Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > American Airlines | AAdvantage
Reload this Page >

Significant changes to UA Mileage Plus program. Impact for AA?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Significant changes to UA Mileage Plus program. Impact for AA?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 13, 2019 | 8:28 pm
  #91  
1M
40 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SAN
Programs: Lots of faux metal
Posts: 7,032
Originally Posted by gateH15
UA/AA/DL have J and extra legroom economy, assigned seats and priority boarding. How can flying cattle and rushing on board to grab whatever seats left can be a good thing. Plus no food on board any WN flights.
You haven't flown WN in a while have you? The cattle call has been gone for years. You get a boarding position and board in order. I'm A-List Preferred, so I get checked in at T-24 and get between A16-A20 every time.
skunker is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2019 | 8:30 pm
  #92  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Nights
1M
50 Countries Visited
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: KHOU/KIAH
Programs: AA EXP | Marriott LT Plat | Hyatt Explorist
Posts: 13,326
Originally Posted by gateH15
UA/AA/DL have J and extra legroom economy, assigned seats and priority boarding. How can flying cattle and rushing on board to grab whatever seats left can be a good thing. Plus no food on board any WN flights.
It is. Otherwise they would not be the only major having never declared bankruptcy.

I have several friends who swear by WN. And WN fits their travel patterns - domestic for work and use companion pass and points to go to LAS, CUN etc. Regularly. Doesnt work for me, but doesnt mean it is a bad model at all.
Spanish likes this.
Antarius is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2019 | 8:33 pm
  #93  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Nights
1M
50 Countries Visited
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: KHOU/KIAH
Programs: AA EXP | Marriott LT Plat | Hyatt Explorist
Posts: 13,326
Originally Posted by skunker
You haven't flown WN in a while have you? The cattle call has been gone for years. You get a boarding position and board in order. I'm A-List Preferred, so I get checked in at T-24 and get between A16-A20 every time.
You still have to be in line to get A16-A20. If you are late, stop for a beer or whatever, you're stuck. I enjoy showing up at T46, checking my bags and being the last (or close) to board, with my FC or MCE seat waiting for me.

Again, not a bad thing about WN - just different. It works for some and doesnt for others, and clearly it works for enough that they continue to be profitable.
jtc246 likes this.
Antarius is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2019 | 8:34 pm
  #94  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
5 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 1,286
Originally Posted by skunker
You haven't flown WN in a while have you? The cattle call has been gone for years. You get a boarding position and board in order. I'm A-List Preferred, so I get checked in at T-24 and get between A16-A20 every time.
I fly WN once a year or so when I absolutely have to. Even when you have positing a16-20 exit rows will be gone. Also if flight came from somewhere else and some passengers stay on board to continue on - they take all seats up front. Plus people who save seats for their companions. I like to have assigned seat before I board. Lining up before boarding begins is also stupid and you have to be at the gate when boarding starts. If you are 5 min late - all good seats are gone. Even when you fly LCC like Spirit you can pay to get exit row or their version of firsts class seat and priority boarding to have a peace of mind.
gateH15 is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2019 | 10:51 pm
  #95  
50 Countries Visited
3M
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Live: IWI; Work: DCA/Everywhere; Play: LAS/SJU/MLE
Programs: AA EXP, DL PM, Hyatt Glob, Marriott Ambassador/LTP, Nat'l Exec Elite, LEYE Gold
Posts: 7,473
Originally Posted by skunker
I get checked in at T-24 and get between A16-A20 every time.
Which = 20-30 minutes of extra airport time getting to & standing at your post on time, per flight, to make sure you get to board in sequence, times 100+ flights = 40-50 hours per year spent making sure I have a tolerable regular leg-room coach seat on each flight I take. No thanks.
MSPeconomist and jtc246 like this.
platbrownguy is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2019 | 10:58 pm
  #96  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
5 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 1,286
Originally Posted by platbrownguy
Which = 20-30 minutes of extra airport time getting to & standing at your post on time, per flight, to make sure you get to board in sequence, times 100+ flights = 40-50 hours per year spent making sure I have a tolerable regular leg-room coach seat on each flight I take. No thanks.
also not sure if you can get A16-20 without paying for early bird during prime time flights. I usually do pay for early bird and lowest I got was a24 one time. Usually its higher so it probably adds up even more waiting around and lining up. As much as I dislike UA its far more superior to WN when it comes to boarding and hard product on domestic flights.
MSPeconomist likes this.
gateH15 is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2019 | 7:49 am
  #97  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: En Route
Programs: Many
Posts: 6,798
Originally Posted by enviroian
They wouldn't have much value to me either if I was flying paying J. lol

