Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Destinations > Americas > Canada
Reload this Page >

Looks like more entry restrictions for Canada coming

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Looks like more entry restrictions for Canada coming

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 24, 2021, 11:53 am
  #61  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 5,190
Originally Posted by tcook052
It does sound to me like the government is not at all interested in trying other options such as arrival testing or targeted route suspensions but rather the nuclear option to wipe out all int. travel completely.
It will be interesting to see what hurdles they put, if any, on non-resident Cdns who would like to visit Canada.
Crampedin13A likes this.
sydneyracquelle is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2021, 11:59 am
  #62  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC*SE 2MM
Posts: 16,655
Given how unsafe the government seems to think travel has become, part of me hopes that Air Canada and Westjet unilaterally decide to shut down all passenger operations (domestic and international) while laying the blame firmly at Trudeau, Ford and Legault's feet. Let the government organize "rescue" flights. Watch people scream when they realize the repercussions. It's not like the airlines are making any money flying right now.
rankourabu, yvrcnx, SFO777 and 1 others like this.
The Lev is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2021, 12:06 pm
  #63  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: YYZ
Programs: BA Gold/Marriott Gold/HH Diamond/IC Plat Amba
Posts: 5,992
Originally Posted by sydneyracquelle
It will be interesting to see what hurdles they put, if any, on non-resident Cdns who would like to visit Canada.
There has been no science put into it.
rankourabu likes this.

Last edited by tcook052; Jan 24, 2021 at 12:32 pm Reason: Off topic
Crampedin13A is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2021, 12:07 pm
  #64  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: YEG
Programs: Table scraps from Aeroplan and AmEx Plat
Posts: 901
Originally Posted by tcook052
Agree. Even with the current 72-hour negative PCR test, testing upon arrival as per the pilot programs at YYC would catch anyone whose status may've changed in the interim while forcing them to follow-up post-arrival which are also provisions of the program.

I'd like to see enforced quarantine be the absolute last resort after other less draconian steps have been taken rather than it being the next club out of the bag.
I believe there would be a lot more compliance if people did not see, rightly I think, the current quarantine measures as overkill.

Take the Alberta program. You fly in, take a test at the airport and go home. For the next day you are sleeping off the jetlag or the hangover from your last day at your Cancun AI. No problem staying in. Next day you get your test result, 99% of the times negative. The ones that test positive, unless they are sociopaths and/or morons, will self-isolate. Those that are negative know that there is still a gestation period and are not out of the woods yet, but can still move about with caution. Maybe go for a drive (why on earth is that forbidden???). Six days later you get your second test result, and you are provably safer than your average neighbour who never left town.

A testing at arrival program would also help focus enforcement efforts on those few that test positive. For the life of me, I cannot understand why we don't have on-arrival testing at every border post. This includes truckers, why can't they get an antigen test once or twice a week?
bambinomartino is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2021, 12:11 pm
  #65  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Canada
Programs: UA*1K MM SK EBG LATAM BL
Posts: 23,314
Originally Posted by Badenoch
Incarceration in a corrections facility would be impractical due to lack of space. However, there are thousands of unused hotel rooms that would be most suitable accommodation for leisure travellers who ignored the travel advisories to spend their two weeks quarantine after their non-essential sun vacation.
Or more likely the dual citizen Canadian who had to travel to see their dying mother in the home country.

Where do you see all these sun vacationers? AC literally has a weekly narrow body to sun destinations that flies half empty. At most thats 500 people a week.

And those people are triple tested. On top of having to quarantine.


