Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Gate A14

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 9, 2014, 2:49 pm
  #151  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Programs: BAEC silver
Posts: 464
Is that the same Prince Andrew who spent most of his time travelling around the world at the Government's request as a trade ambassador then got criticised in the press for traveling too much.......you cannot make it up.
Swampz64 is offline  
Old Dec 9, 2014, 3:37 pm
  #152  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: London
Programs: BA Silver
Posts: 1,283
Originally Posted by Annerk
My own opinion is that I hope that by the time the Queen is ready to pass along the throne, Charles will decide he'd rather play with his gardens and books and allow it to pass directly to William. I think William has a lot of his mothers compassion and would use his position like he's already doing--to make the world a better place.

Just the musings of a Yank.
+1
BERbound is offline  
Old Dec 9, 2014, 4:05 pm
  #153  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,452
Originally Posted by Annerk
My own opinion is that I hope that by the time the Queen is ready to pass along the throne, Charles will decide he'd rather play with his gardens and books and allow it to pass directly to William. I think William has a lot of his mothers compassion and would use his position like he's already doing--to make the world a better place.

Just the musings of a Yank.
But the bugbear of a hereditary monarchy is that you don't get to choose. A system mot for the times, perhaps, but since it's quaint and harmless, why rock the boat?
LondonElite is offline  
Old Dec 9, 2014, 5:06 pm
  #154  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: London
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold & GGL & CCR, HH Diam, Bonvoy Titanium, IHG Spire, Tastecard
Posts: 7,549
Originally Posted by LondonElite
Quote:





Originally Posted by Annerk


My own opinion is that I hope that by the time the Queen is ready to pass along the throne, Charles will decide he'd rather play with his gardens and books and allow it to pass directly to William. I think William has a lot of his mothers compassion and would use his position like he's already doing--to make the world a better place.

Just the musings of a Yank.




But the bugbear of a hereditary monarchy is that you don't get to choose. A system mot for the times, perhaps, but since it's quaint and harmless, why rock the boat?
But given the "powers" are largely ceremonial, I prefer the Queen / Charles / William over President Tusk / Van Rumpoy / Blair or Bercrow!
chris1979 is offline  
Old Dec 9, 2014, 5:33 pm
  #155  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: MAN/BHX
Programs: ABBA
Posts: 6,027
The "don't choose" thing is good - no politics. Of course we can choose, if the British people wanted we could get rid of the whole thing easily.

I'd rather pay for the monarchy than pay for a bunch of gamblers to be bailed out when they lose all my money.

Besides they were on tonight's news (fairly low down the running order), so qualify as "celebs". I suppose Nicholas Witchall was on the flight too, I wonder what cabin.

Last edited by paulwuk; Dec 9, 2014 at 5:41 pm
paulwuk is offline  
Old Dec 9, 2014, 7:04 pm
  #156  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,797
Originally Posted by Annerk

My own opinion is that I hope that by the time the Queen is ready to pass along the throne, Charles will decide he'd rather play with his gardens and books and allow it to pass directly to William. I think William has a lot of his mothers compassion and would use his position like he's already doing--to make the world a better place.

Just the musings of a Yank.
I think if they've any sense the Royal Household will 'suggest' he takes that route whether he likes it or not. He's not a popular bloke and neither is his wife, and once the Queen is gone the country won't need many more excuses to get rid of the lot of them. William and Kate seem to be working hard to cultivate their image, which I assume is because they know they're next up.

I also think its an embarrassment the UK government doesn't have a private aircraft for senior officials.
1010101 is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2014, 3:47 am
  #157  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 10,709
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-30377508

The firm hoping to make economy flights more comfortable
More seat info, if needed.
origin is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2014, 4:05 am
  #158  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: London and Zurich
Programs: AA, BA, Mucci: Sir Roger des Directions Routières, PCR
Posts: 13,609
Why has this thread morphed into another Sleb thread?
Roger is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2014, 4:22 am
  #159  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: UK
Programs: I go wherever the content takes me.
Posts: 5,698
Originally Posted by thatsthebadger


Will and Kate are a good advertisement for GB I think, and Harry
They are all lovely individuals but an appalling advertisement for the UK.

Their status is entirely hereditary. That's not the image I want us to project to the world.
paul4040 is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2014, 4:25 am
  #160  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 10,709
Originally Posted by paul4040
They are all lovely individuals but an appalling advertisement for the UK.

Their status is entirely hereditary. That's not the image I want us to project to the world.
I disagree. I think most of the World understands the system. Many European countries still have a Royal family. If they don't get it, then they are the few that don't.
origin is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2014, 4:26 am
  #161  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 10,709
Originally Posted by Roger
Why has this thread morphed into another Sleb thread?
Sometimes some of the threads on here, resemble the Daily Mail most days.
origin is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2014, 4:27 am
  #162  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,452
Originally Posted by chris1979
But given the "powers" are largely ceremonial, I prefer the Queen / Charles / William over President Tusk / Van Rumpoy / Blair or Bercrow!
I don't disagree with you at all!
LondonElite is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2014, 4:42 am
  #163  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Wedged somewhere between BTS and VIE ✈
Programs: Star Alliance Gold (A3 Gold), Oneworld Emerald (BA Gold), Hilton Diamond
Posts: 6,338
Originally Posted by Roger
Why has this thread morphed into another Sleb thread?
Because the contents got moved here (rightly or wrongly) from the 'Celebs on BA' thread by the moderators.
headingwest is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2014, 4:51 am
  #164  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: London and Zurich
Programs: AA, BA, Mucci: Sir Roger des Directions Routières, PCR
Posts: 13,609
Originally Posted by origin
Sometimes some of the threads on here, resemble the Daily Mail most days.
Originally Posted by headingwest
Because the contents got moved here (rightly or wrongly) from the 'Celebs on BA' thread by the moderators.
Ah, thanks. I ignore a number of threads on FT these days, and the Slebs thread was one of them. I hadn't planned on ignoring A14, but if needs must ...

from him over there mouthing Bah Humbug.
Roger is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2014, 5:34 am
  #165  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: London
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold & GGL & CCR, HH Diam, Bonvoy Titanium, IHG Spire, Tastecard
Posts: 7,549
Originally Posted by paul4040
They are all lovely individuals but an appalling advertisement for the UK.

Their status is entirely hereditary. That's not the image I want us to project to the world.
Originally Posted by origin
I disagree. I think most of the World understands the system. Many European countries still have a Royal family. If they don't get it, then they are the few that don't.
Look at the US: Jebb to follow George W and George H? Hillary to follow Bill? Many sons and daughters in politics. It's dynasties based on ability to fund-raise, use the family name and contact 'black book'. I don't think a hereditary, ceremonial monarchy (as seen as in many other countries (European and Worldwide)) is that bad a comparison - I'd rather have that than Blair Junior and Cameroon Junior.

Originally Posted by Roger
Ah, thanks. I ignore a number of threads on FT these days, and the Slebs thread was one of them. I hadn't planned on ignoring A14, but if needs must ...

from him over there mouthing Bah Humbug.
apologies. my first array into Gate A14 because our little monarchy conversation got moved. Will try to behave.
chris1979 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.