Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Cathay Pacific | Cathay
Reload this Page >

CX admin ERROR - being refused to board!

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

CX admin ERROR - being refused to board!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 3, 2016 | 9:07 pm
  #16  
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
Community Builder
Community Influencer
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 22,109
lchchester: agree. And in the negligence claim cxcat can point out AMTSL is a HK licenced travel agent http://www.tar.gov.hk/cgi-bin/tar/li...arch_detail.pl so a duty of reasonable care and skill must apply no matter how much AML tries to exclude it by contract (as part of AM T&C).
percysmith is offline  
Old Jan 5, 2016 | 1:53 am
  #17  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Programs: CX MPC, BAEC
Posts: 13
Originally Posted by brunos
It is potentially a EC261 case because LCY is your final destination on that day and your were denied boarding. That this is part of a more complex ticket is not important. BA (or the airline operating) would be the one to "pay" for denied boarding. However, they claim that you don't have a proper ticket, and AM admitted it, so there is no legal avenue there.

Your story confirms that it is important to always check that you have a confirmed booking on all airlines of a multi-airline itin (meaning going to that airline website), especially awards, and to always do OLCI. If you cannot OLCI then there is a presumption of problem, and you have time to solve it.

in that case, there would be no reason to try to claim EC261 I suppose?

as for OLCI, I have attempted it a few times, but after I entered all the details, it was stuck on the "loading" page... besides, I had a few pieces of luggage to check in, so had to go to check-in desk anyway
cxcat is offline  
Old Jan 5, 2016 | 4:09 am
  #18  
FlyerTalk Evangelist and Ambassador: The British Airways Club
5M
100 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere between 0 and 13,000 metres high
Programs: AF/KL Life Plat, BA GGL+GfL, ALL Diam, Hilton Diam, Marriott Gold, blablablah, etc
Posts: 33,207
Originally Posted by brunos
BA (or the airline operating) would be the one to "pay" for denied boarding. However, they claim that you don't have a proper ticket, and AM admitted it, so there is no legal avenue there.
Exactly: EC261 only gives you a recourse against the operating airline (regardless of both airline code and purchasing process) if you have a valid ticket. BA claimed that you did not have a valid ticket and AM confirmed this, which seems to me to suggest that the EC261 avenue will be a waste of your time as you would - by your own admission - be suing the wrong airline.

My guess is that the cock up was strictly with AM because they didn't issue the proper e-tix so in my view, the issue is likely incompetence on AM side. In my view, complaint will be more effective than suing in any case unless you have too much time on your hands and do not care about stress. I would focus on the incompetence of not properly issuing the ticket and the unacceptable attitude of the agent you spoke to.
orbitmic is offline  
Old Jan 5, 2016 | 9:20 am
  #19  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Programs: CX MPC, BAEC
Posts: 13
Originally Posted by orbitmic
Exactly: My guess is that the cock up was strictly with AM because they didn't issue the proper e-tix so in my view, the issue is likely incompetence on AM side. In my view, complaint will be more effective than suing in any case unless you have too much time on your hands and do not care about stress. I would focus on the incompetence of not properly issuing the ticket and the unacceptable attitude of the agent you spoke to.
Yes I totally agree hence I submitted a complaint feedback form to CX/MPC last week.. now just waiting for reply.. within 14 days they said.
Now this actually reminds me, when I was on the phone with MPC manager when all this happened, he told me I DO NOT need to file a complaint as he has already done so.. yet so far I have not heard anything from anyone!
cxcat is offline  
Old Jan 5, 2016 | 9:24 am
  #20  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Programs: CX MPC, BAEC
Posts: 13
Originally Posted by brunos
Your story confirms that it is important to always check that you have a confirmed booking on all airlines of a multi-airline itin (meaning going to that airline website), especially awards, and to always do OLCI. If you cannot OLCI then there is a presumption of problem, and you have time to solve it.
It does not justify or excuse the administrative error by AM, if any, but it was a bit careless on your part not to check the confirmed booking. But, you paid a hefty price so no need to insist. As Orbitmic stated, these administrative errors do happen on multi-airline awards.

I did try to OLCI a few times prior to the journey, However I was unable to do so: after submitting all the details the page was stuck loading
Also, I had luggage to check in so I need to pay a visit to the check in desk anyway.
cxcat is offline  
Old Jan 5, 2016 | 9:31 am
  #21  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: HKG
Programs: CX DM, SPG Pt, Le Club Accor GO, Shangri-La GC Jade
Posts: 1,327
Originally Posted by cxcat
Yes I totally agree hence I submitted a complaint feedback form to CX/MPC last week.. now just waiting for reply.. within 14 days they said.
Now this actually reminds me, when I was on the phone with MPC manager when all this happened, he told me I DO NOT need to file a complaint as he has already done so.. yet so far I have not heard anything from anyone!
No worry... It will take some while.... I filed a complaint with them on Nov 8, got the first response on Nov 18, and immediately wrote back... And guess what, I got a reply today! Though it's a bit strange (and repetitive: "we are working on it") and didn't mention where's the 10K compensation miles they said will credit to me gone...

