![]() |
Originally Posted by mosburger
(Post 13201868)
I would like to repeat myself a bit: The worst part of flying economy is the inability to sleep with the tight pitch and lacking recline. If those can be addressed and seat width plus pillow and duvet quality improved, that's about all needed, IMHO.
Lounge access, priority boarding and the like can be acquired through status. What I would not like to see is a biz class light with biz class pricing. Like you said, the primary things need to be address is the following: reclining and softer/adjustable cushions. The success of Eva Y+ shows that people are willing to pay double Y if they can get a good night sleep on the longhaul. |
Originally Posted by mosburger
(Post 13201868)
I would like to repeat myself a bit: The worst part of flying economy is the inability to sleep with the tight pitch and lacking recline. If those can be addressed and seat width plus pillow and duvet quality improved, that's about all needed, IMHO.
|
Originally Posted by IC6A
(Post 13202320)
I think you should fly with KLM. Their biz class is half the price of CX in some route.
It's just that I typically fly CX longhaul on the night flights between Hongkong and London and vice versa and on those sleeping takes preference over catering etc. |
Originally Posted by IC6A
(Post 13202320)
I think you should fly with KLM. Their biz class is half the price of CX in some route.
|
|
Originally Posted by sxc
(Post 13254774)
|
Originally Posted by sxc
(Post 13254774)
|
Originally Posted by hau cheng
(Post 13255122)
I don't get the feeling that CX put the thought, time and effort into innovation as NZ do.
|
CX is managed? Who knew?
Jokes aside, I would hardly call sending members a survey about a potential Y+ attached with a picture of a competitor's product as a guide as to any innovative ideas they may have. Says it all really. Oh, and by the way, lets go back to the 'success' of the various incarnations of CX's J class as examples of their thought and innovation. QED. |
Originally Posted by hau cheng
(Post 13256278)
CX is managed? Who knew?
Jokes aside, I would hardly call sending members a survey about a potential Y+ attached with a picture of a competitor's product as a guide as to any innovative ideas they may have. Says it all really. Oh, and by the way, lets go back to the 'success' of the various incarnations of CX's J class as examples of their thought and innovation. QED. Also although the NZ couch is nice, I really don't think it is a product many airlines will leap to adapt. |
Originally Posted by hau cheng
(Post 13256278)
Jokes aside, I would hardly call sending members a survey about a potential Y+ attached with a picture of a competitor's product as a guide as to any innovative ideas they may have. Says it all really.
I hope I'm right. |
Originally Posted by sl00001
(Post 13255526)
This looks neat! Get a few blankets and pillows and you can create your own little suite:D
a row of 3 seats probably cheaper than J class. Also looks roomier than CX's herringbone J... |
Originally Posted by Rejuvenate
(Post 13256359)
I trust that you never really travel in F Class before?:rolleyes:
Also although the NZ couch is nice, I really don't think it is a product many airlines will leap to adapt. |
Originally Posted by hau cheng
(Post 13256780)
At least they are thinking and innovating. Take a look at the mock-up for their Y+, interesting. As a paying traveller, it's good to see an airline thinking of the customer/comfort/innovation.
Sure it is innovative, but does it make business sense for other airlines? Different markets/Different demands. No one is forcing you to take CX if you feel they are not innovative enough for your taste. |
Originally Posted by sxc
(Post 13254774)
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 3:17 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.