Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Jun 12, 2022, 4:34 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: Prospero
Please do not quote photos in this thread.

Sister thread:
https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/british-airways-executive-club/2085652-long-haul-catering-changes-announcement-12-july.html
Print Wikipost

Long haul in-flight catering | Club World

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 13, 2022, 4:26 am
  #631  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Spitalfields, London
Programs: BA Gold, KFC 'The Colonel's Club' Palladium tier, Mucci des Visions Célestes du Nord-Pas-de-Calais
Posts: 2,330
Originally Posted by Globaliser
I agree. What they should do is to buy their tickets from another airline that offers a level of service more aligned to what they want.

So long as they don't do that, and so long as they keep buying BA tickets in the knowledge that the service levels are below what they expect, they reduce the incentive that BA has to improve those service levels.

The current catering standards are actually only a notable current example of this phenomenon. Whinges about BA (sub-)standards are always around.
Agree to a certain extent, life is too short to wish it away hoping BA becomes some kind of culinary mecca.

However, BA is not always totally avoidable, and without complaining to them, how would they know that they are losing £ to the completion over the food specifically.
choosethedrew is offline  
Old Feb 13, 2022, 5:03 am
  #632  
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Posts: 248
Interesting last comment. BA was not my first choice re flight to Cape Town and I was disappointed it had been changed but hey ho.

My next long haul trip though is not going to be with BA. They will never link this but Emirates were offering car to airport, choice of seating when booked etc. BA have the slots though and often they hang onto them for dear life keeping out the competition and then offering sub par service.
Moonstone1234 is offline  
Old Feb 13, 2022, 5:18 am
  #633  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: GLA
Programs: Chevalier de la Gallentrie - Knight of the Platinum Hair Brush, BA Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 1,389
Originally Posted by Can I help you
I’m afraid not, at present they are keeping contact between customers and crew as less frequent as possible.
CIHY - asking for an objective view, but do you thinks this make it harder from a crew perspective to look after customers, or increase the risk or customers perceiving that service had been "poor" as a result of low visibility/contact frequency from the cabin crew?

Using a recent trip LHR-JFK-LHR in November, my perception (rightly or wrongly) was that the crew did a bare minimum service. No proactive checks for additional drinks etc. Other than meal service and taking orders, I had nobody ask me if I wanted anything for the duration of the flight, and not being a fan of the call bell, resorted to heading to the galley (I was in the smaller forward CW cabin, so hardly a great hardship) myself to ask for another drink at one point. Now, if this is a result of crew being under guidance to limit contact, then that actually makes sense, but BA need to make passengers aware that they will need to ask for something, rather than expecting a more proactive regular check. Conversely, on the return leg, I found the crew to be a lot more proactive, and even though this was an overnight flight, had crew check in with me a number of times (when I was awake and obviously watching IFE) to see if I wanted a drink or anything else. I figured maybe it was minimal crew on the outbound (we were in a 772), vs a quieter overnight flight on a 773 with more crew on the return, but you have me wondering now if it's just a case of them taking guidance about keeping contact frequency down.
becks1 likes this.
efincomputer is offline  
Old Feb 13, 2022, 6:32 am
  #634  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Programs: Mucci des Hommes Magiques et Magnifiques
Posts: 19,130
Sorry I am no longer BA so cannot give you any objective reasons why this is other than a reduction in crew numbers, with regards to the two different levels is service you received it in my opinion was down to the calibre of crew and supervision.
efincomputer likes this.
Can I help you is offline  
Old Feb 13, 2022, 4:11 pm
  #635  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London
Programs: Mucci. Nothing else matters.
Posts: 38,644
Originally Posted by choosethedrew
However, BA is not always totally avoidable, and without complaining to them, how would they know that they are losing £ to the completion over the food specifically.
Definitely complain to BA if you are disappointed.

But even then, many people don't understand how the complaints system is intended to work. It's primarily there to give BA a metric for how particular things are being received. If BA makes a change to a service item and the number of complaints about that item increases by x%, that gives BA some basis for assessing whether the money saved is worthwhile or whether it's going to cost more in lost fares.

What BA writes back to the customer is pretty secondary, but that's a point that is missed by those who complain about BA's response to their complaints. Of course you're usually going to get a boilerplate response back in the template language du jour. There is neither time, resource nor point in writing a new literary masterpiece from scratch every time someone says that the food was poor. Every person who decides not to bother to complain because they expect BA's response to be emotionally unsatisfying is, in a sense, helping to perpetuate the thing that they might have complained about.

In contrast to complaints to BA, the (sometimes overblown) public complaints here on FT aren't likely to achieve very much - especially if they are basically along "how dare they" lines.
Originally Posted by Moonstone1234
Interesting last comment. BA was not my first choice re flight to Cape Town and I was disappointed it had been changed but hey ho.

My next long haul trip though is not going to be with BA. They will never link this but Emirates were offering car to airport, choice of seating when booked etc. BA have the slots though and often they hang onto them for dear life keeping out the competition and then offering sub par service.
Interesting that you should mention Cape Town. BA didn't get to its present position on LON-CPT by blocking out the competition. There was competition, and the competition had established slots that they could use to compete with - but they couldn't hack the competition and withdrew (and two went bust).

