Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > American Airlines | AAdvantage
Reload this Page >

Rumor: Project Oasis retrofitting reversal???

Rumor: Project Oasis retrofitting reversal???

Reply

Old Mar 2, 19, 9:57 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Programs: AA EXP, Marriott Bonvoy titanium
Posts: 300
Rumor: Project Oasis retrofitting reversal???

Seems some rumors are floating around that AA may reverse some of their project Oasis plans including the elimination of a row to increase pitch to 31 inches

credit to jonnyc https://twitter.com/xJonNYC

AA leadership needs to wake up and fire the genius who came up with oasis. Plane seats suck enough, didn’t need to make them worse

im praying for improvements of any kind

*edit adding a link to same topic from view from the wing. https://viewfromthewing.boardingarea...312.1532881156
Dalo likes this.
Nuhusky is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 19, 10:30 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Programs: AA EXP, 2MM lifetime Platinum, Expedia +gold +++
Posts: 1,156
I think it's important us frequent flyers voice our concerns. I've written in and complained and also responded to an email survey which prompted a call a few hours later to ask about my negative comments.
wrp96, Dalo and atbPy like this.
FAA1996 is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 19, 10:34 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: En Route
Programs: Many
Posts: 5,055
fingers crossed
GetSetJetSet is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 19, 10:39 am
  #4  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Programs: AA EXP, Marriott Bonvoy titanium
Posts: 300
Originally Posted by FAA1996 View Post
I think it's important us frequent flyers voice our concerns. I've written in and complained and also responded to an email survey which prompted a call a few hours later to ask about my negative comments.
i agree whole heartedly with you. Itís not going to be the guy who flies once a year that gets AA to reversed their horrible decision. Itís elites voicing their opinion at every opportunity
Dalo likes this.
Nuhusky is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 19, 10:54 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NYC LAX RDU
Programs: US-Plt;Concierge key; American AAirpass; Delta Silver;Starwood - Platinum; Amex Cent
Posts: 664
I never understood this. There are other ways to make money besides cramming in an extra row of ghetto economy.
jrm68, A Lyford and Dalo like this.
morrisunc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 19, 10:55 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 1,589
I have this mental image of AA executives gleefully devising ways to remove comfort from the planes.
jm62, Dalo and atbPy like this.
dickinson is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 19, 10:58 am
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 12,038
I don't see it happening. The flyers that AA is really concerned about are the ones not impacted. They are sitting up front, usually on a long haul in a flat bed seat. The guy/gal flying and spending enough to make GLD, PLT and PLT PRO is a dime a dozen. Not to mention they either have no choice in the airline they fly or are a hub captive. Moreover, its not like DL and UA are providing spacious room in the back. AA's philosophy is that if someone is uncomfortable in a 30-31 inch pinch seat they should pony up the additional $$ for MCE.
CLTUSCAPTIVE and fotographer like this.
newyorkgeorge is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 19, 11:35 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NYC LAX RDU
Programs: US-Plt;Concierge key; American AAirpass; Delta Silver;Starwood - Platinum; Amex Cent
Posts: 664
I agree with this. If, however, the extra seats are causing boarding delays & adding to the stress of FAs I could see them giving in and reducing seat count by a row.
JonNYC and Dalo like this.
morrisunc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 19, 11:35 am
  #9  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Programs: DL 1 million, AA 1 mil, HH lapsed Diamond, Marriott Plat
Posts: 28,174
It's not that Americans find 30" coach seat pitch unacceptable - look at the growth rates of Spirit and Allegiant, or of all the United and Delta planes so configured. IMHO it's part of the value proposition: tight pitch, removing AVOD, and poor on-time performance and baggage handling is not a winning combo.
Dalo likes this.
3Cforme is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 19, 11:43 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Programs: CoUniHound 1K, AA EXP 1MM, Marriott Lifetime Platinum Premier
Posts: 1,066
Originally Posted by newyorkgeorge View Post
I don't see it happening. The flyers that AA is really concerned about are the ones not impacted. They are sitting up front, usually on a long haul in a flat bed seat. The guy/gal flying and spending enough to make GLD, PLT and PLT PRO is a dime a dozen. Not to mention they either have no choice in the airline they fly or are a hub captive. Moreover, its not like DL and UA are providing spacious room in the back. AA's philosophy is that if someone is uncomfortable in a 30-31 inch pinch seat they should pony up the additional $$ for MCE.
