Originally Posted by TedToToe
(Post 32402944)
Yes, a Very Late Aircraft!
|
Originally Posted by ISTFlyer
(Post 32403167)
Also don't forget that IAG had an initial goodwill agreement with Boeing related to 200 Boeing 737-MAX aircraft.
We still don't have any further information if this would happen but if the MAX aircraft is certified within the next year or two, it seems that we would see 737-MAX's at the BA fleet before A321neoLR's or XLR's. School of thought on US focused blogs is that aircraft like the 220 will do much better than the 737 or 320 for orders in the next couple of years. Mainly due to decreased demand. |
Originally Posted by PoincianaKings
(Post 32403610)
I actually wonder if the Max will ever fly again. Raffles for me wondering with a comment on his site re the IAG max order. Airlines aren’t going to return to pre COVID levels for years. Why not just continue with your current fleet (albeit refreshed Interiors maybe) , presumably on better lease terms, for the next five-eight years?
School of thought on US focused blogs is that aircraft like the 220 will do much better than the 737 or 320 for orders in the next couple of years. Mainly due to decreased demand. For LHR, A220 or similar aircraft would not work, slots are limited at Heathrow, and BA must focus on carrying more passengers as they could. Instead, A220's would definitely work with LCY rather than the current CityFlyer fleet. I might seem far too optimistic but believe me or not, LGW has the potential to return to its pre-COVID capacity next summer. And, also, from people's reactions over there, the USA would be the last country in the world, for air travel rates to come back to pre-COVID. |
Originally Posted by ISTFlyer
(Post 32403631)
For LHR, A220 or similar aircraft would not work, slots are limited at Heathrow, and BA must focus on carrying more passengers as they could. Instead, A220's would definitely work with LCY rather than the current CityFlyer fleet. I might seem far too optimistic but believe me or not, LGW has the potential to return to its pre-COVID capacity next summer.
|
Originally Posted by opus99
(Post 32403529)
Well you can expect 24 units in the BA fleet soon! Lol
|
Originally Posted by TedToToe
(Post 32403984)
I haven’t followed the development of the 779 in detail but am aware that its entry into service will be late. This gives BA the opportunity to delay its deliveries without penalty, given that capex needs to be reduced and growth not needed for some time.
|
Originally Posted by TedToToe
(Post 32403984)
I haven’t followed the development of the 779 in detail but am aware that its entry into service will be late. This gives BA the opportunity to delay its deliveries without penalty, given that capex needs to be reduced and growth not needed for some time.
Now some of the certification delays can undoubtedly be attributed to COVID-19, with staff of all organisations concerned affected by lockdowns, social distancing etc, but it was already running late, mainly because of increased scrutiny after the MAX catastrophes. But there was also the incident during the ground-based stress test in September when the rear of the cabin depressurised and a cargo door failed, and the issues with GE's new design engine, though these are meant to have been resolved now. |
Originally Posted by ISTFlyer
(Post 32403167)
Also don't forget that IAG had an initial goodwill agreement with Boeing related to 200 Boeing 737-MAX aircraft.
We still don't have any further information if this would happen but if the MAX aircraft is certified within the next year or two, it seems that we would see 737-MAX's at the BA fleet before A321neoLR's or XLR's. |
Originally Posted by Andy33
(Post 32404016)
Since Boeing has so far been unable to get the 779 certified by the FAA or any other aviation safety authority anywhere, delivery delay is inevitable!
Now some of the certification delays can undoubtedly be attributed to COVID-19, with staff of all organisations concerned affected by lockdowns, social distancing etc, but it was already running late, mainly because of increased scrutiny after the MAX catastrophes. But there was also the incident during the ground-based stress test in September when the rear of the cabin depressurised and a cargo door failed, and the issues with GE's new design engine, though these are meant to have been resolved now. |
As part of the current negotiations with BALPA, BA are trying to allow for BA CityFlyer to fly from Heathrow - this is something that appears likely to happen sooner rather than later (this summer).
|
Originally Posted by tiffwhat
(Post 32404063)
As part of the current negotiations with BALPA, BA are trying to allow for BA CityFlyer to fly from Heathrow - this is something that appears likely to happen sooner rather than later (this summer).
|
Originally Posted by Lynyrd
(Post 32404080)
If approved it would be interesting to see what will happen at LCY. Would it mean moving aircraft from LCY to LHR or increasing the size of CFE (adding extra aircraft to fly from LHR) at the expense of mainline BA?
|
Originally Posted by 13901
(Post 32404129)
I'd rather see it as a way to keep part of BACF flying, as well as covering routes that otherwise wouldn't be economic with larger planes. Still, it'll take some time to implement: literally no one at LHR is even remotely qualified to touch an Embraer.
|
Originally Posted by Lynyrd
(Post 32404142)
Was there not some sort of wet lease from CFE to BA at LGW a few years ago? I can't remember the specifics now.
|
Originally Posted by opus99
(Post 32404013)
it’s delivery is about a year late from 2020 to 21. Though when BA said 2022 at CMD this was after the delay but it’s been moved to 23 I believe due to coronavirus and Boeing cutting down production from 5 to 3 a month but the 779 is needed only for replacement not growth
For example, take a scenario where BA choose to keep the A380 in the fleet (given they are owned). In the current climate, with 35K deliveries continuing, the 781 arriving soon and the densification programmes on the whole 77E/W fleet, do BA really need another large aircraft to fill? A mix of 35K, 788, 789, 781, densified 77E, 77W and 388 is a pretty diverse fleet mix which may facilitate right sizing markets for the next 5-7 years. In the short term there would be fleet reduction with the (very saddening early) loss of the 744. Longer term a deferred 779 order provides the option to expand again later (after all 35K’s and 787’s are received) if demand returns or as replacements when the G-VII 77E’s have no life left. I imagine many airline CEO’s would love to have a crystal ball now more than ever before. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:05 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.