Corporate travel is about to get harder: lower fares to be removed from legacy GDS
#256
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 42,519
Emphasis added.
I'm sure you know this, but for anyone else reading this: this is why fares without a Saturday night stay over are more expensive (business travelers are less price sensitive but less likely to stay on Saturday), and why fully refundable fares tend to be so massively more expensive (again, more likely to be business travelers).
I'm sure you know this, but for anyone else reading this: this is why fares without a Saturday night stay over are more expensive (business travelers are less price sensitive but less likely to stay on Saturday), and why fully refundable fares tend to be so massively more expensive (again, more likely to be business travelers).
#257
Join Date: Aug 2022
Programs: AA Executive Platinum (Oneworld Emerald)
Posts: 135
But what were saying is illegal is AA or any other airline offering Joe at Big Company a refundable fare without a Saturday night stay for $450, offering Joan a single member LLC small business owner without a profit the same fare for $325, Carl the high net worth retiree who spends freely on dining, new cars and clothing the same fare for $525, and Kristin, the unemployed single mother the same fare for $225 - all simultaneously - because their revenue management system accessed thousands of data points on these customers and their employers the moment they started their fare search, and estimated how much each was able and willing to pay for the same ticket.
#258
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Boston, MA
Programs: AA PlatPro (LTG), Marriott Titanium (LTG), HH Diamond
Posts: 255
This hit me for the first time this week. Multiple itineraries in F pricing out at between $490 and $520 on aa.com were all pricing out at $911 via my travel agency and Concur. They can't even see the lower fares. I still do not understand how this is legal.
#259
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,128
What exactly do you think should be prohibited?
#260
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: NYC
Programs: AA 2MM, Bonvoy LTT, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 14,722
AA offers access to all fares with NDC. Your agency is not willing/unable to implement NDC to access those fares.
#261
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: AA Executive Platinum/Million Miler, Marriott Titanium Elite-Lifetime, Hilton Gold
Posts: 3,324
There's an easy solution for this: Put pressure on your CTA to adapt or find a new CTA.
#262
Join Date: Sep 2005
Programs: Mileageplus
Posts: 254
How would it be illegal? Businesses have a right to choose the distribution venues for its products. Just take a look at the ULCCs. In this case, AA is choosing not to offer certain products through vendors who do not meet certain criteria. This happens in business all the time, every day. None of these products are unavailable to consumers direct through AA or through a TA that has adapted.
There's an easy solution for this: Put pressure on your CTA to adapt or find a new CTA.
There's an easy solution for this: Put pressure on your CTA to adapt or find a new CTA.
The reason the CTA may not be participating with AA NDC bookings is the process of handling those bookings is not yet as streamlined as the GDS bookings. You can attribute that to AAs lack of planning or a GDS companys lack of planning or the CTA saying its not worth their effort. But your company should have a way to allow you to book on your own. Thats not a CTAs responsibility. That belongs to your company. Or your company can find an agency that takes on that responsibility.
#263
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,373
the agencies unable/unwilling are the problem. AA has changed how it distributes/sells, and it's still for sale to anyone. You can always call AA or book it yourself online without the agency.
The agencies don't like you going around them or the employers don't want you going rogue and booking without the agency.
The agencies are too cheap to update their tech, or standing on some sort of illusionary "principle" many of us find laughable.
I'm enjoying corporate "natural selection" at work here, as agencies try and hang on by their fingernails to an old business model, when the situation is something they have to either adapt to or simply acknowledge they've lost their value proposition.
I don't think many agency peeps on here are going to admit defeat, but it's fun to watch, so I'm making more popcorn.
#264
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 44,877
If your company insists on using the agency for booking, then book the higher fare and enjoy the higher LP earnings - or book on another carrier
#265
Moderator: American AAdvantage, Signatures
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London, England
Programs: UA 1K, Hilton Diamond, IHG Diamond Ambassador, National Exec, AA EXP Emeritus
Posts: 9,773
This thread isn't about the legality of removing fares from GDS view or only showing certain fares via NDC, so let's stay on topic and keep things relevant to flying AA and earning on AAdvantage.
~Moderator
~Moderator
#266
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Chicago
Programs: AA- EXP UA - Silver SPG- PLT Marriott- PLT
Posts: 791
Seeing the impact of this now on our CTA. The only AA fares available to purchase are ~200 - 300 higher than what is on aa.com, and of course the AA fares are much higher than United. I'm not sure what I will do.
#268
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 42,519
FYI American will now require everyone to buy tickets on their website in order to earn ANY miles going forward.
Certain travel agencies like ours are exempt from this restriction, but it appears this is the final blow to their relationship with travel advisors.
Certain travel agencies like ours are exempt from this restriction, but it appears this is the final blow to their relationship with travel advisors.
#270
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,373
would love to see the source for this claim. i mean it's their right if they want to, but have not heard of this new development you stated.