Trying to throw BA a bone. Prices spat back in my face!
#31
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Brighton. UK
Programs: BA Gold / VS /IHG Diamond & Ambassador
Posts: 14,202
#32
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: London
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 1,683
As as been pointed out already, you just seem irked that you can't bag a potential bargain, you're not acting based on altruistic motives towards BA.
#33
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: London
Programs: Hilton, IHG - BA, GA, LH, QR, SV, TK
Posts: 17,008
Indeed.
Although the OP's altruism is admirable, removing inventory at a price below the level the airline expects to achieve wouldn't be particularly helpful.
#34
Join Date: Mar 2015
Programs: BA GGL
Posts: 2,447
Predictable, yes. Fare difference = payable.
When my flight to EWR is finally cancelled I will be cancelling the whole thing for a cash refund.
I would prefer to just move it by one year, but that'll cost me several hundred pounds, so no thanks.
When my flight to EWR is finally cancelled I will be cancelling the whole thing for a cash refund.
I would prefer to just move it by one year, but that'll cost me several hundred pounds, so no thanks.
#35
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,246
#36
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: UK
Programs: Tufty Club (Gold), BAGA Gymnastics level 4, 440yds swimming certificate
Posts: 2,533
They currently have no customers as non-essential travel is currently not recommended by the Government making any insurance policies on trips booked now null and void. While there will always be people who ignore their governments advice and who don't need insurance when travelling. The vast majority of BAs potential customers wont be looking to book any travel until the FCO travel advice is lifted, which could be sometime
#37
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: UK
Programs: Mucci, Diamond Status & on the Supreme Council des Conseillers, BA Ag, Bonvoy GFL/Plat, xVS Au
Posts: 833
Read through this and afraid another one to disagree with the OP. I understand their frustration but all the points above make sense given BA is not yet at a point where it desperately needs the cash now to stay afloat (maybe VS is in a more precarious position and is thus more willing to dilute future revenue).
#38
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: clue is in the nym
Programs: BA Gold, TP Gold, VS Gold, Hilton Diamond, IHG Diamond, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 832
All of the following questions serve to lessen demand right now, and most of them are immune to deep-discounting as a means to stimulate demand until answers are clearer:-
- How long will 'lockdown' or restrictions on normal daily activities in my home country last?
- Are me or my family going to get sick in the next few weeks?
- Will I still have a job in 6 months?
- Will [company] still exist in 6 months?
- Will they still be operating to [destination]?
- Is [destination] likely to retain stricter immigration/visa requirements even after the immediate crisis is over?
- Will I need a health certificate to fly?
- Will Covid-19 become like the winter flu, i.e. something that is always there in the background with occasional flare-ups in some regions?
- Will I even want to travel as much in the future?
#39
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,452
They currently have no customers as non-essential travel is currently not recommended by the Government making any insurance policies on trips booked now null and void. While there will always be people who ignore their governments advice and who don't need insurance when travelling. The vast majority of BAs potential customers wont be looking to book any travel until the FCO travel advice is lifted, which could be sometime
Last edited by LondonElite; Mar 26, 2020 at 4:43 am
#40
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Henley-On-Thames
Programs: BAEC Silver (but only temporarily) AVIS Presidents Club, Starbucks Gold
Posts: 486
At this moment BA is unsure of how many flights they will be able to operate when this is over. Many Pilots are going out of recency and line check. The training task required to get everybody back to line flying is colossal . That is without training any new Pilots to fill vacancies left by those who retire or lose their medicals.
The training task will take many months to get back to where we were. During that time BA will not be able to just go back to a full schedule.
No wonder they are being cautious about what they sell.
The training task will take many months to get back to where we were. During that time BA will not be able to just go back to a full schedule.
No wonder they are being cautious about what they sell.
ML
#41
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: UK
Programs: Tufty Club (Gold), BAGA Gymnastics level 4, 440yds swimming certificate
Posts: 2,533
#43
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,452
Sorry, May was a typo. My point was OP doesn't know what the demand/bookings are for the flight he was hoping to book next year.
#44
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 7,237
Caveat: probably complete pie in the sky (forgive the pun) I really have no idea the feasibility of this idea but: To help mitigate this would BA not be better if it got hold of one of each aircraft and pilots took a few hours each to fly around somewhere just to keep all the necessary requirements for being able to fly when the time comes. I feel once again I'm about to be educated
ML
ML
Crews must pass their recurrent. If they don't, as per CAA rules, they'd have a return-to-work course of the duration of 6 weeks. Right now I'm told there's no crew training in progress, so no chance for doing recurrents.
Engineers must keep their licence active, if they don't they need to pass a Quality exam.
And, even more basic, airside passes: if you don't swipe every 60 days, they get parked and have to be un-parked. And this affects everyone working in an airport. plus a lot more that I'm sure I'm missing.
This industry is not designed to sit on its bum for months. Unless measures - most of them requiring legal changes - are relaxed, and technical steps put in place, re-starting will be a bit like the T5 opening again.
#45
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 5,596
Caveat: probably complete pie in the sky (forgive the pun) I really have no idea the feasibility of this idea but: To help mitigate this would BA not be better if it got hold of one of each aircraft and pilots took a few hours each to fly around somewhere just to keep all the necessary requirements for being able to fly when the time comes. I feel once again I'm about to be educated
ML
ML
I accept that some of those may be needed and in work but we dont need to add to their workload.