Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Destinations > Americas > Canada
Reload this Page >

Canada Will Require Negative COVID-19 Test 72 Hours Before Arrival

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Canada Will Require Negative COVID-19 Test 72 Hours Before Arrival

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 1, 2021, 9:52 pm
  #211  
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Vancouver
Programs: Aeroplan, Mileage Plus, WestJet Gold, AMEX Plat
Posts: 2,026
Originally Posted by tcook052
With the airlines operating at a small fraction of their normal schedules would aircrews really help make up much of that 40%? I find that hard to believe.
Good question. I don't know either. Crew on freight trains and cargo marine ships and air freighters are going to be part of that. A cargo ship can easily have a crew of 30. There are lots of trains going back and forth each day. Those numbers add up quickly.

The key point is it not 80% of passengers that are exempt it is a smaller number that is quite a bit smaller that 40%. However a headline of 20-30% of travelers being exempt is not going to sell newspapers.
Fiordland is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2021, 10:25 pm
  #212  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: YOW
Programs: AC E75 / Marriott Titanium Elite
Posts: 952
Originally Posted by tcook052
With the airlines operating at a small fraction of their normal schedules would aircrews really help make up much of that 40%? I find that hard to believe.
And of course if this reduces the amount of overall air travel it would also reduce the number of air crews that would require exemption. The way I read it, even folks who have an exemption from quarantine (far longer list than the exemption to the PCR test) will still need to comply with this rule, which will probably reduce the number of people asking for exemptions too given that some essential travel perhaps will also get curtailed with more difficult rules.

Will be interesting to see if this leads to more flight cancellations, particularly to sun destinations, or if people are willing to go this extra step to continue to travel.
YZF_Elite is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2021, 10:35 pm
  #213  
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 297
Originally Posted by Fiordland
Crew on freight trains and cargo marine ships and air freighters are going to be part of that.
Trains are interesting because they will swap crews near the border. You won't have a Canadian crew on a train going beyond the first yard/depot in the US or vice versa. Even going that far is a touchier topic at the US/Mexico border. VIA/Amtrak changeover at the border clearance stoppage itself. But good luck convincing the trucking industry that they could do something similar.

https://www.aar.org/article/mexican-crew-interchange/
tecate55 is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2021, 11:15 pm
  #214  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: YVR
Programs: Air Canada Super Elite 2+ Million Miles
Posts: 2,478
Originally Posted by Fiordland
However a headline of 20-30% of travelers being exempt is not going to sell newspapers.
Your right, but your facts and logic is NOT what gets headline attention in hyper-sensitive media these days.

Big Picture - let's NOT forget how we got here.

COVID-19: 'We’re asking all Ontarians to stay at home' - Doug Ford announces province-wide lockdown
Ottawa Citizen, Dec 22, 2020

"Ford said he’s also “extremely alarmed” about reports of a new, more contagious strain of COVID-19, identified in Britain. “This is an extremely serious threat,” said Ford, emphasizing the need for border security.

If the federal government won’t do it, Ontario will test air travellers when they arrive at the airport, said Ford.

"We’re asking all Ontarians to stay at home, and only leave when absolutely necessary, such as work, groceries, prescriptions, or medical appointments.”

So Ford distracts attention to the border and away from what is really happening with community spread.

Nothing surprising here, and given how popular the Ontario Premier has become, and with minority federal gov't, obviously Ford got what he wanted, and that is:

An admission from Ottawa that the border is a problem (even though in reality it isn't).

In the end, Ottawa wins with immediate political response to the U.K. variant, and Ford wins by distracting attention and showing he can force Ottawa to react.

OF course, doesn't do much for C-19 spread, but none of this is about health, as we all know.
skybluesea is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2021, 12:43 am
  #215  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Programs: FB Silver going for Gold
Posts: 21,811
Originally Posted by Fiordland
Good question. I don't know either. Crew on freight trains and cargo marine ships and air freighters are going to be part of that. A cargo ship can easily have a crew of 30.
FWIW, cargo ships are very sparsely and efficiently manned. I know, I travelled on one and numbers apparently don't vary that much. A huge container ship only needs just over 2 dozen crew (26 to be precise). If anything, bulk and car carriers require fewer due to one less thing to take care of, refrigerated containers a.k.a. reefers.

Crew are pretty much stuck onboard too. They weren't even allowed to disembark to fly home. Not sure if that's been since permitted.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/briti...lors-1.5853309
YVR Cockroach is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2021, 2:00 am
  #216  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: USA
Programs: AC SE100K, F9 100k, NK Gold, UA *S, Hyatt Glob, Bonvoy Titanium
Posts: 5,207
Originally Posted by skybluesea
.... tomorrow, Saturday, Jan 2, and these folks are going for a typical week, how many of these travelers are going to cancel their outbound now that they know the PCR test requirement is needed on the return (Jan 9).

The fun may begin even before the 7th???
I wonder if AC is going to properly notify everyone about the new return PCR test requirement online, at check-in, and via announcements at the boarding gate before they board a flight out if Canada?

