Looks like more entry restrictions for Canada coming
#61
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 5,190
It will be interesting to see what hurdles they put, if any, on non-resident Cdns who would like to visit Canada.
#62
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC*SE 2MM
Posts: 16,655
Given how unsafe the government seems to think travel has become, part of me hopes that Air Canada and Westjet unilaterally decide to shut down all passenger operations (domestic and international) while laying the blame firmly at Trudeau, Ford and Legault's feet. Let the government organize "rescue" flights. Watch people scream when they realize the repercussions. It's not like the airlines are making any money flying right now.
#63
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: YYZ
Programs: BA Gold/Marriott Gold/HH Diamond/IC Plat Amba
Posts: 5,992
#64
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: YEG
Programs: Table scraps from Aeroplan and AmEx Plat
Posts: 901
Agree. Even with the current 72-hour negative PCR test, testing upon arrival as per the pilot programs at YYC would catch anyone whose status may've changed in the interim while forcing them to follow-up post-arrival which are also provisions of the program.
I'd like to see enforced quarantine be the absolute last resort after other less draconian steps have been taken rather than it being the next club out of the bag.
I'd like to see enforced quarantine be the absolute last resort after other less draconian steps have been taken rather than it being the next club out of the bag.
Take the Alberta program. You fly in, take a test at the airport and go home. For the next day you are sleeping off the jetlag or the hangover from your last day at your Cancun AI. No problem staying in. Next day you get your test result, 99% of the times negative. The ones that test positive, unless they are sociopaths and/or morons, will self-isolate. Those that are negative know that there is still a gestation period and are not out of the woods yet, but can still move about with caution. Maybe go for a drive (why on earth is that forbidden???). Six days later you get your second test result, and you are provably safer than your average neighbour who never left town.
A testing at arrival program would also help focus enforcement efforts on those few that test positive. For the life of me, I cannot understand why we don't have on-arrival testing at every border post. This includes truckers, why can't they get an antigen test once or twice a week?
#65
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Canada
Programs: UA*1K MM SK EBG LATAM BL
Posts: 23,314
Incarceration in a corrections facility would be impractical due to lack of space. However, there are thousands of unused hotel rooms that would be most suitable accommodation for leisure travellers who ignored the travel advisories to spend their two weeks quarantine after their non-essential sun vacation.
Where do you see all these sun vacationers? AC literally has a weekly narrow body to sun destinations that flies half empty. At most thats 500 people a week.
And those people are triple tested. On top of having to quarantine.
Meanwhile we let in 5 million+ people without quarantine or testing of any kind. Even if only a small portion of which are in non essential industries, they are a far bigger problem than the handful of sun vacationers.
#66
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: YYC
Programs: AC SE MM
Posts: 605
Given how unsafe the government seems to think travel has become, part of me hopes that Air Canada and Westjet unilaterally decide to shut down all passenger operations (domestic and international) while laying the blame firmly at Trudeau, Ford and Legault's feet. Let the government organize "rescue" flights. Watch people scream when they realize the repercussions. It's not like the airlines are making any money flying right now.
#67
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ontario, Canada
Programs: Aeroplan, IHG, Enterprise, Avios, Nexus
Posts: 8,355
Or more likely the dual citizen Canadian who had to travel to see their dying mother in the home country.
Where do you see all these sun vacationers? AC literally has a weekly narrow body to sun destinations that flies half empty. At most thats 500 people a week.
And those people are triple tested. On top of having to quarantine.
Meanwhile we let in 5 million+ people without quarantine or testing of any kind. Even if only a small portion of which are in non essential industries, they are a far bigger problem than the handful of sun vacationers.
Where do you see all these sun vacationers? AC literally has a weekly narrow body to sun destinations that flies half empty. At most thats 500 people a week.
And those people are triple tested. On top of having to quarantine.
