone to speak to a TSA employee. I limit exchanges to things such as identifying my bag if asked when it comes out of the x-ray when they want to do a secondary. Topics beyond that, such as where I'm flying to, are met with silence, and I do want them to know I can hear them just fine.
N965VJ is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.