So by all means book Emirates next time. It may work for you. Or you may find why some people still book BA for its advantages, despite the disadvantages that come with doing so.
efincomputer and Tobias-UK like this.
Globaliser is offline  
Old Feb 14, 2022, 2:54 am
  #636  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Spitalfields, London
Programs: BA Gold, KFC 'The Colonel's Club' Palladium tier, Mucci des Visions Célestes du Nord-Pas-de-Calais
Posts: 2,330
Originally Posted by Globaliser
Definitely complain to BA if you are disappointed.

But even then, many people don't understand how the complaints system is intended to work. It's primarily there to give BA a metric for how particular things are being received. If BA makes a change to a service item and the number of complaints about that item increases by x%, that gives BA some basis for assessing whether the money saved is worthwhile or whether it's going to cost more in lost fares.

What BA writes back to the customer is pretty secondary, but that's a point that is missed by those who complain about BA's response to their complaints. Of course you're usually going to get a boilerplate response back in the template language du jour. There is neither time, resource nor point in writing a new literary masterpiece from scratch every time someone says that the food was poor. Every person who decides not to bother to complain because they expect BA's response to be emotionally unsatisfying is, in a sense, helping to perpetuate the thing that they might have complained about...
I'm under no illusion that complaining about food is not going to achieve anything other than add one tiny proportion to a metric. However, my single contribution may be the one that shunts food up to 'top' place on whatever dashboard these things feature on, and the likelihood of something eventually changing *might* be marginally increased.
Aston100 likes this.
choosethedrew is offline  
Old Feb 14, 2022, 10:16 am
  #637  
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Mexico
Programs: BAEC Gold / Marriott Platinum
Posts: 3,563
LHR to MEX on 13th February. While it looks a bit scruffy the food tasted good. Beef was melt in mouth soft and the veg well cooked. The dessert was tasty although id call the starter a canapé rather than a starter. It was that small.

Didnt have second meal as was still trying to sleep after 10 hours of listening to screaming kids.



TTmex is offline  
Old Feb 14, 2022, 10:29 am
  #638  
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Mexico
Programs: BAEC Gold / Marriott Platinum
Posts: 3,563
And the menu from 13th. LHR to MEX
TTmex is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2022, 6:48 am
  #639  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Programs: BAEC Gold, IHG Spire Elite
Posts: 1,716


This is the menu from JFK-LHR last night. I didn’t sample anything from it, preferring to focus on getting some sleep on the very short flight.
The _Banking_Scot and jmj9905 like this.
BerksFlyer is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2022, 7:46 am
  #640  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: London
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 2,744
Originally Posted by BerksFlyer
This is the menu from JFK-LHR last night. I didn’t sample anything from it, preferring to focus on getting some sleep on the very short flight.
5 hours is not a short flight - 40 mins is a short flight.

That said, I agree that the starter and dessert are sufficiently underwhelming that I probably wouldn’t have bothered either…
bafan is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2022, 8:29 am
  #641  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 246
Is there any way of second guessing the menu that will be served? I assume pre-orders are no longer available (on MMB only showed special meals).

I am flying on BA173 LHR-JFK on 11 Mar. If it is the Pork main, I will order a Kosher meal but equally don't want to miss out on the Roast Beef! Total 1st World problems!
victairinternational is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2022, 10:06 am
  #642  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Programs: BAEC Gold, IHG Spire Elite
Posts: 1,716
Originally Posted by victairinternational
Is there any way of second guessing the menu that will be served? I assume pre-orders are no longer available (on MMB only showed special meals).

I am flying on BA173 LHR-JFK on 11 Mar. If it is the Pork main, I will order a Kosher meal but equally don't want to miss out on the Roast Beef! Total 1st World problems!
others may know better, but my understanding is that menus in the LHR-JFK route change monthly. Hopefully someone will be kind and post a photo of a menu at the start of March so that you can make a decision then.
BerksFlyer is offline  
Old Feb 15, 2022, 11:48 am
  #643  
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 29
Any recent experiences or suggestions as to what the current LHR-LAX CW offering is like (and the return)?
Moleish is online now  
Old Feb 16, 2022, 4:57 am
  #644  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: UK
Programs: BA Silver (temp demotion), *A Silver, HH Gold, IHG Diamond
Posts: 495
The menu LHR DFW BA193 today looks familiar to followers of the thread.

Beef it is..
Carfield and TTmex like this.
SavvyTravel is offline  
Old Feb 16, 2022, 6:22 am
  #645  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Programs: BAEC Gold, IHG Spire Elite
Posts: 1,716
Originally Posted by SavvyTravel
The menu LHR DFW BA193 today looks familiar to followers of the thread.

Beef it is..
At least you don’t have to suffer the sausage roll as your second ‘meal’!
SavvyTravel likes this.
BerksFlyer is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.