Last edit by: JDiver
Wikipost instructions: signed in members can minimize or maximize Wikipost by clicking on [-] or [+] box upper right of post, and edit this Wikipost to update.
FOR THE CURRENT, 2014, THREAD ON THIS TOPIC, PLEASE SEE: AA and Partner Airline Award info, rules (NOT for oneworld Explorer Awards) 2014 on
updated 20 Jan 2014
FOR THE CURRENT, 2014, THREAD ON THIS TOPIC, PLEASE SEE: AA and Partner Airline Award info, rules (NOT for oneworld Explorer Awards) 2014 on
updated 20 Jan 2014
ARCHIVE: AA and Partner Airline Award info, rules (NOT for oneworld Explorer Awards)
#106
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 4,843
Originally Posted by richarddd
If I'm flying EWR-ZRH-TXL-[open jaw]-MUC-ZRH-EWR using AA miles on LX, I presume I can't change to EWR-ZRH-TXL-[stop]-MUC-[stop]-ZRH-EWR.
Any chance I can get AA to add the TXL-MUC flight in the middle?
Any chance I can get AA to add the TXL-MUC flight in the middle?
Can't do this with a OW award either because of LX.
You should be able to switch MUC to FRA, and then fly AA from FRA to the US. Then you could have TXL as your destination and FRA as the stopover.
Any change to the airlines/stopovers will trigger a change fee.
#107
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,861
Originally Posted by JonNYC
The very question here is what rule-- as we know them-- makes that a stop-over....
#108
Suspended
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FIND ME ON TWITTER FOR THE LATEST
Posts: 27,730
Originally Posted by Austinrunner
The relevant rule is the rule you posted in May 2005 and that I just quoted above. That's why I quoted it.
#109
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2001
Location: South Bend, IN
Programs: AA EXP 3 MM; Marriott Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium Elite
Posts: 18,562
Originally Posted by Austinrunner
The relevant rule is the rule you posted in May 2005 and that I just quoted above. That's why I quoted it.
I was on the first flight I could make ex-LAX and the first flight of the morning ex-LGA, it still wasn't allowed.
I would have either had to have a longer layover in LAX than was alowed (b/c I wouldn't be on the first available flight) or an overnight in NY.
#110
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,861
Originally Posted by PresRDC
The way that itinerary was structured, I would have arrived at LAX on CX at 11:35 AM and connected onto AA's 2:15 PM flight to JFK. That flight arrives at JFK too late to connect to any flight ex-JFK, LGA or EWR to ORD.
I was on the first flight I could make ex-LAX and the first flight of the morning ex-LGA, it still wasn't allowed.
I was on the first flight I could make ex-LAX and the first flight of the morning ex-LGA, it still wasn't allowed.
#111
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2001
Location: South Bend, IN
Programs: AA EXP 3 MM; Marriott Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium Elite
Posts: 18,562
Originally Posted by Austinrunner
Was there a scheduled flight (regardless of availability) from JFK to ORD within 6 hours of your arrival at JFK? (Your reference to "first flight of the morning" is a tad ambiguous.) If not, then I suspect that whoever you talked with didn't know the rules (assuming that the version of those rules JonNYC posted in May 2005 are still "the" rules).
This wasn't just an AAgent telling me this, btw, the AAgent was able to set it up as a 180,000 mile award. It got bounced by the office that reviews these itineraries.
#112
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: SFO/OAK
Programs: AA/EXP 3MM; UA/1K; HY/DIA; SPG/PLT; Fairmont/Life PLT
Posts: 2,232
Most Direct Routing....
Since when does this "most direct routing" BS applied to the OW awards?
I just read about PresRDC's award refusal, and got a little friendly call in my project office an hour ago about mine being refused.
When I ticketed my last OW award, I had 24 hours in each connection and I certainly didn't use the "most direct routing" since I went from BKK-HKG using BKK-SIN-HKG to get F....
Now I am trying to do the same, and AA come back to quote the exact same two quotes that they quoted PresRDC.....
I'm beginning to think that there must have been some changes to the OW award rules after the well-publicized routings of some FTers.....
If the "most direct routing" were true, then how and why in the world can anyone use CX for LAX-HKG-SYD?? Then everyone would be forced to use QF just like that "All Airlines" awards.....
Jon, any additional info that you can share with us regarding this?
I just read about PresRDC's award refusal, and got a little friendly call in my project office an hour ago about mine being refused.