Last edited by sscywong; Jan 5, 2016 at 10:00 am
sscywong is offline  
Old Jan 5, 2016 | 2:55 pm
  #22  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Programs: CX MPC, BAEC
Posts: 13
Originally Posted by sscywong
No worry... It will take some while.... I filed a complaint with them on Nov 8, got the first response on Nov 18, and immediately wrote back... And guess what, I got a reply today! Though it's a bit strange (and repetitive: "we are working on it") and didn't mention where's the 10K compensation miles they said will credit to me gone...
At least the promised 10k miles as compensation! They never mentioned any compensation despite me asking quite directly! Apart from "keep all receipts and we will TRY to reimburse you."

What exactly happened with your case?
cxcat is offline  
Old Jan 6, 2016 | 2:34 am
  #23  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: AU
Programs: former Olympic Airways Gold (yeah - still proud of that!)
Posts: 14,538
Just wondering what happened here? Out of interest, how long did it take to ticket once the booking was made? If there was any sort of substantial delay (more than a couple of days) I wonder if BA cancelled the seat because they didn't receive payment?

If that was the case, CX may have issued the ticket anyway, but it wouldn't have had a seat against it. And likewise the historical reservation would have been there, but unpaid.
LHR/MEL/Europe FF is offline  
Old Jan 6, 2016 | 3:11 am
  #24  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Programs: AA & SPG Plat
Posts: 387
Originally Posted by LHR/MEL/Europe FF
Just wondering what happened here? Out of interest, how long did it take to ticket once the booking was made? If there was any sort of substantial delay (more than a couple of days) I wonder if BA cancelled the seat because they didn't receive payment?

If that was the case, CX may have issued the ticket anyway, but it wouldn't have had a seat against it. And likewise the historical reservation would have been there, but unpaid.
+1
I'm curious to hear the history of changesss OP made - and when they were made.
Daffie is offline  
Old Jan 6, 2016 | 3:11 am
  #25  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Programs: CX MPC, BAEC
Posts: 13
Originally Posted by LHR/MEL/Europe FF
Just wondering what happened here? Out of interest, how long did it take to ticket once the booking was made? If there was any sort of substantial delay (more than a couple of days) I wonder if BA cancelled the seat because they didn't receive payment?

If that was the case, CX may have issued the ticket anyway, but it wouldn't have had a seat against it. And likewise the historical reservation would have been there, but unpaid.
I changed the ticket via telephone a few months ago - usual confirmation of booking/eticket sent to my email soon after, no massive delays that I was aware of.

BA was definitely aware of the booking as it showed up on my BA phone app and also on their screen at check-in.
cxcat is offline  
Old Jan 6, 2016 | 7:52 am
  #26  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: HKG
Programs: CX DM, SPG Pt, Le Club Accor GO, Shangri-La GC Jade
Posts: 1,327
Originally Posted by cxcat
I changed the ticket via telephone a few months ago - usual confirmation of booking/eticket sent to my email soon after, no massive delays that I was aware of.

BA was definitely aware of the booking as it showed up on my BA phone app and also on their screen at check-in.
I don't know how the link between booking reference number and e-ticket number works, but I guess that the booking reference was not updated to tie with the revised e-ticket number after your change...


Originally Posted by cxcat
At least the promised 10k miles as compensation! They never mentioned any compensation despite me asking quite directly! Apart from "keep all receipts and we will TRY to reimburse you."

What exactly happened with your case?
Mine is nothing compared to yours At least I flew on time both sectors.... Simply service related issues...
sscywong is offline  
Old Jan 6, 2016 | 8:09 am
  #27  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
40 Countries Visited
60 Nights
5M
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 102,617
Originally Posted by LchChester
Assuming it is less than 24 hours in london, your destination will be Amsterdam for the purpose of EU261, and you may file a claim under denied boarding accordingly.

However, according to the BA forum:





If you would like to file a claim, you can go for the small claim tribunal, which is a pretty simple application (but the process is still prolonged). Remember to target Asiamiles instead of Cathay Pacific
Doesn't EC261 apply because the flight is operated by BA?

However, with less than 24 hours in London followed by three days at AMS, it would be viewed as IOM to AMS and the intraEU limits would apply.
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Jan 6, 2016 | 9:07 am
  #28  
FlyerTalk Evangelist and Ambassador: The British Airways Club
5M
100 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere between 0 and 13,000 metres high
Programs: AF/KL Life Plat, BA GGL+GfL, ALL Diam, Hilton Diam, Marriott Gold, blablablah, etc
Posts: 33,207
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
Doesn't EC261 apply because the flight is operated by BA?

However, with less than 24 hours in London followed by three days at AMS, it would be viewed as IOM to AMS and the intraEU limits would apply.
The issue is not about the airline or flight, but about the fact that the OP did not have a valid ticket. This was the fault of his ticketing agent (in this case Marco Polo) and not of BA, so using EC261 would be barking at the wrong tree and the OP would lose his case against BA because of the absence of a valid ticket.
orbitmic is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.