Meanwhile we let in 5 million+ people without quarantine or testing of any kind. Even if only a small portion of which are in non essential industries, they are a far bigger problem than the handful of sun vacationers.
tcook052, yvrcnx, pilot007 and 4 others like this.
rankourabu is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2021, 12:19 pm
  #66  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: YYC
Programs: AC SE MM
Posts: 605
Originally Posted by The Lev
Given how unsafe the government seems to think travel has become, part of me hopes that Air Canada and Westjet unilaterally decide to shut down all passenger operations (domestic and international) while laying the blame firmly at Trudeau, Ford and Legault's feet. Let the government organize "rescue" flights. Watch people scream when they realize the repercussions. It's not like the airlines are making any money flying right now.
And maybe they should refuse to sell the government such rescue flights. It would be irresponsible to sell the governement "unsafe flights".
mountainboy is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2021, 12:33 pm
  #67  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ontario, Canada
Programs: Aeroplan, IHG, Enterprise, Avios, Nexus
Posts: 8,355
Originally Posted by rankourabu
Or more likely the dual citizen Canadian who had to travel to see their dying mother in the home country.

Where do you see all these sun vacationers? AC literally has a weekly narrow body to sun destinations that flies half empty. At most thats 500 people a week.

And those people are triple tested. On top of having to quarantine.

Meanwhile we let in 5 million+ people without quarantine or testing of any kind. Even if only a small portion of which are in non essential industries, they are a far bigger problem than the handful of sun vacationers.
It is up to the individual traveller to decide whether their reason to travel justifies meeting the testing and quarantine requirements. The airlines were complaining a few days ago that since the testing requirement was introduced there were 50,000 flight cancellations so clearly it is more than a "handful." We have no idea how many sun worshippers would change their plans due to the restrictions. I do know they have changed mine.

The argument about the people being let in without quarantine and testing does not support easing restrictions on non-essential leisure vacationers. It does however speak to a thorough review of "essential workers" to determine the validity of their claim.
Badenoch is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2021, 12:48 pm
  #68  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: YEG
Programs: HH Silver
Posts: 56,451
Originally Posted by Badenoch
The airlines were complaining a few days ago that since the testing requirement was introduced there were 50,000 flight cancellations so clearly it is more than a "handful."
Yes but 50K over what period? The next 4 weeks or 4 months? That wasn't quantified when a staffer to incoming transport min. Alghabra mentioned it in recent days. 50K spread throughout the whole country over a 4-month period, for example, is a figurative handful.
rankourabu and oreomilkshake like this.
tcook052 is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2021, 1:01 pm
  #69  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: YYC
Programs: AC SE MM
Posts: 605
Originally Posted by tcook052
Yes but 50K over what period? The next 4 weeks or 4 months? That wasn't quantified when a staffer to incoming transport min. Alghabra mentioned it in recent days. 50K spread throughout the whole country over a 4-month period, for example, is a figurative handful.
When people don't get money back (just vague promise of a credit), some hold out hope for a change in refund policy, and won't cancel until immediately before departure.

In regards to route cancellations, WJ has gone further and asks passengers to not cancel of their own accord, but wait for flights to be cancelled, to end up in the refund queue rather than the credit queue. That further delays cancellations.

So I suspect a majority of 50K flights were next 4 weeks. Meanwhile the airlines know the cancellations will increase, as new bookings decrease.
Badenoch likes this.
mountainboy is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2021, 1:30 pm
  #70  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: YEG
Programs: Table scraps from Aeroplan and AmEx Plat
Posts: 901
Originally Posted by Badenoch
The only remaining question is whether the quarantine accommodation is paid for by the leisure traveller or the government.
I don't know about that, I think the rest of us have asked many other good questions.

From where I sit, your position would only make sense if we concurrently locked the country down for a month. And I mean military in the streets, no one leaving their house until the virus is snuffed out. Would you be okay with that?
LETTERBOY likes this.
bambinomartino is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2021, 1:41 pm
  #71  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: YEG
Programs: Table scraps from Aeroplan and AmEx Plat
Posts: 901
Originally Posted by rankourabu
Or more likely the dual citizen Canadian who had to travel to see their dying mother in the home country.
Count me in that group. I haven't seen my 85-year old dad for going on 2 years, since my mom's funeral. Even with the slow vaccine rollout in Eastern Europe, there is a decent chance he'll get it by late spring, and I was already making plans for visiting this summer. There is no chance I could do that if I had to be locked up in a hotel room for 2 weeks upon my return.

