New "77G" with no F
Nov 3, 2011, 9:11 am
#61
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Left
Programs: FT
Posts: 7,285
Is that really necessary? The bash-America thing is both an overused punch-line and offensive....
I am a strong believer in cutting down the number of partner redemptions ("freeloaders") because, as an Asia Miles member all else equal it is frustrating that I must pay substantially more $$ to earn and burn miles than AA members on CX metal. But it's kinda unnecessary to extend the argument any further than that.
I am a strong believer in cutting down the number of partner redemptions ("freeloaders") because, as an Asia Miles member all else equal it is frustrating that I must pay substantially more $$ to earn and burn miles than AA members on CX metal. But it's kinda unnecessary to extend the argument any further than that.
i fear as a BAEC freeloader, nov 16 will be a very bad day. no more 66,666 avion mile trips for J on CX to the far east (well, 100K BA miles that really only means 66666 avion after the 1.5 bonus...and given i churn the avion cards, my really cost is only a couple hundred CAD for the avion points...
Nov 3, 2011, 10:12 am
#62
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: YYZ
Programs: NH Plat, AA Gold
Posts: 542
Is that really necessary? The bash-America thing is both an overused punch-line and offensive....
I am a strong believer in cutting down the number of partner redemptions ("freeloaders") because, as an Asia Miles member all else equal it is frustrating that I must pay substantially more $$ to earn and burn miles than AA members on CX metal. But it's kinda unnecessary to extend the argument any further than that.
I am a strong believer in cutting down the number of partner redemptions ("freeloaders") because, as an Asia Miles member all else equal it is frustrating that I must pay substantially more $$ to earn and burn miles than AA members on CX metal. But it's kinda unnecessary to extend the argument any further than that.
Nov 5, 2011, 8:07 am
#63
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 6,978