As you said there are many once a week AC flights that leave on Saturdays.....
skybluesea likes this.
expert7700 is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2021, 3:07 am
  #217  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: YEG
Programs: HH Silver
Posts: 56,452
Originally Posted by skybluesea
Your right, but your facts and logic is NOT what gets headline attention in hyper-sensitive media these days.

Big Picture - let's NOT forget how we got here.

COVID-19: 'We’re asking all Ontarians to stay at home' - Doug Ford announces province-wide lockdown
Ottawa Citizen, Dec 22, 2020

"Ford said he’s also “extremely alarmed” about reports of a new, more contagious strain of COVID-19, identified in Britain. “This is an extremely serious threat,” said Ford, emphasizing the need for border security.

If the federal government won’t do it, Ontario will test air travellers when they arrive at the airport, said Ford.

"We’re asking all Ontarians to stay at home, and only leave when absolutely necessary, such as work, groceries, prescriptions, or medical appointments.”

So Ford distracts attention to the border and away from what is really happening with community spread.

Nothing surprising here, and given how popular the Ontario Premier has become, and with minority federal gov't, obviously Ford got what he wanted, and that is:

An admission from Ottawa that the border is a problem (even though in reality it isn't).

In the end, Ottawa wins with immediate political response to the U.K. variant, and Ford wins by distracting attention and showing he can force Ottawa to react.

OF course, doesn't do much for C-19 spread, but none of this is about health, as we all know.
FYI It's customary to provide a link to any news article referenced.
tcook052 is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2021, 4:26 am
  #218  
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Programs: AC SE
Posts: 1,506
Originally Posted by rankourabu
Starting January 7, 2021, anyone flying to Canada from another country, unless exempted, will be required to provide written or electronic documentation showing they received a negative result from a COVID-19 test conducted within 72 hours prior to their scheduled boarding.

So 80% of pax, no change at all.
However, looks like transits are not exculded from the requirement.

AC may as well shut down shop apart from domestic. This is gonna hit the airlines hard. And its so, so, pointless. It doesnt do anything to stop imported cases with 80% exempted anyway.
There's an interesting difference here. Essential travelers could declare themselves such at the border and skip the quarantine. But it seems like now essential travelers will need to declare themselves such (and prove it) at the gate. So I wonder how that will work out. How do you prove to a gate agent in SFO or LHR that you're essential and, therefore, don't need the test? It's easy if you're under 5 years old or a member of the aircrew, but I'm not sure beyond that…
skybluesea likes this.
TheCanuckian is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2021, 4:54 am
  #219  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 5,190
Originally Posted by TheCanuckian
There's an interesting difference here. Essential travelers could declare themselves such at the border and skip the quarantine. But it seems like now essential travelers will need to declare themselves such (and prove it) at the gate. So I wonder how that will work out. How do you prove to a gate agent in SFO or LHR that you're essential and, therefore, don't need the test? It's easy if you're under 5 years old or a member of the aircrew, but I'm not sure beyond that…
Agreed. It’s much easier to convince a CBSA officer that you are essential after landing in Canada than a lower-level contracted foreign clerk gate agent who will err on the side of caution to protect their job and the airline from economic loss.
skybluesea and LETTERBOY like this.

Last edited by sydneyracquelle; Jan 2, 2021 at 5:25 am
sydneyracquelle is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2021, 6:07 am
  #220  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Canada
Programs: UA*1K MM SK EBG LATAM BL
Posts: 23,314
Originally Posted by skybluesea

OF course, doesn't do much for C-19 spread, but none of this is about health, as we all know.
We know. But it makes the masses feel better, and is a great distraction from the real problem and the real areas of spread (community, schools, big box stores, etc)

Your assessment of how we got here is bang on.

The sun packages will catch up quick and start offering on-site tests at resorts.
skybluesea likes this.
rankourabu is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2021, 6:48 am
  #221  
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Vancouver
Programs: Aeroplan, Mileage Plus, WestJet Gold, AMEX Plat
Posts: 2,026
Originally Posted by YVR Cockroach
FWIW, cargo ships are very sparsely and efficiently manned. I know, I travelled on one and numbers apparently don't vary that much. A huge container ship only needs just over 2 dozen crew (26 to be precise). If anything, bulk and car carriers require fewer due to one less thing to take care of, refrigerated containers a.k.a. reefers.

Crew are pretty much stuck onboard too. They weren't even allowed to disembark to fly home. Not sure if that's been since permitted.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/briti...lors-1.5853309
So my number of 30 is bit over. It is closer to 26. If you have two or three ships arriving into Vancouver a day, the same up in Prince Rupert, Montreal and Halifax. Then add in a ferry to Alaska. On the Great Lakes there are probably ships that cross over. Given marine crew are listed as "Exempt" I would assume they are included in any count.

