Y pax demanded to be upgraded (CX Secrets)
Jul 25, 2018, 4:57 am
#46
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: HKG/HND/OOL
Programs: QF Emerald. SQ Gold.
Posts: 3,171
everyone happy. Brownie points and extra leave pass without any cost to me
Jul 25, 2018, 5:47 am
#47
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 60
Jul 25, 2018, 6:51 am
#48
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 19,803
Jul 25, 2018, 6:53 am
#49
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: HKG/HND/OOL
Programs: QF Emerald. SQ Gold.
Posts: 3,171
so 10+ hr with 2yr old is walk in the park buddy
Jul 25, 2018, 7:19 am
#51
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: None any more
Posts: 11,017
i once got stuck with 3 kids 6 5 3 in economy cuz i gave up my revenue J to wife... and one of my kid puked inflight.... it was chaos... best bit upon disembarking wife goes "how was it kids behaved ok? the meal wasnt as good as i wished" ....
so 10+ hr with 2yr old is walk in the park buddy
so 10+ hr with 2yr old is walk in the park buddy
Jul 25, 2018, 7:11 pm
#52
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 178
There's a simple preventative mechanism for this. If you choose not to take it then you can really have no complaints!
Jul 25, 2018, 8:37 pm
#53
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: MNL
Programs: CX MPO DM, Le Club Accor Platinum, World of Hyatt Explorist
Posts: 2,284
Seems like the letter was written by the ISM, most likely she would have access to the passenger profile from her iPad, so I'm pretty sure the status stayed was accurate.
Jul 26, 2018, 1:43 am
#54
Suspended
Join Date: May 2006
Location: HKG
Programs: A3, TK *G; JL JGC; SPG,Hilton Gold
Posts: 9,952
my parents always fly next to each other so that means either my sis or i get it, GA get another seat, or pass the opup to someone else at checkin desk
Jul 26, 2018, 6:04 pm
#55
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 19,803
Disorderly conduct is HK law, but does not apply when plane is doors open on the ground outside HKSAR Hong Kong police close in-flight thieves' loophole
https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/...ieves-loophole <-- local law applies
https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/...ieves-loophole <-- local law applies
Jul 27, 2018, 1:50 am
#56
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 969
Disorderly conduct is HK law, but does not apply when plane is doors open on the ground outside HKSAR Hong Kong police close in-flight thieves' loophole
https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/...ieves-loophole <-- local law applies
https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/...ieves-loophole <-- local law applies
https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/...s-down-90-cent
Jul 27, 2018, 2:22 am
#57
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: MNL
Programs: CX MPO DM, Le Club Accor Platinum, World of Hyatt Explorist
Posts: 2,284
Ten since May? Weren't we told the number of cases was down?
https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/...s-down-90-cent
https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/...s-down-90-cent
Jul 31, 2018, 10:21 pm
#58
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 27,237
Captain made the call to offload him. Pax said he would behave, but pilot said it was too late. Now, I don't know how things might have been different if the pax put up a major fuss. And perhaps the length of flight had something to do with it too.
Aug 1, 2018, 1:23 am
#59
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: ZOA, SFO, HKG
Programs: UA 1K 0.9MM, Marriott Gold, HHonors Gold, Hertz PC, SBux Gold, TSA Pre✓
Posts: 13,811
I can use a big laugh after reading this. Such a classical DYKWIA.
Beside - if someone wants to cite the United-Dao incident again, make the fact straight: United was within its legal rights to remove Dao. The problem was how it was done.
So yes - it is sad for the CX personnel working for CX, when the company go deaf about their feedbacks.
Beside - if someone wants to cite the United-Dao incident again, make the fact straight: United was within its legal rights to remove Dao. The problem was how it was done.
So yes - it is sad for the CX personnel working for CX, when the company go deaf about their feedbacks.
Aug 1, 2018, 9:11 am
#60
Join Date: Nov 2006
Programs: MPC,CA,MU,AF
Posts: 8,171
I was on HKG-LAX a couple years ago in F and one pax was being verbally abusive (but not loud) toward one of the FAs pre-departure. (The guy was a bit of a jerk in the lounge too I had noticed previously).
Captain made the call to offload him. Pax said he would behave, but pilot said it was too late. Now, I don't know how things might have been different if the pax put up a major fuss. And perhaps the length of flight had something to do with it too.
Captain made the call to offload him. Pax said he would behave, but pilot said it was too late. Now, I don't know how things might have been different if the pax put up a major fuss. And perhaps the length of flight had something to do with it too.
I can use a big laugh after reading this. Such a classical DYKWIA.
Beside - if someone wants to cite the United-Dao incident again, make the fact straight: United was within its legal rights to remove Dao. The problem was how it was done.
So yes - it is sad for the CX personnel working for CX, when the company go deaf about their feedbacks.
Beside - if someone wants to cite the United-Dao incident again, make the fact straight: United was within its legal rights to remove Dao. The problem was how it was done.
So yes - it is sad for the CX personnel working for CX, when the company go deaf about their feedbacks.