I don't seek complimentary domestic upgrades and not important. What is important are the other benefits. I put everyone of the 4 SWU's to use. That plus free award travel change, MCE, and a free turkey wrap are all I need but value each of those.
I disagree. I fly paid J/F and find status valuable 1. for access to F lounges, where being a no-status biz pax would get you an inferior lounge, much like when you fly LH J and get stuck in the terrible crowded "Business Lounge" instead of the SEN Lounge. 2. IRROPS as discussed. Finally, even if you are flying paid J/F, SWU still have value. While I can purchase a premium cabin ticket, you can be sure I use all my SWU to save $ on as many trips as possible. Why waste $ for no reason? If you're willing to do a little digging on EF it's not so tough to find time of booking C-space.
MSPeconomist likes this.
GetSetJetSet is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2019 | 9:13 am
  #98  
1M
40 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SAN
Programs: Lots of faux metal
Posts: 7,032
Originally Posted by gateH15
also not sure if you can get A16-20 without paying for early bird during prime time flights. I usually do pay for early bird and lowest I got was a24 one time. Usually its higher so it probably adds up even more waiting around and lining up. As much as I dislike UA its far more superior to WN when it comes to boarding and hard product on domestic flights.
A-list and A-list preferred are auto checked-in at T-24h.
skunker is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2019 | 10:04 am
  #99  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wesley Chapel, FL
Programs: American Airlines
Posts: 31,464
Originally Posted by GetSetJetSet
I disagree. I fly paid J/F and find status valuable 1. for access to F lounges, where being a no-status biz pax would get you an inferior lounge, much like when you fly LH J and get stuck in the terrible crowded "Business Lounge" instead of the SEN Lounge. 2. IRROPS as discussed. Finally, even if you are flying paid J/F, SWU still have value. While I can purchase a premium cabin ticket, you can be sure I use all my SWU to save $ on as many trips as possible. Why waste $ for no reason? If you're willing to do a little digging on EF it's not so tough to find time of booking C-space.
I think you missed my point. If I was lucky enough to have an employer pay for J or F I really wouldn't be complaining about anything at all, period.
enviroian is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2019 | 10:37 am
  #100  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Los Angeles& Telluride
Programs: UA1K, 1MM,AA Exec. Platinum, Global Entry, Nexus
Posts: 733
Very polarizing subject. I left UA years ago because they stopped being an airline that even remotely cared about paying passengers and their hard product was terrible (who calls 8 across a 777 as any kind of business class) AA, for me, has been more than ok. I used to have corporate travel pay for about 40,000 of my annual 110,000 miles flown but those days are over. I pay for all of my travel and I value FC on 777-300 as I tend to try to do all of my long hauls on it. Its a great opportunity to use my SWU's and as an earlier poster said, I use them each and every year. They cost me a lot of money to earn. Domestically, each and every airline sucks. Jetblue has a decent product over a few marketplaces. AA is only good on transcon as is UA. Outlier routes with a 788 or 789 can be found if you're willing to look. EF is an efficient tool to aid in the process. In addition, I have a Barclay card and Citi card that help with miles and spend. So while nothing is perfect,
"You get what you tolerate". So if you tolerate it and live it, why ..... about it? Let your dollars do your walking and go to the best of what your looking for: routing, time of day departures/arrivals, hard product, soft product, etc. We each have something we care about. And for me, AA and Oneworld currently meets those criteria.
enviroian likes this.
tomj888 is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2019 | 11:19 am
  #101  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Community Builder
Community Influencer
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Wanting First. Buying First.
Programs: Lifetime Executive Diamond Platinum VIP with Braniff, Eastern, Midway, National & Pan Am
Posts: 22,040
This thread could use a wiki: "Please note that this thread contains no actionable information whatsoever. 100 posts worth of speculation and pontification. Save your time!"
Herb687 is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2019 | 11:33 am
  #102  
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: New York
Programs: AA, CX, Hyatt, Marriott
Posts: 1,484
Originally Posted by Nicc HK
It's a good point, the CX programme works out as segments by cost, and look what happened when MPC introduced those changes, the previously (and like me stupidly) loyal flyers over-paying in PEY and Y walked. Regular flyers at the back end may not bring the margins, but they do provide less-cyclical revenue flow. Losing this may seem minor when creating their models but once this cash disappears it does make a significant dent as CX has discovered.