Meanwhile we let in 5 million+ people without quarantine or testing of any kind. Even if only a small portion of which are in non essential industries, they are a far bigger problem than the handful of sun vacationers.
The argument about the people being let in without quarantine and testing does not support easing restrictions on non-essential leisure vacationers. It does however speak to a thorough review of "essential workers" to determine the validity of their claim.
#68
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: May 2002
Location: YEG
Programs: HH Silver
Posts: 56,451
#69
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: YYC
Programs: AC SE MM
Posts: 605
Yes but 50K over what period? The next 4 weeks or 4 months? That wasn't quantified when a staffer to incoming transport min. Alghabra mentioned it in recent days. 50K spread throughout the whole country over a 4-month period, for example, is a figurative handful.
In regards to route cancellations, WJ has gone further and asks passengers to not cancel of their own accord, but wait for flights to be cancelled, to end up in the refund queue rather than the credit queue. That further delays cancellations.
So I suspect a majority of 50K flights were next 4 weeks. Meanwhile the airlines know the cancellations will increase, as new bookings decrease.
#70
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: YEG
Programs: Table scraps from Aeroplan and AmEx Plat
Posts: 901
From where I sit, your position would only make sense if we concurrently locked the country down for a month. And I mean military in the streets, no one leaving their house until the virus is snuffed out. Would you be okay with that?
#71
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: YEG
Programs: Table scraps from Aeroplan and AmEx Plat
Posts: 901
If this hotel quarantine thing came to pass, how long would it be until it's rescinded? Dollars to donuts many many months longer than reasonable or necessary.
#72
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: YOW
Programs: AC E75 / Marriott Titanium Elite
Posts: 952
Passengers from the Diamond Princess cruise ship were required to quarantine at either CFB Borden or at the Nav Centre in Cornwall, Ontario.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottaw...wall-1.5470386
Currently, incoming passengers who do not have a negative test or a suitable quarantine plan may be sent to a government-approved quarantine facility.
https://www.canada.ca/en/public-heal...ion-sheet.html
So the concept of mandatory quarantine in a place not of your choosing is hardly a new concept, is in place now in some circumstances and the government is hinting it may be expanded to include every non-essential leisure traveller.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottaw...wall-1.5470386
Currently, incoming passengers who do not have a negative test or a suitable quarantine plan may be sent to a government-approved quarantine facility.
https://www.canada.ca/en/public-heal...ion-sheet.html
So the concept of mandatory quarantine in a place not of your choosing is hardly a new concept, is in place now in some circumstances and the government is hinting it may be expanded to include every non-essential leisure traveller.
#73
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC*SE 2MM
Posts: 16,655
The most "at risk" population should be vaccinated within the next three months (unless Canada's vaccine incompetence continues). At that point we have passed the danger zone but governments probably will keep the quarantine requirement in place for all of 2021 because nobody wants to "own" making a decision that could go wrong.
#74
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: May 2002
Location: YEG
Programs: HH Silver
Posts: 56,451
Anyone with plans to travel this winter, “cancel your trip”, says Trudeau
Originally Posted by The Lev
The most "at risk" population should be vaccinated within the next three months (unless Canada's vaccine incompetence continues). At that point we have passed the danger zone but governments probably will keep the quarantine requirement in place for all of 2021 because nobody wants to "own" making a decision that could go wrong.
Last edited by tcook052; Jan 24, 2021 at 3:49 pm
#75
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: YYC
Programs: AC SE MM
Posts: 605
This.
The most "at risk" population should be vaccinated within the next three months (unless Canada's vaccine incompetence continues). At that point we have passed the danger zone but governments probably will keep the quarantine requirement in place for all of 2021 because nobody wants to "own" making a decision that could go wrong.
The most "at risk" population should be vaccinated within the next three months (unless Canada's vaccine incompetence continues). At that point we have passed the danger zone but governments probably will keep the quarantine requirement in place for all of 2021 because nobody wants to "own" making a decision that could go wrong.