Avoiding 737 max in AA?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 8
Avoiding 737 max in AA?
Is there a way to avoid 737 max or should I continue to avoid American Airlines indefinitely. Now their flight search doesn’t even give a complete name of the plane and just says 737 so their loss as I am avoiding everything
#3
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: RDU <|> MMX
Programs: AA EXP 2MM, SK EBS
Posts: 15,182
Not sure what you're searching but AFAIK nothing has changed, I just did a dummy search at aa.com, if you click on details under any of the flight options it still shows the 2 different variants, i.e. '738-Boeing 737' for the non-MAX and '7M8-Boeing 737MAX 8 Passenger' for the MAX.
#4
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 8
Not sure what you're searching but AFAIK nothing has changed, I just did a dummy search at aa.com, if you click on details under any of the flight options it still shows the 2 different variants, i.e. '738-Boeing 737' for the non-MAX and '7M8-Boeing 737MAX 8 Passenger' for the MAX.
an imminent safety concern I would say. It has a design flaw and the measures they have taken have only reduced the risk not eliminated it. I would not travel in it even for free
Last edited by JY1024; Sep 30, 2022 at 1:40 pm Reason: Merged consecutive posts
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: PHL
Programs: AA PLT, UA SLV, MR LTT, HH LTD
Posts: 10,738
Furthermore, are you sure you're posting in the right Forum? AA doesn't fly London to Houston direct, nor does it fly Houston to Toronto direct. Did you perhaps book United?
And finally, AA does indeed show the 738 vs 7M8 in their flight searches.
#8




Join Date: Aug 2010
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 1,784
#10


Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: YYF/YLW
Programs: AA, DL, AS, VA, WS Silver
Posts: 6,235
If you want to be sure you’ll avoid a 737 MAX in the US/Canada, your choices are Delta (for now; they’ve ordered 100 but haven’t had them delivered yet), JetBlue, Frontier, or Spirit. United, Air Canada, WestJet, Alaska, and Southwest all have comparable or larger MAX fleets as a fraction of their overall fleet.
But note that “738” really means 737-800, whereas 7M8 means 737-MAX 8. You can always find what AA intends to fly on a given flight, but that can easily change on most routes on AA of any other airline.If you’re using a booking engine that doesn’t say explicitly, you can check the flight on AA.com.
As others have noted, I recommend taking the train or bus to the airport; you’ll do a lot more to make yourself safe by avoiding driving to the airport than you will by avoiding a 737 MAX. You’ll also reduce your carbon emissions, just as flying a 737 MAX does (compared to less fuel efficient older airplanes).
But note that “738” really means 737-800, whereas 7M8 means 737-MAX 8. You can always find what AA intends to fly on a given flight, but that can easily change on most routes on AA of any other airline.If you’re using a booking engine that doesn’t say explicitly, you can check the flight on AA.com.
As others have noted, I recommend taking the train or bus to the airport; you’ll do a lot more to make yourself safe by avoiding driving to the airport than you will by avoiding a 737 MAX. You’ll also reduce your carbon emissions, just as flying a 737 MAX does (compared to less fuel efficient older airplanes).
#11
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 8
It could be argued that the plane is the safest in the skies right now because of the 2 years of scrutinization the FAA put it under. We've all seen the ongoing news about it, especially in the aftermath of the 2 tragic accidents. I also watched the recent Amazon show "Flight Risk" that really took aim at Boeing's horrendous handling of it all. I would still fly on it, though begrudgingly if there weren't any better options. Begrudgingly because it is a sardine can with very tight seating, not because I'm concerned for my safety any more than I would be on another aircraft type.
Furthermore, are you sure you're posting in the right Forum? AA doesn't fly London to Houston direct, nor does it fly Houston to Toronto direct. Did you perhaps book United?
And finally, AA does indeed show the 738 vs 7M8 in their flight searches.
Furthermore, are you sure you're posting in the right Forum? AA doesn't fly London to Houston direct, nor does it fly Houston to Toronto direct. Did you perhaps book United?
And finally, AA does indeed show the 738 vs 7M8 in their flight searches.
am BA gold so have to stick with BA. so BA is taking me to Austin directly. But on oct 14, flight leaving for Dallas from Austin at 1617 (and then again onwards to Toronto) is American airline which just says 737
i am an aeronautical engineer and very well aware of the risks here. FAA did not do their job the first time nor later. The plane should be redesigned and MCAS is an unnecessary addict al variable which is not the solution. It can go wrong, just the probability of its malfunctioning has been reduced.
#12


Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: YYF/YLW
Programs: AA, DL, AS, VA, WS Silver
Posts: 6,235
Thanks for checking
am BA gold so have to stick with BA. so BA is taking me to Austin directly. But on oct 14, flight leaving for Dallas from Austin at 1617 (and then again onwards to Toronto) is American airline which just says 737
i am an aeronautical engineer and very well aware of the risks here. FAA did not do their job the first time nor later. The plane should be redesigned and MCAS is an unnecessary addict al variable which is not the solution. It can go wrong, just the probability of its malfunctioning has been reduced.
am BA gold so have to stick with BA. so BA is taking me to Austin directly. But on oct 14, flight leaving for Dallas from Austin at 1617 (and then again onwards to Toronto) is American airline which just says 737
i am an aeronautical engineer and very well aware of the risks here. FAA did not do their job the first time nor later. The plane should be redesigned and MCAS is an unnecessary addict al variable which is not the solution. It can go wrong, just the probability of its malfunctioning has been reduced.
[img]blob:https://www.flyertalk.com/c79a30fe-c289-4060-9586-6edbefe5a388[/img]
#14
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: PHL
Programs: AA PLT, UA SLV, MR LTT, HH LTD
Posts: 10,738
Thanks for checking
am BA gold so have to stick with BA. so BA is taking me to Austin directly. But on oct 14, flight leaving for Dallas from Austin at 1617 (and then again onwards to Toronto) is American airline which just says 737
i am an aeronautical engineer and very well aware of the risks here. FAA did not do their job the first time nor later. The plane should be redesigned and MCAS is an unnecessary addict al variable which is not the solution. It can go wrong, just the probability of its malfunctioning has been reduced.
am BA gold so have to stick with BA. so BA is taking me to Austin directly. But on oct 14, flight leaving for Dallas from Austin at 1617 (and then again onwards to Toronto) is American airline which just says 737
i am an aeronautical engineer and very well aware of the risks here. FAA did not do their job the first time nor later. The plane should be redesigned and MCAS is an unnecessary addict al variable which is not the solution. It can go wrong, just the probability of its malfunctioning has been reduced.
At any rate, if you're in doubt you can check aa.com directly. They will show the specific 737 type. But as mentioned, it doesn't guarantee 100% that there wouldn't be an aircraft swap though that's a low probability so you can always change your trip and fly a different airline to your final destination, though it may mean some more $$ and undesirable routings.
aa.com clearly shows 738 Boeing 737 for the 417PM on 10/14.
Last edited by PHL; Sep 30, 2022 at 8:26 am



