BA crew (including Captain) not enforcing face mask rules
#76
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Programs: IC Hotels Spire, BA Gold
Posts: 8,669
The most common reason for someone claiming exemption from mask-wearing is breathing-related conditions.
In that case, they can wear a mask on their mouth (but not nose) and a face shield on top. This is what a fellow passenger on an AA LAX-PHL has worn, and I felt fully comfortable around him.
Most of the times, it is middle aged fit men who appear without face masks. Maybe they do have a genuine breathing condition, in which case they are welcome to follow my suggestion above.
In that case, they can wear a mask on their mouth (but not nose) and a face shield on top. This is what a fellow passenger on an AA LAX-PHL has worn, and I felt fully comfortable around him.
Most of the times, it is middle aged fit men who appear without face masks. Maybe they do have a genuine breathing condition, in which case they are welcome to follow my suggestion above.
#77
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Programs: IC Hotels Spire, BA Gold
Posts: 8,669
You miss the point completely. Let me make it as simple as possible. They can ask any question they like. With me so far? The point I made is this "Why would they have to explain anything to you?". You could ask me why I drunk so much before boarding. Or where am I going. Or what my favourite colour is. But, I don't have to explain anything to you. That's the point.
I've explained HMG's stance above. I'm sorry if it is not the answer you want.
I've explained HMG's stance above. I'm sorry if it is not the answer you want.
#78
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: London / Brighton
Programs: BAEC Gold / M-Life Gold / HH Diamond
Posts: 1,635
You're overreacting. Relax and live life. Quit demonizing the non-mask wearing folks. You don't know their situation. They may have already had it (like me) and now have immunity for a while. If you are TRULY at risk, don't fly or leave your home. The rest of us want to go back to normal and know that statistically, it isn't going to come close to killing you. Plus, air circulation on a plane is top notch with HEPA filters -- believe the science.
#79
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: England
Programs: BAEC: Bronze; Marriott: Gold
Posts: 399
The most common reason for someone claiming exemption from mask-wearing is breathing-related conditions.
In that case, they can wear a mask on their mouth (but not nose) and a face shield on top. This is what a fellow passenger on an AA LAX-PHL has worn, and I felt fully comfortable around him.
Most of the times, it is middle aged fit men who appear without face masks. Maybe they do have a genuine breathing condition, in which case they are welcome to follow my suggestion above.
In that case, they can wear a mask on their mouth (but not nose) and a face shield on top. This is what a fellow passenger on an AA LAX-PHL has worn, and I felt fully comfortable around him.
Most of the times, it is middle aged fit men who appear without face masks. Maybe they do have a genuine breathing condition, in which case they are welcome to follow my suggestion above.
This is exactly the reason why people with hidden disabilities should not be ask to prove them. In the case of myself and Mrs. B, I wear a mask in all enclosed public spaces - Mrs. B. does not. Mrs. B. has a birth defect (cleft pallet) which prevents her breathing through her nose at all. She has to sleep with her mouth open. She is unable to wear any mouth covering. When we go to the supermarket she wears a lanyard to inform other people that she has a hidden disability. The gerenal public seem to accept that.
We could fly as Mrs. B. does have a valid exemption, however a number of airlines (BA excluded) are asking for a doctors letter confirming the exemption. In England GP's have been adviced by their unions that they are not to issue any such letters no matter what the condition may be for fear of been held accountable for providing "expert advice".
We've actually made the concious decision not to fly as sitting in a plane full of people wearing masks reminds Mrs. B. too much of all the hospital stays that she had in her youth - so until masks are a thing of the past, so are our travels.
#80
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Programs: IC Hotels Spire, BA Gold
Posts: 8,669
Sadly the thought of getting a bit of compo at little risk is just too appealing for some....and we all pay the price for that. My sis is a Manager of one of the big supermarket chains and she said this is the main reason why they don't enforce mask wearing....for fear of being accused of discrimination, even it was a genuine mistake by the employee. It is why the supermarkets were very effective at enforcing the max number of people in store during lockdown 1.......because it is a simple hard maximum number to enforce and when full, one out, one in cannot possibly ever be accused of any discrimination. But mask wearing (when some are exempt) is a whole new ball game.
We all pay the price for this, seemingly more so than other countries. Probably why (I am told) LH and SK do strictly enforce it but BA don't. If there were no exceptions under any circumstances (like seatbelt wearing, seat back upright etc) then it probably be enforced.
#81
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: LGB
Posts: 1,205
You're overreacting. Relax and live life. Quit demonizing the non-mask wearing folks. You don't know their situation. They may have already had it (like me) and now have immunity for a while. If you are TRULY at risk, don't fly or leave your home. The rest of us want to go back to normal and know that statistically, it isn't going to come close to killing you. Plus, air circulation on a plane is top notch with HEPA filters -- believe the science.