Originally Posted by tecate55
Trains are interesting because they will swap crews near the border. You won't have a Canadian crew on a train going beyond the first yard/depot in the US or vice versa. Even going that far is a touchier topic at the US/Mexico border. VIA/Amtrak changeover at the border clearance stoppage itself. But good luck convincing the trucking industry that they could do something similar.

https://www.aar.org/article/mexican-crew-interchange/
Which is why they are also listed as exempt travelers. If you toss them into the mix that is still probably a small number of boarder crossings but still adds up at the end of the year. .

Originally Posted by skybluesea
Your right, but your facts and logic is NOT what gets headline attention in hyper-sensitive media these days.

Big Picture - let's NOT forget how we got here.

COVID-19: 'We’re asking all Ontarians to stay at home' - Doug Ford announces province-wide lockdown
Ottawa Citizen, Dec 22, 2020

"Ford said he’s also “extremely alarmed” about reports of a new, more contagious strain of COVID-19, identified in Britain. “This is an extremely serious threat,” said Ford, emphasizing the need for border security......
I think that is the catalyst for all of this. The new strains out of the UK are what driving alarm in the federal government and causing them to act quickly now (as opposed to be before). They are probably looking to "best practice" internationally, seeing other countries effectively use these tests and trying to do the same.

Their issue is their ability to execute is not very good. Also acting at a time when vaccines are now available should provide less demanding ways of handling this. A trained nurse who administer the test, should be near the same effort.
skybluesea likes this.
Fiordland is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2021, 7:35 am
  #222  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ontario, Canada
Programs: Aeroplan, IHG, Enterprise, Avios, Nexus
Posts: 8,355
The mandatory test requirement ends any consideration of my usual Florida baseball trip this year. The two week quarantine at home isn't a problem however the mandatory testing changes the dynamic. Most COVID-19 cases do not require hospitalization and can be managed at home. Were I to acquire the virus in Florida I might not even know about it and unless very seriously ill could manage to make my way home and be treated in Canada.

Should however I test positive I am facing at least an additional two weeks in Florida at my own expense plus two weeks quarantine upon my return. Should my condition deteriorate and hospitalization be required I would need to be treated in the U.S. system. The COVID insurance programs will defray some of the cost but I'll have to pay upfront, submit a claim and be accountable for any amounts over the capped limits.

The Florida county I visit has a 7 day average test positivity rate of just under 10 percent which is twice the rate in my home public health unit. I'm not prepared to take a one in ten chance I might not be able to come home.
Bogwoppit and skybluesea like this.
Badenoch is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2021, 7:58 am
  #223  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 5,190
Originally Posted by Badenoch
The mandatory test requirement ends any consideration of my usual Florida baseball trip this year. The two week quarantine at home isn't a problem however the mandatory testing changes the dynamic. Most COVID-19 cases do not require hospitalization and can be managed at home. Were I to acquire the virus in Florida I might not even know about it and unless very seriously ill could manage to make my way home and be treated in Canada.

Should however I test positive I am facing at least an additional two weeks in Florida at my own expense plus two weeks quarantine upon my return. Should my condition deteriorate and hospitalization be required I would need to be treated in the U.S. system. The COVID insurance programs will defray some of the cost but I'll have to pay upfront, submit a claim and be accountable for any amounts over the capped limits.

The Florida county I visit has a 7 day average test positivity rate of just under 10 percent which is twice the rate in my home public health unit. I'm not prepared to take a one in ten chance I might not be able to come home.
Or simply fly from Florida to US border city rent a car and drive home to skip the covid test.
LETTERBOY likes this.
sydneyracquelle is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2021, 8:33 am
  #224  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ontario, Canada
Programs: Aeroplan, IHG, Enterprise, Avios, Nexus
Posts: 8,355
Originally Posted by sydneyracquelle
Or simply fly from Florida to US border city rent a car and drive home to skip the covid test.
The minute I cross the border I'm under quarantine requirements which do not include a detour to return a rental car so it would have to be kept for two weeks. Renting a car in Buffalo from my usual agency and dropping it off at their nearest Canadian outlet after the quarantine period would be in excess of $4,000CDN. Nor could I add an extra driver to the rental because they would have to be there at the counter when I rented and present a valid driver's license.
skybluesea likes this.
Badenoch is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2021, 8:50 am
  #225  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 5,190
Originally Posted by Badenoch
The minute I cross the border I'm under quarantine requirements which do not include a detour to return a rental car so it would have to be kept for two weeks. Renting a car in Buffalo from my usual agency and dropping it off at their nearest Canadian outlet after the quarantine period would be in excess of $4,000CDN. Nor could I add an extra driver to the rental because they would have to be there at the counter when I rented and present a valid driver's license.
Not true. I always return the rental car and uber home with a mask to quarantine. Why would you keep the car for 2 weeks? Makes no sense you could fly or drive from Toronto to Vancouver but not return a rental car. You are allowed to proceed to your final destination and get gas and food and lodging. Otherwise everyone would have to quarantine at the port of entry. People land at YYZ and have to get home somehow. They only start calling you on Day 4 for this reason.

Last edited by sydneyracquelle; Jan 2, 2021 at 9:06 am
sydneyracquelle is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.