Community
Wiki Posts
Search

New regional business class in 2019

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 16, 2017, 1:00 am
  #61  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX Diamond, UA Platinum, SPG Plat, Marriott Plat
Posts: 123
Originally Posted by sscywong
Sort of understand the rational... Since FB on 320 might either take up too many spaces or the seat will feel cramped....

As I pointed out some time last year, QR also managed to install 8 FB into their A320 fleet... Just the seat is quite tight and don't expect the same level of comfort as long haul FB product... Thus, to me at least, a better designed recliner seat might be better for the A320 than a tight FB or an inclined FB...

Respectfully disagree. Flew AA transcon F class which uses the Cirrus seat and it works just fine on an A321.

For the prices CX/KA charge for regional business flyers should expect a fully-flat bed.
hkflyer2014 is offline  
Old May 16, 2017, 1:15 am
  #62  
Hyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ORD [formerly] + HKG
Programs: CX Diamond, AA exExPlat, BAEC exGold, HH Diamond, Hyatt Globalist, Starriott Titanium, GE
Posts: 2,966
Originally Posted by hkflyer2014
Respectfully disagree. Flew AA transcon F class which uses the Cirrus seat and it works just fine on an A321.

For the prices CX/KA charge for regional business flyers should expect a fully-flat bed.
But AA's A321 is skewedly premium (102 pax only) and if anything CX regional configs are going less and less premium. Still, I don't disagree with you at all that a flatbed configuration is 'doable'. In fact it's exactly the same plane that you mention but J class (which is the B/E Diamond product, also used by QR on their A320s/A330s/A340s and RJ(?), UA, CA,...etc). It's not the most comfy seat for a 16 hour flight but it will be wonderful to like Sapporo or Singapore. Very space saving config I think the pitch is like 50" or less and CX can fit the same number of seats across each row as they do now.
G-CIVC is offline  
Old May 16, 2017, 11:41 pm
  #63  
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 19,802
Originally Posted by hkflyer2014
For the prices CX/KA charge for regional business flyers should expect a fully-flat bed.
(Edited 14:53) You're paying CX/KA fares for the schedule. Not for comfort.

Last edited by percysmith; May 17, 2017 at 12:53 am
percysmith is online now  
Old May 17, 2017, 2:56 am
  #64  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong, France
Programs: FB , BA Gold
Posts: 15,562
Originally Posted by G-CIVC
But AA's A321 is skewedly premium (102 pax only) and if anything CX regional configs are going less and less premium. Still, I don't disagree with you at all that a flatbed configuration is 'doable'. In fact it's exactly the same plane that you mention but J class (which is the B/E Diamond product, also used by QR on their A320s/A330s/A340s and RJ(?), UA, CA,...etc). It's not the most comfy seat for a 16 hour flight but it will be wonderful to like Sapporo or Singapore. Very space saving config I think the pitch is like 50" or less and CX can fit the same number of seats across each row as they do now.
The (poor) B/E Diamond seat has been selected by airlines (e.g. QR) to replace their old angled lie-flat with 60" pitch, with exactly the same number of Diamond seats with a 60" pitch. For example, CX could have replaced their first-generation facing-forward angled longhaul seats (the one prior to the herringbone coffins), by fully-flat sideways Diamond seats. The Diamond (not the Super Diamond) are the worst flay seats I can think of especially the extremely narrow window seats. But that does not apply to the current CX regional seats. These have a mere 45" pitch and you need a minimum of 60".
brunos is online now  
Old May 17, 2017, 8:10 am
  #65  
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 19,802
QF's domestic business is only 37" pitch and 22" wide. Please sir, I want some more.
percysmith is online now  
Old Jan 14, 2020, 10:20 pm
  #66  
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 19,802
Cathay Pacific: evolution, not revolution

The first half of 2020 will also see the debut of Cathay Pacific's Airbus A321neo – to be flown by its regional sibling Cathay Dragon – and a new regional business class seat.