If this hotel quarantine thing came to pass, how long would it be until it's rescinded? Dollars to donuts many many months longer than reasonable or necessary.
LETTERBOY and Yul_voyager like this.
bambinomartino is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2021, 2:35 pm
  #72  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: YOW
Programs: AC E75 / Marriott Titanium Elite
Posts: 952
Originally Posted by Badenoch
Passengers from the Diamond Princess cruise ship were required to quarantine at either CFB Borden or at the Nav Centre in Cornwall, Ontario.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottaw...wall-1.5470386

Currently, incoming passengers who do not have a negative test or a suitable quarantine plan may be sent to a government-approved quarantine facility.

https://www.canada.ca/en/public-heal...ion-sheet.html

So the concept of mandatory quarantine in a place not of your choosing is hardly a new concept, is in place now in some circumstances and the government is hinting it may be expanded to include every non-essential leisure traveller.
Given the PCR test restriction and this restriction used in the past, couldn't the government also put a complete ban on airlines transporting anyone into the country that doesn't have an essential designation from the government? Folks are free to travel, but the government could theoretically make it even more difficult for people to travel. Alternatively put in place a $1,000 surcharge to administer the quarantine program plus stay in a government facility for the 14 days. I'm not advocating for these measures, but there must be ways if they wanted to. Asking another country to ban Canadians seems like a strange way to effect policy change.
YZF_Elite is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2021, 3:25 pm
  #73  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC*SE 2MM
Posts: 16,655
Originally Posted by bambinomartino
If this hotel quarantine thing came to pass, how long would it be until it's rescinded? Dollars to donuts many many months longer than reasonable or necessary.
This.

The most "at risk" population should be vaccinated within the next three months (unless Canada's vaccine incompetence continues). At that point we have passed the danger zone but governments probably will keep the quarantine requirement in place for all of 2021 because nobody wants to "own" making a decision that could go wrong.
The Lev is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2021, 3:35 pm
  #74  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: YEG
Programs: HH Silver
Posts: 56,451
Originally Posted by mountainboy
So I suspect a majority of 50K flights were next 4 weeks. Meanwhile the airlines know the cancellations will increase, as new bookings decrease.
While I hear what you're saying, I'm less convinced.

Anyone with plans to travel this winter, “cancel your trip”, says Trudeau

Originally Posted by The Lev
The most "at risk" population should be vaccinated within the next three months (unless Canada's vaccine incompetence continues). At that point we have passed the danger zone but governments probably will keep the quarantine requirement in place for all of 2021 because nobody wants to "own" making a decision that could go wrong.
I'd hope not as the we've repeatedly been told that everyone who wants to be vaccinated can do so by Sep. so the public will want to begin traveling again and will apply the same kind of pressure to remove or reduce any quarantine as it did in calling for travel bans in recent weeks. What should be done at that point it a roll-out to more Canadian airports of a permanent short-term rapid testing programs such as the pilot program at YYC and coming soon to YEG.
LETTERBOY likes this.

Last edited by tcook052; Jan 24, 2021 at 3:49 pm
tcook052 is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2021, 3:41 pm
  #75  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: YYC
Programs: AC SE MM
Posts: 605
Originally Posted by The Lev
This.

The most "at risk" population should be vaccinated within the next three months (unless Canada's vaccine incompetence continues). At that point we have passed the danger zone but governments probably will keep the quarantine requirement in place for all of 2021 because nobody wants to "own" making a decision that could go wrong.
Around that time vaccine passports might become a thing, and cause the next level of travel / route decimation, not just slow return of demand, but many people unable to navigate & satisfy the mishmash of requirements being established. I fear this is going get worse well into 2022.
Crampedin13A and 24left like this.
mountainboy is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.