When I ticketed my last OW award, I had 24 hours in each connection and I certainly didn't use the "most direct routing" since I went from BKK-HKG using BKK-SIN-HKG to get F....
Now I am trying to do the same, and AA come back to quote the exact same two quotes that they quoted PresRDC.....
I'm beginning to think that there must have been some changes to the OW award rules after the well-publicized routings of some FTers.....
If the "most direct routing" were true, then how and why in the world can anyone use CX for LAX-HKG-SYD?? Then everyone would be forced to use QF just like that "All Airlines" awards.....
Jon, any additional info that you can share with us regarding this?
#113
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2001
Location: South Bend, IN
Programs: AA EXP 3 MM; Marriott Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium Elite
Posts: 18,562
Originally Posted by jkc22
Since when does this "most direct routing" BS applied to the OW awards?
I just read about PresRDC's award refusal, and got a little friendly call in my project office an hour ago about mine being refused.
When I ticketed my last OW award, I had 24 hours in each connection and I certainly didn't use the "most direct routing" since I went from BKK-HKG using BKK-SIN-HKG to get F....
Now I am trying to do the same, and AA come back to quote the exact same two quotes that they quoted PresRDC.....
I'm beginning to think that there must have been some changes to the OW award rules after the well-publicized routings of some FTers.....
If the "most direct routing" were true, then how and why in the world can anyone use CX for LAX-HKG-SYD?? Then everyone would be forced to use QF just like that "All Airlines" awards.....
Jon, any additional info that you can share with us regarding this?
I just read about PresRDC's award refusal, and got a little friendly call in my project office an hour ago about mine being refused.
When I ticketed my last OW award, I had 24 hours in each connection and I certainly didn't use the "most direct routing" since I went from BKK-HKG using BKK-SIN-HKG to get F....
Now I am trying to do the same, and AA come back to quote the exact same two quotes that they quoted PresRDC.....
I'm beginning to think that there must have been some changes to the OW award rules after the well-publicized routings of some FTers.....
If the "most direct routing" were true, then how and why in the world can anyone use CX for LAX-HKG-SYD?? Then everyone would be forced to use QF just like that "All Airlines" awards.....
Jon, any additional info that you can share with us regarding this?
#114
Suspended
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FIND ME ON TWITTER FOR THE LATEST
Posts: 27,730
Pres;
I'm trying to keep up and understand here; is it your position that you were rejected on "most direct routing" type thing? Or, is there any possibility that there another trip-wire in your itin.?
One thing I was thinking; maybe something about the fact that you could arrive in ORD at a time that makes taking a later flight LAX-JFK (which then necessitates your overnight before taking LGA-ORD the next day.)
So, is there any possibility that they see it as a transit->stopover violation when those factors are combined? (Yes, I'm totally grasping at straws here.)
In any case, we'll get an answer of there are new rules.
I'm trying to keep up and understand here; is it your position that you were rejected on "most direct routing" type thing? Or, is there any possibility that there another trip-wire in your itin.?
One thing I was thinking; maybe something about the fact that you could arrive in ORD at a time that makes taking a later flight LAX-JFK (which then necessitates your overnight before taking LGA-ORD the next day.)
So, is there any possibility that they see it as a transit->stopover violation when those factors are combined? (Yes, I'm totally grasping at straws here.)
In any case, we'll get an answer of there are new rules.
#115
Suspended
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FIND ME ON TWITTER FOR THE LATEST
Posts: 27,730
Originally Posted by jkc22
..When I ticketed my last OW award, I had 24 hours in each connection and I certainly didn't use the "most direct routing" since I went from BKK-HKG using BKK-SIN-HKG to get F....
It does appear that a few years ago there was "24 hours in each connection" type rule-- several FTers were very surprised when I posted the actual stopover rules which will often force you to fly much sooner than 24 hours--regardless of if you want to or not. So, that indeed changed (or enforcement of same) but that's more like a year or two ago.
#116
Moderator, OneWorld
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: SEA
Programs: RAA RIP; AA ExEXP
Posts: 11,803
Chatting with the EXP desk (where I was sent for an award enquiry - is that standard?) I asked about a Europe - Africa J award I want to book for later this year (to JNB or CPT on BA... ha, ha.) I asked about open-jaws and got a definitive answer - O/J at origin or destination, but not both. But could I set it up as a stopover instead of an open jaw? For instance, PRG-xLHR-JNB (stopover) - CPT (destination) - xLHR-BCN? I looked through this thread (maybe inadequately) but couldn't figure out if that would pass kashrut.
