Today was the day...(The Michael Roberts/ExpressJet Story)
#166
Join Date: May 2010
Location: FLL - Nice and Warm
Programs: TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 1,025
The first of Many:
#168
Join Date: Jul 2006
Programs: United
Posts: 2,710
And I'm saying that you should have to prove what you say it is. Where's the problem?
#169
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ORD / DUB / LHR
Programs: UA 1K MM; BA Silver; Marriott Plat
Posts: 8,243
#171
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ORD / DUB / LHR
Programs: UA 1K MM; BA Silver; Marriott Plat
Posts: 8,243
How would I have such images? I don't work in the industry or have any association with the TSA. I'm telling you what I've seen - my personal experience. That isn't saved on my computer as a jpeg image.
At the end of the day I'm telling you, having looked at plenty of these images, that I don't believe that they are "nude" images or "pornography" or whatever hyperbolic nonsense they're being called today on this board. You can either agree or disagree with that opinion, but telling me that it is factually wrong is just not possible.
At the end of the day I'm telling you, having looked at plenty of these images, that I don't believe that they are "nude" images or "pornography" or whatever hyperbolic nonsense they're being called today on this board. You can either agree or disagree with that opinion, but telling me that it is factually wrong is just not possible.
Last edited by essxjay; Oct 18, 2010 at 6:58 pm Reason: Argumentative
#172
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 321
How do you know you're getting the real deal - especially enough to matter-of-factually dismiss the claims made in opposition to the idea that we are getting the real deal?
Last edited by essxjay; Oct 18, 2010 at 7:02 pm Reason: Personal attack
#173
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newport Beach, California, USA
Posts: 36,062
At the end of the day I'm telling you, having looked at plenty of these images, that I don't believe that they are "nude" images or "pornography" or whatever hyperbolic nonsense they're being called today on this board. You can either agree or disagree with that opinion, but telling me that it is factually wrong is just not possible.
Airport security chiefs have been banned from subjecting children to a controversial new X-ray scanner that produces ‘naked’ pictures of passengers because of legal warnings the images may break child pornography laws.
#174
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 89
, and it shall be unlawful for any passenger to refuse or fail to take a seat among those assigned to the race to which he belongs, at the request of any such employee in charge, if there is such a seat vacant
While I don't equate racial discrimination with the injustice of the loss of civil liberties in the security theater, the analogy is somehow appropriate.
As for your assertion that Parks was a habitual violator of the race segregation, it would appear that NOT to be the case. The only noted incident prior was one where while doing the required "pay your fare up front and then go out and reboard through the rear doors" she sat briefly to retrieve her dropped purse which enraged the same driver who she would face on the subsequent incident (though neither apparently recognized each other from the earlier incident).
\
#175
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,165
Wirelessly posted (BlackBerry8830/4.5.0.138 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/105)
I'm in Germany this week wondering why we can't strike like the French. Imagine if all the airline pilots rose at once to support him? Our country used to be like that....
I'm in Germany this week wondering why we can't strike like the French. Imagine if all the airline pilots rose at once to support him? Our country used to be like that....
#176
Join Date: Jul 2006
Programs: United
Posts: 2,710
How would I have such images? I don't work in the industry or have any association with the TSA. I'm telling you what I've seen - my personal experience. That isn't saved on my computer as a jpeg image.
At the end of the day I'm telling you, having looked at plenty of these images, that I don't believe that they are "nude" images or "pornography" or whatever hyperbolic nonsense they're being called today on this board. You can either agree or disagree with that opinion, but telling me that it is factually wrong is just not possible.
At the end of the day I'm telling you, having looked at plenty of these images, that I don't believe that they are "nude" images or "pornography" or whatever hyperbolic nonsense they're being called today on this board. You can either agree or disagree with that opinion, but telling me that it is factually wrong is just not possible.
Then, how can you tell me with the certainty needed to say:
"I'm not debating what the TSO can actually see. I'm debating what it is."
If you have never seen the image that a TSO can see? Just because you got to see the same general technology a few years ago in another country?
#177
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Benicia CA
Programs: Alaska MVP Gold 75K, AA 3.8MM, UA 1.1MM, enjoying the retired life
Posts: 31,849
#178
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 57,623
Unlike some others who post on this board, I've seen WBI's in actual use screening people at an airport. The screen shots I saw were much more detailed than the foggy images TSA would like us to believe they are looking at.
#180
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Kansas | Colorado Native
Programs: Amex Gold/Plat, UA *G, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott LT Gold, NEXUS, TSA Disparager Unobtanium
Posts: 21,608
Remember the CBS News report on TSA? Kippie took the CBS reporter into the "imaging" room, and they showed the pics from the monitor. Obviously, the buttons to invert and zoom were not used during the interview..