And at that point, you're murdering grandma, just like those unwashed non-elites who attempted to steal 1A from you.
#82
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Programs: IC Hotels Spire, BA Gold
Posts: 8,669
You're overreacting. Relax and live life. Quit demonizing the non-mask wearing folks. You don't know their situation. They may have already had it (like me) and now have immunity for a while. If you are TRULY at risk, don't fly or leave your home. The rest of us want to go back to normal and know that statistically, it isn't going to come close to killing you. Plus, air circulation on a plane is top notch with HEPA filters -- believe the science.
#83
Join Date: May 2012
Location: JFK, MAN
Programs: BA Gold, Hilton Diamond, Amex Plat
Posts: 425
It'd be rude to talk while you're eating with an open mouth. Eating does not carry the same Covid-transmission risk as talking (not to mention coughing or sneezing).
#85
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: London, UK
Programs: BAEC GGL/CCR; TK Elite; ITA Executive; Hilton Diamond; Marriott Bonvoy Platinum
Posts: 1,551
#86
Join Date: May 2012
Location: JFK, MAN
Programs: BA Gold, Hilton Diamond, Amex Plat
Posts: 425
Yet another generalisation!
This is exactly the reason why people with hidden disabilities should not be ask to prove them. In the case of myself and Mrs. B, I wear a mask in all enclosed public spaces - Mrs. B. does not. Mrs. B. has a birth defect (cleft pallet) which prevents her breathing through her nose at all. She has to sleep with her mouth open. She is unable to wear any mouth covering. When we go to the supermarket she wears a lanyard to inform other people that she has a hidden disability. The gerenal public seem to accept that.
We could fly as Mrs. B. does have a valid exemption, however a number of airlines (BA excluded) are asking for a doctors letter confirming the exemption. In England GP's have been adviced by their unions that they are not to issue any such letters no matter what the condition may be for fear of been held accountable for providing "expert advice".
We've actually made the concious decision not to fly as sitting in a plane full of people wearing masks reminds Mrs. B. too much of all the hospital stays that she had in her youth - so until masks are a thing of the past, so are our travels.
This is exactly the reason why people with hidden disabilities should not be ask to prove them. In the case of myself and Mrs. B, I wear a mask in all enclosed public spaces - Mrs. B. does not. Mrs. B. has a birth defect (cleft pallet) which prevents her breathing through her nose at all. She has to sleep with her mouth open. She is unable to wear any mouth covering. When we go to the supermarket she wears a lanyard to inform other people that she has a hidden disability. The gerenal public seem to accept that.
We could fly as Mrs. B. does have a valid exemption, however a number of airlines (BA excluded) are asking for a doctors letter confirming the exemption. In England GP's have been adviced by their unions that they are not to issue any such letters no matter what the condition may be for fear of been held accountable for providing "expert advice".
We've actually made the concious decision not to fly as sitting in a plane full of people wearing masks reminds Mrs. B. too much of all the hospital stays that she had in her youth - so until masks are a thing of the past, so are our travels.
#87
Fontaine d'honneur du Flyertalk
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Morbihan, France
Programs: Reine des Muccis de Pucci; Foreign Elitist (according to others)
Posts: 19,180
Honey - save your pain! bakera About which union are you speaking? I know of at least two people from two separate GPs who have letters confirming their chronic condition. If they are asthmatic (amongst other conditions) they can be exempt. I'm asking as I am curious.
We were asked for our opinions on what to do in a particular situation and this I have done. I am not going down the path of the amorality, irresponsibility or the potential criminality of mask wearing in general. Moreover as this is being read at a time when it is a bit late for tea and a bit early for Gin, I will leave it to you all as they remind me too strongly of a sort of A-level English question about The Scottish Play. Macbeth pleads with the three Hags or is it Lady Macbeth and her Ugly Sisters. Discuss
We were asked for our opinions on what to do in a particular situation and this I have done. I am not going down the path of the amorality, irresponsibility or the potential criminality of mask wearing in general. Moreover as this is being read at a time when it is a bit late for tea and a bit early for Gin, I will leave it to you all as they remind me too strongly of a sort of A-level English question about The Scottish Play. Macbeth pleads with the three Hags or is it Lady Macbeth and her Ugly Sisters. Discuss
#89
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: England
Programs: BAEC: Bronze; Marriott: Gold
Posts: 399
bakera About which union are you speaking? I know of at least two people from two separate GPs who have letters confirming their chronic condition. If they are asthmatic (amongst other conditions) they can be exempt. I'm asking as I am curious.