Apr 16, 2023, 10:52 am
Last edit by: Prospero
Active aircraft types:
Airbus A321ceo variants
A321K and A321R (Kodiak) configured 20C 170M (including 35 MCE). These types share a common cabin layout
A321T (Transcon) configured 10F 20J 72M (including 36 MCE)
Airbus A321neo
A321NX configured 20C 176M (including 47 MCE)
Airbus A321ceo variants
A321K and A321R (Kodiak) configured 20C 170M (including 35 MCE). These types share a common cabin layout
A321T (Transcon) configured 10F 20J 72M (including 36 MCE)
Airbus A321neo
A321NX configured 20C 176M (including 47 MCE)
Airbus A321 seating guide (A321, A321H, A321neo / A321NX, “A321OA”, A321S, A321T)
Aug 30, 2021, 2:22 pm
#77
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2012
Location: MCO
Programs: AA, B6, DL, EK, EY, QR, SQ, UA, Amex Plat, Marriott Tit, HHonors Gold
Posts: 12,809
I don't really like the bulkhead personally and row 5 is just too close to Y with no proper divider.
Aug 30, 2021, 5:50 pm
#78
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: SFO
Programs: UA 1K, AA EXP, Hyatt Glob, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Plat, Total Wine & More Reserve
Posts: 4,503
I've also avoided row 5 under the assumption that if the plane gets swapped to a 16F version with only 4 rows, that I'd end up getting reassigned to some random seat that I might not otherwise want.
Aug 31, 2021, 12:26 am
#79
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: ORD/LHR
Programs: AA EXP, UA 1K, 1MM, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 1,293
Aug 31, 2021, 4:36 pm
#80
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,967
Thanks my SO really wanted the bulkhead so I guess Im about to find out how comfortable or not row 1 is after the oasis 2.0 revisions. v1.0 was horrible so hopefully the extra 3" of legroom helps.
Aug 31, 2021, 5:34 pm
#81
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2012
Location: MCO
Programs: AA, B6, DL, EK, EY, QR, SQ, UA, Amex Plat, Marriott Tit, HHonors Gold
Posts: 12,809
I didn’t realize there was a 1.0 and 2.0 version on the 321, thought that was only the 737. If that’s the case then maybe there is something better about the bulkhead.
Aug 31, 2021, 6:25 pm
#82
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 1,285
i saw F bulkhead on refurbished LUS321 last week and legroom looked really bad! I don’t mind bulkhead on 737 but I would actively avoid first row on 321 especially EF side since there is no cut out in the bulkhead and no knee/leg room
Aug 31, 2021, 7:50 pm
#83
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2012
Location: MCO
Programs: AA, B6, DL, EK, EY, QR, SQ, UA, Amex Plat, Marriott Tit, HHonors Gold
Posts: 12,809
The US A321s had exactly two decent seats, 10A and 10C. Other than those, I’m not sure how anyone ever flew on those slAAveships.
Aug 31, 2021, 8:37 pm
#84
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,967
Ah man maybe that’s right. It’s supposed to get done but not yet, well this might be an uncomfortable flight.
Sep 18, 2021, 5:27 pm
#89
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 48
yeah. Not much different than it’s neighbors in row 11. As stated, crew jump seat in front. So no underseat storage. All of row 11 has more than ample legroom. Power ports located at seat base rather than row in front. Tray table in armrest. These new seats are uncomfortable for longer haul flights.
Last edited by a.tall.guy; Sep 18, 2021 at 5:34 pm
Sep 19, 2021, 1:31 pm
#90
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Dallas
Programs: AA Executive Platinum
Posts: 591
Which non-first class seat has the most legroom now? For context, I originally booked 23F (exit row, no seat in front, essentially unlimited legroom) on the older seat layout, but upon re-checking my booking it looks like the flight was switched to the retrofitted aircraft. So looking for the seat closest to the 23/25 A/F in terms of legroom, as this is a transcon and with my long legs, a "regular" MCE seat can still be rough for me. Any difference between 11 A/C/D/F etc (and likewise for 24)?