Rumor: Project Oasis retrofitting reversal???
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2017
Programs: AA EXP, Marriott Bonvoy titanium
Posts: 537
Rumor: Project Oasis retrofitting reversal???
Seems some rumors are floating around that AA may reverse some of their project Oasis plans including the elimination of a row to increase pitch to 31 inches
credit to jonnyc https://twitter.com/xJonNYC
AA leadership needs to wake up and fire the genius who came up with oasis. Plane seats suck enough, didn’t need to make them worse
im praying for improvements of any kind
*edit adding a link to same topic from view from the wing. https://viewfromthewing.boardingarea...312.1532881156
credit to jonnyc https://twitter.com/xJonNYC
AA leadership needs to wake up and fire the genius who came up with oasis. Plane seats suck enough, didn’t need to make them worse
im praying for improvements of any kind
*edit adding a link to same topic from view from the wing. https://viewfromthewing.boardingarea...312.1532881156
#4
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2017
Programs: AA EXP, Marriott Bonvoy titanium
Posts: 537
i agree whole heartedly with you. It’s not going to be the guy who flies once a year that gets AA to reversed their horrible decision. It’s elites voicing their opinion at every opportunity
#7
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2006
Programs: AAdvantage PP
Posts: 13,913
I don't see it happening. The flyers that AA is really concerned about are the ones not impacted. They are sitting up front, usually on a long haul in a flat bed seat. The guy/gal flying and spending enough to make GLD, PLT and PLT PRO is a dime a dozen. Not to mention they either have no choice in the airline they fly or are a hub captive. Moreover, its not like DL and UA are providing spacious room in the back. AA's philosophy is that if someone is uncomfortable in a 30-31 inch pinch seat they should pony up the additional $$ for MCE.
#8
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NYC LAX RDU
Programs: US-Plt;Concierge key; American AAirpass; Delta Silver;Starwood - Platinum; Amex Cent
Posts: 710
I agree with this. If, however, the extra seats are causing boarding delays & adding to the stress of FAs I could see them giving in and reducing seat count by a row.
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2001
Programs: DL 1 million, AA 1 mil, HH lapsed Diamond, Marriott Plat
Posts: 28,190
It's not that Americans find 30" coach seat pitch unacceptable - look at the growth rates of Spirit and Allegiant, or of all the United and Delta planes so configured. IMHO it's part of the value proposition: tight pitch, removing AVOD, and poor on-time performance and baggage handling is not a winning combo.
#10
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Programs: CoUniHound 1K 1MM, AA EXP 2MM, DL Plat, Marriott Lifetime Titanium
Posts: 1,625
I don't see it happening. The flyers that AA is really concerned about are the ones not impacted. They are sitting up front, usually on a long haul in a flat bed seat. The guy/gal flying and spending enough to make GLD, PLT and PLT PRO is a dime a dozen. Not to mention they either have no choice in the airline they fly or are a hub captive. Moreover, its not like DL and UA are providing spacious room in the back. AA's philosophy is that if someone is uncomfortable in a 30-31 inch pinch seat they should pony up the additional $$ for MCE.
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2010
Programs: AA
Posts: 14,740
I don't see it happening. The flyers that AA is really concerned about are the ones not impacted. They are sitting up front, usually on a long haul in a flat bed seat. The guy/gal flying and spending enough to make GLD, PLT and PLT PRO is a dime a dozen. Not to mention they either have no choice in the airline they fly or are a hub captive. Moreover, its not like DL and UA are providing spacious room in the back. AA's philosophy is that if someone is uncomfortable in a 30-31 inch pinch seat they should pony up the additional $$ for MCE.
#12
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NYC LAX RDU
Programs: US-Plt;Concierge key; American AAirpass; Delta Silver;Starwood - Platinum; Amex Cent
Posts: 710
I'm with Catbert10 on this. The problems with the Oasis interiors are definitely not isolated to the back of the planes (although I think the economy issues are worse as they feel like a safety issue to me, not just a comfort issue). I know I'm not the only F flyer actively booking away from AA if the only option is an Oasis cabin.
#13
Join Date: Aug 2012
Programs: AA PLT, SPG Gold
Posts: 2,405
That is really insane. I didn't realize the F seats on the oasis birds also sucked this bad. Is it true that LCC just took their new PEY seat (which is also inferior to comparable offerings such as CX) and installed it in domestic F? Makes me happy that 1) we fly a lot less than we used to and 2) have plenty of E75 flights to choose from.
#14
Join Date: Nov 2010
Programs: AA EXP (owe), BA Silver (ows), AB Silver (owr), WN A+/CP, IHG Spire AMB, Avis First
Posts: 1,414
That is really insane. I didn't realize the F seats on the oasis birds also sucked this bad. Is it true that LCC just took their new PEY seat (which is also inferior to comparable offerings such as CX) and installed it in domestic F? Makes me happy that 1) we fly a lot less than we used to and 2) have plenty of E75 flights to choose from.
Actually, the E75s are a great example of how to do no IFE right. I don't mind that there's no IFE on the E75 because it's just a super comfortable plane to begin with.
#15
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Programs: Chase Sapphire Reserve, WFBF
Posts: 1,573
They've also heard plenty from us who fly in MCE more often than in FC. The MCE seats on the Oasis birds are extremely tight. Obviously they have more pitch than "regular Y" on the same planebut they don't feel like an extra legroom seat. They feel like regular Y on a "normal" plane. I would certainly not be pleased if I paid $150 or whatever to sit there.