#117
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2001
Location: South Bend, IN
Programs: AA EXP 3 MM; Marriott Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium Elite
Posts: 18,562
Originally Posted by JonNYC
Pres;
I'm trying to keep up and understand here; is it your position that you were rejected on "most direct routing" type thing? Or, is there any possibility that there another trip-wire in your itin.?
One thing I was thinking; maybe something about the fact that you could arrive in ORD at a time that makes taking a later flight LAX-JFK (which then necessitates your overnight before taking LGA-ORD the next day.)
So, is there any possibility that they see it as a transit->stopover violation when those factors are combined? (Yes, I'm totally grasping at straws here.)
In any case, we'll get an answer of there are new rules.
I'm trying to keep up and understand here; is it your position that you were rejected on "most direct routing" type thing? Or, is there any possibility that there another trip-wire in your itin.?
One thing I was thinking; maybe something about the fact that you could arrive in ORD at a time that makes taking a later flight LAX-JFK (which then necessitates your overnight before taking LGA-ORD the next day.)
So, is there any possibility that they see it as a transit->stopover violation when those factors are combined? (Yes, I'm totally grasping at straws here.)
In any case, we'll get an answer of there are new rules.
The first AAgent I spoke to said it was because I was not on the last flight out from LAX and thus could not overnight, even though I was arriving too late to connect to ORD. The second AAgent said I had to take the most direct routing from LAX to ORD. She supposedly was reading from the message sent-up by the office that approves these routings.
I will have an opportunity to ask someone about it this evening, so hopefully we can get a definitive answer as to whether there is a "most direct routing" rule now in effect for Oneworld Awards and what that means for U.S.-Oz awards.
That said, I have successfully ticketed the following itinerary for 180,000 miles:
JFK-SFO-HKG-MEL-AKL//SYD-BNE//BNE-SYD//SYD-MEL-HKG-LAX-JFK
I should mention that I overnight at MEL on the way to AKL.
#118
Suspended
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FIND ME ON TWITTER FOR THE LATEST
Posts: 27,730
Originally Posted by PresRDC
Honestly, I don't know why it was rejected. My best guess is it was for one of the two reasons I listed.
The first AAgent I spoke to said it was because I was not on the last flight out from LAX and thus could not overnight, even though I was arriving too late to connect to ORD. The second AAgent said I had to take the most direct routing from LAX to ORD. She supposedly was reading from the message sent-up by the office that approves these routings.
I will have an opportunity to ask someone about it this evening, so hopefully we can get a definitive answer as to whether there is a "most direct routing" rule now in effect for Oneworld Awards and what that means for U.S.-Oz awards.
The first AAgent I spoke to said it was because I was not on the last flight out from LAX and thus could not overnight, even though I was arriving too late to connect to ORD. The second AAgent said I had to take the most direct routing from LAX to ORD. She supposedly was reading from the message sent-up by the office that approves these routings.
I will have an opportunity to ask someone about it this evening, so hopefully we can get a definitive answer as to whether there is a "most direct routing" rule now in effect for Oneworld Awards and what that means for U.S.-Oz awards.
#119
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 21
intra-Europe w/a stopover...no can do?
this would be on the AA All-Partner, not OW.
i want to redeem a PAR-ATH via IST ticket (on TK) and would really like the IST stopover. just so i know that it's absolutely impossible, anyone had luck doing intra-Europe with a stopover for all-Partner?
i want to redeem a PAR-ATH via IST ticket (on TK) and would really like the IST stopover. just so i know that it's absolutely impossible, anyone had luck doing intra-Europe with a stopover for all-Partner?
#120
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 4,843
Originally Posted by legend214
this would be on the AA All-Partner, not OW.
i want to redeem a PAR-ATH via IST ticket (on TK) and would really like the IST stopover. just so i know that it's absolutely impossible, anyone had luck doing intra-Europe with a stopover for all-Partner?
i want to redeem a PAR-ATH via IST ticket (on TK) and would really like the IST stopover. just so i know that it's absolutely impossible, anyone had luck doing intra-Europe with a stopover for all-Partner?
However, have you taken a look at how much the tickets you want would cost using cash? There are a lot of pretty cheap intra-Europe tickets, and I would think PAR-IST-ATH-PAR would not be too expensive. Just being able to stop in IST would cause me to pay for the ticket with cash instead of miles.