However, the Oneworld member airline is not expected to radically depart from the same 'premium economy-like' design as its current regional business class, which began flying in January 2013 and borrowed some elements from an angled lie-flat or ‘sloping sleeper’ seat to weave them into the more conventional form of a recliner.

“I think it will be most likely reclinable because it is a narrow-body aircraft,” tips Vivian Lo, Cathay Pacific’s Head of Customer Experience & Design. “Basically we're still seeing the majority of the flights are below two hours, stretched to four and at most six" – flight durations which Lo suggests do not require the lie-flat luxury of a business class bed.

The A321neo fleet will see Cathay Dragon retire its ageing A320 jets, with both a larger passenger capacity to cater for popular destinations such as Beijing and Shanghai, and a longer range to extend the network's reach.


https://www.executivetraveller.com/n...ur-way-in-2020
percysmith is online now  
Old Jan 15, 2020, 12:44 am
  #67  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ...
Programs: CX DM / SQ PPS / VN Platinum
Posts: 1,078
Originally Posted by percysmith
Cathay Pacific: evolution, not revolution

The first half of 2020 will also see ... a new regional business class seat.

... the Oneworld member airline is not expected to radically depart from the same 'premium economy-like' design as its current regional business class...

Premium economy-like class is a good description for that crap seat.
rickywk and thomas164 like this.
Jane's Addiction is offline  
Old Jan 15, 2020, 12:49 am
  #68  
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 19,802
Originally Posted by Jane's Addiction
Premium economy-like class is a good description for that crap seat.
Inferior than Premium Economy in my view (YMMV)
percysmith is online now  
Old Jan 15, 2020, 12:52 am
  #69  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 289
Originally Posted by Jane's Addiction
Premium economy-like class is a good description for that crap seat.
It's really a crap seat. No matters you just want have a seat, enjoy the crap meal or take a nap, you cannot find a good position for it.
rickywk is offline  
Old Jan 15, 2020, 2:11 am
  #70  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Programs: CX - DM; Hilton - Diamond, Marriott - Titanium
Posts: 542
Originally Posted by rickywk
It's really a crap seat. No matters you just want have a seat, enjoy the crap meal or take a nap, you cannot find a good position for it.
I actively avoid the regional planes like plague whenever I fly within Asia! It is absolutely dreadful!
HKGglobaltrotter is offline  
Old Jan 15, 2020, 2:36 am
  #71  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ...
Programs: CX DM / SQ PPS / VN Platinum
Posts: 1,078
Originally Posted by rickywk
It's really a crap seat. No matters you just want have a seat, enjoy the crap meal or take a nap, you cannot find a good position for it.

I usually revert it to the take off position after 15 mins of fussing around with the 'recline' in a failed effort to find a comfy configuration (it seems I forget this lesson and have to re-learn it each flight). Quite a comment on the seat that it is less comfortable in the recline position...
Jane's Addiction is offline  
Old Jan 15, 2020, 3:15 am
  #72  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong, France
Programs: FB , BA Gold
Posts: 15,562
"Reclineable" would be a great plus. With the fixed shell, the current awful seat does not recline but just slides a bit.
brunos is online now  
Old Jan 15, 2020, 4:30 am
  #73  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 481
I’m sure most will be happy if they even implemented the old old j class. The shell sliding ones. Even with a reduced pitch it will be more comfortable
londonexpert is offline  
Old Jan 15, 2020, 4:47 am
  #74  
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 19,802
Originally Posted by londonexpert
I’m sure most will be happy if they even implemented the old old j class. The shell sliding ones. Even with a reduced pitch it will be more comfortable
So old CX recliners for regional? https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/cath...l#post31918866 (ignoring long haul products in regional of course)
percysmith is online now  
Old Jan 15, 2020, 5:20 am
  #75  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 481
Originally Posted by percysmith
So old CX recliners for regional? https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/cath...l#post31918866 (ignoring long haul products in regional of course)
No those are not recliners but angled flat seats.
londonexpert is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.