I agree with the principle that there ought to be reasonable levels of earnings to get the tiered rewards of memberships, but I think the airlines are in danger of taking in to an extreme by reducing membership numbers at the top levels to the very exclusive.

This only encourages people to go 'free agent' meaning the airlines will be back to competing on cost creating new fare wars. Bad for the airlines, but perhaps good for the consumer.
I completely hear you and this is exactly why every time FA/ISM asked me in CX metal and I was being 100% honest with them - I paid way more to CX than AA but I am stuck with AA FFP because MPC is not for me...

As this is an AA post I am not expanding this topic about MPC, but I think we have seen enough on CX forum.
Nicc HK likes this.
andersonCooper is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2019 | 12:27 pm
  #103  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Programs: AAdvantage PP
Posts: 13,913
If we didn't have threads and posts centered around speculation and pontification I'm not sure what we'd talk about on FT. To be fair if a major competitor of AA changes it's FF program it's a good bet AA will move in that direction. I'm sure for years AA (and others) has wanted to better align rewards with flyer profitability but of course had to worry about the competition.

The FF programs of 2010 are about as dead as complimentary meals in Y on a 1K mile flight.
enviroian likes this.
MiamiAirport Formerly NY George is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2019 | 2:45 pm
  #104  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: United Premier 1K 1MM; AA Plat Pro; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott Platinum; Avis President's Club
Posts: 2,614
Well the changes at UA are driving me to AA as my preferred carrier. UA devalued its MileagePlus program; changed how you upgrade internationally and then completely killed their elite program (my view) so I'm done. I've put up with years of lackluster performance and poor customer service because of the merger and I'm done. My 1K status is NOT worth $18,000 - they just aren't that good. Nothing has changed to make the value proposition there.

I know AA has significant problems but I suspect there will be a change and I can only hope they won't follow the path of UA. Call me nave or overly wishful but that's what I hope. AA does lots of things better than UA right now and I always find the FAs very accommodating. I enjoy my time flying which is more than I can say on lots of UA flights.
mh3265a is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2019 | 2:47 pm
  #105  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
5 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 1,286
Originally Posted by mh3265a
Well the changes at UA are driving me to AA as my preferred carrier. UA devalued its MileagePlus program; changed how you upgrade internationally and then completely killed their elite program (my view) so I'm done. I've put up with years of lackluster performance and poor customer service because of the merger and I'm done. My 1K status is NOT worth $18,000 - they just aren't that good. Nothing has changed to make the value proposition there.

I know AA has significant problems but I suspect there will be a change and I can only hope they won't follow the path of UA. Call me nave or overly wishful but that's what I hope. AA does lots of things better than UA right now and I always find the FAs very accommodating. I enjoy my time flying which is more than I can say on lots of UA flights.
AA will probably change AAdvantage but not until delta does it. AA usually only copies what delta does, not United.

Last edited by gateH15; Oct 14, 2019 at 3:17 pm
gateH15 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.