The customers sitting in the front of an Oasisfied plane are sitting in some of the worst FC seats in the sky. Trust me, AA is hearing lots of complaints from the people riding in front
steve64, JDiver, jerryss and 26 others like this.
Catbert10 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 19, 11:51 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Programs: AA
Posts: 9,654
Originally Posted by newyorkgeorge View Post
I don't see it happening. The flyers that AA is really concerned about are the ones not impacted. They are sitting up front, usually on a long haul in a flat bed seat. The guy/gal flying and spending enough to make GLD, PLT and PLT PRO is a dime a dozen. Not to mention they either have no choice in the airline they fly or are a hub captive. Moreover, its not like DL and UA are providing spacious room in the back. AA's philosophy is that if someone is uncomfortable in a 30-31 inch pinch seat they should pony up the additional $$ for MCE.
Originally Posted by Catbert10 View Post
The customers sitting in the front of an Oasisfied plane are sitting in some of the worst FC seats in the sky. Trust me, AA is hearing lots of complaints from the people riding in front
I'm with Catbert10 on this. The problems with the Oasis interiors are definitely not isolated to the back of the planes (although I think the economy issues are worse as they feel like a safety issue to me, not just a comfort issue). I know I'm not the only F flyer actively booking away from AA if the only option is an Oasis cabin.
steve64, JDiver, JonNYC and 5 others like this.
wrp96 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 19, 11:56 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NYC LAX RDU
Programs: US-Plt;Concierge key; American AAirpass; Delta Silver;Starwood - Platinum; Amex Cent
Posts: 664
Originally Posted by wrp96 View Post
I'm with Catbert10 on this. The problems with the Oasis interiors are definitely not isolated to the back of the planes (although I think the economy issues are worse as they feel like a safety issue to me, not just a comfort issue). I know I'm not the only F flyer actively booking away from AA if the only option is an Oasis cabin.
I'm one of them. It doesn't take a $10mm McKinsey report to realize you can't put your briefcase under the F seat in front of you.
Coathanger, Dalo and nancypants like this.
morrisunc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 19, 12:01 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Programs: AA PLT, SPG Gold
Posts: 2,020
Originally Posted by morrisunc View Post
I'm one of them. It doesn't take a $10mm McKinsey report to realize you can't put your briefcase under the F seat in front of you.
That is really insane. I didn't realize the F seats on the oasis birds also sucked this bad. Is it true that LCC just took their new PEY seat (which is also inferior to comparable offerings such as CX) and installed it in domestic F? Makes me happy that 1) we fly a lot less than we used to and 2) have plenty of E75 flights to choose from.
no2chem likes this.
no1cub17 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 19, 12:24 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Programs: AA EXP (owe), BA Silver (ows), AB Silver (owr), WN A+/CP, IHG Spire AMB, Avis First
Posts: 1,308
Originally Posted by no1cub17 View Post
That is really insane. I didn't realize the F seats on the oasis birds also sucked this bad. Is it true that LCC just took their new PEY seat (which is also inferior to comparable offerings such as CX) and installed it in domestic F? Makes me happy that 1) we fly a lot less than we used to and 2) have plenty of E75 flights to choose from.
At this point I wish they just scrapped their boeings and airbuses (well, except 321T) and replaced them all with E75s. I mean, no hot food or power sucks, but way more comfortable

Actually, the E75s are a great example of how to do no IFE right. I don't mind that there's no IFE on the E75 because it's just a super comfortable plane to begin with.
C17PSGR, yankeezulu, wrp96 and 6 others like this.
no2chem is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 19, 1:01 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Programs: AA Plat, DL WFBF, National Emerald Club, Global Entry, CSR, IHG Gold
Posts: 1,334
Originally Posted by Catbert10 View Post
The customers sitting in the front of an Oasisfied plane are sitting in some of the worst FC seats in the sky. Trust me, AA is hearing lots of complaints from the people riding in front
They've also heard plenty from us who fly in MCE more often than in FC. The MCE seats on the Oasis birds are extremely tight. Obviously they have more pitch than "regular Y" on the same planebut they don't feel like an extra legroom seat. They feel like regular Y on a "normal" plane. I would certainly not be pleased if I paid $150 or whatever to sit there.
wetrat0 is offline  
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Search this Thread